Chapter 3: American Federalism
Part I: The Logic Behind Federalism
Think about this: How can a government serve both the shared interests of nearly 330 million people—and the unique needs of 50 very different states?
Shared Sovereignty: A New Idea in 1787
The U.S. Constitution created the first modern federal system—a bold shift from earlier forms of government. Before 1787, the idea of shared sovereignty—where national and state governments both hold authority over the same territory—wasn’t just unusual, it was practically unheard of.
Why didn’t the Founders push for a different system?
Technology and geography
Cultural differences
Political reality
Debating Federalism: National Power vs. State Power
The big debate: How much power should the new national government have?
Political scientist David Brian Robertson describes two groups:
Note: Madison and the Broad Nationalists even proposed that Congress could nullify state laws—not just if they were unconstitutional, but if they seemed unwise. That idea was defeated.
Broad Nationalists vs. Narrow Nationalists
Broad Nationalists: James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, James Wilson, Gouverneur Morris
Narrow Nationalists: Roger Sherman, Oliver Ellsworth, and most small-state delegates
Key differences:
Broad: Wanted expansive national power, including a legislative veto over state laws
Narrow: Wanted limited, clearly defined national powers
Common ground: Believed a stronger national government was essential for unity and progress; feared too much national control would undermine states' rights
The compromise? A federal system, with:
Shared sovereignty between the national and state governments
Reserved powers for the states
Limits on both national and state authority
The Supremacy Clause and Supreme Court as referees when conflicts arise
Why Federalism Still Matters
Shapes everyday life—from COVID-19 responses to debates over education, healthcare, and public safety.
The U.S. Constitution created a balance of power between states and the national government—but that balance isn’t fixed. It evolves with politics, crises, and leadership.
A Federal Republic is Fairly Uncommon
Larger, culturally diverse countries are more likely to adopt federalism—but most of the world relies on unitary systems, where central governments hold nearly all authority.
Part II: Federalism and the Constitution
Power, But Not Always Clarity
Full Faith and Credit Clause
Privileges and Immunities
Extradition
The Fugitive Slave Clause (Obsolete)
Understanding Constitutional Power
Enumerated Power
Unenumerated Power
Implied/Inherent powers
Implied powers can be traced to the powers expressed in the language of the Constitution.
Inherent powers derive from national sovereignty. Because the U.S. exists, inherent powers exist.
Federal Regulatory Power – The Commerce Clause
Federal Supremacy – Supremacy Clause
Reserved Power
Concurrent Power
Part III: The Good & Bad of Federalism
"It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country." — Louis Brandeis
Source reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lq6uEIuy768&t=5s
Other Claimed Advantages of Federalism
Accommodating Regional Differences
Developing Political Talent
Proximity to the People
The Other Side — Why Federalism Creates Problems
Amendment Process
Political Fragmentation
Low Participation and Influence
“Laboratories of Autocracy”
Economic Competition Between States
Federalism Blocking National Progress
Part IV: Fiscal Federalism: How Money Shapes Power
Why Federalism Isn’t Just About Laws — It’s About Money
Fiscal Federalism
Categorical Grants — Federal Money with Conditions
Block Grants — Federal Funds with Flexibility
Money Means Influence: Federal Leverage Over States
Federal dollars can come with direct or indirect policy pressure
Examples: Drinking Age Mandate; Unfunded mandates
Figure 1: Federal Grants as a Share of States' Budgets
Description: The share of state budget revenue financed by federal grants over time (FY 1971–2020)
Key trend: The share varies across decades, with notable increases during some periods and a general range in the 20s to mid-30s percent; by 2020, the share sits in the mid-30s percentile range
Note: Shaded columns indicate recessions
Source: Pew analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Annual Survey of State Government Finances; and National Bureau of Economic Research
Figure 2: Federal Grants Vary as a Share of State Budgets (Map, FY 2020)
Range across states: < 30% to 50%+ of state revenue from federal funds
35.9% Share (national average for FY 2020)
Source: Pew analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Annual Survey of State Government Finances
Figure 3: Federal Grants Account for Over a Third of State Revenue (FY 2020)
Federal grants: 35.9 ext{ ext{%}}
Taxes: 45.8 ext{ ext{%}}
Service charges: 10.6 ext{ ext{%}}
Other: 7.6 ext{ ext{%}}
Note: Taxes include income, sales, and property taxes; Service charges are fees for services; “Other” includes property sales, fines, and revenue from local governments
Source: Pew analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Annual Survey of State Government Finances
Part V: Federalism in Action
Understanding Policy Diffusion
Video resource: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRE3ZXIULwo&t=22s
Real-world examples in the news (illustrating policy diffusion and conflict between levels of government)
In Red States, Gun Reform often means easier access to guns (e.g., Dobbs-era debates and post-Dobbs abortion policy shifts) — NBC/CBS-style coverage (examples cited from Monica Potts and Shawa Mizelle)
Two years after Dobbs: Democratic-led states move to combat abortion bans (example coverage 2024)
UCF note: Emphasizes the ongoing patchwork created by state versus federal policy in health care, education, and public safety
Part VI: The Future of Federalism: A System Under Pressure
Growing Tensions, Complex Realities
State governments asserting independence on abortion, climate policy, and gun rights
Federal influence remains powerful via funding, regulations, and judicial decisions
Presidents from both parties have tested federal authority boundaries; clashes with governors and state legislatures seen through lawsuits, executive orders, and funding battles
You’ve seen this play out through lawsuits, executive orders, and funding battles that define today’s federalism debates
Key Trends Redefining Federalism
Partisan Polarization
Red vs. blue states with sharper policy differences and divergent legal landscapes
Fiscal Leverage and Economic Power Plays
Federal funding as a major tool to influence state policy
Proposals like DOGE, block grant restructuring, and the One Big Beautiful Bill illustrate dollars as leverage to shape state decisions
Institutional Shifts and the Courts
Courts continually interpret boundaries between federal and state power
Rulings on abortion, gun rights, and regulatory authority can escalate tensions and create legal uncertainty
What Comes Next?
The future of federalism depends on ongoing power struggles, political leadership, and the choices made by voters
Key questions to consider:
Will states expand their autonomy, or will national standards override local decisions?
How will funding debates reshape public services, healthcare, and infrastructure?
Can the system adapt to modern challenges—or will growing polarization weaken shared governance?
Final notes
The content shows a spectrum of perspectives on federalism — from arguments for a strong national government to concerns about overreach and loss of state autonomy
It highlights the central role of money in shaping policy outcomes (fiscal federalism) and the real-world consequences of policy diffusion across states
It also points to the evolving nature of constitutional power via court decisions and political developments
Quick reference: Key terms and concepts
Enumerated Powers: powers explicitly granted to the national government in the Constitution
Implied Powers: powers inferred from enumerated powers (Example: via the Necessary and Proper Clause)
Inherent Powers: powers arising from national sovereignty
Reserved Powers: powers retained by the states
Concurrent Powers: powers shared by both national and state governments
Commerce Clause: basis for federal regulation of interstate commerce
Supremacy Clause: federal law takes precedence over state law when in conflict
Full Faith and Credit Clause: requires states to recognize each other’s public acts, records, and judicial proceedings
Privileges and Immunities: prohibits states from discriminating against citizens of other states in fundamental rights
Extradition: process of returning a person charged with a crime to the state where the crime occurred
Fugitive Slave Clause (Obsolete): historical clause related to fugitive slaves; superseded by later amendments
Laboratory of Democracy: idea that a single courageous state can experiment with novel policies without risking the whole country
Coercive Federalism: use of federal dollars to press states into complying with national policy
DOGE: reference to a hypothetical or real federal funding consolidation plan discussed in debates about federal grants
Block Grants vs Categorical Grants: flexibility vs conditions in federal funding
Fiscal Federalism: how money and funding structures shape the balance of power between national and state governments
References and resources cited
Brandeis quote on laboratories of democracy (video link provided in slide): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lq6uEIuy768&t=5s
News coverage references on abortion, gun policy, and state-federal conflicts (e.g., Dobbs aftermath, state immigration policies, environmental protections)
Pew and U.S. Census Bureau data sources for state budget funding shares (Figures 1–3 in the slides)
Thematic connections to broader discussions on federalism in historical and contemporary contexts