Context for the COLD WAR & DECOLONIZATION [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 1]
Cold War: A state of hostility that exists between two states chiefly characterized by an ideological struggle rather than open warfare
The Cold War: A standoff between the US and the Soviet Union that transformed global politics for about 4 decades after WW2
The enormous cost and destruction of WW2 meant that the victorious powers, though they won, were still suffering from the war
However, in this devastation, two global superpowers emerged from the war, namely the US and the USSR
There were two reasons why these states emerged as superpowers, while everyone else were in ruins: Their economic and technological advantages
U.S
Although suffered profoundly during the Great Depression, the mobilization for WW2 created the occasion for a complete economic turnaround as their industrial sector ramped up to meet wartime production demands
Many women took up industrial jobs during WW2
Additionally, aside from the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor, the US experienced almost none of the destructive consequences of the war
European countries and cities laid in ruins and now had to face the monumental and expensive task of rebuilding
Thus, the US became the most prosperous nation in the world
One of their most momentous results of the U.S’s post war prosperity was their ability to help pay for the rebuilding of European nations through programs like the Marshall Plan
Through this plan, the US sent over $13 billion in aid for economic recovery in war torn nations and on the whole, the nations that received those funds experienced their own economic revivals
The global balance of power shifted decisively toward the US
Soviet Union
Since the 1920s, the Soviet economy was heavily directed by the state
Although that kind of command economy drew skepticism from free market minded folks, in years leading up to WW2, the Soviet economy did grow rapidly, even if that growth led to the suffering and death of millions of Soviet citizens
Unlike the US, the Soviet Union was hit hard by WW2, not least by Hitler’s attempted invasion and siege of Leningrad
Even so, the centralized command economy of the Soviets meant that they could easily recover
Soviet Union had the benefit of drawing natural resources
Enormous territory had more natural resources
Large population
More people to work towards economic recovery
Government’s large scale investment in heavy industry before WW2
Much of the infrastructure they needed for recovery was already in place
It wasn’t long before the Soviet Union was economically powerful again
Although later in the century, their emphasis on coal extraction and steel production at the expense of consumer goods would contribute to a weakening economy
The US developed the most advanced and devastating technology of the war, namely the atomic bomb
Deployment of two of those bombs in Japan effectively ended the war
This display of new technology made it clear to the rest of the world that the US was the technological king on the global stage
The Soviet Union, not wanting to be outdone, reacted quickly with their own atomic weapons
The first was tested in 194, just 4 years after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
This led to one of the most defining characteristics of the Cold War, namely the Arms Race
Both powers spent stupid amount of money to developed bigger and more destructive bombs
Now that both powers had nuclear power and hydrogen bombs, it was clear who had the power on the world stage
For most of world history, powerful states had built up empire all over the world
However, in this period, a complete reversal of that trend
In truth, it was the two world wars that created the conditions for decolonization
The imperial powers that fought in WW1 called up millions of troops from their colonial holdings to help them win
Though they really had no choice in the matter, many colonial troops fought for their imperial parents’ cause, hoping that their sacrifices would be honored with a greater degree of self-rule, or even independence
Adding to this desire was Woodrow Wilson’s insistence that self determination for all nations should be the guiding principle after the war
However, after the war, many colonies of the defeated powers simply changed hands to the victorious powers
Through the Mandate System, the victorious powers claimed that they were organizing colonies into a hierarchical system with varying degrees of self-rule, based on their ability to sustain themselves
However in practice, the Mandate System essentially continued the colonial system unchanged
Angered the colonies
But, it was WW2 that really set the process of decolonization in motion
Again, colonial troops fought for their imperial parents’ cause
But this time, after the war was over and there appeared to be no clear intention of the imperial countries to grant independence to their colonies, massive anti-imperial movements broke out across the world
The difference this time was imperial states like Britain and France and the rest had almost no resources to resist these movements
The war had devastated their economies and severely weakened their military
Therefore, after 1945, these developments would lead to a worldwide process of decolonization
Broke apart colonial empires and created something like 80 new states on the world map
The COLD WAR, Explained [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 2]
Conflicting IDeologies
Democratic Capitalism of the US
Emphasized free market economics and political participation from citizens
Authoritarian Communism of the Soviet Union
Emphasizes strict government control of economy and redistribution of wealth equal to all citizens
Citizens have no voice in government
The problem is both of these ideologies are universalizing ideas, meaning that those who hold them want everyone else to hold them as well
The US wasn’t satisfied with keeping democracy themselves, nor was the Soviet Union satisfied with keeping communism to themselves
Each ideology could only prove its superior worth once every part of the world was conformed into one ideology or the other
Mutual Mistrust
Started before WW2 had ended
The 3 big powers, the US, Soviet Union, and Great Britain, met together in a series of conferences to discuss plans for the postwar world
Basically all agreed that Central and Eastern European Countries would be able to hold free elections after the war
Presented a problem to the Soviet Union that bordered those states
If those states were democratic and capitalist, then, well, they wouldn’t be communist
So, Stalin decided to keep those countries under Soviet control to acts a buffer zone between Russia and Europe
Became known as the Eastern Bloc
Those nations became communist in short order and served the purposes of the Soviet Union
The US saw this as a flagrant violation of their agreement to allow these nations the right of self-determination and democracy
After the war, Germany was split into occupation zones, with one occupation zone going to each of the victorious powers(Great Britain, France, US, and Soviet Union)
The occupation was meant to be temporary, but Stalin refused to set Eastern Germany free
Quickly became another communist satellite state of the Soviet Union
It was all of these territorial divisions that led former British prime minister Winston Churchill to proclaim that an “Iron Curtain” had fallen across Europe
Therefore, due to conflicting ideologies and mutual mistrust, the Cold War began and would last for the next four decades
The effects of this conflict reached farther than just the two superpowers, it in fact impacts most of the entire world
Each power wanted their own ideology to cover the entire earth
So, as the process of decolonization was creating dozens of brand new states across the world, the US and the Soviet Union raced to influence each of these new states and win them to their respective ideologies
All these new states were finally becoming free of colonial rule and establishing their own paths to independence
The US and the Soviet Union started seeing them as pawns in their larger ideological struggle
Some groups and individuals in these newly forming states refused to be pawns in this global conflict which in many ways would make them more dependent on more powerful nations
Exactly the situation they had just escaped in their colonial past
Therefore, the Non-Aligned Movement began
Led by Indonesian president, Ahmed Sukarno
Hosted the first meeting of this movement in 1955
29 African and Asian heads of state met
Most significant states being India, Ghana, Indonesia, and Egypt
All represented new states that had been formerly colonies or those still resisting colonial rule in search of independence
Described themselves as non-aligned in order to communicate that they refused to be controlled by the conflict between the superpowers
The Non-Aligned movement represented an alternative to the existing economic, political, and social orders created by the Cold War rivalry
However, leaders of non-aligned nations were also shrewd and they knew how how to take advantage of the Cold War Rivalry
By feigning support for one side or the other, non-aligned states were able to gain weapons and resources that hey needed for their own defense and development
Ex: Indonesia received aid from the Soviet Union in its struggle for independence, but they also absolutely destroyed the Communist party there, racking up something like half a million deaths in the process
The EFFECTS of the Cold War, Explained [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 3]
After WW2, the Soviets occupied much of Eastern Europe(Communist Bloc)
In doing so, they installed communist governments in these countries
Made their economies serve the Soviet Union and not their own populations
Due to all those new communist nations near the countries of western Europe, not to mention the US, decided to form a mutual defense alliance called North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO) in 1949
Alliance of nations that were against the Soviets with the US at the helm and the countries in Western Europe
Not to be outdone, the Soviets formed a military alliance of their own which included the Warsaw Pact in 1955
Included the Soviet Union at the helm and all the countries in Eastern Europe
The agreement that was common in each alliance was that if any one member state was attacked, that constituted an attack on all of them
Therefore, all member nations would respond
The creation of these alliances cranked up tensions of the Cold War heavily
Arms Race
US pioneered atomic bomb in 1945 in WW2
Soviets made their own atomic bomb in 1949
The US responded with the development of a hydrogen bomb in 1951
The Soviets responded with their own hydrogen bomb in 1953
After a couple of decades, each superpower possessed enough nuclear weapons to blow the world up a thousand times over
The crisis moment of this proliferation came in 1962 with the Cuban Missile Crisis
After a failed attempt by the US to oust communist leader Fidel Castro in Cuba, the Soviet leader, Nikita Khrushchev, shipped a metric buttload of nuclear missiles to Cuba
Cuba was basically in America’s backyard
Thus, Cuba could easily blow up America
In 1962, US spy planes discovered these missile sites and the US was outraged
However, the US wasn’t innocent either
They had basically done the same thing by placing nuclear missiles in Turkey, which shared a border with the Soviet Union
After the discovery of these missiles in Cuba, President John F. Kennedy ordered a naval blockade around Cuba to prevent anymore shipments to Cuba
This naval blockade wasn’t a neutral action, it was pretty close to a declaration of war
For 13 intense and anxiety-filled days, everyone in the world was worried if nuclear war would break out
Fortunately, the missiles were never fired, and eventually all the parties backed down
This did show the world that the buildup of nuclear weapons was a real problem
Therefore in 1968, the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty was created
Called on nuclear powers to prevent non-nuclear countries from developing such disastrous weapons
Even though the two superpowers never directly fought, there was a lot of indirect fighting through proxy wars
Proxy war: Small local wars in Africa, Asia, and Latin America that took on global scope as the US and the Soviet Union took sides and supported the fighting
Korean War
After WW2, the Allies divided Korea into Soviet-occupied North Korea and US-occupied South Korea
In 1950, after both superpowers had withdrawn, the communist North Korea invaded the anti-communist South Korea in order to create a single communist state
Because this was a struggle of communists and anti-communists, the Soviets and the Americans took sides quickly
The United Nations(mostly the US) came to the aid of South Korea
The Soviets sent gun’s and power to North Korea
In this way, the US and the Soviet Union “fought” each other without directly fighting each other
In 1953, the conflict ended in a stalemate and everything in the two countries remained largely as they were before the war, except that 3 million people were dead as a result
Angolan Civil War
Began in 1975
Colony of Portugal
When they drew the borders of Angola, they threw rival people groups under one government
These Angolan ethnic groups, despite their rivalry, united and fought against the Portuguese and won their independence
But after they won independence, the real question was which one of the groups would actually hold power in the newly formed state of Angola?
This conflict seemed like a small conflict in sub saharan Africa, but the global superpowers did indeed get involved
The Soviets backed one of the groups, the US backed another, and South America yet another
Thus began the Angolan Civil War
Became another ground for larger powers conducting the Cold War
Contra War in Nicaragua
In 1979, the Sandinista National Liberation Front, who were self-proclaimed socialists, seized power in Nicaragua
Two years later, the US backed a group of contras
Tried to overthrow the Sandinistas
In turn, the Sandinistas had support from the Soviet Union
In this attempted overthrow, the contras committed many human rights violations
The conflict ended in a ceasefire and the Sandinistas were defeated in the next election
The SPREAD of COMMUNISM After 1900 [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 4]
By the 1920s, tensions were brewing against the Chinese Nationalist Party
Due to their dependence on western powers and institutions
Main antagonist were the newly formed Chinese Communist Party under the leadership of Mao Zedong
Starting in 1927, there was a bitter conflict between the two parties over who would control China
But in 1931, Japan invaded northern China
By 1935, the communists and the nationalist put their conflict aside and united to deal with the Japanese
Once the Japanese were defeated by the Allied Powers in WW2, the two rival Chinese factions started up the civil war right where they had left it off
The Communist Party won with significant help from the Soviets and had themselves a communist revolution in China
In 1949, leader Mao Zedong stood in Tiananmen Square and proclaimed the founding of the People’s Republic of China
Under Mao’s leadership, China nationalized its industry and redistributed land to peasant by means of a massive collectivization of agriculture
Comparison of collectivization of agriculture in China and the Soviet Union
Soviet Union:
Sparked internal rebellion
Millions of people died because of famine
China:
Relatively peaceful process
Communist party had built up trust with peasants during the civil war period
Mao brought the economy into state control through a program called the “Great Leap Forward”
Definition: An economic plan to rapidly industrialize China through the development of heavy industry
During this period, relations between China and the Soviet Union became strained
Mao believed the Soviet version of communism had become corrupt, and this is where the Chinese version of communism started to contrast to the Soviet version
Comparison of industrialization in Soviet Union and China
Soviet Union:
Stalin’s 5 year plans aimed to industrialize by focusing mainly on urban areas
China:
Mao focused on small-scale industrialization in rural areas
However, the industrial goods created in rural areas were poor quality
Add to that, bad harvest led to starvation of somewhere between 20-50 million Chinese people
Far worse than the Soviet famines caused by communist control there
To be clear, it was the horrible Chairman Mao who largely caused this deadly event
Just to show the rest of the world that his brand of communism was working just fine, he refused foreign aid during the famine
Continued to export the very grain that could have saved his people
Socialism and communism spread through land reforms and redistribution of resources
Egypt
The French and the British completed work on the Suez Canal in 1869 and took pains to control that highly strategic link between Europe and Asia
This canal was extremely important to the economic wellbeing of European powers, as it saved them time and money
In 1952, Gamal Abdul Nassar led a movement to overthrow the British and proclaimed independence for Egypt
Implemented socialist reforms for Egypt’s land resources
Nationalized the Suez Canal
The canal would now be under the control of Egypt alone
British, French, and Israeli forces invaded Egypt in retaliation
The Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev threatened a nuclear strike against the invading countries
Thus, the US president, Dwight Eidenhower, put pressure on Britain and France to withdraw, and they did
Vietnam
During WW2, Japan occupied Vietnam, even though at that point, it was a French colony
After Japan was defeated, Vietnam declared independence from both Japan and France
In the wake of that declaration, two rival governments were established in Vietnam
Communist government in the North and a anti-communist government in the South
The communist government of the North began a program of land redistribution
A few wealthy landowners held nearly all of Vietnam’s agricultural land
Under this program, their ownership was canceled and land was given to the rural peasantry
Cuba
In 1956, Fidel Castro led a revolution in Cuba to establish it as a communist state
Castro’s main goals was to purge Cuba of dependence on and subservience to the US
With support from the Soviet Union, Castro launched a program of land redistribution and raised wages
Resulted in the transfer of 15% of Cuba’s wealth from the rich to the poor
Castro nationalized much of the land that had belonged to various US corporations
These corporations had exploited Cuba’s economy for their own benefit
Situation similar to Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez Canal
With their interest under attack, the US CIA led a failed attempt to overthrow Castro
Only further radicalized him in his communist beliefs
Led him to develop even close ties with the Soviet Union
DECOLONIZATION, Explained [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 5]
India
Britain’s most prosperous and valuable colony
As such, Britain invested heavily in to build up India’s infrastructure
Railroads, seaports, urban development
All of yielded great return, but it was only built for the sake of enriching the British empire and not India
Resulted in a growing an educated middle class
Became increasingly influenced by nationalism and greater degrees of self-rule
Formed the Indian National Congress in 1885
Goal was to petition the British government for more of a voice in Indian policy
These petitions were largely ignored by the British government
Even with this ignorance, Indians fought by the millions for the British cause in WW1
Even though they didn’t really have a choice, they fought regardless because they believed such sacrifices would earn them a greater degree of self-rule
Again, their hopes were essentially ignored
The discontent that followed erupted into violent resistance
Occurred especially after the British troops slaughtered hundreds of peaceful Indian protesters in the Amritsar Massacre
Thanks to the powerful leadership of Indian nationalist Mohandas Gandhi, the imperial resistance movement turned nonviolent
By the 1920s, in response to the increasing pressure, the British government did transfer some limited authority to the Indians themselves
Once WW2 rolled around, the British again called millions of Indian troops to fight for their cause
The Indians did fight, and once the war was over, they demanded independence
The British were broke enough from the war and had amassed enough pro-independence politicians in Parliament
Officially recognized India’s independence in 1947
Even though the official process of India’s independence was negotiated and peaceful, the establishment of India as a new state was fraught with incredible violence
For centuries, India was home to a Muslim minority
So the Muslims, fearing that they would be marginalized in an independent India, formed a religious and ethnic movement known as the Muslim League
Called for a separate state of their in the independence negotiation
The result was the partition of India that created the new state of Pakistan
Would become the home of India’s Muslim minority
Once the two states were created, Hindus fled south while Muslims fled north
Each side committed unspeakable violence against each other
Once the dust had settled, hundreds of thousands to over a million people died as a result
Gold Coast
Also a colony of Great Britain
In 1947, an independence movement was led by Kwame Nkrumah
As Nkrumah began negotiations with the British, the situation was similar to India
There was no more public support for imperialism and Britain was in no position to spend money on quelling rebellions while they were busy rebuilding from the war
As a result of the negotiations, the new state of Ghana was born in 1957
Whether the process of decolonization was peaceful or violent came down to the population of European settlers in the colony
For those colonies in which large population of European settlers had made their homes, they resisted decolonization and that resistance caused outbreaks of violence in the name of independence
Independence movement in the French colony of Algeria
In Africa, the French held colonial possessions in Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria
For Morocco and Tunisia, they recognized their independence through negotiation and without bloodshed
However, they wouldn’t do the same for Algeria due to the population of white Europeans in the colony
Algeria was a hotspot for French migration for a long period of time, and French citizens living there resisted Algerian independence fiercely
In 1954, Arab and Berber Muslims responded by forming the National Liberation Front
Staged a series of violent attacks against French troops and civilians in the name of independence
French responded with brutality
Made the struggle for independence among the bloodiest in the period
French soldiers target civilians without restraint and committed human rights abuses on a massive scale
War continued until 1962, wen President Charles De Gualle opened negotiations with the Algerians
Declared the end of the war and Algeria’s independence
Angola
By the 1950s, three Angolan political groups had joined together their colonial rule
Violence broke out during a spontaneous insurrection protesting inhuman treatment of farmers by the Portuguese
As a result, both sides unleashed violence against one another and neither made much progress
In 1974, a bloodless coup occurred in Portugal
The Angolans took the opportunity to open negotiations for independence
Independence came in 1975
Like other decolonized nations, violence immediately followed
Once the Portuguese were ousted, the 3 rival ethnic groups immediately fell into a civil war to determine which of them would hold power
The Angolan Civil war became yet another proxy war in the larger context of the Cold War
The simplest reason for why many colonial independence movements quickly descended into civil war after winning independence is because of the problem of colonial boundaries
Imperial powers drew the boundaries for their respective territorial holdings without respect for the various ethnic and religious groups
In some cases, those boundaries brought rival groups together and in other cases, those boundaries split ethnic and religious groups apart
That carelessness on the part of imperial powers often led to violent power struggles after colonial independence
Nigeria
In 1960, Nigerians negotiated their independence from Britain
But a civil war broke out by 1967 over who would gain control over the newly independent Nigeria
Began when the Igbo people, who were westernized Christian people in the south, tried to secede and form their own nation called Biafra
Because their land was rich in oil, the northern government resisted the secession violently
Ultimately, the north won out in 1970 and established, at last, a united Nigeria
But the legacy of colonial boundaries in Africa and in various places throughout the world continue to cause tension till today
State Building AFTER Decolonization [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 6]
Imperial powers drew the boundaries for their respective territorial holdings without respect for the various ethnic and religious groups
When colonies gained independence, they inherited those wack boundaries
Some states sought to draw new boundaries
But whether they kept the colonial boundaries or not, the outcome was either way usually nasty
Partition of India
Example of independence through negotiation
During the negotiations for India’s independence, both Gandhi and the British made frequent and impassioned appeals for India to remain one state as a home to the Hindu majority and the Muslim minority
However, the Muslim League(represented the Muslim minority) was pretty skeptical that the Hindu majority would treat them fairly in and Independent India
Pushed for a state of their own
Amounted to the partition of India into two states: India for the Hindu people, and Pakistan for the Muslims
Even though the partitions for the states largely reflected the existing locations of these rival ethnic groups, there were still significant numbers of Hindus living in the Muslim areas and vice versa
When independence came, Muslims fled to the north and Indians fled to the South
In the process, they committed enormous amounts of violence against one another
Once the dust settled, over 12 million people had migrated to one state or another
Over half a million people had died
After the migrations were done, yet another conflict arose over the region of Kashmir
In every state in the newly independent India, Muslims were the minority except Kashmir where they held a large majority
The fact that it held a border with Pakistan made Pakistanis assume Kashmir would be added to their territory
However, complicating the issue even further was the fact that the ruler of the state was Hindu and the region had many valuable natural resources
India declared that Kashmir belonged to them and Pakistan responded by launching attacks to claim the region for themselves
The U.N stepped in to mediate the dispute and insisted that the people of Kashmir themselves vote on the territorial outcome of their state
Given their Muslim population, would have certainly resulted in Pakistan annexing Kashmir
The vote never occurred, and the region has been a source of conflict between the two states to this day
Creation of Israel in 1948
Before WW1, Palestine was home to a Muslim majority and was part of the Ottoman Empire
After the war, Palestine was transferred under the rule of Great Britain through the Mandate System, which but Great Britain in a tough spot
Since the late 19th century, a nationalistic ideology known as Zionism gained a lot of traction among Jews scattered around Europe
The chief desire of Zionist Jews was to have a state of their own, specifically in their ancestral land of Israel
Under the influence of Zionism, large migrations of Jews to Palestine occurred before and after WW1
In addition the Zionism, this migration was encouraged by the Balfour Declaration
Pledge by the British to make Palestine a home for the Jews
The Arab Muslims that lived in Palestine vigorously resisted this migration and re envisioning of their territory as a home for the Jews
Things got even more tense when a huge spike in Jewish migration to Palestine during WW2 occurred as Jews fled the persecution of the Holocaust
After the war, the British couldn’t come up with a way to peacefully handle the problem, so they handed the decision to the UN
The UN declared that Palestine will be partitioned into two states
One for the Jews, and one for the Arab Muslims
The Jews accepted this plan and declared independence in 1948
But the Palestinians refused to give up their land
To them, it seemed like another consequence of European colonial control
The Palestinians almost immediately took up arms against the Israelis with support from neighboring Arab countries
In the end, the Israelis won that war, but several other conflicts would erupt throughout the 20th century
Even today, the legacy of this partition has the region filled with conflict
Gamal Abdur Nasser - Egypt
As a key member of the Non-Aligned movement, Nasser payed off the Cold War rivalry in order to get involved in Egypt’s economic development
Nationalized the Suez Canal(1956), which brought it under Egyptian control
When western powers invaded, Nasser gained Soviet support to end the conflict
Oversaw completion of the Aswan High Dam on the Nile River(1970)
Provided electricity and irrigation for much of Egypt
Initiated social welfare reforms which included free schooling and healthcare\
The Egyptian government played a significant role in directing their economy after independence
Indira Gandhi - Egypt
First and only prime minister of India in 1966
Inherited an economic crisis
Brought on by the ongoing conflict with Pakistan and the droughts that had caused widespread famine
In response, she implemented a series of five year socialist economic plans
Aimed to allow the government to assert more control over the economy instead of relying on foreign aid from powerful western nations
Adopted the green revolution which used science to develop high-yielding grain
Increased harvest yields and made India agriculturally self-sufficient
Oversaw the nationalization of key Indian industries and introduced significant government regulation on others
Her nationalization of banks and the increase of taxes on the wealthy, along with her 20-point economic plan, reduced inflation and increased production throughout India
Metropoles: Designated territory of the imperial country in distinction from their colonial holdings during the age of imperialism
Ex: India was a colony was a colony of Great Britain, so Great Britain would be the metropole of India
Over the long history of colonialism, imperial states and their colonies developed both cultural and economic connections with one another
So even if the presence of the imperial power was unwelcome in a colony, the colonial people grew familiar with the customs and culture of that occupying power
Therefore, in the light of various economic difficulties faced in newly independent states during decolonization, some people choose to migrate to the cities of those metropoles to find work
Ex: South Asians migrating to Britain, Algerians migrating to France, Filipinos to the US
Ultimately, this mass immigration transformed the majority white and culturally homogenous societies into genuine multi-ethnic societies
Those migrations also kept the cultural and economic ties between the two places live and well
RESISTANCE to Power Structures After 1900 [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 7]
Mohandas Gandhi
Promoted nonviolence and civil disobedience in the cause of independence for India
Started political life in the Indian National Congress and became its leader by 1921
During the 1930s, he fully nonviolent resistance against British imperial policies in the Indian cause of independence through several significant acts
Homespun Movement
In protest of Britain’s economic dominance of India’s cotton industry, Gandhi encouraged his followers to boycott British made textile and make their own clothes at home
He himself did this by refusing to wear the western style suits that he had worn in his earlier years as a lawyer
Instead he wore the traditional dhoti of Indian culture
Salt March
Reaction against the British salt monopoly
The British colonial government made it illegal for Indian to harvest their own salt, which they had in abundance along their sea shores
In order to protest this injustice, Gandhi led his followers on a march to the sea where they harvested their own salt
Although an imperial police squad was waiting for them at the coast and although they had already broken up the salt deposits and buried them in the mud, Gandhi dug them up and processed his own salt
For this defiance, Gandhi was arrested, one of multiple occasions in which he spent time in jail for his civil disobedience
Over time, though the British definitely retaliated against the movement, Gandhi’s efforts began to break Britain’s colonial hold on India
After WW2, Britain no longer had the resources or overwhelming public support to continue to resist Indian independence
Gandhi and his actions were a key player in one of the most momentous political changes in Indian history, namely its independence from the British
Martin Luther King Jr.
Black Baptist minister from the US
Took inspiration from Gandhi’s nonviolent and civil disobedience methods
Fought against America’s racial segregation laws
Civil Rights Movement
Aimed to secure equal rights for black Americans
King and his followers also resisted unjust laws by means of civil disobedience
Montgomery bus boycott:
Black Americans boycotted the city’s public bus transportation system
The boycott caused the city significant economic distress in Montgomery and in other places where the movement spread
King was also arrested on several occasions for his act of Civil disobedience
Affected political change as the US Supreme Court outlawed racial discrimination in schools in the 1950s and Congress passed anti-discrimination laws in the 1960s
Nelson Mandela
Although Mandela began by promoting nonviolence, he later changed his tactics
Once South Africa had secured its independence from Great Britain, the minority white population rose to power and introduced legalized racial segregation under a group of policies known as apartheid
Nelson Mandela, a prominent member of the African National Congress, led black South Africans in acts of nonviolent resistance that included boycotts and strikes
But a series of events caused Mandela to champion violence as the only way to achieve equality in South America
While Mandela was standing trial for treason, a nonviolent protest was occurring in the town of Sharpeville
In order to suppress it, the police began firing into the crowd, killing 69 people and injuring many more
The treason trial, combine with outrage over the Sharpeville Massacre led Mandela and other anti-apartheid activists to abandon nonviolent approaches and adopt violence in their struggle for freedom
Although he was jailed for more than two decades for his connection to those violent acts, upon his release in 1994, he ran for president and won office
Final nail in the coffin for South African Apartheid
Violent responses were much more common than nonviolent resistance
By committing to force, some groups actually intensified violence and suffering
Augusto Pinochet in Chile
Pinochet led a military coup to overthrow Salvador Allende
Allende happened to be a Marxist and had been implementing socialist policies
With help from the US, Pinochet assumed power and ruled over Chile as a dictator, and with that power, he violently suppressed opposition to his leadership
The military conducted raids, executions, and torture against Pinochet’s political enemies including members of leftist political parties and labor unions and the Catholic Church
Idi Amin
Assumed power through a military coup in 1971
Responded to ethnic conflicts in Uganda with exceptional violence
Demonized the large South Asian population of Uganda
These South Asians had made significant contributions to the economy for centuries
Amin claimed that they were responsible for taking jobs from Ugandans
In the midst of his chaotic rule, Amin became known to the western world as the Butcher of Uganda
Due to the frequent campaigns of violence he carried out against his own people and his rivals
The violence targeted ethnic groups and in others, it targeted political enemies and in still others, it targeted seemingly random groups and individuals whom Amin deemed his enemies
In the end, the manner in which Amin responded to conflict intensified violence in Uganda
80,000 up to 500,000 people died in the intensifying conflicts
Rise of the Military Industrial Complex
As fear and economic pressure caused some states to worry about the future, one response to this anxiety was to defend the future by building up their militaries
The main countries that displayed this response were the US and the Soviet Union, as they raced to stockpile enough nuclear weapons to destroy everything that exists
This buildup was a self-feeding cycle
As military spending increased, so did the number of people who relied on this industry for their jobs
That meant if a policy maker did want to cut military spending, then they would also be putting huge amounts of people out of work
This meant this military-industrial complex served to increase violence throughout the world because it was economically profitable to produce and sell weapons
Known as terrorism
Al-Qaeda
Founded and led by Saudi Arabian billionaire, Osama bin Laden
Was a militant Islamic group that had deep grievances concerning the involvement of the US in Middle Eastern states, most notably Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia
Responded with acts of terrorism against civilians in various parts of the world in order to pressure the US to change their policies in the region
The most infamous of these terrorist attacks was the 9/11 attacks on the US
Left more than 2000 Americans dead
Didn’t really dissuade the US from getting involved in the Middle East
This only intensified their involvement
The END of the COLD WAR [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 8]
By the early 1980s, the US and the Soviet Union had produced over 12,000 nuclear missiles and all those weapons of mass destruction were pointed at one another
A major consideration that kept them from launching these missiles was the guarantee that if either started a nuclear war, it would certainly end in mutual assured destruction
However, the tension between the two superpowers did relax somewhat during a period of detente in the 1970s
Ex: US President Richard Nixon and Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev signed the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty(SALT 1)
Both states agreed to prohibit further manufacturing of nuclear weapons
In 1980, the US elected Ronald Reagan as president
He took a much harder line against the Soviets and decided to take the detente and basically get rid of it
Spearheaded the Strategic Defense Initiative
System that rendered any attack on the US by nuclear weapons obsolete
SDI sought to launch defense systems into space
Could detect a nuclear launch and shoot them down from space with lasers
The detractors of this plan dubbed it “Star Wars”
Even though the SDI never really came to pass, it represented a growing divide between the US and the Soviet Union
Reagan believed the US would attempt to match the US spending and weapons development
In large part, he was right
But the problem was since the 1970s, the Soviet economy had been stagnate and couldn’t support that kind of spending
Therefore, the Soviet attempts to keep up with the US military and technological investment led them into further economic decline
In 1979, Soviet troops invaded Afghanistan in order to prop up its communist regime against Afghan Muslim groups that sought to overthrow it
However, the Afghan rebels were supported and supplied by the US, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan
While the Soviets were able to control some of Afghanistan’s major cities, they could not win the rural guerilla war waged against them by the rebels
All in all, the Soviet Union waged this losing battle for 9 years
Further depressed the Soviet economy
Mikhail Gorbachev rose to power in 1985
Soviet Economy was in a crisis
Foreign trade was extremely limited
Government control of agriculture stifled the industry
Farmers lacked freedom to decide what to plant and how to price crops
Soviet Bloc countries continued to grow discontent with Soviet oppression
Prague Spring: Series of mass protests in Czechoslovakia erupted in 1968 as a reaction to oppressive Soviet policies
The Soviets violently crushed this outcry, but the sentiment was spreading
The Soviet state was having to devote more and more resources that they did not have to putting those rebellions down
With all this background, Mikhail Gorbachev enters with some policy ideas that will ultimately lead to the demise of the Soviet Union
Gorbachev’s Policies
Perestroika
A restructuring of the economy to address economic woes by reducing the level of central planning from the government
Glasnost
Means “openness”
All the dissent and criticism against the government and its policies that had been brutally silenced by previous leaders was now allowed
Ceased Military Intervention
Soviet Union would no longer use military intervention in order to prop up communist governments in its own sphere of influence
With those developments, satellite states in the Soviet Bloc took quick advantage of the loosening Soviet grip
Democratic reform movements erupted in one eastern European country after another, and that led to similar reform movements in the Soviet Union proper as people in Lithuania, Georgia, and other states began declaring independence and breaking free from Soviet control
In 1989, the Berlin Wall was torn down and Germany was reunited
In response to all these destabilizing forces, the Soviet legislature voted in 1991 to dissolve the Soviet, thus marking an end to the Cold War