In-Depth Notes on Automation in Microbiology
Automation in Microbiology
Introduction
- Overview of Automation in Microbiology
- Not as advanced as other medical disciplines.
- Recent significant developments.
- Limited availability of advanced instruments, e.g., MALDI-TOF, Total Lab Automation (TLA).
- Basic tests (e.g., biochemical tests, Gram stains, colonial morphology) still prevalent in modern labs.
- Microbiology remains a predominantly hands-on discipline.
Specimen Processing
- Challenges of Automation
- Varied specimens and identification methods complicate automation.
- Different streaking techniques for different specimens (e.g., urines).
- Common Specimen Types
- Urine: one of the most frequently processed specimens.
- Collection in diverse containers.
- Focus of Automation
- Mainly targeted at organism identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST).
Commercial Identification & AST Methods
- Automated Systems
- Automate basic biochemical testing, results setup, and interpretation.
- Utilizes spectrophotometry and fluorometry for analysis in identification and AST.
Examples of Automated Systems
- BD Phoenix
- MicroScan WalkAway
- VITEK 2 Compact
Total Laboratory Automation (TLA)
- Functionality of TLA Systems
- Manage specimen handling, streaking plates, incubation, and digital imaging of cultures.
- Common Systems Available
- BD Kiestra, FMLA (Biomerieux), WASPLab (Copan).
- Key Features
- Conveyor/track systems for moving plates.
- Digital cameras for reading plates.
- Robotic management for automated processing.
Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)
- Innovation Significance
- Major leap in microbial identification technology.
- Utilizes Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight approach.
- Process Overview
- Chemical compounds ionized into charged molecules; measures mass-to-charge ratio (m/z).
- Minimal organism needed compared to older technologies.
- Applicable for early identification of infectious diseases from bacteria, viruses, fungi.
MALDI-TOF Operation
- Requirements
- Pure isolate necessary for reliable results (high scores for accuracy).
- Formic acid enhances ionization and identification accuracy.
- Limitations
- Mixed cultures may yield obscure results; high confidence thresholds (90% generally acceptable).
- Direct spotting from specimens (blood/urine) possible but requires lab validation.
MALDI-TOF Sample Preparation
- Add matrix solution.
- Spot target slide with colony (up to 5 days old).
- Air dry matrix.
- Load target slides and create spectra.
MALDI-TOF Mechanism
- Process Components
- Sample ionization by matrix absorption and UV laser pulse.
- Drift region for mass spectrum generation; results in identification confidence scores for organisms.
- Identification Accuracy
- Comparative studies showing high % species identification accuracy using MALDI vs. traditional biochemical methods.
- Example:
- 1,371 isolates; conventional vs MALDI-TOF identified 93% matches.
- 92% identification for Enterobacteriaceae, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli 92%, etc.
Downsides to MALDI-TOF
- Technical Challenges
- Spotting plates relies on skillful technique; prone to concentration errors.
- Complexity of updated species nomenclature can lead to confusion.
- Some organisms (e.g., S. pneumoniae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae) may not differentiate effectively due to capsule density.
- No performance of antimicrobial testing during the process.
Conclusion
- Current Status of Microbiology Automation
- Recent improvements, yet many technologies hindered by high costs.
- Basic automation tools (e.g., Vitek, Phoenix) are commonplace.
- Growing acceptance of MALDI-TOF in labs, despite its limitations.
- Total Laboratory Automation is projected to form the future direction of microbiology labs.
Learning Check Questions
- What is the main quality control organism used as a calibration spot for MALDI?
- What is the CHCA reagent?
- What is Formic Acid used for?
- What are some limitations of MALDI?
- How does MALDI differentiate various organisms, and how are spectra generated?