Introduction: changing politics
Sections Covered:
The National Farmers’ Union & corporatism
Biosecurity crises
Conclusion: from ‘farming interest’ to ‘rural social movement’?
Understanding Required:
Post-war political consensus was prevalent.
Breakdown of this consensus began in the 1970s.
Subsequent impacts included animal health crises.
Transition from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ (Woods 2005) reflects changing power dynamics in rural Britain.
Farmers viewed as ‘natural stewards of the countryside’.
Influences on Legislation:
Agriculture Act 1947 and its implications.
Farming largely overlooked in the National Parks Act 1949.
Planners perpetuated ‘agricultural exceptionalism’.
Reinforcement of the ‘sturdy yeoman farmer’ stereotype, tied to English national myths and representations in popular culture.
Increasing challenges to these stereotypes.
NFU Overview:
Founded in 1908 during an agricultural depression.
Approximately 47,000 members (2023), covering around 2/3 of agricultural land.
Peak membership: 80% full-time farmers.
NFU is a powerful and effective trade union.
Key Characteristics (from NFU website):
Champions British farming.
Largest farming organisation in the UK.
Provides professional representation and services to members.
Acts as a strong, independent voice.
Regional offices in Stoneleigh Park, London, Brussels, Wales, and other English regions.
Funded by member subscriptions and non-affiliated to political parties.
Definition: A ‘working partnership’ aimed at mutual benefit based on the Scandinavian model.
To be seen as corporatist, NFU must be:
Prominent
Self-regulatory
Cooperative
Active participation during 1939-45 amidst significant state intervention.
Following the 1947 Act, NFU became the official representative of British farming.
Continuous engagement with the state through:
Lobbying Parliament
Developing contacts
Volunteering for rural working groups
British Agriculture Bureau representing NFU post-Brexit.
Representative Challenges:
Strengthened via decentralized branches, yet threatened by dissent.
Example: Farmers’ Union of Wales established in 1955 catering to small farmers.
Less corporatist attitude—more vociferous in advocating policies to protect Welsh agriculture.
Internal divisions characterized by conflict between:
‘Corn’ (large-scale farmers) vs. ‘horn’ (smaller farmers).
Various specialist groups: tenant farmers, sheep, pigs, organic farming.
Rise of Farmers for Action (2000) and alternatives like the Small Farms Association and Land Workers’ Alliance.
Emerging Pressures:
Activation of external pressure groups: environmentalists, animal welfare advocates, consumer rights groups, anti-meat campaigns.
Increased bureaucratic controls, weakening of focus on ‘farming’.
Growing concerns over agricultural support costs and influences of food producers & supermarkets.
Shift in political dynamics including urbanisation of the Conservative Party contributing to agriculture's re-politicisation.
Pollution Regulation Context:
Pre-1980s view of pollution as non-rural.
The 1986 report on the River Torridge highlighted declining salmon catches tied to intensified dairying activity.
Major Contributors to Pollution Acknowledgment:
National Rivers Authority (1989-96)
Environmental critics e.g. Body (1983).
Assistance from groups like Friends of the Earth and perspectives of counter-urbanising middle-class residents.
Efforts evident in the establishment of the Environment Agency (1996).
Farmers increasingly felt threatened by:
New neighboring residents.
Negative media coverage.
Campaigns aimed at environmental practices and new regulatory demands leading to court convictions.
Overview of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy:
Neuro-degenerative disease resembling scrapie and CJD in humans.
Identified in 1986, impacting 1/3 of British herds and requiring 4.5 million cattle to be slaughtered.
Key Events in BSE Timeline:
June 1988: BSE made notifiable disease
• July 1988: ban on ruminant protein (sheep) in cattle feed
• August 1988: compulsory slaughter of BSE suspects, 50% compensation
• February 1990: full compensation for slaughtered BSE suspects
• April 1990: Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee established
• March 1996: EU ban all products from British cattle
• July 1996: cattle ‘passports’ introduced
• December 1997: ban on sale of beef-on-the-bone in UK
• March 1998: start of official BSE Inquiry
• August 1999: beef export ban lifted
• December 1999: beef-on-the-bone ban lifted; BSE Inquiry ends (cost £25m)
• October 2000: Inquiry published – criticised; BSE in rest of Europe…
Disease Characteristics:
Highly infectious but rarely fatal with significant yield impacts.
Initially detected in Essex before rapid spread via animal movements.
Government's ultra-cautionary approach was controversial.
Outbreak Impact:
Lasted approximately 2/3 of a year with around 2000 cases, notably in Cumbria, Devon, Dumfries, and North Yorks.
Over 6 million cattle, sheep, and pigs slaughtered as a containment measure.
The FMD outbreak revealed the rural economy's reliance beyond agriculture.
Emphasized the need to reassess the role of farming in the rural economy and society, advocating for a shift from traditional farming to broader rural, social, and environmental objectives.
Described by Woods (2005) as a critical turning point for British farming and its countryside, marked symbolically by devastation such as dead cattle and sheep.
Establishment and Context:
Created in 2002 at the site of a former WW2 airfield for the burial of livestock killed during the FMD outbreak.
Emerging Concerns:
Tuberculosis in cattle debated due to badger culling.
Schmallenberg Virus causing congenital malformations in livestock.
Bluetongue in sheep and concerns surrounding avian influenza.
Ash dieback posing costly challenges for farmers.
Continuing pressure on the ‘farming’ sector as observed through advocacy from movements like the Oxford ‘Real Farming’ Conference in 2020.
Material and Ideological Aspects:
Materially eclipsed due to loss of income and price drops of agricultural goods.
Recent challenges include the juxtaposition of the NFU’s influence diminished amidst policy changes and emerging alternatives.
Challenges Within the NFU:
The transition and restructuring of farming authorities (MAFF to DEFRA) reduced NFU’s dominance.
Increased influence from alternative rural stakeholders and recognition of changing rural economies affected NFU’s role in agricultural policy.
Global markets & trade
Definition and Challenges:
‘Good farming’ defined by cultural practices and maintaining traditional rural aesthetics is increasingly threatened by:
Environmental land-use policies and biosecurity protocols, leading to loss of cultural identity without adequate compensation.
E.g. hard to balance new disease control rules with traditional cattle purchasing practices (Enticott & Little 2022)
Conceptual Expansion of Rural Crises:
Rural crises stretching beyond agricultural discourse towards broader political engagement, described as moving from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ by Woods (2005).
From politics located in rural space to struggles over rural meaning (representation) & regulation
Beyond party politics
Rural as Engagement Sites:
Highlighting emerging social movements which challenge predominant narratives and politics.
Calls for retaining the diversity of rural voices, emphasizing their struggles over place representation and control.
L12- Politics Of Farming
Introduction: changing politics
Sections Covered:
The National Farmers’ Union & corporatism
Biosecurity crises
Conclusion: from ‘farming interest’ to ‘rural social movement’?
Understanding Required:
Post-war political consensus was prevalent.
Breakdown of this consensus began in the 1970s.
Subsequent impacts included animal health crises.
Transition from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ (Woods 2005) reflects changing power dynamics in rural Britain.
Farmers viewed as ‘natural stewards of the countryside’.
Influences on Legislation:
Agriculture Act 1947 and its implications.
Farming largely overlooked in the National Parks Act 1949.
Planners perpetuated ‘agricultural exceptionalism’.
Reinforcement of the ‘sturdy yeoman farmer’ stereotype, tied to English national myths and representations in popular culture.
Increasing challenges to these stereotypes.
NFU Overview:
Founded in 1908 during an agricultural depression.
Approximately 47,000 members (2023), covering around 2/3 of agricultural land.
Peak membership: 80% full-time farmers.
NFU is a powerful and effective trade union.
Key Characteristics (from NFU website):
Champions British farming.
Largest farming organisation in the UK.
Provides professional representation and services to members.
Acts as a strong, independent voice.
Regional offices in Stoneleigh Park, London, Brussels, Wales, and other English regions.
Funded by member subscriptions and non-affiliated to political parties.
Definition: A ‘working partnership’ aimed at mutual benefit based on the Scandinavian model.
To be seen as corporatist, NFU must be:
Prominent
Self-regulatory
Cooperative
Active participation during 1939-45 amidst significant state intervention.
Following the 1947 Act, NFU became the official representative of British farming.
Continuous engagement with the state through:
Lobbying Parliament
Developing contacts
Volunteering for rural working groups
British Agriculture Bureau representing NFU post-Brexit.
Representative Challenges:
Strengthened via decentralized branches, yet threatened by dissent.
Example: Farmers’ Union of Wales established in 1955 catering to small farmers.
Less corporatist attitude—more vociferous in advocating policies to protect Welsh agriculture.
Internal divisions characterized by conflict between:
‘Corn’ (large-scale farmers) vs. ‘horn’ (smaller farmers).
Various specialist groups: tenant farmers, sheep, pigs, organic farming.
Rise of Farmers for Action (2000) and alternatives like the Small Farms Association and Land Workers’ Alliance.
Emerging Pressures:
Activation of external pressure groups: environmentalists, animal welfare advocates, consumer rights groups, anti-meat campaigns.
Increased bureaucratic controls, weakening of focus on ‘farming’.
Growing concerns over agricultural support costs and influences of food producers & supermarkets.
Shift in political dynamics including urbanisation of the Conservative Party contributing to agriculture's re-politicisation.
Pollution Regulation Context:
Pre-1980s view of pollution as non-rural.
The 1986 report on the River Torridge highlighted declining salmon catches tied to intensified dairying activity.
Major Contributors to Pollution Acknowledgment:
National Rivers Authority (1989-96)
Environmental critics e.g. Body (1983).
Assistance from groups like Friends of the Earth and perspectives of counter-urbanising middle-class residents.
Efforts evident in the establishment of the Environment Agency (1996).
Farmers increasingly felt threatened by:
New neighboring residents.
Negative media coverage.
Campaigns aimed at environmental practices and new regulatory demands leading to court convictions.
Overview of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy:
Neuro-degenerative disease resembling scrapie and CJD in humans.
Identified in 1986, impacting 1/3 of British herds and requiring 4.5 million cattle to be slaughtered.
Key Events in BSE Timeline:
June 1988: BSE made notifiable disease
• July 1988: ban on ruminant protein (sheep) in cattle feed
• August 1988: compulsory slaughter of BSE suspects, 50% compensation
• February 1990: full compensation for slaughtered BSE suspects
• April 1990: Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee established
• March 1996: EU ban all products from British cattle
• July 1996: cattle ‘passports’ introduced
• December 1997: ban on sale of beef-on-the-bone in UK
• March 1998: start of official BSE Inquiry
• August 1999: beef export ban lifted
• December 1999: beef-on-the-bone ban lifted; BSE Inquiry ends (cost £25m)
• October 2000: Inquiry published – criticised; BSE in rest of Europe…
Disease Characteristics:
Highly infectious but rarely fatal with significant yield impacts.
Initially detected in Essex before rapid spread via animal movements.
Government's ultra-cautionary approach was controversial.
Outbreak Impact:
Lasted approximately 2/3 of a year with around 2000 cases, notably in Cumbria, Devon, Dumfries, and North Yorks.
Over 6 million cattle, sheep, and pigs slaughtered as a containment measure.
The FMD outbreak revealed the rural economy's reliance beyond agriculture.
Emphasized the need to reassess the role of farming in the rural economy and society, advocating for a shift from traditional farming to broader rural, social, and environmental objectives.
Described by Woods (2005) as a critical turning point for British farming and its countryside, marked symbolically by devastation such as dead cattle and sheep.
Establishment and Context:
Created in 2002 at the site of a former WW2 airfield for the burial of livestock killed during the FMD outbreak.
Emerging Concerns:
Tuberculosis in cattle debated due to badger culling.
Schmallenberg Virus causing congenital malformations in livestock.
Bluetongue in sheep and concerns surrounding avian influenza.
Ash dieback posing costly challenges for farmers.
Continuing pressure on the ‘farming’ sector as observed through advocacy from movements like the Oxford ‘Real Farming’ Conference in 2020.
Material and Ideological Aspects:
Materially eclipsed due to loss of income and price drops of agricultural goods.
Recent challenges include the juxtaposition of the NFU’s influence diminished amidst policy changes and emerging alternatives.
Challenges Within the NFU:
The transition and restructuring of farming authorities (MAFF to DEFRA) reduced NFU’s dominance.
Increased influence from alternative rural stakeholders and recognition of changing rural economies affected NFU’s role in agricultural policy.
Global markets & trade
Definition and Challenges:
‘Good farming’ defined by cultural practices and maintaining traditional rural aesthetics is increasingly threatened by:
Environmental land-use policies and biosecurity protocols, leading to loss of cultural identity without adequate compensation.
E.g. hard to balance new disease control rules with traditional cattle purchasing practices (Enticott & Little 2022)
Conceptual Expansion of Rural Crises:
Rural crises stretching beyond agricultural discourse towards broader political engagement, described as moving from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ by Woods (2005).
From politics located in rural space to struggles over rural meaning (representation) & regulation
Beyond party politics
Rural as Engagement Sites:
Highlighting emerging social movements which challenge predominant narratives and politics.
Calls for retaining the diversity of rural voices, emphasizing their struggles over place representation and control.