Last saved 14 hours ago

L12- Politics Of Farming

The Politics of Farming: Corporatism Undermined

  • Introduction: changing politics

  • Sections Covered:

    • The National Farmers’ Union & corporatism

    • Biosecurity crises

    • Conclusion: from ‘farming interest’ to ‘rural social movement’?

Introduction: Changing Rural Politics

  • Understanding Required:

    • Post-war political consensus was prevalent.

    • Breakdown of this consensus began in the 1970s.

    • Subsequent impacts included animal health crises.

    • Transition from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ (Woods 2005) reflects changing power dynamics in rural Britain.

Scott Report (1942) Legacy

  • Farmers viewed as ‘natural stewards of the countryside’.

  • Influences on Legislation:

    • Agriculture Act 1947 and its implications.

    • Farming largely overlooked in the National Parks Act 1949.

  • Planners perpetuated ‘agricultural exceptionalism’.

  • Reinforcement of the ‘sturdy yeoman farmer’ stereotype, tied to English national myths and representations in popular culture.

  • Increasing challenges to these stereotypes.

The National Farmers’ Union & Corporatism

  • NFU Overview:

    • Founded in 1908 during an agricultural depression.

    • Approximately 47,000 members (2023), covering around 2/3 of agricultural land.

    • Peak membership: 80% full-time farmers.

    • NFU is a powerful and effective trade union.

NFU Characteristics

  • Key Characteristics (from NFU website):

    • Champions British farming.

    • Largest farming organisation in the UK.

    • Provides professional representation and services to members.

    • Acts as a strong, independent voice.

    • Regional offices in Stoneleigh Park, London, Brussels, Wales, and other English regions.

    • Funded by member subscriptions and non-affiliated to political parties.

Corporatism

  • Definition: A ‘working partnership’ aimed at mutual benefit based on the Scandinavian model.

  • To be seen as corporatist, NFU must be:

    • Prominent

    • Self-regulatory

    • Cooperative

Corporatist Development of NFU

  • Active participation during 1939-45 amidst significant state intervention.

  • Following the 1947 Act, NFU became the official representative of British farming.

  • Continuous engagement with the state through:

    • Lobbying Parliament

    • Developing contacts

    • Volunteering for rural working groups

    • British Agriculture Bureau representing NFU post-Brexit.

Corporatism Undermined: Internal Strains

  • Representative Challenges:

    • Strengthened via decentralized branches, yet threatened by dissent.

    • Example: Farmers’ Union of Wales established in 1955 catering to small farmers.

    • Less corporatist attitude—more vociferous in advocating policies to protect Welsh agriculture.

Tensions Within NFU

  • Internal divisions characterized by conflict between:

    • ‘Corn’ (large-scale farmers) vs. ‘horn’ (smaller farmers).

    • Various specialist groups: tenant farmers, sheep, pigs, organic farming.

    • Rise of Farmers for Action (2000) and alternatives like the Small Farms Association and Land Workers’ Alliance.

Corporatism Undermined: External Pressures

  • Emerging Pressures:

    • Activation of external pressure groups: environmentalists, animal welfare advocates, consumer rights groups, anti-meat campaigns.

    • Increased bureaucratic controls, weakening of focus on ‘farming’.

    • Growing concerns over agricultural support costs and influences of food producers & supermarkets.

    • Shift in political dynamics including urbanisation of the Conservative Party contributing to agriculture's re-politicisation.

Biosecurity Crises

  • Pollution Regulation Context:

    • Pre-1980s view of pollution as non-rural.

    • The 1986 report on the River Torridge highlighted declining salmon catches tied to intensified dairying activity.

1980s Discovery of Farm Pollution

  • Major Contributors to Pollution Acknowledgment:

    • National Rivers Authority (1989-96)

    • Environmental critics e.g. Body (1983).

    • Assistance from groups like Friends of the Earth and perspectives of counter-urbanising middle-class residents.

    • Efforts evident in the establishment of the Environment Agency (1996).

Farmers’ Threatened Status

  • Farmers increasingly felt threatened by:

    • New neighboring residents.

    • Negative media coverage.

    • Campaigns aimed at environmental practices and new regulatory demands leading to court convictions.

BSE (1986-2000)

  • Overview of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy:

    • Neuro-degenerative disease resembling scrapie and CJD in humans.

    • Identified in 1986, impacting 1/3 of British herds and requiring 4.5 million cattle to be slaughtered.

Tracking the BSE Crisis

  • Key Events in BSE Timeline:

  • June 1988: BSE made notifiable disease

    • July 1988: ban on ruminant protein (sheep) in cattle feed

    • August 1988: compulsory slaughter of BSE suspects, 50% compensation

    • February 1990: full compensation for slaughtered BSE suspects

    • April 1990: Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee established

    • March 1996: EU ban all products from British cattle

    • July 1996: cattle ‘passports’ introduced

    • December 1997: ban on sale of beef-on-the-bone in UK

    • March 1998: start of official BSE Inquiry

    • August 1999: beef export ban lifted

    • December 1999: beef-on-the-bone ban lifted; BSE Inquiry ends (cost £25m)

    • October 2000: Inquiry published – criticised; BSE in rest of Europe…

Foot & Mouth Disease (FMD) (2001)

  • Disease Characteristics:

    • Highly infectious but rarely fatal with significant yield impacts.

    • Initially detected in Essex before rapid spread via animal movements.

    • Government's ultra-cautionary approach was controversial.

FMD Incidence Numbers

  • Outbreak Impact:

    • Lasted approximately 2/3 of a year with around 2000 cases, notably in Cumbria, Devon, Dumfries, and North Yorks.

    • Over 6 million cattle, sheep, and pigs slaughtered as a containment measure.

FMD's Economic Reveal

  • The FMD outbreak revealed the rural economy's reliance beyond agriculture.

  • Emphasized the need to reassess the role of farming in the rural economy and society, advocating for a shift from traditional farming to broader rural, social, and environmental objectives.

FMD as a Watershed Event

  • Described by Woods (2005) as a critical turning point for British farming and its countryside, marked symbolically by devastation such as dead cattle and sheep.

Watchtree Nature Reserve

  • Establishment and Context:

    • Created in 2002 at the site of a former WW2 airfield for the burial of livestock killed during the FMD outbreak.

Other Biosecurity Threats

  • Emerging Concerns:

    • Tuberculosis in cattle debated due to badger culling.

    • Schmallenberg Virus causing congenital malformations in livestock.

    • Bluetongue in sheep and concerns surrounding avian influenza.

    • Ash dieback posing costly challenges for farmers.

Conclusion: From ‘Farming Interest’ to ‘Rural Social Movement’

  • Continuing pressure on the ‘farming’ sector as observed through advocacy from movements like the Oxford ‘Real Farming’ Conference in 2020.

Eclipsed Single ‘Farming Interest’

  • Material and Ideological Aspects:

    • Materially eclipsed due to loss of income and price drops of agricultural goods.

    • Recent challenges include the juxtaposition of the NFU’s influence diminished amidst policy changes and emerging alternatives.

Ideological Eclipsing Factors

  • Challenges Within the NFU:

    • The transition and restructuring of farming authorities (MAFF to DEFRA) reduced NFU’s dominance.

    • Increased influence from alternative rural stakeholders and recognition of changing rural economies affected NFU’s role in agricultural policy.

    • Global markets & trade

‘Good Farming’ Undermined

  • Definition and Challenges:

    • ‘Good farming’ defined by cultural practices and maintaining traditional rural aesthetics is increasingly threatened by:

    • Environmental land-use policies and biosecurity protocols, leading to loss of cultural identity without adequate compensation.

      • E.g. hard to balance new disease control rules with traditional cattle purchasing practices (Enticott & Little 2022)

More-than-Agriculture

  • Conceptual Expansion of Rural Crises:

    • Rural crises stretching beyond agricultural discourse towards broader political engagement, described as moving from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ by Woods (2005).

    • From politics located in rural space to struggles over rural meaning (representation) & regulation

    • Beyond party politics

Emerging Rural Social Movement

  • Rural as Engagement Sites:

    • Highlighting emerging social movements which challenge predominant narratives and politics.

    • Calls for retaining the diversity of rural voices, emphasizing their struggles over place representation and control.


robot
knowt logo

L12- Politics Of Farming

The Politics of Farming: Corporatism Undermined

  • Introduction: changing politics

  • Sections Covered:

    • The National Farmers’ Union & corporatism

    • Biosecurity crises

    • Conclusion: from ‘farming interest’ to ‘rural social movement’?

Introduction: Changing Rural Politics

  • Understanding Required:

    • Post-war political consensus was prevalent.

    • Breakdown of this consensus began in the 1970s.

    • Subsequent impacts included animal health crises.

    • Transition from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ (Woods 2005) reflects changing power dynamics in rural Britain.

Scott Report (1942) Legacy

  • Farmers viewed as ‘natural stewards of the countryside’.

  • Influences on Legislation:

    • Agriculture Act 1947 and its implications.

    • Farming largely overlooked in the National Parks Act 1949.

  • Planners perpetuated ‘agricultural exceptionalism’.

  • Reinforcement of the ‘sturdy yeoman farmer’ stereotype, tied to English national myths and representations in popular culture.

  • Increasing challenges to these stereotypes.

The National Farmers’ Union & Corporatism

  • NFU Overview:

    • Founded in 1908 during an agricultural depression.

    • Approximately 47,000 members (2023), covering around 2/3 of agricultural land.

    • Peak membership: 80% full-time farmers.

    • NFU is a powerful and effective trade union.

NFU Characteristics

  • Key Characteristics (from NFU website):

    • Champions British farming.

    • Largest farming organisation in the UK.

    • Provides professional representation and services to members.

    • Acts as a strong, independent voice.

    • Regional offices in Stoneleigh Park, London, Brussels, Wales, and other English regions.

    • Funded by member subscriptions and non-affiliated to political parties.

Corporatism

  • Definition: A ‘working partnership’ aimed at mutual benefit based on the Scandinavian model.

  • To be seen as corporatist, NFU must be:

    • Prominent

    • Self-regulatory

    • Cooperative

Corporatist Development of NFU

  • Active participation during 1939-45 amidst significant state intervention.

  • Following the 1947 Act, NFU became the official representative of British farming.

  • Continuous engagement with the state through:

    • Lobbying Parliament

    • Developing contacts

    • Volunteering for rural working groups

    • British Agriculture Bureau representing NFU post-Brexit.

Corporatism Undermined: Internal Strains

  • Representative Challenges:

    • Strengthened via decentralized branches, yet threatened by dissent.

    • Example: Farmers’ Union of Wales established in 1955 catering to small farmers.

    • Less corporatist attitude—more vociferous in advocating policies to protect Welsh agriculture.

Tensions Within NFU

  • Internal divisions characterized by conflict between:

    • ‘Corn’ (large-scale farmers) vs. ‘horn’ (smaller farmers).

    • Various specialist groups: tenant farmers, sheep, pigs, organic farming.

    • Rise of Farmers for Action (2000) and alternatives like the Small Farms Association and Land Workers’ Alliance.

Corporatism Undermined: External Pressures

  • Emerging Pressures:

    • Activation of external pressure groups: environmentalists, animal welfare advocates, consumer rights groups, anti-meat campaigns.

    • Increased bureaucratic controls, weakening of focus on ‘farming’.

    • Growing concerns over agricultural support costs and influences of food producers & supermarkets.

    • Shift in political dynamics including urbanisation of the Conservative Party contributing to agriculture's re-politicisation.

Biosecurity Crises

  • Pollution Regulation Context:

    • Pre-1980s view of pollution as non-rural.

    • The 1986 report on the River Torridge highlighted declining salmon catches tied to intensified dairying activity.

1980s Discovery of Farm Pollution

  • Major Contributors to Pollution Acknowledgment:

    • National Rivers Authority (1989-96)

    • Environmental critics e.g. Body (1983).

    • Assistance from groups like Friends of the Earth and perspectives of counter-urbanising middle-class residents.

    • Efforts evident in the establishment of the Environment Agency (1996).

Farmers’ Threatened Status

  • Farmers increasingly felt threatened by:

    • New neighboring residents.

    • Negative media coverage.

    • Campaigns aimed at environmental practices and new regulatory demands leading to court convictions.

BSE (1986-2000)

  • Overview of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy:

    • Neuro-degenerative disease resembling scrapie and CJD in humans.

    • Identified in 1986, impacting 1/3 of British herds and requiring 4.5 million cattle to be slaughtered.

Tracking the BSE Crisis

  • Key Events in BSE Timeline:

  • June 1988: BSE made notifiable disease

    • July 1988: ban on ruminant protein (sheep) in cattle feed

    • August 1988: compulsory slaughter of BSE suspects, 50% compensation

    • February 1990: full compensation for slaughtered BSE suspects

    • April 1990: Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee established

    • March 1996: EU ban all products from British cattle

    • July 1996: cattle ‘passports’ introduced

    • December 1997: ban on sale of beef-on-the-bone in UK

    • March 1998: start of official BSE Inquiry

    • August 1999: beef export ban lifted

    • December 1999: beef-on-the-bone ban lifted; BSE Inquiry ends (cost £25m)

    • October 2000: Inquiry published – criticised; BSE in rest of Europe…

Foot & Mouth Disease (FMD) (2001)

  • Disease Characteristics:

    • Highly infectious but rarely fatal with significant yield impacts.

    • Initially detected in Essex before rapid spread via animal movements.

    • Government's ultra-cautionary approach was controversial.

FMD Incidence Numbers

  • Outbreak Impact:

    • Lasted approximately 2/3 of a year with around 2000 cases, notably in Cumbria, Devon, Dumfries, and North Yorks.

    • Over 6 million cattle, sheep, and pigs slaughtered as a containment measure.

FMD's Economic Reveal

  • The FMD outbreak revealed the rural economy's reliance beyond agriculture.

  • Emphasized the need to reassess the role of farming in the rural economy and society, advocating for a shift from traditional farming to broader rural, social, and environmental objectives.

FMD as a Watershed Event

  • Described by Woods (2005) as a critical turning point for British farming and its countryside, marked symbolically by devastation such as dead cattle and sheep.

Watchtree Nature Reserve

  • Establishment and Context:

    • Created in 2002 at the site of a former WW2 airfield for the burial of livestock killed during the FMD outbreak.

Other Biosecurity Threats

  • Emerging Concerns:

    • Tuberculosis in cattle debated due to badger culling.

    • Schmallenberg Virus causing congenital malformations in livestock.

    • Bluetongue in sheep and concerns surrounding avian influenza.

    • Ash dieback posing costly challenges for farmers.

Conclusion: From ‘Farming Interest’ to ‘Rural Social Movement’

  • Continuing pressure on the ‘farming’ sector as observed through advocacy from movements like the Oxford ‘Real Farming’ Conference in 2020.

Eclipsed Single ‘Farming Interest’

  • Material and Ideological Aspects:

    • Materially eclipsed due to loss of income and price drops of agricultural goods.

    • Recent challenges include the juxtaposition of the NFU’s influence diminished amidst policy changes and emerging alternatives.

Ideological Eclipsing Factors

  • Challenges Within the NFU:

    • The transition and restructuring of farming authorities (MAFF to DEFRA) reduced NFU’s dominance.

    • Increased influence from alternative rural stakeholders and recognition of changing rural economies affected NFU’s role in agricultural policy.

    • Global markets & trade

‘Good Farming’ Undermined

  • Definition and Challenges:

    • ‘Good farming’ defined by cultural practices and maintaining traditional rural aesthetics is increasingly threatened by:

    • Environmental land-use policies and biosecurity protocols, leading to loss of cultural identity without adequate compensation.

      • E.g. hard to balance new disease control rules with traditional cattle purchasing practices (Enticott & Little 2022)

More-than-Agriculture

  • Conceptual Expansion of Rural Crises:

    • Rural crises stretching beyond agricultural discourse towards broader political engagement, described as moving from ‘rural politics’ to ‘politics of the rural’ by Woods (2005).

    • From politics located in rural space to struggles over rural meaning (representation) & regulation

    • Beyond party politics

Emerging Rural Social Movement

  • Rural as Engagement Sites:

    • Highlighting emerging social movements which challenge predominant narratives and politics.

    • Calls for retaining the diversity of rural voices, emphasizing their struggles over place representation and control.