The Federalist No 78 with questions
Written by Alexander Hamilton, dated June 14, 1788.
Discusses the necessity of a federal judiciary as a solution to the defects of the Confederation.
Mode of Appointing Judges
Similar to the appointment of officers of the Union.
Tenure of Judges
Judges hold office during good behavior.
This stability is essential for impartial administration of laws and acts as a barrier to oppression.
Judicial Authority Structure
Examination of how judicial authority is partitioned among courts.
The judiciary is the least dangerous branch of government, unable to affect the sword or purse.
Lacks "force" or "will," and relies on executive aid to enforce judgments.
Insufficient power to attack the other branches of government; seen as the weakest branch.
Critical for protecting Constitutional rights, especially in a limited government.
Independence serves as a safeguard against legislative encroachments.
Courts have the responsibility to declare legislative actions void if they violate the Constitution.
Legislative acts contrary to the Constitution are void; the courts interpret the law to ensure the Constitution's supremacy.
Courts serve as intermediaries between the people and the legislature, ensuring that laws align with constitutional limits.
The authority to decide on the validity of legislative acts is vital to prevent the legislature from overstepping its boundaries.
Courts possess the duty to prioritize the Constitution over conflicting statutes.
Permanent tenure is necessary for judges to avoid influences from legislative whims and popular pressures.
Ensures that judges can uphold individual rights without fear of repercussions from temporary political currents.
The Federalist No. 78 asserts that a judiciary with life tenure during good behavior is fundamental to safeguarding liberty and ensuring the integrity of the Constitution.
Written by Alexander Hamilton, dated June 14, 1788.
Discusses the necessity of a federal judiciary as a solution to the defects of the Confederation.
Mode of Appointing Judges
Similar to the appointment of officers of the Union.
Tenure of Judges
Judges hold office during good behavior.
This stability is essential for impartial administration of laws and acts as a barrier to oppression.
Judicial Authority Structure
Examination of how judicial authority is partitioned among courts.
The judiciary is the least dangerous branch of government, unable to affect the sword or purse.
Lacks "force" or "will," and relies on executive aid to enforce judgments.
Insufficient power to attack the other branches of government; seen as the weakest branch.
Critical for protecting Constitutional rights, especially in a limited government.
Independence serves as a safeguard against legislative encroachments.
Courts have the responsibility to declare legislative actions void if they violate the Constitution.
Legislative acts contrary to the Constitution are void; the courts interpret the law to ensure the Constitution's supremacy.
Courts serve as intermediaries between the people and the legislature, ensuring that laws align with constitutional limits.
The authority to decide on the validity of legislative acts is vital to prevent the legislature from overstepping its boundaries.
Courts possess the duty to prioritize the Constitution over conflicting statutes.
Permanent tenure is necessary for judges to avoid influences from legislative whims and popular pressures.
Ensures that judges can uphold individual rights without fear of repercussions from temporary political currents.
The Federalist No. 78 asserts that a judiciary with life tenure during good behavior is fundamental to safeguarding liberty and ensuring the integrity of the Constitution.