AA

Chapter 9: Savings, Interest Rates, and the Market for Loanable Funds

CHAPTER 9 - SAVINGS, INTEREST RATES, AND THE MARKET FOR LOANABLE FUNDS

  • Context and purpose

    • Chapter 9 introduces how savers supply funds and how borrowers demand funds through the loanable funds market.

    • Banks and financial institutions act as the bridge between savers (lenders) and borrowers (fisw rms/governments).

    • A well-functioning loanable funds market supports investment, production of output/GDP, and overall economic growth.

    • This chapter ties into prior material on savings, investment, and interest rates discussed in Chapters 6, 9, 11, and 12; anticipate a Midterm covering these chapters.

  • Key terms to know

    • Loanable funds market: a market where savers supply funds for loans to borrowers.

    • Suppliers (savers): typically households or foreign entities; save via deposits, bonds, and stocks.

    • Demanders (borrowers): typically firms and governments; borrow to fund investment and production.

    • Banks as the bridge: banks are the intermediary that connects savers and borrowers and earns a profit margin.

    • Price in this market: the interest rate.

  • Why the loanable funds market matters

    • A safe and well-functioning market helps savers earn a predictable return and helps borrowers access funds for investment.

    • When investment is funded, it contributes to GDP and economic growth.

    • The market operates like other markets: price (interest rate) coordinates saving and borrowing.

  • The players and what they do

    • Savers: supply funds for loans (households, foreign entities).

    • Borrowers: demand funds to invest in production (firms, governments).

    • Banks: middlemen/bridge that facilitates saving and lending; ensure liquidity and risk management.

    • Price mechanism: the interest rate acts as the price that coordinates saving and borrowing decisions.

  • The core dynamic

    • If the interest rate is high, saving becomes more attractive, and saving supply tends to rise (incentive to save grows).

    • If the interest rate is high, borrowing becomes more expensive, which reduces borrowing demand.

    • The intersection of the savings supply curve and investment demand curve determines the equilibrium interest rate and the quantity of loanable funds exchanged.

  • Practical takeaway

    • The loanable funds market explains why shifts in saving behavior or investment demand influence interest rates and overall GDP.

    • Understanding shifts helps explain how policy, income changes, or life-cycle dynamics affect saving, investment, and growth.

  • Real-world relevance and links to other ideas

    • Monetary policy and central banks influence the loanable funds market by affecting saving and borrowing conditions (e.g., target interest rates).

    • Time preferences, income/wealth, and consumption smoothing from later sections interrelate with saving decisions and the supply of loanable funds.

  • Quick preview of the framework

    • Supply of loanable funds: determined by savers’ willingness to save given the interest rate.

    • Demand for loanable funds: determined by borrowers’ investment opportunities and expected returns.

    • Equilibrium outcome: price (interest rate) and quantity of loanable funds; changes in either side shift the curves.

  • Mathematical intuition (basic)

    • Let S(r) denote the savings supplied as a function of the interest rate r, and D(r) denote the investment demand as a function of r.

    • Equilibrium: S(r) = D(r) at the equilibrium interest rate r*.

    • A shift in S or D reflects a change in the underlying determinants (income, wealth, time preferences, etc.).

  • Relationship to inflation and the real rate

    • The real rate is the rate after removing expected inflation; the nominal rate is what actually matters for contracts today.

    • Real rate concept reminder: the real rate is what savers/borrowers care about in terms of true purchasing power of funds.

  • Summary connections to other content

    • Real vs nominal rates: how inflation distorts the nominal rate and affects saving/borrowing incentives.

    • Shifts in supply/demand: how income, wealth, time preferences, and consumption-smoothing behavior move the curves, not just movement along them.

    • Life-cycle and education: long-run saving decisions are shaped by lifetime income profiles and expected returns to education.

WHAT IS THE LOANABLE FUNDS MARKET?

  • The loanable funds market is the arena where savers supply funds for loans to borrowers.

  • The market is facilitated by banks and financial institutions (the bridge).

  • The price mechanism is the interest rate, which coordinates saving and borrowing decisions.

THE LOANABLE FUNDS MARKET: PLAYERS AND FLOW

  • Savers: households or foreign entities; save via deposits, bonds, and stocks.

  • Borrowers: firms and governments; borrow to invest and produce output/GDP.

  • Banks: serve as the intermediary (the bridge) between savers and borrowers.

HOW SAVERS AND BORROWERS INTERACT

  • For savers, the interest rate is the return on supplying funds.

    • Example (corrected): If you save $1,000 and the bank offers 5% for one year, you’ll receive $1,050 at year-end.

    • Concept: the higher the rate, the more you are compensated for delaying consumption.

  • For borrowers, the interest rate is the cost of borrowing.

    • Example: If you borrow $100,000 at 6% for one year, the annual interest is $6,000, so you repay $106,000 in total (principal plus interest).

    • Investment condition: borrow and invest only if the expected return exceeds the interest cost, i.e.,

    • ext{Expected Return} > ext{Interest Cost} = 100{,}000 imes 0.06 = 6{,}000.

  • Demand for loans falls when the interest rate rises; saving supply rises when the interest rate rises.

  • Real-world intuition: higher rates discourage borrowings and encourage savings; lower rates encourage borrowing and discourage saving.

REAL VS NOMINAL RATES

  • Definition: The real rate is the return after adjusting for inflation; the nominal rate is the rate observed in the market.

  • Relationship: r{ ext{nominal}} = r{ ext{real}} + ext{inflation}( ext{expected})

  • Significance: Savers and borrowers care about the real rate because it reflects the true purchasing power of funds.

INTEREST RATES AND INFLATION (historical perspective)

  • The gap between real and nominal rates reflects inflation expectations.

  • The historical pattern: nominal rates tend to be higher when inflation is high (e.g., 1970s).

  • Visual reference: a graph tracking nominal vs. real rates from 1970–2020 shows inflation driving nominal rate levels.

SHIFT IN SUPPLY AND DEMAND: REVIEW

  • Movement along the curve vs. shift of the curve

    • Moving along the curve: a change in the quantity supplied or demanded due to a change in the current interest rate, holding other factors constant.

    • Shifting the curve: a change in the entire curve due to a non-price factor (income, wealth, time preferences, etc.).

  • Conceptual panel takeaways (summary of what shifts do):

    • Increase in demand → higher price and higher quantity in equilibrium.

    • Increase in supply → lower price and higher quantity in equilibrium.

    • Decrease in demand → lower price and lower quantity in equilibrium.

    • Decrease in supply → higher price and lower quantity in equilibrium.

FACTORS SHIFTING SUPPLY OF LOANABLE FUNDS

  • Three key factors:

    • Income and Wealth

    • Time Preferences

    • Consumption Smoothing

SHIFT IN SUPPLY: INCOME AND WEALTH

  • If income and wealth rise, households save more (increased incentives to save).

  • Foreign savings also rise as residents save more or invest abroad.

  • Effect: S increases; the supply curve shifts to the right.

  • Intuition: higher income/wealth makes saving more affordable and attractive, increasing the pool of loanable funds.

SHIFT IN SUPPLY: TIME PREFERENCES

  • Time preference: preference for receiving goods sooner rather than later.

  • Strong time preference: less patient, save less; weaker (lower) time preference: more patient, save more.

  • Effect: Higher time preference decreases supply of loanable funds (curve shifts left).

  • Example: people with strong time preference may opt for immediate consumption rather than investing in education (returns realized years later).

IT TAKES MORE TO GET MORE: EDUCATION AND EARNINGS

  • Pattern: education generally pays off in higher lifetime earnings.

  • Median annual salaries by education (2018):

    • Less than high school diploma: $
      $42{,}900

    • High school graduates, no college: $
      $37{,}752

    • Some college or associate degree: $
      $28{,}808

    • Bachelor’s degree only: $
      $61{,}724

    • Advanced degree: $
      $78{,}624

  • Note: Higher education levels correspond to higher earnings, illustrating why midlife earnings support greater saving and thus a larger supply of loanable funds.

  • Possible data formatting issue in the slide (the first three figures appear counterintuitive, but the overall point remains: higher education yields higher earnings).

SHIFT IN SUPPLY: CONSUMPTION SMOOTHING (LIFE-CYCLE MOTIVATION)

  • Across a typical lifetime, income fluctuates: relatively low early in life, rising in prime years, falling near retirement.

  • People prefer to smooth consumption over their lifetime (consumption today vs. in the future).

  • How it works in the loanable funds market:

    • Borrow early in life (e.g., education, first home) to bridge low income.

    • Save during midlife when income is highest.

    • Dissave in retirement, drawing down savings.

  • This pattern contributes to the supply of loanable funds, especially in midlife when saving is highest.

SAVINGS AND THE LIFE CYCLE (visual intuition)

  • A typical life-cycle profile shows: income and consumption paths, with borrowing in youth, saving in middle age, and dissaving in retirement.

  • Implication for the loanable funds market: supplying funds is typically strongest in midlife, shifting the supply curve to the right as more people are in their prime earning years.

SHIFT IN SUPPLY: CONSUMPTION SMOOTHING (RECAP)

  • Recap of key directions and explanations:

    • Income and wealth increases → supply of loanable funds increases.

    • Higher or more widespread midlife population → more saving → supply shifts right.

    • Time preferences: lower patience (higher time preference) reduces saving; higher patience increases saving.

    • Consumption smoothing over the life cycle reinforces saving in midlife and dissaving later.

SHIFTS IN SUPPLY: RECAP TABLE

  • Factor: Income and wealth

    • Direction: Increases supply; shifts right.

    • Explanation: Higher income/wealth makes saving easier and more attractive.

  • Factor: Time preferences

    • Direction: Higher time preference decreases supply; shifts left. Lower time preference increases supply; shifts right.

    • Explanation: Greater patience leads to more saving for the future.

  • Factor: In midlife population/prime earning years

    • Direction: Increases supply; shifts right.

    • Explanation: More people in the prime earning years save more.

  • Factor: Consumption smoothing (life-cycle)

    • Direction: Overall effect is to smooth consumption across the life cycle; typically supports a rightward shift in midlife.

WHY DID AMERICAN SAVINGS SPIKE IN 2020?

  • Observation: The U.S. personal savings rate spiked during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Why it happened: Pandemic-related store closures and uncertainty reduced spending; households saved more instead of spending.

  • Aftermath: Savings rates declined somewhat as the economy reopened, but remained relatively high relative to pre-pandemic levels.

  • Data source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

  • Simple takeaway: Uncertainty, income support, and reduced opportunities to spend temporarily increased saving, shifting the supply of loanable funds to the right.

  • Quick refresher: key formulas and relationships

    • Real vs nominal rate relationship: r{ ext{nominal}} = r{ ext{real}} + ext{inflation}

    • Investment condition for borrowers: invest if ext{Expected Return} > ext{Interest Cost} = P imes r, e.g., for P=100{,}000 and r=0.06, interest is 100{,}000 imes 0.06 = 6{,}000.

    • Equilibrium condition (conceptual): S(r^) = D(r^) where S is the saving supply and D is investment demand.

  • Connections to broader topics

    • The loanable funds framework links saving behavior, investment opportunities, and macroeconomic outcomes like GDP growth and inflation dynamics.

    • The determinants of saving (income/wealth, time preferences, life-cycle consumption smoothing) tie into topics on consumer behavior and fiscal/monetary policy.

  • Key takeaways for the exam

    • Know who saves, who borrows, and how banks facilitate the market.

    • Understand the difference between shifts vs movements along the curves and the determinants of each.

    • Be able to explain why higher income/wealth and longer time horizons typically increase saving.

    • Be able to relate real vs nominal rates to inflation and to interpret simple examples of borrowing and saving.

    • Recognize real-world patterns, such as why savings spikes can occur during periods of uncertainty or policy changes.