JT

PHIL2001 Bioethics Notes - Reproductive Technologies and Parental Choice

Reproductive Technologies and Parental Choice

Overview of Ethical Framework

  • Key Authors:

  • Savulescu, Julian and Guy Kahane (2009) - The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life, Bioethics.

  • Barker, Matthew J. & Robert A. Wilson (2019) - Well-Being, Disability, & Choosing Children, Mind.

  • Primary Theme: The moral implications behind choosing embryos based on predicted life quality.

  • Reading Prompts:

  • Procreative beneficence requires disability: True or false?

  • Barker and Wilson’s skepticism regarding appeals to well-being.

Background on Parents' Responsibilities

  • Parents strive to ensure:

  • Protection

  • Safety

  • Nurturance (Good nutrition, education)

  • Use of Reproductive Technologies:

  • Influence traits in children (e.g., through IVF).

  • Ethical considerations surrounding selection of traits.

Selective Implantation Thought Experiment

  • Scenario: Choose between two embryos:

  • One with a genetic profile predicting disability.

  • One without disability predictions.

  • Moral Question: Which embryo to implant?

Structure of Barker and Wilson (2019)

  • Disability-Free Intuition:

  • Preference for procreating disability-free children.

  • Argument Construction:

  • Links disability and well-being through Procreative Beneficence.

  • Version A: Moderate Disability Principle (MDP).

  • Version B: Bold Disability Principle (BDP).

  • Critical Views:

  • Challenges on subjective vs. objective well-being.

  • Competing moral reasons against versions A and B.

Savulescu & Kahane on Procreative Beneficence

  • Moral Imperative:

  • If selecting a child, it should be one expected to have the best life.

  • Consensus on traits that improve life quality.

Barker and Wilson’s Scrutiny of Welfarism

  • Welfarism Defined:

  • Disabilities seen as states reducing well-being.

  • Empirical question regarding recognized disabilities.

  • Disability-Free Procreation Principle:

  • If disabilities reduce well-being, parents should select embryos resistant to these disabilities.

Argument Structure Analysis

  • Simple Argument Form: (Modus Ponens)

  1. If disabilities reduce well-being, parents have reasons against creating a child with disabilities.

  2. Disabilities reduce well-being (Conceptualization issues).

  3. Conclusion: Significant moral reasons against selecting children with disabilities.

Ambiguities in the Argument

  • Reduction of well-being needs precise definition (substantial vs. trivial).

  • The implications of perceived reductions in well-being are under scrutiny.

Comparing Argument Versions

  • Version A (MDP) vs. Version B (BDP):

  • A claims significant reduction in well-being from disabilities, while B requires any reduction to warrant moral consideration.

  • Empirical Support for A:

  • Self-reports indicate individuals with disabilities report a higher quality of life than assumed by non-disabled perspectives.

  • Critiques of A stem from the claim that not all disabilities lead to substantial reductions in life quality.

Subjective vs. Objective Well-Being

  • Objective Well-Being (OW) has criteria independent of how individuals perceive their well-being.

  • Dependent OW: Goods that enhance SW.

  • Independent OW: Goods valued for their own sake.

  • Issues arise from epistemic challenges related to understanding the relationship between OW and SW.

Epistemic Injustice in Bioethics

  • Discussion on the lack of representation of disabled individuals in philosophical discourse.

  • Philosophical Hubris: Underestimating the experiences and perspectives of disabled individuals.

  • Types of Epistemic Injustice:

  • Testimonial: Who is acknowledged as knowledgeable?

  • Hermeneutical: How do we understand and evaluate moral significance?

Conclusion and Future Examinations

  • Ethical implications of reproductive choices tied to perceptions of disability and well-being.

  • Upcoming discussions on Transhumanist values and well-being in the health context, emphasizing the need for inclusive philosophical ethics.

general principal whether to accept it

he has reservations

what do you need to add to it

2 different versions to the argument

show each of those arguments have a different premise that is harder to defend

what is the “secret for people watching