Organizational Structure
Organization: formal term
Ancient Chinese; thousands of years ago they do civil-servant exam
a theory developed in the 20th century that described the form and structure of organizations
each level of management has subordinates
a theory developed in the 1950s (Hawthorne studies) that described psychological or behavioral issues associated with organizations
new understanding; not really a theory
a theory developed in the 1970s that described organizations in terms of interdependent components that form a system
organization as a system
Functional Principle
the concept that organizations should be divided into units that perform similar functions
work is broken down to provide clear areas of specialization
work activities are often organized into departments
accounts for the grouping of work functions into such units as production, sales, engineering, finance, and so on
horizontal growth of the organization
Scalar Principle
the concept that organization are structed by a chain of command that grows with increasing levels of authority
deals with the organization’s vertical growth
each level has its own degree of authority and responsibility for meeting organizational goals, with higher levels having more responsibility
Unity of Command: the concept that each subordinate should be accountable to only 1 supervisor
Line/Staff Principle
the concept of differentiating organizational work into line and staff functions
Line and Staff Functions: life and blood of business
Line Functions: have the primary responsibility for meeting the major goals of the organization (e.g. production department)
support functions support the line’s activities but are regarded as subsidiary in overall importance to line functions (e.g., personnel and quality control)
Span of Control Principle
the concept that refers to the number of subordinates a manager is responsible for supervising
a “small” span of control is 2 subordinates; a “large” span of control might be 15
large spans of control produce flat organizations (that is, few levels between the top and bottom of the organization)
small spans of control produce tall organizations (that is, many levels)
primarily based on either psychological research or an examination of real-life organizational problems, that is, it recognized the importance of psychological and behavioral issues
Division of Labor: depersonalizes work activities so that the individual finds little meaning in them; results to a sense of alienation from highly repetitive work, which ultimately results in dissatisfaction with their work
specialization
reducing people to machines
argued for less rigid division of labor and far more “humanistic” work in which people derive a sense of value and meaning from their jobs
Objection to Scalar Principle: Individuals are influence by interpersonal activities that extend well beyond those prescribed by the formal organizational structure
possible to have possible bosses
Objection to Line/Staff Principle: Black-and-white theoretical distinction between line and staff functions is not always so clear in practice; many staff functions are critical to the success of the organization
Objection to Span of Control: More complex than picking a number; depends on such issues as the supervisor’s managerial ability and the intensity of the needed supervision
What if routine work?
With origins in the biological sciences, it views organizations as any other form of living organism with a series of interlocking systems
All parts affect other parts. Every action has repercussions throughout the organization because all of its elements are linked
Interdependence: All of the other parts and their interrelatedness make up the “system”
The purpose of an organization is to reach stability, to grow, and to adapt, as all living organisms must do to survive
Individuals bring their own personalities, abilities, and attitudes with them to the organization, which influence what they hope to attain by participating in the system.
Individuals are complicated, everyone is different from each other.
The formal organization is the interrelated pattern of jobs that provides the structure of the system.
Individuals do not work in isolation but become members of small groups as a way to facilitate their own adaptability within the system
Small Groups: idea of interdependence
Status and role differences exist among jobs within an organization and define the behavior of individuals within the system.
higher role = higher status
This is the external physical environment and the degree of technology that characterizes the organization.
division of labor and patterns of coordination, communication, workflow, and formal power that direct organizational activities
Structure: the arrangement of work functions within an organization designed to achieve efficiency and control
Division of Labor
subdividing work into separate jobs assigned to different people
limited by ability to coordinate work
potentially increases work efficiency
necessary as company grows and work becomes more complex
Organization: formal term
Ancient Chinese; thousands of years ago they do civil-servant exam
a theory developed in the 20th century that described the form and structure of organizations
each level of management has subordinates
a theory developed in the 1950s (Hawthorne studies) that described psychological or behavioral issues associated with organizations
new understanding; not really a theory
a theory developed in the 1970s that described organizations in terms of interdependent components that form a system
organization as a system
Functional Principle
the concept that organizations should be divided into units that perform similar functions
work is broken down to provide clear areas of specialization
work activities are often organized into departments
accounts for the grouping of work functions into such units as production, sales, engineering, finance, and so on
horizontal growth of the organization
Scalar Principle
the concept that organization are structed by a chain of command that grows with increasing levels of authority
deals with the organization’s vertical growth
each level has its own degree of authority and responsibility for meeting organizational goals, with higher levels having more responsibility
Unity of Command: the concept that each subordinate should be accountable to only 1 supervisor
Line/Staff Principle
the concept of differentiating organizational work into line and staff functions
Line and Staff Functions: life and blood of business
Line Functions: have the primary responsibility for meeting the major goals of the organization (e.g. production department)
support functions support the line’s activities but are regarded as subsidiary in overall importance to line functions (e.g., personnel and quality control)
Span of Control Principle
the concept that refers to the number of subordinates a manager is responsible for supervising
a “small” span of control is 2 subordinates; a “large” span of control might be 15
large spans of control produce flat organizations (that is, few levels between the top and bottom of the organization)
small spans of control produce tall organizations (that is, many levels)
primarily based on either psychological research or an examination of real-life organizational problems, that is, it recognized the importance of psychological and behavioral issues
Division of Labor: depersonalizes work activities so that the individual finds little meaning in them; results to a sense of alienation from highly repetitive work, which ultimately results in dissatisfaction with their work
specialization
reducing people to machines
argued for less rigid division of labor and far more “humanistic” work in which people derive a sense of value and meaning from their jobs
Objection to Scalar Principle: Individuals are influence by interpersonal activities that extend well beyond those prescribed by the formal organizational structure
possible to have possible bosses
Objection to Line/Staff Principle: Black-and-white theoretical distinction between line and staff functions is not always so clear in practice; many staff functions are critical to the success of the organization
Objection to Span of Control: More complex than picking a number; depends on such issues as the supervisor’s managerial ability and the intensity of the needed supervision
What if routine work?
With origins in the biological sciences, it views organizations as any other form of living organism with a series of interlocking systems
All parts affect other parts. Every action has repercussions throughout the organization because all of its elements are linked
Interdependence: All of the other parts and their interrelatedness make up the “system”
The purpose of an organization is to reach stability, to grow, and to adapt, as all living organisms must do to survive
Individuals bring their own personalities, abilities, and attitudes with them to the organization, which influence what they hope to attain by participating in the system.
Individuals are complicated, everyone is different from each other.
The formal organization is the interrelated pattern of jobs that provides the structure of the system.
Individuals do not work in isolation but become members of small groups as a way to facilitate their own adaptability within the system
Small Groups: idea of interdependence
Status and role differences exist among jobs within an organization and define the behavior of individuals within the system.
higher role = higher status
This is the external physical environment and the degree of technology that characterizes the organization.
division of labor and patterns of coordination, communication, workflow, and formal power that direct organizational activities
Structure: the arrangement of work functions within an organization designed to achieve efficiency and control
Division of Labor
subdividing work into separate jobs assigned to different people
limited by ability to coordinate work
potentially increases work efficiency
necessary as company grows and work becomes more complex