Distinct concepts (often conflated):
Civil Liberties
Limitations on government power designed to protect individual freedoms.
Civil Rights
Constitutional guarantees that government will treat people equally, regardless of protected-class status (race, gender, ethnicity, religion, etc.).
Pandemic example (Capitol Hill Baptist Church v. Bowser, 2020): collision between religious liberty and public-health regulation—outcome allowed outdoor worship services.
Bill of Rights (1789 proposal; 1791 ratification)—primary repository of civil-liberty protections.
Ratification debate: promise of amendments was essential to winning state approval of the Constitution.
Article I, § 9 prohibitions:
\textbf{Bills of attainder} – legislative punishments without trial.
\textbf{Ex post facto laws} – retroactive criminalization.
\textbf{Suspension of habeas corpus} – forbidden except in rebellion/invasion; writ requires judicial review of detention.
Historical precedent: Ex parte Quirin (1942) upheld military commission trials for unlawful enemy combatants.
Pre-Civil War: Bill of Rights constrained only the federal government.
Post-Fourteenth Amendment (1868): Supreme Court used the amendment’s Due Process Clause to incorporate most Bill-of-Rights guarantees against state action (selective, clause-by-clause).
Key figure: Representative John Bingham, principal author of the Fourteenth Amendment.
First Amendment – religion, speech, press, assembly, petition.
Second – right to keep & bear arms.
Third – no quartering of soldiers.
Fourth – protection from unreasonable search & seizure.
Fifth – grand-jury indictment, double jeopardy bar, self-incrimination protection, due process, just compensation (takings).
Sixth – fair-trial rights (speedy, public, impartial jury, counsel, confrontation, compulsory process, notice).
Seventh – jury trial in civil suits.
Eighth – no excessive bail/fines; no cruel & unusual punishment.
Ninth – unenumerated rights retained by the people.
Tenth – powers not delegated to U.S. or denied to states are reserved to states/people.
Individual Freedoms: First, Second, Third Amendments.
Procedural Protections (Criminal & Civil): Fourth through Eighth Amendments.
Residual / Structural: Ninth & Tenth Amendments.
Establishment Clause: no state religion, no preference among faiths.
Free Exercise Clause: government may not prohibit or unduly burden religious practices.
Example: Oregon bakery & Masterpiece Cakeshop—tension between free exercise and anti-discrimination laws.
Free Speech Clause: protects verbal, written, and symbolic speech.
Allows even offensive or hateful expression; but permits regulation of true threats or incitement.
Symbolic speech cases: flag burning (protected), cross burning with intent to intimidate (may be banned).
Free Press Clause: bars prior restraints & censorship of news/opinion.
Free Assembly Clause: protects peaceful gatherings & protests.
Right to Petition Clause: ensures ability to seek redress—letters, lobbying, lawsuits.
Overlapping concept Freedom of Expression combines speech, press, assembly, petition rights.
Illustrative imagery: U.S. currency motto “In God We Trust,” Ten Commandments monuments—ongoing Establishment-Clause debates.
Text: “A well regulated Militia… the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Little controversy until post-Civil War “Black Codes” restricted freedmen’s arms.
1930s: first federal gun controls (e.g., National Firearms Act).
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008): Court recognized individual right to possess firearms for lawful purposes (self-defense at home).
McDonald v. Chicago (2010): incorporated the individual right against the states via Fourteenth Amendment.
Right remains subject to regulation (e.g., public-park “No Firearms” signs).
Forbids quartering soldiers without consent in peacetime (and limits in wartime).
Response to British Quartering Acts experienced by colonists.
Not yet incorporated; rarely litigated.
Requires probable cause and specific warrants.
Gray areas: car searches, cell-phone data, digital privacy.
Warrantless search exceptions:
Consent.
Exigent circumstances (risk of evidence destruction).
Items in plain view.
“No-knock” warrants controversial; example: police shooting of Breonna Taylor spurred reform efforts.
Grand-jury indictment for felonies.
Double jeopardy bar (criminal only; civil still possible).
Self-incrimination safeguard; Miranda v. Arizona (1966) requires warnings during custodial interrogation.
Due Process Clause – procedural & substantive fairness.
Takings Clause: private property cannot be taken for public use without “just compensation.”
Tools such as civil forfeiture criticized for undermining this guarantee.
Speedy, public trial by impartial, vicinage jury.
Notice of charges.
Confrontation & cross-examination of witnesses.
Compulsory process to obtain favorable testimony.
Right to counsel; Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) established state obligation to provide attorneys for indigent defendants—originated with Clarence Gideon’s handwritten cert petition.
Seventh: jury trial preserved in federal civil cases >\$20 (historical threshold).
Eighth: prohibits
Excessive bail/fines.
Cruel & unusual punishment.
Capital punishment debate: United States maintains death penalty; Amnesty International data (2007-2019) show U.S. 12^{\text{th}} highest per-capita execution rate.
Sample figures (average annual executions): 399.2 Iran, 112.5 Saudi Arabia, 35.0 United States, etc.
Text cautions that listing rights should not deny others “retained by the people.”
Competing views:
Source of natural/common-law rights.
Merely interpretive “rule of construction.”
Reserves non-delegated powers to states/people.
Modern Court treats as reiteration of enumerated-powers doctrine, but occasionally invoked to limit federal overreach.
Not explicit in Constitution, but inferred from: Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth (due process & takings), Ninth Amendments.
Recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) (contraceptive use by married couples).
Privacy jurisprudence underlies abortion, intimate association, and surveillance cases.
Contemporary issues:
Anti-solicitation signs after Pruneyard decision balancing speech & property rights.
Abortion protests & clinic “buffer zones.”
Technology & tracking: electronic toll systems (E-ZPass, FasTrak) raise movement-monitoring concerns.
Tension between individual liberty and collective security (e.g., pandemic restrictions, national security prosecutions).
Ongoing debate over scope of religious freedom vs. anti-discrimination protections.
Gun-rights discourse pits self-defense and tyranny-prevention rationales against public-safety arguments.
Search-and-seizure disputes focus on balancing effective policing with privacy and racial-equity considerations.
Death-penalty litigation raises moral questions of retribution, deterrence, and wrongful conviction risk.
Federalism: Tenth Amendment interacts with Commerce Clause limits (see preceding chapters).
Judicial Review: incorporation & privacy rights illustrate Supreme Court’s role in rights expansion.
Civil-Rights Movement: First Amendment protections enabled demonstrations like 1963 March on Washington (photo of Sidney Poitier, Harry Belafonte, Charlton Heston).
War-powers & national security: Ex parte Quirin parallels to modern military commissions at Guantanamo Bay.
Civil Liberties vs. Civil Rights
Distinction
Civil liberties: Government cannot act; they are negative restraints that safeguard individual freedoms (speech, worship, press, assembly, petition).
Civil rights: Government must act; they are positive guarantees of equal treatment for everyone, especially members of protected classes (race, gender, ethnicity, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, etc.).
Foundational implication
Civil liberties flow largely from the Bill of Rights and the Due Process Clauses (Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments).
Civil rights flow primarily from the Equal Protection Clause and subsequent statutes.
Text: “No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (Fourteenth Amendment, 1868).
Judicial gloss
Supreme Court shorthand: “All persons similarly circumstanced shall be treated alike.”
Practical restatement: “Similarly situated individuals are treated similarly.”
Principles grounded in equality, fairness, and non-discrimination, yet not absolute—some discrimination allowed if constitutional tests are met (e.g., age restrictions on alcohol).
Discrimination: Unjust/prejudicial treatment of categories of people, esp. by race, age, sex.
Two analytic prongs the courts examine:
Discriminatory impact/effect – facially neutral law produces unequal outcomes.
Discriminatory purpose/intent – law enacted because of the unequal treatment it produces.
Example of lawful discrimination: age-based alcohol purchase limit (21+). Example of unlawful: race-exclusive hiring.
Rational Basis Test (default)
Government action must be rationally related to a legitimate goal.
Burden: Challenger must prove no rational link.
Intermediate Scrutiny (gender/sex, legitimacy of birth, some immigration status)
Action must be substantially related to an important objective.
Burden: Government.
Strict Scrutiny (race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, fundamental rights)
Action must serve a compelling interest, be narrowly tailored, and use the least restrictive means.
Nearly always fatal to the challenged law.
Definition: Policies/programs intended to remedy historical discrimination and expand opportunities (education, employment) for marginalized groups.
Legal tightrope: Allowed if it meets strict or intermediate scrutiny (depending on category) and uses race/sex as a plus factor, not a quota (e.g., Regents v. Bakke, Grutter v. Bollinger).
Ethical debate: Equity vs. color-blind meritocracy, remedy vs. reverse discrimination.
Thirteenth Amendment (1865)
Abolishes slavery and involuntary servitude except as criminal punishment.
Fourteenth Amendment (1868)
Birthright citizenship, Privileges or Immunities, Due Process (extends to states), Equal Protection.
Implies a right to travel among states.
Fifteenth Amendment (1870 – not explicitly in slides but context)
Prohibits race-based voting denial.
Historical goal: Prevent “black codes” and secure newly freed peoples’ liberties.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): Upholds “separate but equal,” enabling Jim Crow laws.
Techniques to suppress Black vote:
Literacy tests & understanding tests (with grandfather-clause loopholes for illiterate Whites).
Poll taxes (receipt in Figure 5.6 shows 1 tax in 1917 Jefferson Parish, LA).
White-only primaries.
Result: Widespread disenfranchisement until mid-20th-century reforms.
De jure segregation: Mandated by law (e.g., separate schools, public facilities).
De facto segregation: Result of private decisions (housing patterns, economic factors).
Even under the Plessy “separate but equal” doctrine, facilities were overwhelmingly unequal (resource disparities favored Whites).
Iconic visuals
Burning of Freedmen’s school (Figure 5.3) demonstrates violent resistance.
Little Rock Nine (Figure 5.7): 1957 federal troops enforce integration.
Post-WWII direct action: Bus boycotts, sit-ins, Freedom Rides, voter-registration drives.
Confrontations
“Bloody Sunday” on Edmund Pettus Bridge, Selma (1965) – televised brutality galvanized support.
Court breakthrough: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) overturns Plessy in education; declares segregation inherently unequal. Implementation met with “massive resistance” for decades.
Legislative landmarks
Civil Rights Act of 1964
• Bans discrimination in public accommodations, employment (creates EEOC), and unequal voting requirements.
• Constitutional hook: Congress’s Commerce Clause power, not solely Fourteenth Amendment.
Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Figure 5.1 signing)
• Suspends literacy tests, installs federal examiners, requires pre-clearance for jurisdictions with histories of discrimination.
Civil Rights Movement catalyzed subsequent pushes for equality:
Women’s liberation, American Indian Movement, Chicano/Latino activism, Asian-American redress, LGBTQIA+ rights.
Demonstrated strategic spectrum: Non-violent civil disobedience (MLK) vs. separatist/self-defense rhetoric (Malcolm X) (Figure 5.9).
Contemporary backlash: White supremacist resurgence (Charlottesville “Unite the Right,” 2017; Figure 5.10).
Early advocates: Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott (Figures 5.11 & 5.12) emerge from abolitionist circles.
Milestones
Western territories grant partial suffrage in late 1800s.
Nineteenth Amendment (1920): Prohibits sex-based voting denial; still limited by racial disenfranchisement until 1960s.
Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)
Proposed 1923, passed Congress 1972, required 38 states; deadline lapsed 1982 though Virginia ratified in 2020 (map Figure 5.14).
Second-wave feminism (1960s–1980s): Focus on workplace equality, reproductive rights, credit/property, Title IX, combatting sexual harassment.
Removal & Sovereignty Loss
Trail of Tears (1831–1838) (Figure 5.16 maps forced marches).
Citizenship progression
Indian Citizenship Act 1924 grants citizenship to Native Americans born after enactment; Nationality Act 1940 covers remaining.
Rights on reservations
Courts treat reservations as “quasi-sovereign”; Bill of Rights not automatically applied.
Indian Civil Rights Act 1968 extends many rights inside reservations.
Activism
AIM occupation of Wounded Knee (1973) – 71-day standoff; two deaths, 15 injuries (Figure 5.17).
Asian-American exclusion
Naturalization barred until 1943 for Chinese; broader restrictions loosened post-WWII.
WWII Japanese internment (Figure 5.20); redress movement leads to Civil Liberties Act 1988 (not in slides but relevant link).
Latino/Chicano activism
Focus: Farmworker rights (César Chávez, Dolores Huerta), bilingual education, end to segregation (e.g., Mendez v. Westminster, 1947), immigration reform.
Immigrant rights demands: Anti-trafficking, due process in deportations, Deferred Action (DACA) for undocumented youth.
Early criminalization: All 50 states outlaw same-sex acts pre-1960s; laws also target gender-nonconforming dress.
Movement spark: Stonewall riots (1969) though not named in slides.
Legal milestones
Lawrence v. Texas (2003) invalidates remaining sodomy laws under Fourteenth Amendment privacy and liberty.
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) mandates nationwide marriage equality (Figure 5.21 celebration).
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) (referenced): Title VII bars employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Continuing issues: Transgender healthcare access, military service, bathroom & sports participation, hate-crime protections.
Intersectionality: Many individuals belong to multiple marginalized identities; discrimination can be compounded.
Federalism tension: State autonomy vs. national enforcement (e.g., federal troops in Little Rock; pre-clearance under VRA).
Commerce Clause as civil-rights engine: Used when Fourteenth Amendment limits reach of Congress over private actors (e.g., CRA 1964 on businesses).
Scrutiny tiers as gatekeepers: Litigation strategy often hinges on framing classification into strict or intermediate scrutiny.
Backlash dynamics: Each advance (Reconstruction, Civil Rights, Marriage Equality) triggers counter-mobilization (Jim Crow, Massive Resistance, religious-freedom bills).
Moral arc narrative: Figures of emancipation (Lincoln – Figure 5.4), civil-rights icons (King, Lewis), and protesters illustrate the long struggle bending toward justice but requiring vigilance.