Philosophical issues and concepts serve as the foundation for the study of psychology.
Be able to define the history of psychology and its existence.
Identify various approaches to writing the history of psychology.
Examine reasons for studying the history of psychology.
Definition: The history of psychology involves the study of how historical perspectives shaped the discipline.
Understanding its origins helps clarify the principles that govern the field.
Ancient man utilized witch doctors and traditional medicine men to interpret dreams, mental illness, and emotions.
Greek Philosophers: Theories revolved around cognitive processes.
Psychology became a distinct scientific discipline in the 19th century.
Psyche: Refers to "soul" or "mind".
Logos: Means "study of a subject".
Together they denote the study of the mind or soul.
Presentism: Evaluating historical events with contemporary knowledge and standards.
Historicism: Studying the past without interpreting it against modern standards.
Zeitgeist Approach: Considers the influence of the social, economic, and political context on psychology.
Great-Person Approach: Focuses on influential individuals (e.g., Freud, Plato).
Historical Development Approach: Examines how events and individuals contribute to changes in psychological thought.
Eclectic Approach: A combination of the above approaches.
Understanding the origins of psychology adds depth to one's knowledge.
Recognizing historical fads helps in discerning valid research from trends influenced by societal factors.
Familiarity with historical errors helps prevent recurrence of past mistakes in research and practice.
Familiarity with earlier ideas fosters the discovery of valuable concepts that may have been overlooked.
Rationalism: Uses mental principles for true knowledge acquisition.
Empiricism: Knowledge arises from sensory observations.
Science encompasses empirical observation and theory development.
Involves organized direct observation of nature, noting similarities and differences among observations.
Organizes empirical data and acts as a guide for future observations.
Leads to confirmable propositions that can be tested.
Discover causal relationships between events.
Classify scientific laws into correlational and causal laws.
Assumes lawful operations in natural phenomena.
Indicates the potential for accurate predictions once causes are identified.
Traditional view includes observation, theory testing, and the assumption of determinism.
Karl Popper's View: Emphasizes the importance of falsifiability in scientific theory, positing that a theory must make testable predictions.
Examples illustrate that a scientific theory's capacity to be disproven is essential for it to be considered scientific.
Paradigms: A set of beliefs and values guiding scientific inquiry within a community.
Normal Science: Involves solving problems within established paradigms.
Revolutionary Science: Occurs when anomalies lead to the development of new paradigms.
Popper promotes a creative problem-solving approach in science, unlike Kuhn's focus on conventional understanding.
Kuhn argues that scientific truth is relative to paradigm shifts.
Greek Philosophers (5th century BC)
Renaissance (14th–17th century)
Empiricism (17th century)
Physiology/Experimental Psychology (19th century)
Structuralism (Early 20th century)
Functionalism (Late 19th/Early 20th century)
Psychoanalysis (Early 20th century)
Behaviorism (Early 20th century)
Gestalt Psychology (20th century)
Humanistic Psychology (Mid 20th century)
Cognitive Psychology (Mid 20th century)
Contemporary Psychology (~1960s)
Universal truths about humanity?
The nature of human aggression or goodness?
Relationship between the mind and body?
Interactionism: Mind-body interaction.
Emergentism: Mental states arise from brain activity.
Epiphenomenalism: Brain causes mental events.
Psychophysical Parallelism: Mind and body function independently but in parallel.
Assess different historical writing approaches in psychology.
Popper's objections to theories like those of Freud and Adler.
Nativist vs. empiricist views on human attributes' origins.
How do empiricists and rationalists explain learning?