Co-authored by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling.
Originated from a New Jersey program in the 1970s aimed at improving quality of life through foot patrol.
Safe and Clean Neighborhoods Program: Aimed to improve community life in New Jersey cities.
Objective: Increase police visibility and engagement through walking beats rather than patrol cars.
Police reaction: Many police chiefs were skeptical due to perceived limitations of foot patrol, including mobility and effectiveness.
Officers found foot patrol physically demanding and it was sometimes seen as a punishment assignment.
A study by the Police Foundation five years later indicated:
No significant reduction in crime rates.
Residents reported feeling safer and believed crime had decreased.
Increased positive perceptions of police among residents in foot patrol areas.
Higher officer morale and job satisfaction were noted in foot patrol assignments.
Skeptics argued that the improved sense of safety was illusory, but Wilson and Kelling proposed otherwise.
Crime Fear: Mainly comes from the threat of violent attacks.
Disorder Fear: Frightened by the presence of disorderly people rather than overt criminals (e.g., panhandlers, drunks).
Foot patrol helped maintain public order and alleviate this fear.
Order Maintenance: Officers in Newark were seen maintaining order by enforcing informal community rules:
Example patrols showed how officers interacted with both regular and transient street populations.
Officers knew the community dynamics and applied informal rules to maintain peace.
The community's perception of disorder influences their overall safety and behavior.
Broken Windows Theory: Suggests that visible signs of disorder (like broken windows) lead to increased crime by signaling neglect.
Philip Zimbardo's experiments illustrated how environments perceived as neglected lead to vandalism.
Untended properties signal to residents and transients that disorder is tolerated, which can escalate to crime.
Communities deteriorate when informal social controls break down, leading to fear and avoidance behaviors.
Urban decay has continually evolved, but modern issues are exacerbated by mobility and disconnection:
Perception shifts: Residents believe crime rates are rising due to visible disorder.
Surveys show increased anxiety, particularly among vulnerable groups like the elderly.
Police often struggle to respond effectively under current policing paradigms focused largely on crime fighting rather than order maintaining.
Historical context: The police role shifted from maintaining order to enforcing laws against specific crimes, resulting in reduced focus on community engagement.
Increased challenges in policing relate to how crime-fighting has overshadowed community needs.
There is a noticeable reduction in the police presence available for proactive order-maintenance tasks.
Community members can effectively contribute to maintaining order through:
Citizen patrols and organized groups like the Guardian Angels.
Traditional practices of neighborhood watch that deter disorder.
Balancing police functions requires collaboration between law enforcement and community residents to respond to local needs.
The traditional view must return to recognizing the police as protectors of community cohesion, not just individual rights.
The overarching goal should be to maintain intact communities, fostering a sense of safety and order to prevent deterioration.
Real solutions may involve identifying and reinforcing community standards rather than just responding to individual crimes.