Chapter 20: Evaluation of Scientific Literature and Dental Products
Evaluation of Scientific Literature and Dental Products
Introduction
- Faculty: Renee Hastings, RDH, BSDH
- Course: DHY 221, Spring 2025
Regulation of Dental Products
- Patients often seek product advice from dental hygienists.
- Importance of understanding research reports for informed advice.
- FDA (Food & Drug Administration):
- Part of Department of Health and Human Services.
- Voluntarily corrects problems with dental products.
- Enforces product recalls when necessary.
- Provides medical bulletins regarding oral health products.
American Dental Association (ADA)
- Provides guidelines on testing and advertising dental products.
- ADA Seal:
- Indicates endorsement; however, it is not government regulated.
- Manufacturers must apply for the seal which must be renewed periodically.
- ADA reviews advertising claims for products carrying their seal to ensure accuracy.
Research Sources for Dental Care Products
- Peer-reviewed Articles:
- Reviewed by dental health experts for content accuracy.
- Requires submission to a journal editor and thorough review by impartial reviewers.
- Reliable Resources:
- Dental hygiene schools, faculty, and coursework.
- Professional organizations found on the internet (avoid non-professional sources like Instagram).
- PubMed:
- A resource from the US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, and other governmental agencies.
Evaluation of Scientific Literature
- Dental hygienists should rely on various sources for product and treatment information:
- Published research reports.
- Literature reviews.
- Commentaries.
- Literature Reviews:
- Introduction summarizing the significance of the topic.
- Main body discussing advantages and disadvantages based on multiple studies.
- Types:
- Systematic Review: Combines findings from numerous studies into collective insights.
- Meta-analysis: Analyzes data gathered from different studies.
- Hierarchy:
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- Randomized Controlled Double Blind Studies
- Cohort Studies
- Case Control Studies
- Case Series
- Case Reports
- Ideas, Editorials, Opinions
- Animal Research
- In vitro ('test tube') research
Understanding Study Types
- Randomized Control Trials: Controlled experimental studies on medications/conditions with placebo groups.
- Cohort Studies: Non-experimental studies observing groups with known risk factors (e.g., smokers) over time, without pre-existing conditions in subjects.
- Case Control Studies: Non-experimental observational studies linking disease outcomes with risk factors by looking retrospectively.
- Case Series/Reports: Narrative reviews used often in dental literature; helpful for forming hypotheses based on anecdotal evidence.
Assessment of a Scientific Study
- Key Components:
- Title: Indicates purpose and main concept.
- Authors and Affiliations: Ensures credibility.
- Abstract: Summarizes content without exceeding 250 words.
- Literature Review: Outline of previous research on the topic.
- Methodology:
- Sample selection/size (random, sufficiently large).
- Ethical considerations (approved protocols).
- Research design (e.g., double-blind).
- Product usage details (methods of application).
- Endpoints (effectiveness of treatment).
- Results: Comparison of findings with other studies.
- Conclusion/Recommendations: Summarizes implications and potential for further research.
Conclusion
- The integrity of the source is critical when searching for information or answering patient queries.
- Following structured steps when researching will provide solid, evidence-based answers.
References
- Nathe, C. N. (2017). Dental Public Health & Research: Contemporary Practice for the Dental Hygienist. (4th ed.). Pearson.