Unit One AP Government: Foundations of American Democracy
Declared that the colonies are now independent from their previous British government
Declared that people have inalienable rights: (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness)
Written to declare independence from British rule and establish a new country
nine out of the thirteen states had to approve any law before it was enacted
there was no executive branch
no national judicial systems
Congress couldn’t have a national military
Congress couldn’t regulate trade or currency between the states or with other countries
Congress had no power to prevent states from breaking laws
any amendment to the Articles required the approval of all 13 states
Defines the fundamental law of the federal government
Determines three principle branches of he federal government and outlines their jurisdictions.
Replaced the Articles of Confederation and made the federal government more powerful.
Created after the Articles of Confederation failed; demonstrated by Shay’s Rebellion
-The purpose: To explain how a federal government disallows chaos caused by factions and their spread across state borders
-Faction: A small society defined by a common interest and/or location
-Madison’s claims on how to control factions: checks and balances; representation for each faction in a larger government
-Madison’s claim on why it is impossible to abolish all factions: factions are simply people bonding over their interests, and people and their opinions cannot be entirely suppressed in the name of democracy and liberty
-The purpose: To explain the Constitution’s shortcomings in the handling of factions.
Brutus believes that smaller and state governments will be more likely to protect personal liberties.
Brutus expresses his fear that federal governments will overrule state government rulings and cause legislation to become out of touch with the people it is supposed to protect and represent.
Brutus predicts that future government representatives would abuse their power and not come to conclusions due to various opinions.
Factions can be problematic
Factions are bound to be problematic
the government should be fair and protect the people’s liberties and freedoms
government should be built on representation
Brutus believed that public officials would be easily corrupted, while Fed 10 believe that it wouldn’t be likely.
Brutus believed that the proper size of a republic should be smaller, ie. the states, and Fed 10 believes that the republic should be the entire United States that we have today (larger and over a larger variety of people).
Brutus believed that the people should have as much power as possible in the governmental system and Fed 10 believes that the people should have enough power, but only through representatives.
Date: 1803
Parties involved: Adams/The Federalists vs. Jefferson/Democratic-Republicans/Madison
Reason for the case:
John Adams named Marbury and several other justices just before his last day in office. Some of the commissions were not delivered before his term ended, so Jefferson took office and shut down the process. Marbury sued Jefferson’s new secretary of state (Madison) for vetoing his commission, and the case was taken to the Supreme Court.
Ruling and significance:
The case ruled that the federal courts have the power to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. It established the principle of judicial review.
Date: 1994
Parties involved: United States vs. Lopez
Reason for the case:
There was debate over whether the 1990 Gun-Free Schools Act (at the state level) was unconstitutional or not because it exceeds the power of Congress to legislate under the Commerce Clause.
Ruling and Significance:
This was the first case where the court held that Congress had exceeded its powers to legislate under the Commerce Clause.
Date: 1819
Parties involved: James McCulloch vs. State of Maryland
Reason for the case:
When McCulloch refused a tax, the US government appealed to the Supreme Court because McCulloch claimed that a national bank was unconstitutional.
Ruling and Significance:
The Supreme Court ruled that although the Constitution doesn’t technically grant Congress the power to create a national bank, the authority to do so is protected under the Necesary and Proper Clause. The case established implied powers and national supremacy.
New Jersey Plan:
Unicameral legislature
Equal representation in the House
Executives chosen by the legislative branch
Legislative branch has no veto powers
Removal of those in the legislative by the states
Judges appointed for life by the executive branch
Virginia Plan:
Bicameral legislature
Representation is based on population or monetary contributions to federal government
A single executive is chosen by the legislative branch
One term only
Executive can veto legislative acts
Executive can be removed from Congress
Judges are chosen by the legislative branch
3/5ths Compromise
-The southern states wanted slaves to count as part of the population so they would have more representation in Congress
-Northern states wanted slaves to not count as population because they had fewer slaves and wouldn’t get as much representation in a Congress
-Compromise: 3:5s of the slave population of a state counted in Congressional representation
Great Compromise
-Virginia plan wanted bicameral legislature and representation based on population
-New Jersey plan wanted unicameral legislature and representation equal for each state
- Compromise: The number of representatives in the House of Representatives is based on population and the Senate has two representatives from each state
Slave Trade Compromise
The federal government would not touch slave trade or use for 20 years and banned taxing exports on for the states.
Electoral College
People would vote for the president they want, those votes are evaluated by an appointed member in the electoral college for your region/state, they put in their vote as a representation of the votes they received. The Electoral College more directly elects the president than the average voter, but everyone has influence.
Federalists:
Favored the Constitution
Federalists | Antifederalists |
---|---|
Favored the Constitution | Opposed the Constitution |
Lead by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay | Lead by Henry, R. Henry Lee, Mason, and Adams |
Believed strong government was needed to protect the nation and solve domestic problems | Wanted strong state governments; feared strong national governments |
Checks and balances would protect against abuse of power. | Believed that a strong executive (president) was similar to monarchy |
Believed in protection of property rights | Wanted fewer limits on popular participation |
Believed that the Constitution itself was a bill of rights with limitations and reserved powers for states | Believed that the addition of the Bill of Rights was needed to protect citizens against the government. |
A strong federal government can protect the nation from external and internal threats and dangers.
Strong state governments are more personal to the people and have less opportunity to be corrrupt.
Most Common:
Proposition by Congress with a 2/3 majority vote in both the House and the Senate.
Checks and Balances | Seperation of Powers |
---|---|
How the powers divided between the government are regulated and balanced | The distribution of power amongst the branches of government. |
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Social Contract Theory | A voluntary agreement between the government and the governed |
Representative Democracy | Citizens choose officials who decide public policy; found in most democratic nations |
Selective Incorporation | The supreme court can incorporate certain parts of the different amendments, not necessarily the whole amendment |
Slave Trade compromise | Banned slave trade for 20 years and prohibited taxing exports on the states |
Devolution Revolution | A transfer of power to political subunits |
Participatory Democracy | Depends on consent of the governed; consent given directly or through representatives; “traditional government” CITIZEN PARTICIPATION |
Pluralist democracy | Interest groups: political parties: FACTIONS |
Elite Democracy | Small number of powerful elites; upper class acts in own self interest; higher education; wealthier |
Federalism | A division of governmental powers between the national government and the states |
Supremacy Clause | Helps to resolve conflict between national and state government; national government is supreme |
10th Amendment | Powers not delegated by the Constitution are given to the states and/or the people directly |
Implied Powers | Powers not expressed; powers reasonably inferred from the Constitution |
Judicial Review | Judges and the times they serve affect how courts interpret law; Marbury vs Madison (1803) |
Necessary and Proper Clause | Congress can make laws that “carry into execution the foregoing Powers” and enforce the Constitution |
Grants-in-Aid | Money and resources provided by the federal government to state and local government for specific projects or programs |
Categorial Grants | Grants with a specific purpose defined by law’ sometimes require matching funds from state or local government |
Revenue Sharing | “no strings attached” form of aid to state and local government; Proposed by Johnson’s administration and ended during the Reagan administration |
Federal Mandates | Requirements imposed by national governments on state and local governments; usually at the state or local expense |
Commerce Clause | Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3; Gives Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, states, and Indian tribes |
Enumerated Powers | Delegated Powers; Powers given specifically to the national government |
Inherent Powers | Powers that exist for the national government because the national government is sovereign |
Full Faith and Credit Clause | States are required to recognize legal documents from other states |
Popular Sovereignty | The people are the source of the government’s authority |
Unitary System | States are governed as a single entity where the central government is supreme authority |
Block Grants | General grants that can be used for a variety of purposes within a broad category |
Reserved Powers | Powers belonging to the states because they do not belong to the national goverment and are not denied to the states |
Cooperative Federalism | MARBLE CAKE; federalism in which state and federal government share responsibilities; ie. roads and railroads |
Concurrent Powers | Powers that belong to both the national and state governments |
Connecticut Compromise (Great Compromise) | Duel system of government with congressional representation; the House of Representatives is determined by the population of each state |
Privileges and Immunities Clause | States cannot discriminate against people for being from a different state; you can do things in a state you don’t live in |
Declared that the colonies are now independent from their previous British government
Declared that people have inalienable rights: (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness)
Written to declare independence from British rule and establish a new country
nine out of the thirteen states had to approve any law before it was enacted
there was no executive branch
no national judicial systems
Congress couldn’t have a national military
Congress couldn’t regulate trade or currency between the states or with other countries
Congress had no power to prevent states from breaking laws
any amendment to the Articles required the approval of all 13 states
Defines the fundamental law of the federal government
Determines three principle branches of he federal government and outlines their jurisdictions.
Replaced the Articles of Confederation and made the federal government more powerful.
Created after the Articles of Confederation failed; demonstrated by Shay’s Rebellion
-The purpose: To explain how a federal government disallows chaos caused by factions and their spread across state borders
-Faction: A small society defined by a common interest and/or location
-Madison’s claims on how to control factions: checks and balances; representation for each faction in a larger government
-Madison’s claim on why it is impossible to abolish all factions: factions are simply people bonding over their interests, and people and their opinions cannot be entirely suppressed in the name of democracy and liberty
-The purpose: To explain the Constitution’s shortcomings in the handling of factions.
Brutus believes that smaller and state governments will be more likely to protect personal liberties.
Brutus expresses his fear that federal governments will overrule state government rulings and cause legislation to become out of touch with the people it is supposed to protect and represent.
Brutus predicts that future government representatives would abuse their power and not come to conclusions due to various opinions.
Factions can be problematic
Factions are bound to be problematic
the government should be fair and protect the people’s liberties and freedoms
government should be built on representation
Brutus believed that public officials would be easily corrupted, while Fed 10 believe that it wouldn’t be likely.
Brutus believed that the proper size of a republic should be smaller, ie. the states, and Fed 10 believes that the republic should be the entire United States that we have today (larger and over a larger variety of people).
Brutus believed that the people should have as much power as possible in the governmental system and Fed 10 believes that the people should have enough power, but only through representatives.
Date: 1803
Parties involved: Adams/The Federalists vs. Jefferson/Democratic-Republicans/Madison
Reason for the case:
John Adams named Marbury and several other justices just before his last day in office. Some of the commissions were not delivered before his term ended, so Jefferson took office and shut down the process. Marbury sued Jefferson’s new secretary of state (Madison) for vetoing his commission, and the case was taken to the Supreme Court.
Ruling and significance:
The case ruled that the federal courts have the power to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. It established the principle of judicial review.
Date: 1994
Parties involved: United States vs. Lopez
Reason for the case:
There was debate over whether the 1990 Gun-Free Schools Act (at the state level) was unconstitutional or not because it exceeds the power of Congress to legislate under the Commerce Clause.
Ruling and Significance:
This was the first case where the court held that Congress had exceeded its powers to legislate under the Commerce Clause.
Date: 1819
Parties involved: James McCulloch vs. State of Maryland
Reason for the case:
When McCulloch refused a tax, the US government appealed to the Supreme Court because McCulloch claimed that a national bank was unconstitutional.
Ruling and Significance:
The Supreme Court ruled that although the Constitution doesn’t technically grant Congress the power to create a national bank, the authority to do so is protected under the Necesary and Proper Clause. The case established implied powers and national supremacy.
New Jersey Plan:
Unicameral legislature
Equal representation in the House
Executives chosen by the legislative branch
Legislative branch has no veto powers
Removal of those in the legislative by the states
Judges appointed for life by the executive branch
Virginia Plan:
Bicameral legislature
Representation is based on population or monetary contributions to federal government
A single executive is chosen by the legislative branch
One term only
Executive can veto legislative acts
Executive can be removed from Congress
Judges are chosen by the legislative branch
3/5ths Compromise
-The southern states wanted slaves to count as part of the population so they would have more representation in Congress
-Northern states wanted slaves to not count as population because they had fewer slaves and wouldn’t get as much representation in a Congress
-Compromise: 3:5s of the slave population of a state counted in Congressional representation
Great Compromise
-Virginia plan wanted bicameral legislature and representation based on population
-New Jersey plan wanted unicameral legislature and representation equal for each state
- Compromise: The number of representatives in the House of Representatives is based on population and the Senate has two representatives from each state
Slave Trade Compromise
The federal government would not touch slave trade or use for 20 years and banned taxing exports on for the states.
Electoral College
People would vote for the president they want, those votes are evaluated by an appointed member in the electoral college for your region/state, they put in their vote as a representation of the votes they received. The Electoral College more directly elects the president than the average voter, but everyone has influence.
Federalists:
Favored the Constitution
Federalists | Antifederalists |
---|---|
Favored the Constitution | Opposed the Constitution |
Lead by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay | Lead by Henry, R. Henry Lee, Mason, and Adams |
Believed strong government was needed to protect the nation and solve domestic problems | Wanted strong state governments; feared strong national governments |
Checks and balances would protect against abuse of power. | Believed that a strong executive (president) was similar to monarchy |
Believed in protection of property rights | Wanted fewer limits on popular participation |
Believed that the Constitution itself was a bill of rights with limitations and reserved powers for states | Believed that the addition of the Bill of Rights was needed to protect citizens against the government. |
A strong federal government can protect the nation from external and internal threats and dangers.
Strong state governments are more personal to the people and have less opportunity to be corrrupt.
Most Common:
Proposition by Congress with a 2/3 majority vote in both the House and the Senate.
Checks and Balances | Seperation of Powers |
---|---|
How the powers divided between the government are regulated and balanced | The distribution of power amongst the branches of government. |
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Social Contract Theory | A voluntary agreement between the government and the governed |
Representative Democracy | Citizens choose officials who decide public policy; found in most democratic nations |
Selective Incorporation | The supreme court can incorporate certain parts of the different amendments, not necessarily the whole amendment |
Slave Trade compromise | Banned slave trade for 20 years and prohibited taxing exports on the states |
Devolution Revolution | A transfer of power to political subunits |
Participatory Democracy | Depends on consent of the governed; consent given directly or through representatives; “traditional government” CITIZEN PARTICIPATION |
Pluralist democracy | Interest groups: political parties: FACTIONS |
Elite Democracy | Small number of powerful elites; upper class acts in own self interest; higher education; wealthier |
Federalism | A division of governmental powers between the national government and the states |
Supremacy Clause | Helps to resolve conflict between national and state government; national government is supreme |
10th Amendment | Powers not delegated by the Constitution are given to the states and/or the people directly |
Implied Powers | Powers not expressed; powers reasonably inferred from the Constitution |
Judicial Review | Judges and the times they serve affect how courts interpret law; Marbury vs Madison (1803) |
Necessary and Proper Clause | Congress can make laws that “carry into execution the foregoing Powers” and enforce the Constitution |
Grants-in-Aid | Money and resources provided by the federal government to state and local government for specific projects or programs |
Categorial Grants | Grants with a specific purpose defined by law’ sometimes require matching funds from state or local government |
Revenue Sharing | “no strings attached” form of aid to state and local government; Proposed by Johnson’s administration and ended during the Reagan administration |
Federal Mandates | Requirements imposed by national governments on state and local governments; usually at the state or local expense |
Commerce Clause | Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3; Gives Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, states, and Indian tribes |
Enumerated Powers | Delegated Powers; Powers given specifically to the national government |
Inherent Powers | Powers that exist for the national government because the national government is sovereign |
Full Faith and Credit Clause | States are required to recognize legal documents from other states |
Popular Sovereignty | The people are the source of the government’s authority |
Unitary System | States are governed as a single entity where the central government is supreme authority |
Block Grants | General grants that can be used for a variety of purposes within a broad category |
Reserved Powers | Powers belonging to the states because they do not belong to the national goverment and are not denied to the states |
Cooperative Federalism | MARBLE CAKE; federalism in which state and federal government share responsibilities; ie. roads and railroads |
Concurrent Powers | Powers that belong to both the national and state governments |
Connecticut Compromise (Great Compromise) | Duel system of government with congressional representation; the House of Representatives is determined by the population of each state |
Privileges and Immunities Clause | States cannot discriminate against people for being from a different state; you can do things in a state you don’t live in |