L3: Work Motivation II
Application Based Theories
Draw on needs and process based theories but focus on more real-world applications
Goal Setting Theory
Locke and Latham, 1990
One of the most studied and best supported WOP theories
Focuses on the goals people adopt and how they strive towards meeting them
In most situations, best to set difficult and specific goals
SMART
Specific: set specific goals
Measurable: devise way to measure achievement
Achievable: set goals that are realistic
Relevant: set goals that serve a purpose
Time-bound: place a time frame on goal achievement
Goal Commitment: determination of an individual to reach their goal
When ppl are not committed to a goal, they are not motivated to achieve the goal
Self-Concordance: when the personal reasons for pursuing goals are consistent with personal interests and core values, people are happier and more successful
Managers can help employees accept and commit to goals by encouraging employee participation in the goal-setting process
Self-Regulation: the capacity to control one’s impulses
Goal Orientation: motivation to develop and learn vs just wanting to do well
Self-Efficacy: person’s belief they can succeed
Self-Efficacy Theory
Bandura
An individual’s belief that he or she is capable of performing a task
Higher efficacy related to: greater confidence, greater persistence, better response to negative feedback
Complements goal-setting theory
Increasing Self-Efficacy
Enactive Mastery
Most important source
Gaining relevant experience with task or job
Practice makes perfect
Vicarious Modeling
Increasing confidence by watching others perform the task
Most effective when observer sees the model to be similar to themself
Verbal Persuasion
Motivation through verbal conviction
Pygmalion (external person that feels you’d do well at a task, converse is true) and Galatea (internally believe you’ll do well or not) effects, self-fulfilling prophecy
Arousal
Getting psyched up to complete task
Can hurt performance if emotion is not a component of the task
Job Characteristics Theory
Hackman and Oldham, 1980
Way of understanding the motivating potential of the job itself in relation to the individual
5 perceived core job characteristics
Skill Variety: the variety in job tasks in terms of skills and abilities required
Task Identity: the association between a task and the job’s ultimate outcome
Task Significance: the impact of a job on others’ lives
Autonomy: the freedom to dictate and control one’s job
Feedback: the receipt of direct information regarding how effective one’s job performance is
Psychological States: meaningfulness, responsibility, knowledge of results
Outcomes: motivation, performance, satisfaction, absenteeism7
May be individual differences in the experienced motivating potential of a job
Sources
Knowledge and skill
Growth-needs strength
Satisfaction with contextual factors
Motivating Job Design
Job Rotation: moving workers from one job to another to promote interest and satisfaction
Job Enlargement: expanding a person’s job to include tasks previously performed by other workers (horizontal loading)
Job Enrichment: granting the worker more control over the job (vertical loading), enrich jobs by accountability, feedback, work-pace, control over resources
Sociotechnical Systems: new technology and job design
Self-Managed Work Teams: autonomous working groups
Social Information: what is going on at work shapes individual’s perception of the job and the response to it
Work Schedules: such as flexi-time, job sharing, teleworking
Worker Flexibility: employees are trained to do a number of jobs (refinement of job rotation)
Reinforcement Theory
Luthans and Kreitner, 1985
Pioneered by Skinner, based on operant conditioning
Behavior is environmentally caused
Theory posits that behavior that is reinforced tends to be repeated while behaviors that are punished/ignored tend to be extinguished
Requires a definition of what good performance looks like and clarity about what behavior should be reinforced
Types of Reinforcers
Positive Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, positive reward is given
Negative Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, negative thing is taken away
Punishment: negative behavior is demonstrated, negative consequence is given
Extinction: negative behavior is demonstrated, positive consequence taken away
Reinforcement Schedules
Continuous: reinforcement follows every instance of a behavior
Fixed Ratio: reinforcement follows after a set number of behaviors are observed
Fixed Interval: reinforcement follows after a set period of time
Variable Ratio: reinforcement follows a random pattern, unknown to the person
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Providing an extrinsic reward for behavior that had been previously only intrinsically rewarding tends to decrease the overall level of motivation
Major implications for work rewards
Intrinsic and extrinsic rewards are not independent
Extrinsic rewards decrease intrinsic rewards
Pay should be non-contingent on performance
Verbal rewards increase intrinsic motivation, tangible rewards reduce it
Creating a motivating environment
Autonomy:
Self-leadership
Shared leadership
Participatory goal-setting
Flexible working practices
Meaningfulness:
Purpose
Relatedness
Meaningful social contact
Having a positive impact
Competence:
The need to feel like you’re good at stuff
The feeling that you’re learning and developing
Recognition:
How good is performance recognized in your organization
Application Based Theories
Draw on needs and process based theories but focus on more real-world applications
Goal Setting Theory
Locke and Latham, 1990
One of the most studied and best supported WOP theories
Focuses on the goals people adopt and how they strive towards meeting them
In most situations, best to set difficult and specific goals
SMART
Specific: set specific goals
Measurable: devise way to measure achievement
Achievable: set goals that are realistic
Relevant: set goals that serve a purpose
Time-bound: place a time frame on goal achievement
Goal Commitment: determination of an individual to reach their goal
When ppl are not committed to a goal, they are not motivated to achieve the goal
Self-Concordance: when the personal reasons for pursuing goals are consistent with personal interests and core values, people are happier and more successful
Managers can help employees accept and commit to goals by encouraging employee participation in the goal-setting process
Self-Regulation: the capacity to control one’s impulses
Goal Orientation: motivation to develop and learn vs just wanting to do well
Self-Efficacy: person’s belief they can succeed
Self-Efficacy Theory
Bandura
An individual’s belief that he or she is capable of performing a task
Higher efficacy related to: greater confidence, greater persistence, better response to negative feedback
Complements goal-setting theory
Increasing Self-Efficacy
Enactive Mastery
Most important source
Gaining relevant experience with task or job
Practice makes perfect
Vicarious Modeling
Increasing confidence by watching others perform the task
Most effective when observer sees the model to be similar to themself
Verbal Persuasion
Motivation through verbal conviction
Pygmalion (external person that feels you’d do well at a task, converse is true) and Galatea (internally believe you’ll do well or not) effects, self-fulfilling prophecy
Arousal
Getting psyched up to complete task
Can hurt performance if emotion is not a component of the task
Job Characteristics Theory
Hackman and Oldham, 1980
Way of understanding the motivating potential of the job itself in relation to the individual
5 perceived core job characteristics
Skill Variety: the variety in job tasks in terms of skills and abilities required
Task Identity: the association between a task and the job’s ultimate outcome
Task Significance: the impact of a job on others’ lives
Autonomy: the freedom to dictate and control one’s job
Feedback: the receipt of direct information regarding how effective one’s job performance is
Psychological States: meaningfulness, responsibility, knowledge of results
Outcomes: motivation, performance, satisfaction, absenteeism7
May be individual differences in the experienced motivating potential of a job
Sources
Knowledge and skill
Growth-needs strength
Satisfaction with contextual factors
Motivating Job Design
Job Rotation: moving workers from one job to another to promote interest and satisfaction
Job Enlargement: expanding a person’s job to include tasks previously performed by other workers (horizontal loading)
Job Enrichment: granting the worker more control over the job (vertical loading), enrich jobs by accountability, feedback, work-pace, control over resources
Sociotechnical Systems: new technology and job design
Self-Managed Work Teams: autonomous working groups
Social Information: what is going on at work shapes individual’s perception of the job and the response to it
Work Schedules: such as flexi-time, job sharing, teleworking
Worker Flexibility: employees are trained to do a number of jobs (refinement of job rotation)
Reinforcement Theory
Luthans and Kreitner, 1985
Pioneered by Skinner, based on operant conditioning
Behavior is environmentally caused
Theory posits that behavior that is reinforced tends to be repeated while behaviors that are punished/ignored tend to be extinguished
Requires a definition of what good performance looks like and clarity about what behavior should be reinforced
Types of Reinforcers
Positive Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, positive reward is given
Negative Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, negative thing is taken away
Punishment: negative behavior is demonstrated, negative consequence is given
Extinction: negative behavior is demonstrated, positive consequence taken away
Reinforcement Schedules
Continuous: reinforcement follows every instance of a behavior
Fixed Ratio: reinforcement follows after a set number of behaviors are observed
Fixed Interval: reinforcement follows after a set period of time
Variable Ratio: reinforcement follows a random pattern, unknown to the person
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Providing an extrinsic reward for behavior that had been previously only intrinsically rewarding tends to decrease the overall level of motivation
Major implications for work rewards
Intrinsic and extrinsic rewards are not independent
Extrinsic rewards decrease intrinsic rewards
Pay should be non-contingent on performance
Verbal rewards increase intrinsic motivation, tangible rewards reduce it
Creating a motivating environment
Autonomy:
Self-leadership
Shared leadership
Participatory goal-setting
Flexible working practices
Meaningfulness:
Purpose
Relatedness
Meaningful social contact
Having a positive impact
Competence:
The need to feel like you’re good at stuff
The feeling that you’re learning and developing
Recognition:
How good is performance recognized in your organization