knowt logo

L3: Work Motivation II

Application Based Theories

  • Draw on needs and process based theories but focus on more real-world applications


Goal Setting Theory

  • Locke and Latham, 1990

  • One of the most studied and best supported WOP theories

  • Focuses on the goals people adopt and how they strive towards meeting them

  • In most situations, best to set difficult and specific goals

  • SMART

    • Specific: set specific goals

    • Measurable: devise way to measure achievement

    • Achievable: set goals that are realistic

    • Relevant: set goals that serve a purpose

    • Time-bound: place a time frame on goal achievement

  • Goal Commitment: determination of an individual to reach their goal

    • When ppl are not committed to a goal, they are not motivated to achieve the goal

    • Self-Concordance: when the personal reasons for pursuing goals are consistent with personal interests and core values, people are happier and more successful

    • Managers can help employees accept and commit to goals by encouraging employee participation in the goal-setting process

  • Self-Regulation: the capacity to control one’s impulses

  • Goal Orientation: motivation to develop and learn vs just wanting to do well

  • Self-Efficacy: person’s belief they can succeed


Self-Efficacy Theory

  • Bandura

  • An individual’s belief that he or she is capable of performing a task

  • Higher efficacy related to: greater confidence, greater persistence, better response to negative feedback

  • Complements goal-setting theory

  • Increasing Self-Efficacy

    • Enactive Mastery

      • Most important source

      • Gaining relevant experience with task or job

      • Practice makes perfect

    • Vicarious Modeling

      • Increasing confidence by watching others perform the task

      • Most effective when observer sees the model to be similar to themself

    • Verbal Persuasion

      • Motivation through verbal conviction

      • Pygmalion (external person that feels you’d do well at a task, converse is true) and Galatea (internally believe you’ll do well or not) effects, self-fulfilling prophecy

    • Arousal

      • Getting psyched up to complete task

      • Can hurt performance if emotion is not a component of the task


Job Characteristics Theory

  • Hackman and Oldham, 1980

  • Way of understanding the motivating potential of the job itself in relation to the individual

  • 5 perceived core job characteristics

    • Skill Variety: the variety in job tasks in terms of skills and abilities required

    • Task Identity: the association between a task and the job’s ultimate outcome

    • Task Significance: the impact of a job on others’ lives

    • Autonomy: the freedom to dictate and control one’s job

    • Feedback: the receipt of direct information regarding how effective one’s job performance is

  • Psychological States: meaningfulness, responsibility, knowledge of results

  • Outcomes: motivation, performance, satisfaction, absenteeism7

  • May be individual differences in the experienced motivating potential of a job

    • Sources

      • Knowledge and skill

      • Growth-needs strength

      • Satisfaction with contextual factors

  • Motivating Job Design

    • Job Rotation: moving workers from one job to another to promote interest and satisfaction

    • Job Enlargement: expanding a person’s job to include tasks previously performed by other workers (horizontal loading)

    • Job Enrichment: granting the worker more control over the job (vertical loading), enrich jobs by accountability, feedback, work-pace, control over resources

    • Sociotechnical Systems: new technology and job design

    • Self-Managed Work Teams: autonomous working groups

    • Social Information: what is going on at work shapes individual’s perception of the job and the response to it

    • Work Schedules: such as flexi-time, job sharing, teleworking

    • Worker Flexibility: employees are trained to do a number of jobs (refinement of job rotation)


Reinforcement Theory

  • Luthans and Kreitner, 1985

  • Pioneered by Skinner, based on operant conditioning

  • Behavior is environmentally caused

  • Theory posits that behavior that is reinforced tends to be repeated while behaviors that are punished/ignored tend to be extinguished

  • Requires a definition of what good performance looks like and clarity about what behavior should be reinforced

  • Types of Reinforcers

    • Positive Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, positive reward is given

    • Negative Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, negative thing is taken away

    • Punishment: negative behavior is demonstrated, negative consequence is given

    • Extinction: negative behavior is demonstrated, positive consequence taken away

  • Reinforcement Schedules

    • Continuous: reinforcement follows every instance of a behavior

    • Fixed Ratio: reinforcement follows after a set number of behaviors are observed

    • Fixed Interval: reinforcement follows after a set period of time

    • Variable Ratio: reinforcement follows a random pattern, unknown to the person


Cognitive Evaluation Theory

  • Providing an extrinsic reward for behavior that had been previously only intrinsically rewarding tends to decrease the overall level of motivation

  • Major implications for work rewards

    • Intrinsic and extrinsic rewards are not independent

    • Extrinsic rewards decrease intrinsic rewards

    • Pay should be non-contingent on performance

    • Verbal rewards increase intrinsic motivation, tangible rewards reduce it

  • Creating a motivating environment

    • Autonomy: 

      • Self-leadership

      • Shared leadership

      • Participatory goal-setting

      • Flexible working practices

    • Meaningfulness:

      • Purpose

      • Relatedness

      • Meaningful social contact

      • Having a positive impact

    • Competence:

      • The need to feel like you’re good at stuff

      • The feeling that you’re learning and developing

    • Recognition:

      • How good is performance recognized in your organization

L3: Work Motivation II

Application Based Theories

  • Draw on needs and process based theories but focus on more real-world applications


Goal Setting Theory

  • Locke and Latham, 1990

  • One of the most studied and best supported WOP theories

  • Focuses on the goals people adopt and how they strive towards meeting them

  • In most situations, best to set difficult and specific goals

  • SMART

    • Specific: set specific goals

    • Measurable: devise way to measure achievement

    • Achievable: set goals that are realistic

    • Relevant: set goals that serve a purpose

    • Time-bound: place a time frame on goal achievement

  • Goal Commitment: determination of an individual to reach their goal

    • When ppl are not committed to a goal, they are not motivated to achieve the goal

    • Self-Concordance: when the personal reasons for pursuing goals are consistent with personal interests and core values, people are happier and more successful

    • Managers can help employees accept and commit to goals by encouraging employee participation in the goal-setting process

  • Self-Regulation: the capacity to control one’s impulses

  • Goal Orientation: motivation to develop and learn vs just wanting to do well

  • Self-Efficacy: person’s belief they can succeed


Self-Efficacy Theory

  • Bandura

  • An individual’s belief that he or she is capable of performing a task

  • Higher efficacy related to: greater confidence, greater persistence, better response to negative feedback

  • Complements goal-setting theory

  • Increasing Self-Efficacy

    • Enactive Mastery

      • Most important source

      • Gaining relevant experience with task or job

      • Practice makes perfect

    • Vicarious Modeling

      • Increasing confidence by watching others perform the task

      • Most effective when observer sees the model to be similar to themself

    • Verbal Persuasion

      • Motivation through verbal conviction

      • Pygmalion (external person that feels you’d do well at a task, converse is true) and Galatea (internally believe you’ll do well or not) effects, self-fulfilling prophecy

    • Arousal

      • Getting psyched up to complete task

      • Can hurt performance if emotion is not a component of the task


Job Characteristics Theory

  • Hackman and Oldham, 1980

  • Way of understanding the motivating potential of the job itself in relation to the individual

  • 5 perceived core job characteristics

    • Skill Variety: the variety in job tasks in terms of skills and abilities required

    • Task Identity: the association between a task and the job’s ultimate outcome

    • Task Significance: the impact of a job on others’ lives

    • Autonomy: the freedom to dictate and control one’s job

    • Feedback: the receipt of direct information regarding how effective one’s job performance is

  • Psychological States: meaningfulness, responsibility, knowledge of results

  • Outcomes: motivation, performance, satisfaction, absenteeism7

  • May be individual differences in the experienced motivating potential of a job

    • Sources

      • Knowledge and skill

      • Growth-needs strength

      • Satisfaction with contextual factors

  • Motivating Job Design

    • Job Rotation: moving workers from one job to another to promote interest and satisfaction

    • Job Enlargement: expanding a person’s job to include tasks previously performed by other workers (horizontal loading)

    • Job Enrichment: granting the worker more control over the job (vertical loading), enrich jobs by accountability, feedback, work-pace, control over resources

    • Sociotechnical Systems: new technology and job design

    • Self-Managed Work Teams: autonomous working groups

    • Social Information: what is going on at work shapes individual’s perception of the job and the response to it

    • Work Schedules: such as flexi-time, job sharing, teleworking

    • Worker Flexibility: employees are trained to do a number of jobs (refinement of job rotation)


Reinforcement Theory

  • Luthans and Kreitner, 1985

  • Pioneered by Skinner, based on operant conditioning

  • Behavior is environmentally caused

  • Theory posits that behavior that is reinforced tends to be repeated while behaviors that are punished/ignored tend to be extinguished

  • Requires a definition of what good performance looks like and clarity about what behavior should be reinforced

  • Types of Reinforcers

    • Positive Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, positive reward is given

    • Negative Reinforcement: positive behavior is demonstrated, negative thing is taken away

    • Punishment: negative behavior is demonstrated, negative consequence is given

    • Extinction: negative behavior is demonstrated, positive consequence taken away

  • Reinforcement Schedules

    • Continuous: reinforcement follows every instance of a behavior

    • Fixed Ratio: reinforcement follows after a set number of behaviors are observed

    • Fixed Interval: reinforcement follows after a set period of time

    • Variable Ratio: reinforcement follows a random pattern, unknown to the person


Cognitive Evaluation Theory

  • Providing an extrinsic reward for behavior that had been previously only intrinsically rewarding tends to decrease the overall level of motivation

  • Major implications for work rewards

    • Intrinsic and extrinsic rewards are not independent

    • Extrinsic rewards decrease intrinsic rewards

    • Pay should be non-contingent on performance

    • Verbal rewards increase intrinsic motivation, tangible rewards reduce it

  • Creating a motivating environment

    • Autonomy: 

      • Self-leadership

      • Shared leadership

      • Participatory goal-setting

      • Flexible working practices

    • Meaningfulness:

      • Purpose

      • Relatedness

      • Meaningful social contact

      • Having a positive impact

    • Competence:

      • The need to feel like you’re good at stuff

      • The feeling that you’re learning and developing

    • Recognition:

      • How good is performance recognized in your organization