Week 5 | Day 2 | PSYA02

Week 5 | Day 2 | PSYA02

Social-Cognitive Approach

  • Social cognitive approach: Personality is how a person deals with the situations encountered in daily life
  • Underlying assumptions
    • People note the consequences of their behaviour
    • People observe the behaviour of others across many situations
    • Out of these observations, they develop cognition about themselves
  • Unique personalities occur because of our different cognition
  • Theorists:
    • Albert Bandura
    • Julian Rotter
    • Walter Mischel

Bandura’s Self-System

  • The self-system involves cognition that we use to observe, evaluate, and regulate our behaviour
    • Imitate the successful behaviour of others and avoid unsuccessful behaviour
    • Learn how to act appropriately in the situation and fit in
  • Self-efficacy: (aka confidence) is how well we think we will perform in a given situation
    • Monitor your own behavior to determine when it is successful or not

Rotter’s Social Learning Perspective

  • Locus of control: belief about how in control you are of the events that can happen to you
    • Internal = you’re in control
    • External = events out of your control
  • Internal locus of control: better adjusted and able to cope with stressors
  • External locus of control: learned helplessness and higher prevalence of maladaptive behaviour

The Delay of Gratification: The Power of “Willpower”

  • Walter Mischel’s (2014) Marshmallow Test for delayed gratification (aka are you willing to sacrifice a small, sooner reward for a bigger, later reward)
    • Important for expression of personality
  • 20 years after the original delay of gratification study, the researchers interviewed the participants
  • The preschool children who waited for the larger reward (i.e. several marshmallows) were better-adjusted adults
    • Higher SAT scores + planned ahead + more mature
    • Physical health
    • Less drug abuse + criminal offence
  • Delay of gratification is a core component of successful personality adjustment and predicts future success BUT his research was a little biased since they used kids from campus, which means socioeconomic status + background can determine future success and delayed gratification

The Biological Perspective

  • The biological perspective: assume that certain biological processes serve to influence the underlying operation and expression of personality
    • Behavioural Genetics Perspective
    • Neurological Perspective: Physiological and Cortical Influences
    • Evolutionary PerspectiveEven if they were raised differently (100% DNA, different environment) personality comes from a lot od genetics

Monozygotic/Identical Twins

Dizygotic/Fraternal Twins

• One egg and one sperm.

• 100% shared genetic

material.

• Twins raised together are

more similar to those

raised apart

• Two eggs and two sperm.

• Up to 50% shared genetic

material.

• Less similar than monozygotic

twins.

Neurological Perspective: Physiological and Cortical Influences

  • Physiological Factors: Hormones and neurotransmitters.
    • Higher levels of testosterone are linked to dominance, aggression, persistence, and high-risk behaviour.
    • Lower levels of serotonin are associated with a greater willingness to engage in thrill-seeking activities
  • Brain Activity: Arousal and inhibition.
    • Introverts have higher levels of arousal in ARAS

Evolutionary Perspective

Survival

Reproduction

• Living longer.

• Positive personality

characteristics.

• Conscientiousness

• Optimism

• Negative personality

characteristics.

• Hostile Type A personality

• Neuroticism

• Functionally Infertile Individuals

(FII)

• Low rate of reproductive

success.

• Women who are high FII:

• Low cooperativeness.

• Men who are low FII:

• Self-confidence, extraversion,

social assertiveness.