Research Methods
Research Methods
Population
Definition: Any complete set of observations (or potential observations).
Real vs. Hypothetical Population
Real Population:
Definition: All potential observations are available at the time of sampling.
Example: If I could put every human being through my memory experiment to determine the exact workings of memory.
Application: Gallup polls survey 140 countries around the world on social, political, and economic issues.
Hypothetical Population:
Definition: All potential observations are not accessible at the time of sampling.
Significance: Sampling allows researchers to make generalizations to these hypothetical populations or sub-populations.
Sample
Definition: Any subset of observations from a population.
Characteristic: Sample sizes are generally smaller than population sizes.
Representative Sampling
Purpose: To make good generalizations from our sample back to the population.
Requirement: The population must be clearly defined (e.g., Are we discussing all humans, all college students, or Americans?).
Ideal Outcome: Our sample should closely match defined population parameters.
Example: If 10% of the population identifies as Black, the same percentage should be present in our sample.
Random Sampling
Objective: To randomly select participants for the study by drawing from the greater population.
Key Point: Each individual in the population has an equal chance of being selected.
Convenience Sampling
Definition: Used when complete access to the entire population isn't possible; relies on readily available samples.
Example: Undergraduates taking psychology courses at a prestigious urban university.
Advantages: Increases research efficiency by allowing quicker study execution.
Disadvantages: Decreases generalization capability. However, findings can still generalize if confirmed adequately.
Selection Biases
Definition: Occurs when a sample is collected in a way that some members of the intended population are less likely to be included.
Types of Bias:
Sampling Bias: Unrepresentative sampling methods.
Self-Selection Bias: E.g., when the group of individuals has control over their participation.
Example: Especially prevalent in online polling or surveys targeting narrow demographics.
Random Assignment
Definition: A procedure ensuring each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to any experimental group.
Outcome: Generates groups that are similar at the outset of the experiment.
Application: All experimental research should utilize random assignment.
How to Randomly Assign Participants
Method: Use a physical method to ensure randomness, e.g., flipping a coin, can be an effective strategy.
Validity in Research
Questions Addressed: How valid are our results?
Types of Validity: External validity and internal validity.
External Validity
Definition: The extent to which findings generalize to the population.
Factors Influencing External Validity:
Random, representative sampling enhances external validity.
Question: Can a sample from a hypothetical population exhibit external validity?
Answer: Yes, but requires replication.
Example: Do results from an intro psychology participant pool generalize to a wider population?
Internal Validity
Definition: The extent to which a finding is free from alternative explanations.
Consideration: Assess if confounding variables (or third variables) could explain findings instead.
Impact of Random Assignment: Leads to enhanced internal validity.
Example of Internal Validity
Case Studies:
Need for examples illustrating internal validity nuances.
Psychological Methods
Significance: Different investigation methods have varied efficiency in acquiring statistical data, validity, and control.
Ecological Validity: Refers to the extent findings can be applied to real-world scenarios. Not limited to the specific population but addresses a broader conceptualization.
Control: The degree of accuracy in measuring targeted variables through controlled circumstances and environments.
Psychological Methods Overview
Case Study:
Definition: Intensive investigation and observation of an individual.
Pros: Long observation periods enable rapport-building with individuals for in-depth information.
Cons: Lack of representativeness, potential observer bias, and low ecological validity. Typically qualitative rather than quantitative.
Observational Studies:
Definition: Observing individuals' behaviors in natural settings.
Pros: Involves numerous participants and avoids artificial laboratory conditions.
Cons: Limited to behavioral descriptions, subject to external influences, high ecological validity, but low control. Usually qualitative rather than quantitative.
Survey Studies:
Definition: Gathering self-reported attitudes, experiences, or demographics from a large number of individuals.
Pros: Ability to survey large groups on diverse topics.
Cons: Biased responses due to self-reporting, susceptibility to wording effects, medium ecological validity, and medium control. Generally quantitative, with limitations based on correlations.
Experimentation:
Definition: Manipulating variables in a precise, controlled manner to evaluate one variable's effect on another.
Pros: Determines cause-and-effect relationships, researcher control over variables/behaviors.
Cons: Ethical concerns and low real-world validity; high control counts against ecological validity. Primarily quantitative.
Ethics in Psychological Research
Essential Components of Ethical Research:
Voluntary participation of subjects.
Informed consent from participants.
Prohibition against coercion.
Transparency regarding deception.
Measures taken to avoid harm (physical or psychological).
Maintenance of participant confidentiality.
Protected Populations
Definition: Categories of individuals requiring additional ethical considerations during research.
Examples of Protected Populations:
Children
Mentally Disabled individuals
Prisoners
Pregnant Women (including their unborn fetuses)