This article discusses the connection between religious populism, state control, and digital authoritarianism in Turkey.
Focuses on the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its tactics to dominate digital media.
Combines religious justification with political policies to regulate cyberspace.
Investigates the AKP’s control over information and media narratives, highlighting coercive tactics against dissenters.
Digital Authoritarianism, Religious Populism, Media Control, Islamism, Digital Governance, Cyberspace, Fatwas, Sermons.
Free access under Creative Commons Attribution license.
Published by European Centre for Populism Studies (ECPS).
Article explores AKP's religious populism and media control strategies.
Incorporates scholarly sources, media reports, and legislative changes.
Turkey's governance evolved under Erdoganism since 2002.
Transition from Kemalism to AKP's pro-authoritarian approach.
Erdogan’s leadership centralizes power and diminishes dissent.
AKP’s grip affects political opposition, minorities, media, and academia.
Over 150,000 dismissals post-2016 coup; 100,000 arrests documented.
Academic institutions and media reported significant crackdowns.
AKP's influence extends into the Turkish diaspora, involving extradition cases.
Perception of extensive governmental reach affecting citizens abroad.
Freedom House declares Turkey's internet freedom as "not free".
Internet usage among Turks remains high despite restrictions; 80% active online.
86.5% internet penetration by early 2024; nearly 70% of the population on social media.
Average time spent online: 7 hours, 29 minutes.
Digital platforms serve as crucial channels for dissent, contrasting with declining traditional media.
AKP uses Islamic rhetoric to justify censorship and online opposition crackdowns.
Diyanet (Directorate of Religious Affairs) supports the government's digital authoritarian agenda.
Islamic values framed as essential for moral governance.
Diyanet sermons align with government policies, promoting the narrative of digital censorship.
Kemalism historical roots contribute to contemporary political dynamics.
AKP’s constitutional changes remove Kemalists from power and bolster authoritarianism.
Defined by electoral authoritarianism, neopatrimonialism, and populism.
Erdogan’s persona solidifies control over Turkish identity and governance.
Diyanet’s growth in budget and influence since AKP’s rise.
Support for Erdogan's policies, including digital governance initiatives.
Religious teachings and public sermons disseminate pro-government narratives, enhancing control over public opinion.
Diyanet voices concerns about social media harming societal morals; advocates for regulation.
A social media ethics booklet promotes surveillance and control in line with Islamic teachings.
Notable scholars advocating for tighter controls on digital narratives to uphold Islamic values.
Emphasis on combating misinformation to shape public opinion favorably towards AKP.
Government employs anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric as part of broader authoritarian tactics.
Censorship of LGBTQ+ content and initiatives to suppress visibility in media.
Response to protests led to stricter internet regulations and censorship under the guise of anti-terrorism.
Internet Law No. 5651 allows expansive government control over online content, targeting dissent.
Historical context of expanded legal frameworks to suppress opposition online.
Increased censorship on various fronts, affecting online and traditional media platforms.
Social media companies pressured to comply with government demands or face bans.
Regulatory environment favoring pro-government narratives while suppressing dissent.
Targeted harassment and legal actions against dissenting voices since 2016 coup attempt.
Threats to individuals for sharing non-conforming opinions.
Integration of religious ideology with digital governance enhances perceived legitimacy of the AKP's policies.
Effects of religious framing on public compliance and censorship practices.
Comprehensive reference list provided for sources cited in the analysis.