DOWNLOAD-PDF-5
Abstract
This article discusses the connection between religious populism, state control, and digital authoritarianism in Turkey.
Focuses on the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its tactics to dominate digital media.
Combines religious justification with political policies to regulate cyberspace.
Investigates the AKP’s control over information and media narratives, highlighting coercive tactics against dissenters.
Keywords
Digital Authoritarianism, Religious Populism, Media Control, Islamism, Digital Governance, Cyberspace, Fatwas, Sermons.
Page 1: Introduction to the Article
Free access under Creative Commons Attribution license.
Published by European Centre for Populism Studies (ECPS).
Article explores AKP's religious populism and media control strategies.
Incorporates scholarly sources, media reports, and legislative changes.
Page 2: Political Context
Rise of Religious Populism
Turkey's governance evolved under Erdoganism since 2002.
Transition from Kemalism to AKP's pro-authoritarian approach.
Erdogan’s leadership centralizes power and diminishes dissent.
Political Landscape
AKP’s grip affects political opposition, minorities, media, and academia.
Over 150,000 dismissals post-2016 coup; 100,000 arrests documented.
Academic institutions and media reported significant crackdowns.
Global Impact
AKP's influence extends into the Turkish diaspora, involving extradition cases.
Perception of extensive governmental reach affecting citizens abroad.
Page 3: Digital Landscape Evaluation
Internet Freedom Decline
Freedom House declares Turkey's internet freedom as "not free".
Internet usage among Turks remains high despite restrictions; 80% active online.
Social Media Engagement
86.5% internet penetration by early 2024; nearly 70% of the population on social media.
Average time spent online: 7 hours, 29 minutes.
Digital platforms serve as crucial channels for dissent, contrasting with declining traditional media.
Page 4: Role of Religion in Authoritarianism
Legitimization through Religion
AKP uses Islamic rhetoric to justify censorship and online opposition crackdowns.
Diyanet (Directorate of Religious Affairs) supports the government's digital authoritarian agenda.
Impact of Religious Leadership
Islamic values framed as essential for moral governance.
Diyanet sermons align with government policies, promoting the narrative of digital censorship.
Page 5: Historical Context of Governance
Transition from Kemalism to Erdoganism
Kemalism historical roots contribute to contemporary political dynamics.
AKP’s constitutional changes remove Kemalists from power and bolster authoritarianism.
Erdoganism Characterization
Defined by electoral authoritarianism, neopatrimonialism, and populism.
Erdogan’s persona solidifies control over Turkish identity and governance.
Page 6: Co-option of Religious Authorities
Diyanet’s Role in Supporting AKP
Diyanet’s growth in budget and influence since AKP’s rise.
Support for Erdogan's policies, including digital governance initiatives.
Public Messaging and Propaganda
Religious teachings and public sermons disseminate pro-government narratives, enhancing control over public opinion.
Page 7: Diyanet and Social Media
Critique of Social Media
Diyanet voices concerns about social media harming societal morals; advocates for regulation.
A social media ethics booklet promotes surveillance and control in line with Islamic teachings.
Page 8: Islamic Scholars and Digital Governance
Pro-AKP Scholars
Notable scholars advocating for tighter controls on digital narratives to uphold Islamic values.
Emphasis on combating misinformation to shape public opinion favorably towards AKP.
Page 9: Anti-LGBTQ+ Sentiment in Governance
Targeting LGBTQ+ Communities
Government employs anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric as part of broader authoritarian tactics.
Censorship of LGBTQ+ content and initiatives to suppress visibility in media.
Page 10: Digital Network Control
Gezi Park Protests as a Turning Point
Response to protests led to stricter internet regulations and censorship under the guise of anti-terrorism.
Internet Law No. 5651 allows expansive government control over online content, targeting dissent.
Page 11: Continued Digital Suppression
Increase in Media Restrictions
Historical context of expanded legal frameworks to suppress opposition online.
Increased censorship on various fronts, affecting online and traditional media platforms.
Page 12: Social Media Influences & Restrictions
Government Control of Platforms
Social media companies pressured to comply with government demands or face bans.
Regulatory environment favoring pro-government narratives while suppressing dissent.
Page 13: Digital Authoritarianism Tactics
Crackdown on Online Voices
Targeted harassment and legal actions against dissenting voices since 2016 coup attempt.
Threats to individuals for sharing non-conforming opinions.
Page 14: Conclusion and Future Implications
Relationship Between Religion and Digital Control
Integration of religious ideology with digital governance enhances perceived legitimacy of the AKP's policies.
Effects of religious framing on public compliance and censorship practices.
References
Comprehensive reference list provided for sources cited in the analysis.