Chapter 4 - classical sociological explanations of crime
Sociological theories explain crime through social context
Criminals are produced by their environment and social relationships
Criminal behaviour may have similarities to non-criminal behaviour and may be possible to explain using similar social theory
Sociological criminologists: examine group characteristics rather than focusing on distinctive things about individual engaged in crime
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917)
Founder of sociology as a discipline and how work on crime and deviance is impactful today
Sociological approach on suicide
Suidcide differences were the result of individuals having weaker ties to their communities
Essential to most societies is social solidarity
Social togetherness
Shared goals
Shared norms
Without norms to guide, societies function poorly, and people experience a lack of grounding (anomie)
In rapid change social solidarity can break down
Heterogeneity and division of labour weaken societal norms, loosen social controls and encourage individualism
When social cohesion breaks down individuals desires no longer controlled by traditional social control mechanisms
This was a worry as industrial capitalism fuelled urbanization - pushing people from their communities into bing new rapid moving cities
Chicago school
Early 20th century scholars were most prominent voices of sociology
Crime and social disorganization
Shaw and Mckay (1942) and Thrasher (1927) argues that crime and juvenile delinquency were not randomly distributed
High rates were caused by types of neighborhoods in which youth grew up
Social ties were weak and few controls
Economic disadvantage
Disorganization of theses neighborhoods were largely assumed rather than studied
Collective efficacy
Considered the opposite of social disorganization
Positive capacities of a community regardless of lack of resource and wealth
strain/anomie theory
Robert K Merton created social structure and anomie informing durkheim's ideas
Anomie: way societies are organized can strain individuals that can lead to rule-breaking behaviour - this is an inability to meet goals
Strain: is caused by the discrepancy between culturally defined goals and the availability to achieve goals
Dominant cultural goal in many countries is wealth
Hard work and education are supposedly what is required to achieving material goals
Problem arises when legitimate means for achieving material success are not uniformly distributed (some work may be harder than others)
When cultural goals encourage people to want things that are difficult for certain groups to get members of the group experience strain
5 modes of adaptation
To this strain: conformity, innovation, retreatism, ritualism and rebellion
Innovation is most often used to explain crime
The innovator believes in the culturally-defined goals and rejects achieving these goals
Innovators adapt using the proceeds from crimes (theft, fraud, and drug-dealing) to access so called american dream
Criticism of strain theory
Does not explain why educated and financially successful individuals engage in crime
Fails to explain gender differences (far lower rated for women)
Albert Cohen (merton's student)
Delinquent boys: the culture of the gang
Social control theory
Assumptions
People are born with the capacity to do wrong
No special motivation is needed to explain deviance
It is conformity, not deviance that needs to be explained
Asks
Why don't we all commit deviance
Why only some commit deviance
Focuses on
Why we refrain from deviance
Processes that bind people to the social order
Hirschi and the social bond
Causes of delinquency
Individuals are most likely to turn to crime if societal bonds are weak or broken
Control theory
Control theory views society as set of institutions that act to control and regulate rule-breaking behaviours
Travis Hirschi (1969) modern oringtor of control theory - social bond theory
Most people are risk takers but bonds in society help them follow rules and laws
If social bonds are broken or weak in individual could become open to egocentric impulses
4 components of social bond theory
Attachment: extent to which an individual is emotionally tied to and respects the opinions to their social group
Commitments: an investment or stake in conforming behaviour
Involvement: pursuit of conventional activities
Beliefs: a person's loyalty to dominant value system
Criticisms
Does not explain more serious youth crime or fault crime
Strong bonds and involvement does not guarantee protection from forms of deviance
Assumes 4 components relate to conforming behaviour
Differential association theory
Edwin sutherland first proposed differential association theory in 1939
Criminal behaviour is learned
Learning through interactions and learnt criminal ways
Those around people who commit crimes are more likely to engage as well
Techniques, motives and attitudes are learned
Criminal behaviour is a response to the same cultural needs and values
Labelling
Some groups have power to force label on less powerful
Not a quality of an act but a label
Labelling theory
Cooley (1902), Mead (1934) and Tannenbaum (1938)
Interested in explaining how crime is defined and how those with power react to rule breaking
Primary deviance: initial act of deviance
Primary deviation
Early in career, offender commits deviant acts infrequently
Secondary deviance: label is internalized following social reaction
Secondary deviation
Deviance becomes way of life
Individuals has acquired intended deviant act
Critical criminology
Struggle and conflict in society between powerful and less powerful classes
The state secures and maintains the interest of the economic elites
Focus of criminology should be directed to rule breakers and makers
Illegal activities in working class are subject to criminalization where political elites have impunity
Left realism
Victims of most cries tend to be those from most vulnerable segments of community
Main causes are believed to be relative deprivation - food for survival
Policies ineffective response to this situation
Feminism and criminology
Change social attitudes and criminal justice system responses to issues like sexual assault and domestic violence
Carol smart (1976) Freda Alder (1975) Rita Simon (1975) looked into this theory
Societies around world follow patriarchy (men occupying dominant positions of power inside and outside household)
Adler and Simon made liberation/emancipation hypothesis
Gender variation through patriarchy
John hagan A.R Gillis and john simpson proposed power control theory
Including genders
Deviance is related the amount of control in household
Girls are more deviant in equal households
Findings and supporting evidence has been mixed but some believe in relation to different forms of parenting
Male violence against women
1983 rapelaws in canada were renamed to sexual assault statues (including marital rape)
Women needed to have evidence to have charges laid
Moral character (credibility) of woman was questioned in regard to weather she provided consent
Domestic disturbances often did not lay chargers
Costs of violence against women is high and support services for victims of violence are lacking
Ideal victim
Race
Gender
Power held
Outcast of society
Mental health issues
Violence in home
Major source of call for police
Limited means for addressing domestic violence
Family depending on perpetrator causes issues on incarceration
Responding to violence
Movement of domestic abuse survivors has been more effective than police intervention
Police work alongside social services to help visits
Women as victims and offenders
Most criminalized women had been physically abused or sexually assaulted as children or adults
Pathways show connection between criminal activity and victimization
Chapter 5
Gottfredson and Hirschi wrote a general theory of crime
Argument is that crime are all results of low self control
Low self control is constant through life and behavioral problems in children move onto delinquency
Parenting is most important factor is determining level of self-control
If a child is abusive… ect. Upbringing they will tend to be the same and engage in crime
Criticism
Mixed results when put to empirical testing
Self-control may shift over time
Fails to explain white collar crime
Ignores role of crime opportunity
Why do young people commit crimes
Adolescence is period of ambiguity
Neither children or adults may not be fully committed to conventional values
Life course perspective
Why do they stop?
Individuals refrain from crime and deviance as they enter adult rokes
Data from longitudinal research are used to test this theory
Victimization during early years carry negative repercussions later in life
If social supports are provided to crime victim, long term disadvantages may be prevented
General strain theory
Merton argued strain can lead to criminal behavior
Robert Angew argued Merton's version did not apply to youth who additionally experience other kinds of strain
Angew theory suggest that several types of negative experiences can lead to stress and it is not just economically induced strain that prevents youth from achieving goals
Inability to achieve immediate goals (good grades, popularity) can lead to strain (stress) as can abuse
Three types of strain
Inability to achieve positively valued goals
removal or threat to remove positively valued stimuli (getting suspended, getting divorced)
Actual or anticipated exposure to negative harmful stimuli
Rational choice theory
Rooted in classical school of criminology
Human behavior is result of conscious decision making
Criminals are rational actors
Crime is influenced by variations in opportunity, environment, target, and risk of detection
Policy implication corporate and other white collar crimes are effective regulation and sufficient funding of enforcement agencies
Distinguish between 2 types
Instrumental crimes: involves planning and weighing of risks
Expressive crimes: often impulsive and emotional people who commit them are not likely to be concerned at the time of commission
Routine activity theory
Proposed by cohen & felson (1979)
Suggest that changes in levels of crime in society are closely associated with changing lifestyles
Changes in how teenagers are supervised
Ability to travel
Crime is likely to occur when motivated offender and suitable vitim come together in an environment that does not provide protection
2 policy implications directed at protection
Private property: residence, business, vehicles
Target hardening - locked entry points, visible alarm systems
Public areas: active surveillance and patrols by police and security
Cristims
Opportunities to commit crime doe not necessarily lead to committing crime
What about crime displacement
Crime prevention through environmental design
Natural surveillance
Objects or people maxime natural visibility or observation - presence of window
Natural access control
Deter access to crime target by creating increased perception of risk to the offender (lighting, entrances)
Territorial reinforcement
Use of physical attributes that express ownership (fencing, landscaping)
Maintenance
Creating appearance of ownership
Park benches
Bus stops
Meridians
Strategy more so than a theory
Critical criminology
Strain theory
Theory on economic inequality as a contributor to crime and how subcultures form through exclusion from “American Dream’
Labelling theory
Theory on how some people/groups define who is criminal
Critical criminology sees crime as
Inequalities
Class division
Segmented social organization
Separate, segregate and cause governments at all levels everywhere to differently and discriminately
Critical criminology
Harmfulness ranking
C “protestors block loggers from chopping down an old-growth forest”
Alcohol being illegal in america
This is how black market gets involved
Drinking whiskey made people crazy
Banned and gone underground
Policy implications
Radical political approach that is more about social and economic policy rather than crime control
Policies that target the social, cultural and economic forces that push people into crime such as family violence
Poverty and unemployment targeting root causes and transformations of society
Criticism: how crime is actually a problem for regular people (left realism)
Risk and actuarial crim
Postmodern risk theory - focus on understanding emerging forms of social control
Different techniques of governing people and ways of thinking that go alongside
How do people think about and approach the problem of crime
What techniques, technologies ideas are brought together to deal with crime
Risk and actuarial criminology example
Credit card suspension
Chapter 6
Social exclusion
It is not just about poverty
Can involve physical and non-physical exclusion often in ways that are aligned
“The process of being shut out, fully or partially from any social, economic. Political or cultural systems
Social exclusion is multi-dimensional
Restriction of people's access to spaces, practices and institutions
Homelessness
Consequence and cause of social exclusion
25,000-35,000 young people are homeless in 2020
Homeless youth have greater involvement in criminal behaviour
Most troubled background engage in crime
Trauma, abuse, involvement with protective services
Big part of kids from foster care
Youth gangs
Specific minorities, groups or immigrant background struggling with social exclusion
Power, money and protection are the reasons youth identify with gangs
Gangs provide a sense of belonging, a way to make money
Indigenous people
Social exclusion has been apart of their lives forever
More suicide, being sick, substance use, and more time in crim justice system
They take up small amount of population but take up a quarter of prison population
Solutions to change the indigenous population in criminal justice system
Educate the judges about the problem and make more sentencing alternatives
Make the amount of indigenous people brought in lower
Indigenous women are more likely to be victims in crime
Indigenous women are 12x more likely to be murdered or go missing
Violence against women
Social and economic exclusion plays a role in violence against women
Women are more likely to be killed by partner is relationship
Hate crime
Crimes done based on race, ethnicity, sexual orientation
Acts of Terrorism on non dominant groups
Victims are strangers and mostly committed by males under 30 with no criminal records
This is why hate propaganda is a crime
Large numbers of hate crimes against asians after covid-19
Sikh students being targeted in kelowna
Hate crime is hard to deal with in canada because
Police departments use different definitions of hate crimes
There is no hate crime section in criminal code
Chapter 7
White collar crime
Crime that is committed by person with high status in their occupation
Focuses on crimes committed by those who have an advantage over others
These crimes take place in the business world
There's different benefits from the crime between white collar and corporate
White collar: beneficial for that person
Corporate: good for the whole business
There is also
Occupational crime: people who commit crime in their employment (ex. Theft, fraud)
Ponzi scheme: money paid to investors is from their own pocket or other investors not actual profit of business
Pyramid scheme: participants pay to recruit others into a scheme and then they make money (brooklyn 99 boom boom)
Theres not a lot of information on corporate crime
Corporations
Corporations are considered legal people but they don't follow the same rules
Corporations have an advantage because of special legal protections and money
White collar crimes are rarely charged
People are more worried about violent crime
White collar crime are complex to investiagte
There is crossovers with penalties for the rcmp
The financial collapse of 2008
Financial institutions did not want or use regulations
Was very reckless ended up having the global economy collapse
No corporate executives were punished
E.coli breakout 2000
Deregulating drinking water testing
7 people died and half the town were sick in ontario
Price fixing:
Companies set prices that are not changed on goods/services which leads to higher prices
Car manufacturing defective fuel systems
Knowing this they did not recall because of unwanted costs
“Profits-over-human consideration”
Occupational death
The third leading cause of death in canada
State corporate crime
Illegal actions that occur when institutions of political governance co-operate with one or more economic production and distrubution
Smartest guy in the room - documentary
Enron
What factors influenced the company to become an example of what things can go wrong in corporate america
George W Bush supported Enron - friends in high places
Used these friends to get legislations passed
Deregulation = more freedom
“Government is not the solution to our problem they are the problem”
Texas oil men wanted government out of the electricity business
Performance reviews:
10-15% were fired lay off the bottom in reviews
Dominance
Monopoly position
Culture
Risk-taking
Do whatever it takes to not be in the bottom
Men dominated
Trying to prove masculinity
Causes of white collar crime
White collar opportunities
Changes in regulation or tech
Stock market manipoulatin
White collar decision making
Rational choice theory
Weighing cost and benefit of illegal behaviour
Cost of rule compliances, moral inhibitions
The characteristics of white collar offenders
Mostly male
Gender based
causes cont.
Regulatory capture
Green criminology: study of environmental damage, caused by human acitivtiy
Crime against state/government
Quebec terrorists in 1970
Storming of capital in 2021
Crime committed by state
Scadnals during 2011 federal election
Treatment of activists and supporters during rallys/demonstrations
Police misconduct
Constant factors
The role played by discretion
Bribes, low visibility
Variable factors
Culture of police and culture of community
Level of morals in community
Crime in trusted organization
Residential school system continuing even though abuse was reported
Violence
Rather than violence being an evolved behaviour we have evolved interactional obstacles to violence
Like animals we avoid physical violence (one party backs down)
Dominance and emotional energy
1960s why people fight
When audience there's pressure to fight
Involves alcohol - someone being offended - group
Chapter 4 - Classical Sociological Explanations of Crime
Sociology explains crime through social context, emphasizing that criminals are shaped by their environment and relationships.
Criminal behavior shares similarities with non-criminal behavior and can be analyzed through social theory.
Sociological criminologists study group characteristics rather than focusing solely on individual traits.
Durkheim is a key figure in sociology, influencing crime and deviance studies.
He linked suicide rates to weak community ties, highlighting the importance of social solidarity—a sense of social connectedness through shared norms and goals.
When norms weaken (anomie), societies experience instability, leading to higher crime rates.
Example: Rapid urbanization during industrial capitalism weakened traditional social bonds, leading to more deviance.
Early 20th-century sociologists (Shaw & McKay, 1942; Thrasher, 1927) studied crime in relation to neighborhoods.
High crime rates were linked to economically disadvantaged areas with weak social ties and little social control.
Example: Inner-city areas with high poverty and frequent population turnover often see more youth crime.
Collective Efficacy:
Opposite of social disorganization.
A community can reduce crime even without wealth if it fosters strong relationships and social cohesion.
Example: Neighborhood watch programs that build trust among residents.
Builds on Durkheim’s concept of anomie.
Society sets cultural goals (e.g., wealth) but not everyone has equal means to achieve them.
This gap creates strain, leading some to turn to crime.
Five Modes of Adaptation to Strain:
Conformity – Accepts cultural goals and means (e.g., working hard).
Innovation – Accepts goals but uses illegitimate means (e.g., theft, fraud).
Ritualism – Rejects goals but follows social norms (e.g., low-wage workers).
Retreatism – Rejects both goals and means (e.g., substance abusers, homeless individuals).
Rebellion – Creates new goals and means (e.g., revolutionaries).
Criticisms:
Does not explain why wealthy individuals commit crimes.
Fails to account for gender differences (lower female crime rates).
People are naturally capable of deviance; what needs explaining is why people conform rather than commit crime.
Crime occurs when social bonds are weak.
Four Components of Social Bond Theory:
Attachment – Strong emotional ties to family, friends, community.
Commitment – Investment in conforming behavior (e.g., education, career).
Involvement – Participation in conventional activities (e.g., sports, jobs).
Belief – Acceptance of societal norms and values.
Criticisms:
Does not explain serious crimes or white-collar crime.
Strong social bonds do not always prevent crime (e.g., organized crime families).
Crime is learned through interaction with others.
Individuals exposed to criminal behavior (family, peers) are more likely to engage in crime.
Example: A teenager growing up in a gang-influenced neighborhood learns and adopts criminal values.
Deviance is not inherent but results from societal labels.
Primary deviance: Minor rule-breaking (e.g., skipping school).
Secondary deviance: Internalization of a deviant identity due to labeling (e.g., repeated criminal behavior after being labeled a criminal).
Example: A student labeled as a “troublemaker” may eventually embrace this identity and continue delinquency.
Focuses on power imbalances.
The legal system protects the interests of economic elites while criminalizing the working class.
Example: White-collar crime (e.g., corporate fraud) often goes unpunished, while petty theft is harshly penalized.
Examines gender inequalities in crime and justice.
Women’s crimes often stem from victimization (e.g., domestic abuse survivors committing self-defense crimes).
Example: Prior to 1983, marital rape was not recognized as a crime in Canada.
Crime occurs when:
A motivated offender
A suitable target
Lack of capable guardians (security, surveillance) converge.
Example: Unlocked cars in an unmonitored parking lot attract theft.
Natural surveillance: Windows, open spaces for visibility.
Access control: Fences, security lighting.
Territorial reinforcement: Landscaping to indicate private property.
Maintenance: Clean and well-kept areas deter crime.
Chapter 5 - Self-Control & Life-Course Criminology
Crime results from low self-control, established in childhood.
Parenting is the most crucial factor in developing self-control.
Example: Poorly supervised children are more likely to engage in delinquency later in life.
Criticism: Fails to explain crimes of high-status individuals (e.g., fraud, corporate crime).
Expands on Merton’s strain theory to include non-economic strains:
Failing grades
Bullying
Loss of a loved one
Example: A student facing academic failure may resort to cheating or vandalism.
Chapter 6 - Social Exclusion & Crime
Social exclusion is broader than poverty; it includes exclusion from education, employment, and social services.
Example: Homeless youth are more likely to engage in crime due to lack of stability and resources.
Indigenous people make up a quarter of Canada’s prison population despite being a small percentage of the total population.
Solutions: Culturally appropriate sentencing alternatives and judicial education on systemic racism.
Crimes motivated by race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.
Example: Increased hate crimes against Asian communities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chapter 7 - White-Collar Crime
White-collar crime: Benefits individuals (e.g., fraud, embezzlement).
Corporate crime: Benefits entire companies (e.g., price-fixing, environmental violations).
Corporations influence regulators to avoid penalties (e.g., 2008 financial crisis—banks avoided accountability).
Example: The 2000 Walkerton E. coli outbreak in Canada due to water regulation failures.