Typhoon Haiyan case study
Physical causes
Surrounded by Pacific Ocean where temperatures are above 23°C
Cluster of thunderstorms in the region in November 2013
Light wind sheer, keeping the storm structure in tact
Small islands that couldn’t absorb the storm’s energy
Human factors that contributed to the scale of impacts
Low level of development in the Philippines affected the country’s ability to cope with natural disasters of this scale
Much of the country lives in extreme poverty
Rapid population growth, particularly in vulnerable coastal areas (e.g in Tacloban the population grew from 76,000 to 221,000 in 40 years)
Buildings and storm shelters are poorly constructed
Characteristics of the typhoon
Violent
Ferocious winds - 320 km/h - made landfall at its peak
400mm of rain
Waves as big as 15m tall
Impacts
Environmental
Soil erosion and loss of vegetation
Economic
Estimated economic damage of $2.86 billion
Other primary industries damages (e.g fishing boats and coconut trees - the Philippines is one of the world’s largest produces of coconuts)
130,000 tonnes of rice ruined
Social
11.5 million people affected
At least 6300 dead
1800 declared missing
670,000 made homeless
90% of houses in Tacloban demolished
130,000 houses destroyed
Responses
UK government provided food, shelter, clean water, medicine and other supplies for up to 800,000 victims
Several charities provided emergency aid (water, food and shelter)
Repaired fishing boats for distributing rice seeds
UN launched and international aid appeal in December 2013 for £480 million to finance the humanitarian relief effort for 2014
How effective were the responses? SOMEWHAT
Helped a lot of people to get food, water, shelter in the short term
Some places were unable to be reached due to the amount of damage and help needed, meaning it was not effective long term
Physical causes
Surrounded by Pacific Ocean where temperatures are above 23°C
Cluster of thunderstorms in the region in November 2013
Light wind sheer, keeping the storm structure in tact
Small islands that couldn’t absorb the storm’s energy
Human factors that contributed to the scale of impacts
Low level of development in the Philippines affected the country’s ability to cope with natural disasters of this scale
Much of the country lives in extreme poverty
Rapid population growth, particularly in vulnerable coastal areas (e.g in Tacloban the population grew from 76,000 to 221,000 in 40 years)
Buildings and storm shelters are poorly constructed
Characteristics of the typhoon
Violent
Ferocious winds - 320 km/h - made landfall at its peak
400mm of rain
Waves as big as 15m tall
Impacts
Environmental
Soil erosion and loss of vegetation
Economic
Estimated economic damage of $2.86 billion
Other primary industries damages (e.g fishing boats and coconut trees - the Philippines is one of the world’s largest produces of coconuts)
130,000 tonnes of rice ruined
Social
11.5 million people affected
At least 6300 dead
1800 declared missing
670,000 made homeless
90% of houses in Tacloban demolished
130,000 houses destroyed
Responses
UK government provided food, shelter, clean water, medicine and other supplies for up to 800,000 victims
Several charities provided emergency aid (water, food and shelter)
Repaired fishing boats for distributing rice seeds
UN launched and international aid appeal in December 2013 for £480 million to finance the humanitarian relief effort for 2014
How effective were the responses? SOMEWHAT
Helped a lot of people to get food, water, shelter in the short term
Some places were unable to be reached due to the amount of damage and help needed, meaning it was not effective long term