Sure Ground

Writing Process and Perceptions of Impossibility

The writing process is often viewed as impossible.
Analogy of writing difficulty compared to the inevitability of a constructed building.
- Building perceived as an inherent outcome, while writing feels unstable and flawed.
The process includes multiple drafts and editing.
Readers perceive polished writing as flawless, regardless of the author’s hesitations during creation.

Activity with students involves analyzing emotional responses to a video.
- Initial impressions without context (e.g., feelings of love or hate).
- Revealing information about the video changes responses.
The video depicted a skyline with smoky visuals and emotive orchestral music.
- Music by William Basinski from The Disintegration Loops conveys themes of loss and decay.
Students often use metaphorical language to express interpretations after learning the context.

The focus is on how knowledge alters emotional and intellectual responses.
Understanding an artwork’s creation doesn’t guarantee a more authentic response but shifts the perspective.
Literary studies aim to provide insights into art and processes involved.
Challenges in justifying the humanities and its impact in a profit-driven academic environment.

Literary studies faces marginalization due to economic-driven education systems.
Arguments for the discipline often hinge on profit-making potentials (e.g., analytical skills helping future employment).
The need for unceasing critique in humanities to retain value.

Criticism reflects the uncertainty of meaning; no absolute ground exists in critiques.
Neoliberal thought undermines critical analysis by demanding profitability from meaning.
Bruno Latour states that literary studies go beyond critique and have intrinsic value.

Academics often grapple with self-doubt regarding the value of their work.
Doubts about motivations for pursuing literary criticism as societal pressures mount.
The humanities provide nuanced reflections on work and creativity amidst broader societal issues.

Work, particularly in the arts, is enshrouded in mystification.
Tensions between art creation and economic value challenge the understanding of success in the humanities.
There is a constant search for equivalence between different types of work and their meaning.

The author reflects on their decision to pursue a PhD inspired by art experiences.
Early career frustrations led to a commitment to professionalize knowledge and skills in the humanities.
Exploration of demystification in the experience of art reveals critical insights.

Critique can disclose the complexity of artworks but risks diminishing the sense of wonder.
Importance of balancing understanding with maintaining emotional connections to art.
Archives of influential authors underline diligence in the writing process, challenging romantic notions of authorship.

The elusive nature of writing creates a divide between the writer and their process.
Writing often transitions between chaotic and structured stages; clarity emerges from disorder.
Success in art leads to a feeling of inadequacy for aspiring writers.

The simplistic view of artistic creation can mask the complexities of writing processes.
Acknowledging epistemic limits can enrich our understanding of literature.
Totalizing explanations may contribute to the humanities crisis, reflecting limitations in understanding art.

The fatefulness of creation (e.g., Basinski’s work) often transcends intentional meaning.
Engagement with art requires patience and critical listening—highlighting the contrast between noise and silence.
The process of art creation serves as a metaphor for personal and societal sense-making.

0.0(0)

Chat with Kai

View the linked pdf