Self-Esteem and Self-Perception
Self-Esteem and Performance
Unsuccessful performance triggers self-blame.
Leads to further lowering of self-esteem.
Creates a cycle that keeps individuals from achieving their wishes.
Ethnicity and gender significantly interact in complex ways regarding self-esteem.
Some minority groups exhibit lower self-esteem compared to the majority group.
Conversely, some minority groups have higher self-esteem.
Gender Differences in Self-Esteem
Research indicates that white females may have lower self-esteem than minority females, especially concerning body image.
Overall, males typically score higher in self-esteem measures compared to females.
Meta-Analysis Study by Gentile et al. (2009)
Focused on domain-specific self-esteem and gender.
Method:
Meta-analysis compiles various studies to identify overall effects and conclusions.
Findings:
Men scored higher in domains such as:
Physical appearance.
Athleticism.
Self-satisfaction regarding self-esteem.
Women scored higher in domains like:
Behavioral conduct.
Moral and ethical self-esteem.
Basic Principles of Self-Perception
Types of Information Processing
Automatic Processing
Definition: A mindless type of processing requiring little thought or attention.
Examples of automatic processes:
Morning routines (like brushing teeth) that can be performed without conscious thought.
Walking a familiar route without conscious recollection of certain actions (e.g., crossing streets).
Controlled Processing
Definition: A mindful type of processing that requires active thinking and intention.
Used for tasks such as:
Problem-solving.
Decision-making.
Selective Attention
Definition: The ability to focus on relevant stimuli while ignoring irrelevant stimuli.
Seen in the cocktail party effect, where a person can focus on a conversation despite background noise.
Significance: Demonstrates how the brain prioritizes information relevant to the self.
Cocktail Party Effect Explained
Scenario: At a bustling cocktail party, surrounded by noise, one can focus on a friend's voice.
Mechanism: The brain scans for significant information, such as one’s name, triggering a shift in attention.
Implications of the cocktail party effect:
Showcases exceptional selective attention capabilities of the human brain.
Importance in social environments; enables effective communication despite background noise.
Automatic Processing During Selective Attention
While engaged in a conversation, the brain also unconsciously processes background noise, which may lead to increased attention when personal topics arise.
Example: Recognizing a friend's name or a unique sound (like a baby crying) amidst conversations.
Other self-relevant stimuli might attract attention:
Favorite celebrity names mentioned.
Various important events or familiar sounds.
Self-Attributions
Understanding Self-Attributions
Self-attributions are inferences individuals make about the causes of their behavior.
Attributions can be categorized into two dimensions:
Internal vs. External
Internal: Attributing behavior to personal traits (e.g., effort).
External: Attributing behavior to situational factors (e.g., difficulty of the exam).
Stable vs. Unstable
Stable: Traits that do not change (e.g., ability).
Unstable: Variables that may change over time (e.g., mood).
Examples of Attributions
An individual performs well on an exam:
Internal Attribution: "I did well because I worked hard."
External Attribution: "I did well because the test was easy."
Stability of Attributions:
Stable internal: Intelligence.
Unstable internal: Effort; mood.
Stable external: Established laws.
Unstable external: Luck, situational opportunities.
Attribution Scenarios
Scenario: If someone slips and falls on an icy sidewalk:
Attribution: External (blaming the sidewalk).
Stability: Unstable (the situation caused the fall).
Attribution Styles Impact on Mental Health
Pessimistic explanatory style:
Leads to internal, stable, global attributions leading to chronic negative feelings and a lack of control.
Example: "I failed the exam because I'm stupid".
Optimistic explanatory style:
Leads to external, unstable, specific attributions promoting temporary negative emotions and active behaviors.
Example: "I failed due to unusual pressures preventing study, next time I’ll do better".
Self-Understanding Motives
Types of Self-Assessment Motives
Self-Assessment: Desire for truthful information about oneself.
Self-Enhancement: Desire to maintain positive self-regard.
Effects of Self-Perception
Individuals often evaluate their abilities favorably.
Dunning-Kruger Effect:
Definition: A cognitive bias where individuals fail to recognize their lack of skill in certain domains.
Consequence: Overestimation of abilities leading to inflated self-views.
Better-Than-Average Effect:
Definition: The tendency for individuals to believe they perform better than the average in various domains.
Statistics: Approximately 75-80% of individuals rate themselves above average on various metrics despite only 50% being mathematically feasible.
Impact Bias:
Definition: The tendency to overestimate the impact of events on emotional well-being.
Example: Predicting long-term distress after breakups or job loss.
Study on Impact Bias
College students predicted happiness levels after being assigned to various dormitories.
Predictive results indicated:
Those placed in desirable dorms anticipated a happiness level around 6.
Those in undesirable dorms predicted happiness around 3.
Actual happiness one year later showed no significant difference between groups,
The finding illustrated overestimation of the impact of living conditions on happiness (focalism).
Self-Enhancement Methods
Cognitive Biases for Self-Enhancement
Self-Serving Bias:
Definition: Tendency to attribute successes to personal factors and failures to situational factors.
Common examples include:
Failing a test may be attributed to the test being unfair rather than a lack of knowledge.
Fundamental Attribution Error:
Definition: The tendency to overemphasize personal causes when explaining others' poor behaviors.
Example: Assuming someone is a poor driver for cutting you off without considering situational factors (e.g., distractions).
Group Dynamics in Self-Enhancement
Basking in Reflective Glory (BIRGing):
Definition: Enhancing personal image by association with successful individuals or groups.
Example: Students boast about their sports team's success, saying “we won”.
Cutting Off Reflected Failure (CORFing):
Definition: Downplaying association with unsuccessful groups.
Example: Distancing oneself from a sports team after it loses.
Self-Regulation and Delay of Gratification
Overview of Self-Regulation
Definition: The process of directing and controlling behavior to achieve set goals.
Measurement of self-regulation often involves delay of gratification tasks.
Marshmallow Test Overview
Marshmallow Test:
Test participants' ability to wait for a greater reward.
Children must choose whether to eat one marshmallow immediately or wait for a second marshmallow after a delay.
Findings from past cohorts show:
Those who resisted temptation generally have higher SAT scores, better life outcomes, and healthier social interactions compared to those who did not.
Challenges in Delay of Gratification
Children face various distractions that impact their ability to wait, including:
Taste preferences (e.g., liking marshmallows).
Feeling hungry.
Presence of peers (social influence).
Importance of Teaching Delayed Gratification
Methods to cultivate self-regulation include:
Encouraging children to wait for rewards through saving or working towards desired items.
Not yielding to tantrums teaches self-control and the value of delayed gratification.
Ego Depletion Model in Self-Regulation
Definition of Ego Depletion
Suggests that self-control is a limited resource; excessive use leads to depletion.
Subsequent tasks became difficult to manage post-exhaustion of self-control resources.
Study Example on Ego Depletion
Task Design: Participants had a choice between eating radishes (challenging) or chocolate (easy), followed by a difficult puzzle task.
Findings:
Participants who refrained from eating chocolate performed poorly in the puzzle task compared to participants controlling their intake or eating radishes.
Supports the concept of ego depletion: depletion of self-regulation resources negatively impacts ongoing performance.
Conclusion: The ability to delay gratification predicts significant outcomes such as academic performance, social interactions, and overall life satisfaction.