The author, Woody Holton, a US history teacher, recounts an incident in January 2022 where a parent complained about The 1619 Project on the syllabus.
The author sees this message as a reflection on academic freedom.
Holton tweeted images of 76 founding-era documents to support the claim that African Americans offered to fight for the British in exchange for freedom in 1774.
Most students sided with The 1619 Project, requiring Holton to present opposing views.
During early 2022, South Carolina House debated five bills to prohibit K–12 teachers from assigning books that might cause white students to feel guilty.
Two bills specifically targeted The 1619 Project.
Other bills aimed to outlaw the teaching of “critical race theory” (CRT).
The author joined hundreds of South Carolinians in opposing these book bans.
The 1619 Project gained significant readership after its release in August 2019 as a New York Times Magazine special issue and later as a best-selling book in 2021.
Critics allege the project contains errors, is overly focused on grievances, and presents a gloomy view of the U.S.
Some critics argue that the project prioritizes class over race and North America over the Atlantic world, and is unkind to the Founding Fathers and white abolitionists.
Liberal historians like Gordon S. Wood and Sean Wilentz also critiqued it, with some suggesting it downplayed African American agency.
Daryl Michael Scott noted the project ended a “moratorium on depicting African Americans as victims.”
Starting in January 2021, lawmakers in 15 states introduced bills to ban The 1619 Project from public schools.
Texas and Florida enacted the ban.
Opponents of CRT claim that the COVID-19 pandemic revealed teachers indoctrinating students with anti-American sentiment.
CRT is described as growing out of critical legal studies (CLS), focusing on underlying structures rather than individuals.
CRT seeks to shift analysis away from individuals and toward underlying structures.
In 2020, right-wing politicians and media personalities broadened the definition of CRT to include anything considered “divisive.”
Christopher F. Rufo claimed credit for turning CRT into a mass-market brand, inviting conservatives to categorize various “cultural insanities” under it.
President Donald Trump issued an executive order banning “divisive concepts” from DEI trainings for federal workers.
Fox News significantly increased its references to CRT between 2019 and 2021.
The Washington Times also sharply increased its mentions of CRT during the same period.
Attacks extend beyond African American history, with laws targeting “gender or sexual diversity training.”