Exam 1 Review: Meet with Grad TAs or instructor during office hours.
Mid-semester and TA Evaluation: Complete within weekly module.
ADS Accommodations: Reserve for Exam 2 now.
Exam 2 Prep: Start immediately, review material after each class for 10-15 minutes, practice examples in reverse order, understand the Phillips curve and labor market curves.
Monetary policymakers must recognize the trade-off between inflation and unemployment, noting that instability does not imply nonexistence.
Developed a model explaining output variations during the business cycle.
Emphasis on labor markets' role in determining the natural rate of unemployment and price levels.
A.W. Phillips discovered a negative correlation between wage growth (linked to inflation) and unemployment in 1958.
This relationship, termed the Phillips curve by Samuelson and Solow in 1960, became central to macroeconomic policy.
Analysis of inflation and unemployment in the U.S. showed low unemployment correlating with high inflation and vice versa.
Triangles on graph indicate data collected during the Great Depression (1931-1939).
Established the notion that low unemployment can coexist with high inflation, and low inflation would correspond with higher unemployment.
The 1970s experienced shifts indicating the need to reconsider these trade-offs.
Wage Setting (WS) and Price Setting (PS) equations used to derive the basic structure of the Phillips Curve, linking unemployment (u) and inflation (π).
Introduced parameters such as wage rigidity (⍺) affecting wage flexibility related to unemployment changes.
Under specific assumptions of constant inflation expectations, the relationship becomes: [ \pi_t = \pi_e + m + z - \alpha u_t ]
Where ( \alpha ) indicates wage sensitivity to unemployment rate changes.
Originally, a constant inflation rate led to observable trade-offs in the 1960s.
In the 1970s, a shift occurred as wage-setters reevaluated inflation expectations, leading to a breakdown of the predictable relationship.
By setting expected inflation as dependent on past inflation rates, the relationship fluctuated, particularly during 1970-1995.
Introduced changes in inflation rate dynamics, where current unemployment affects future inflation trends.
As expectations evolved, the Phillips curve's predictability diminished, marking distinct phases in macroeconomic thinking about the relationship between unemployment and inflation.