Theory and Methods Booklet 1
A-level Sociology
Part 1 - Theory and methods
Name: ________________________________________
Teacher: _________________________ Class code: ________________________
Section | Topic | Completed |
---|---|---|
1 | Structural consensus: Functionalism | |
2 | Structural Conflict: Marxism | |
3 | Neo-Marxism | |
4 | Social Action- Weber | |
5 | Social Action: Symbolic Interactionism | |
6 | Social Action: Phenomenology and Ethnomethodology | |
7 | Structuration- Giddens | |
8 | Structural conflict: Feminism | |
9 | Modernity vs. post modernity |
A Level Sociology
Theory and Methods: Functionalism
Spec Title: consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories
(AO2) Braindump
General theory:
Consensus theory
Society functions as a body and each sector acts as a different sector (organic analogy)
Family:
Parsons
Murdock
Young and Wilmott
Bott
Education:
Durkheim
Parsons
David and Moore
Beliefs:
Bellah
Durkheim
Malinowski
Crime and Deviance:
Durkheim
Cohen
Merton
Hirschi
Who are the founding fathers?
Durkheim
Marx
Weber
Durkheim & Functionalism:
INFLUENCED the work of Parsons and Merton
Important to measure objective facts as they are free from bias and subjectivity
Objective truths are based on the law, money and language
Beliefs norms and values in society are based on objective truths
Measuring objective truths would lead to the scientific measurement of society
Founded the functionalist view that society is based on value consensus
Social institutions shape the process of socialisation, create social solidarity and social cohesion
All social phenomena performs positive functions for society
How does society work?
The Work of Durkheim directly influences Parsons: AO1- Parsons and systems (1970): Systems are like organisms, such as the human body, both self regulating but also inter-dependent. The human body works collectively as institutions in society (family education, media) works collectively also. Organic analogy is a system.
Needs:
Institutions in society have needs e.g. the need for socialisation or socialisation
(AO2) For example…
E.g. education relies on parental consent and adequate primary socialisation
E.g. family needs economic stability and a form of a workplace
Functions:
Institutions are able to function for the benefit of society
(AO2) For example…
E.g. the family’s function is to provide socialisation and communicate
E.g. crime has the function of creating social cohesion through reaffirming boundaries
AO1- Social order Parsons:
A state of stability and consensus rather than a state of chaos and upheaval (anomie)
Central value system: the practices in society based on the hegemonic value consensus
A shared set of norms, values, beliefs, moral codes and goals in society
Value consensus: allows for social change and can lead to disagreement with the central value system
An agreement upon the shared practices in society
For value consensus, three things are needed:
Socialisation:
The learning of society’s norms and values and the requirements to succeed and thrive to achieve societal goals
AO2- For example…
Primary socialisation in the family e.g. taught how to speak and eat
Secondary socialisation in education e.g. meritocracy teaches pupils a work ethic and value of competition
Social Integration:
Belonging to a society or community.
AO2- For example…
In religion this occurs through going to places of worship to have shared liturgy
In education this is done through learning FBV and history teaches British victories and patriotism
Social control:
Informal- unwritten values that are policed by peers as well as institutions e.g. family and education and formal- written laws and policies to enforce their agenda
Reaffirms value consensus
Following societal norms and values are rewarded
Deviance from societal norms and values result in sanctions
AO2- Parsons- Functional Prerequisites: must be fulfilled by the social systems using…
Adaptations:
Society meets its members needs by adapting through the economic sub-system e.g. the raising of minimum wage during the cost of living crisis, triple lock pensions
Goal attainment:
Society has set goals and has allocated resources to achieve them
This occurs due to the political sub-system e.g. achieving a place of high social standing so education is free and healthcare is free in the UK
Integration:
Different parts of society work together to help individuals achieve their goals e.g. religion provides a large network of support, education gives people a work ethic preparing them for the workplace
Maintained the norms and values of society through the ‘warm bath theory’ in the family
Latency:
The processes in society that are maintained over a long period of time
Society runs smoothly during periods of social change e.g. education moving online during the pandemic
Being made redundant allows people to rely on their families or religious beliefs
This is referred to as the AGIL schema.
Which of these roles are instrumental and which are expressive?
Instrumental:
Adaptations
Goal attainment
Expressive:
Integration
Latency
AO2- Durkheim’s views on social change and social evolution:
Compares traditional society to an traditional society
Works independently and functions by itself, self-reliant and single cell organism
Comparable with traditional pre-industrial communities
It provided and consumed by itself
Pre-industrial society was judged purely by ascribed status
IN MODERN SOCIETIES HOWEVER, it functions like the digestive system
Many different organs (institutions) working together to provide for its members
If something changes in one institution, it directly affects other institutions
Thus, society has developed slowly and gradually leading to the development of specific social institutions
AO1- Structural differentiation (Parsons)
Different institutions in society have become more specialised, they have developed specific functional roles each meeting a different set of needs
E.g. education allows for social mobility, the family allows for norms and values, religion teaches morals and ethics
Particularistic standards- differing levels of judgement based on socialisation practices
Universalistic standards- even level of judgement through examinations
AO2-
AO3 (analysis)-
This causes secularisation which has led to the separation of religion from major socialising institutions like education or the state.
Religion is being replaced by the family and education system in teaching norms and values to children especially based on morality and provision of knowledge, moreover, education now takes on the role of social solidarity
AO3- Evaluation of Parsons:
Ethnocentric view as secularisation isn’t occurring in Islamic cultures
Exaggerates the separation of institutions rather they are overlapping e.g. faith schools in the UK
the rise of the media shows that it is becoming even more differentiated
Merton (1968):
Indispensability- all institutions are necessary for society to function adequately- no empirical evidence to support this. E.g. the idea that the nuclear family is the best and most effective family type has no supporting evidence
Functionality- all instructions have functional unity and directly influence each other. Not always true as E.g. change in mandatory education age has no impact on religious belief or 2008 financial crash doesn’t affect the rules of netball THIS CRITICISES THE IDEA OF SYSTEMS
Parsons assumes that everything is intended however, Merton argues that we have both intended and unintended consequences and functions.
AO2- e.g. Hopi Indian Rain Dance
Manifest function (intended)- to produce rainfall
Latent function (untended)- created social solidarity in a time of hardship e.g. drought
Manifest function of education: building knowledge
Latent function of education: reproducing class inequality
Manifest function of religion: teach morality
latent function of religion: maintaining social cohesion in society
AO3 Evaluation:
Marxism:
Society isn’t harmonious
Based upon class conflict and exploitation
Legitimises power seeing as those with the most privilege would have the most to lose if society changed.
Postmodernism:
Functionalism is too outdated to look at the diverse and the fragmented nature of society
Functionalism is a meta narrative that attempts to explain society as a whole but fails in doing so due to the complexities of society
Dennis Wong:
Sees functionalism as as deterministic as it assumes that people have no free will or agency- individuals will blindly follow society's norms and values due to socialisation and value consensus
Ethnocentric:
The studies are focused in western-centric places
Craib (1992):
Though there are flaws to Parsons theory he must be accredited for his attempt to provide an explanation for society as a whole as very few theorists have tried or come to the conclusions that Parsons does.
Functionalism and the New Right:
Political ideology which emerged in Britain during the years 1979-1997 of conservative gov’ts.
Share functionalism’s beliefs in: social order, socialisation, social stability
Functionalism= consensus and New Right argues that society is failing seen throughout the development of the underclass
Family:
Dependency Culture
Marsden and Murray
Education:
Education voucher
Chubb and Moe
Crime:
Merton
A Level Sociology
Theory and Methods: Marxism
Spec Title: consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories
Warring factions based on ideology but approaches to society are very similar
Similarities with functionalism
Structural theories
See inequality as inevitable
Impact of structures on individuals
Both are deterministic
Quantitative, positivists
Macro theories
Modernist theories
Main differences to functionalism
Conflict vs consensus
For functionalism social change is smooth and gradual but for Marxists the only way for social change is a revolution.
Workers of means of production:
Proletariat own their labour
Exploited as they create products for the bourgeoisie to sell for profit
Owners of means of production:
Own everything including proletariat labour e.g. land, capital, factories
Have the means to exploit the proletariat through the fact they control every aspect of Proletariat lives
Lumpenproletariat:
lowest social group and they are fundamentally unable to gain class consciousness e.g. vagrants, unemployed and criminals
Slows the idea of revolution as they are unable to help the proletariat
They act as a deterrent for the proletariat to revolt as they are aware that their situation could be worse
Act as easy replacement workers for the proletariat
Their lack of mainstream participation in the economy means that they don’t disrupt capitalist and bourgeois society and industry
Petty Bourgeoisie:
The middle class with the lowest social status e.g. small business owners
They have the same politico-economic ideology as the bourgeoisie
Aim to gain the same level of economic capital as the bourgeoisie
As they have the same values and interests as the bourgeoisie they develop a superiority complex over the proletariat
Halts a revolution as they want to be the bourgeoisie not get rid of their existence
Their small business ownership stops them having a revolution as they feel that they would be worse off after revolution
According to Marxism, the bourgeoisie will reduce in size as the proletariats become bigger, this is because…
When the petty bourgeoisie threaten the bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie will buy their business or copy the same successful model as the petty bourgeoisie
This allows them to create the same product, both quicker, cheaper and better
This eventually pushes the petty bourgeoisie out of business e.g. Tesco express putting corner shops out of business
This allows the bourgeoisie to get richer as there is less competition
Buying out the petty bourgeoisie makes the bourgeoisie smaller
The petty bourgeoisie lose their capital and sink into the proletariat
More people in the proletariat means that there is more competition
AO3: Is this relevant to contemporary society?
Many companies are becoming increasingly monopolised.
Most sweet food consumption is controlled by 10 companies like nestle and PepsiCo
Meta bought out their social media competition e.g. WhatsApp and instagram
AO2:
Chart comparing proportion of 16-18 year olds studying towards A-level qualifications achieving at least AAB at A-Level in 'facilitating subjects', by type of school or college attended
over ⅕ of private school students get AAB at a level whereas 1/10 of those who go to state schools get the same qualifications
How will the proletariats respond to this?
The proletariat will gain class consciousness inevitably
See false class consciousness in every institution people interact with
Social change in society:
Marx identifies three successive class societies, each with its own form of exploitation:
Ancient society:
Succeeded primitive communism
Slaves were exploited by empires and rulers of empires
Tied to their slave owners and exploitation
Feudal society:
Monarchs and lords were able to exploit serfs that worked on the land
Absence of a bartering system
Capitalist society:
Happened as a result of industrialisation
As the lords and nobles transitioned into the bourgeoisie e.g. House of Lords members have hereditary peers
The serfs have become slaves to wage labour
Materialist theory of history:
Base is known as the economic level of society where all the capital of society exists. Bourgeoisie is able to profit from the base economically
The base shapes the superstructure from the profit gained from the base.
The proletariat can’t influence the superstructure as they only learn bourgeois norms and values
Cyclical nature as it maintains the status quo
One way causality as everything starts at the base and the base shapes ideology
How is society structured?
Base Structure and the Superstructure
Superstructure- the bourgeoisie are able to benefit from the economic production of the base. Thus the profit from the base allows them to shape the superstructure.
As the proletariat have a lack of capital to influence the superstructure, they only learn bourgeois norms and values and cement their oppression by maintaining the status quo
the economic level of society and contains all the capital and the population of the respective society
Thus, there is a one way causality between how the base influences the superstructure.
AO2-
Family- Inheritance and Engels; ideology which maintains the structure of the inequality in the base as bourgeoisie is able to keep the most capital for themselves
Education
Religion
The inequalities predicated by the downfall of capitalism as proposed by Marx
Alienation:
Ideologies:
What is stopping the fall of capitalism from happening?
AO2-
AO3: Grenfell
Social mobility:
Social capital:
Cultural capital:
AO3: Is Marxism still relevant in contemporary society?
How has the working-class eating culture changed?
What is the name of the top level of social class?
What is the name of the bottom level of social class?
What is the new class that is no longer based on wealth/income?
What is the class based on?
Social class in contemporary society:
Devine (1992):
AO3: Is Marxism relevant in contemporary society?
Harvey- Neo-Marxism (1990)
Discusses economic impacts in the 1970s
Society became deindustrialised and a turn towards financial goals through financial sector
In a globalised world, there is a need for global Marxism due to the exploitation on a global level e.g. sweatshops and outsourcing labour
Flexible accumulation- MNCs exploit the global systems to their advantage. Produce goods, cheap and sell those goods around the world
Move away from traditional Marxism and exploitation due to the rising scale of those exploited.
However, Harvey (1990)…
National governments are now a lot less powerful than previously e.g. UN are able to block and veto the ability to pass laws i.e. Rwanda, EU free movement between countries
NATO and international armies
Image Politics gives the illusion of choice and the fact that democracy and freedom of choice is a facade. Many individuals represent similar views, little access to who is supports and backs the leaders of the country
There are now more dilemmas than class e.g. race, religion and ethnicity
Rise of single issue political parties e.g. Green Party and UKIP
Summary of Marxism:
Evaluation of Marxism:
Weber- Class isn’t the only division in society. Splits class into status e.g. leisure time activities and party e.g. political ideology you subscribe to and support. When the two don’t align, it causes more divisions in society
Weber argued that Marx is too simplistic by oversimplifying the categories that people are split into e.g. the proletariat should be: skilled and unskilled, the bourgeoisie should be: office workers, white collar, petty
Feminists argue that class divisions are less relevant as women regardless of class women are more likely to oppressed and exploited due to the fact that they are more likely to experience part time work, dual burden
Marx thought that class would be a massive division and the middle class would become a bigger working class, however, M/C has grown in the UK. China’s globalisation has allowed W/C to benefit
Marxism is economically deterministic as it ignores social mobility and the presence of free will
gaining class consciousness is an example of how the working-class will gain the free will as its inevitable
The first to explain massive inequalities in terms of wealth, power, and income, through the owners of the means of production
Recognises the importance of the economy and how the economic base is able to dictate and control what is happening in wider society
The revolution hasn’t happened yet e.g. Russian Revolution 1917 and there were divisions on how to reach revolution
Theory and Methods: Neo-Marxism
Spec Title: consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories
Trying to compensate for the critiques of Marxism
Scientific/Structuralist Marxism:
E.g. Althusser
Maintains economic determinism, no free will- no matter what, people maintain their ascribed status of w/c
ISA and RSA
Humanistic/Critical Marxism:
E.g. Gramsci
People do have free will
Hegemony vs Counter hegemony
Humans have the ability to change history
AO1: Althusser: believes that societies exist on three levels: the economic (Goods) (production in order to satisfy needs), the political (RSA) (organisations) and the ideological (ISA) (the way people see themselves and the world). The later two are not mere reflections of the economic level (as Marx believed – economic determinism) but they have ‘relative autonomy’ although still having an effect on the economy.
Critical of the base superstructure model as its one way causality is unrealistic and too simplistic.
There is a two way causality between the ideological and state apparatus
Althusser (1971)– also identifies two kinds of state apparatus used to help maintain the position of the capitalist class:
‘Ideological state apparatus’ – education and the mass media
‘Repressive state apparatus’ – the army and police
Provides a more sophisticated model of Marx based on three levels:
Economic level - Goods and services
Political Level- RSA
Ideological Level- ISA
AO2: Craib’s analysis:
All levels influence each other, thus there is a 2 way causality
All levels equally cause exploitation in society
The ideological and the political levels have relative autonomy and can work independently from the economic level
Ground floor shop- buy/sell products, level of profit dictates political long term decisions
First floor offices- long term decisions e.g. buy another shop, fire an employee
Top floor living quarters- personal changes in life that influence your interactions with the lower levels e.g. having a child
Education:
Economic level= reproducing a workforce
Political level= creating and maintaining norms and values through hidden curriculum, discipline, and sanctions
Ideological level= values of work ethic and socialisation of young people
Family:
Economic level= unit of consumption
Political level= surveillance
Ideological level= socialisation
Beliefs:
Economic level= Consumption and financial contributions to society
Political level= influences legislation
Ideological level= informs and justifies accepting position on earth.
AO3: Evaluation of Althusser:
Overcomes Marxists failings in saying that the superstructure can affect the economic base and the economic base can impact on our superstructure.
Craib- Althusser provides a more sophisticated concept of social structure but whilst Althusser believed he was analysing society scientifically, ironically, he has heavily influenced postmodernism who reject the idea that you can research society scientifically.
It claims to get rid of economic determinism, it just replaces it with a more complex determinism.
Frankfurt School: Developed on Althusser’s ideas and criticised Marx for ignoring three main areas:
Instrumental Reason: the idea that the w/c work for instrumental reasons and often are working to achieve a means to an end, sometimes working hard, is not for capitalism but for rational reasons e.g. providing for the family. Rationale implies that it is a choice to work rather than just being exploited by capitalism
Mass Culture: Marx understates the impact the mass media have on maintaining capitalism. E.g. promotes consumerist norms and values by othering countries who are perceived as less than in order to increase uptake of capitalist support
Oppression of personality: Capitalism takes advantage of how many members of the w/c see work as a key part of their identity and therefore, work hard because they want to work hard
Humanistic Neo-Marxism
AO2: Gramsci (1937): also highlighted the importance of ideology in ensuring the maintenance of capitalism. Gramsci’s notion of hegemony (intellectual and moral leadership), argues that the capitalist class exercise hegemony because their ideas and values are dominant. As a result they are able to pursue.
Do others consent to their rule. According to Gramsci:
“Revolution is only possible if the working class challenge the hegemony of the ruling class.”
Hegemony- Bourgeoisie maintain their dominant ideas and values- intellectual/ moral leadership
Coercion and Consent- The ruling class maintain their power through laws, police, and army.
AO2- Control over CJS
Duel Consciousness- An acute awareness of their exploitation. W/C need to unite behind a new hegemony to enforce social change.
AO2- Revolution
Organic intellectuals- Special individuals who give a voice to those that need it or inspire a social action.
AO2- Martin Luther King
AO2: Maduro ‘liberation theology’
Catholic priests in South America in 1960s and 1970s
Church had relative autonomy from the state
Priests taught the W/C about their exploitation
The Church aligned with the w/c to create social change
In 1979 Nicaguan Revolution: the 1979 Sandinista National Liberal Front ovethrew the Samozaan Dynasty.
The Group aligned their Catholic view with Marxism to form a new hegemony
Founded by university students across the country
AO3: Evaluation of Gramsci:
Paul Willis- Learning to Labour, the participants saw through the myth of meritocracy and maintained their position, proving that they had dual consciousness
Overplays the role of ideas and consciousness and understates the role of coersion and consent as he places it below in the hierarchy e.g. Public Order Bill, 2011 London Riots
Theory and Methods: Social action
Spec Title: consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories
Social Structure: Pre-existing social arrangements that shape behaviour e.g. institutions
Social Action: Humans have free will, rational thoughts and emotions.
In what ways do social action theorists disagree with structural theories such as functionalism or Marxism?
People reject/rebel against societal institutions as they have free will rather than being controlled by them, interpretivist approach, micro, life chances aren’t determined by an individual’s CAGE factors so people can change their social standing
Unlike structural theorists, social action theorists argue that people’s behaviour and life-chances are not determined by their social background. Instead, social action theorists emphasise the role of the active individual and interactions between people in shaping personal identity and in turn the wider society. In order to understand human action we need to uncover the individual’s own motives for acting.
Weber= strong contribution to sociology as it influences interactionism as a whole
Max Weber (1864-1920):
Max Weber was one of the founding fathers of Sociology. He argued that understanding individual motives is crucial for understanding changes to the social structure. This made him different from Marx and Durkheim as they only focused on the social structures.
Verstehen: Empathetic understanding which is the main point of sociology.
The Level of Cause: societal institutions, directly shape and form human behaviour
The level of meaning: subjective meanings, individuals react independently to society’s structures, attach our meanings to our actions
Social Action: refers to an act which takes into account the actions and reactions of individuals.
AO2- Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism
Cause- The Protestant Reformation meant that Catholicism lost its monopoly of truth and denominations such as Calvinism arose.
Meaning- They lived an ascetic lifestyle- simplistic, minimalist, reinvesting in their businesses and the economy allowing their businesses to grow and boom. This allows capitalism to thrive and move forward. However, not every Calvinistic led an ascetic lifestyle and not every Calvinist was successful in their business and they made mistakes. Each Calvinistic acted and reacted to the Protestant reformation differently and independently, thus, there is a level of meaning attached to this.
Weber is a mixed method sociologist as he discusses how micro reactions influence macro structures.
Types of Social Action:
Instrumental- rational social action:
Actions carried out to achieve a certain goal.
An individual does something to achieve a result.
The action may not be the most desirable option but is necessary for the goal at the end
AO2- for example
E.g. paying staff minimum wage to increase profit, hiring new employees to help expand the business
E.g. the pandemic and following lockdown regulations
E.g. going to school in order to get into university- deferred gratification
E.g. raising children for primary socialisation
Value Social Action:
Action that there is inherent value in the action
The result itself, can’t be measured and there is no way of calculating the result
The action is carried out for the sake of its own goal
AO2- for example
E.g. Praying to gain a place in heaven
E.g. Holding a door open for someone
E.g. Saying bless you when someone sneezes
Traditional Social Action:
Carrying out an action because it is the way it has always been done
There is no goal to be achieved
AO2- for example
E.g. marriage
E.g. Eating with a cutlery
Singing the national anthem before a sports event
Affective Social Action:
Actions that can’t be controlled or there is little control over
Based on emotion and affection
AO2- for example
E.g. Falling in love
E.g. crying, laughing
Charismatic leaders are able to use affective social action to galvanise support for their motives e.g. Kim Jung Un crying for mothers to have more children
Evaluation of Weber:
He is profound as he was first to highlight the free will humans have in society
Structures in society don’t have as much power as first suggested by structuralists.
Strong contribution to sociology as he was first to discuss the need and research into empathetic understanding in sociology
Schutz- Little explanations for shared reactions and shared feelings and meanings
It is very hard to truly understand the thoughts and feelings of others
Weber’s typology is very difficult to apply and it is unworkable as there are only 4 social action groups.
Some actions fit into multiple typologies e.g. having children, Christmas, Marriage
Malinowski- The Trobriand Islanders engaged in a gift giving ceremony called- Kula. Giving gifts to neighbouring tribes thus, it was both traditional and instrumental
AO3- analysis
Strong contribution to
sociology as it inspired the whole of
Symbolic interactionism
A Level Sociology
Theory and Methods: Symbolic interactionism
Spec Title: consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories
Symbolic interactionism- Mead (1863- 1931) and then Blumer (1969)
Disagreed with the Marxist and Functionalist view that humans are controlled by social structures.
The symbol
Interested to see how people act and react to a stimulus in society
Explore how meaning is attached to those symbols
Meanings may not be shared by everyone. For example…
Reactions to cars, marriage, sports, political ideology
Mead: Unlike animals, our behaviour is not shaped by fixed, pre-programmed instincts.
Humans respond to the world by giving meaning to things, thus we inhabit a world of meanings by attaching symbols to the world.
Animals respond to stimuli in an automatic way. Humans interpret its meanings e.g. shaking your fist is a symbol that can mean many things.
Stimulus- the original symbol that evokes a particular reaction
interpretive phase- How we interpret the symbol can change depending on the individual e.g. two fingers= swearing, peace, victory
Response- Response dependent on interpretation
In order to interpret meanings we take on the role of the other (trying to see ourselves as others do). This develops through interaction.
AO1- Mead- The ‘I’ and the ‘Me’: similar to the Superego and the Id
What is the ‘I’?
The ‘I’ is the individual and is self-opinion and is shaped by the ‘me’.
The choices we make
What is ‘Me’?
The socialised aspect of the individual based on interactions.
What is the relationship between the ‘I’ and the ‘Me’?
the ‘me’ keeps the ‘i’ in check and controls it.
The ‘I’ bends the rules
‘Me’ and ‘I’ make up the individual
E.g. a boy wearing a dress
The ‘me’ restricts the boy from wearing a dress.
The wants and desires of the ‘I’ are restricted by the ‘me’
E.g. openness of sexuality
AO1- Cooley: The Looking Glass Self
AO1- Blumer:
Self: For an individual to know how to respond to the symbols and for them to have meaning to them they must know their role in society.
Interaction:
Each person must learn to take the viewpoint of other people into account
We have to read the meaning of a situation – very complex situation.
Here is where there is scope for confusion and error – people may read the rules or symbols
Wrong
Blumer suggests that we develop the notion of our self in childhood and playing games
Blumer- 3 stages of interaction
Meaning-
Language-
Thought-
AO2: Example
A boy (Jeremy) and a girl (Kim) broke up last year. When Jeremy received an email from Kim to go out he agreed and they went to a bar. Jeremy had a different kind of meaning though in comparison with Kim. Jeremy went out as friends, where Kim went out as with the meaning of ‘potential boyfriend’. Also in the communication the language was misunderstood. Kim wanted to have a romantic night, while Jeremy wanted to have a talk in a bar. This is also caused by the nonverbal element of emails. The third miscommunication is under thought. When Jeremy replied so fast Kim thought that they were going out to a romantic place. Jeremy went out just as ‘friends’. They both used an internal dialogue to interpret the situation and to make a perception of the evening
Goffman- Dramaturgical Analogy: Society is like a stage with people acting out performances. We are all ‘actors’, acting out ‘scripts’, using ‘props’, resting ‘backstage’ between ‘performances’.
Impression management: People are constantly engaged in managing the impressions they give to others by putting on performances to convince others of the identities they wish to assert. This involves studying our ‘audience’ to see how they respond.
Roles: Unlike Functionalists Goffman argues that there is a ‘role distance’ from who we are on stage and off stage – our roles are loosely scripted by society & we have freedom in how we play them e.g. teachers being strict/ or easy going.
AO3- Evaluation of symbolic interactionism:
AO2- Symbolic interactionism has been applied in labelling theory
Labelling Theory (H. Becker)
Stage 1: Someone in society with power applies a label to a group/individual as ‘other’ or deviant.
Stage 2: The labelled individual/group is then treated differently by others in society.
Stage 3: The individual begins to see themselves as different and begins to associate themselves with others that share a similar label.
Stage 4: The individual becomes the label.
Stage 1:
Stage 2:
Stage 3:
Stage 4:
Subcultures and Labelling
A group of people with a culture (whether distinct or hidden) which differentiates them from the larger/mainstream culture in the society they belong to.
Labelling and Subcultures:
Cohen ‘Folk Devils and Moral Panics’:
Cohen was interested in the truth behind the ‘Mods vs. Rockers’ media hype in the late 1960s. According to the media the violence between the ‘Mods’ and ‘Rockers’ was a national problem that represented the decay of society.
Cohen reached very different conclusions compared to what the media was reporting…….
Cohen found the following in his research (which contradicted the media stories)…..
>The ‘Violence’ that the media reported was actually minimal.
> The majority of young people at the seaside during these so called ‘riots’ were not Mods or Rockers.
> The media seemed to have painted a skewed picture of events & sensationalised the clashes between these two groups.
In order to understand why this occurred (occurs), Cohen suggests we need to understand the concepts of Social Control, Folk Devils & Moral Panics.
AO3- The key point is that labelling can have a serious impact on someone’s sense of self and their identity and interactionists uncover this impact.
Outline and explain contributions by social action perspectives in understanding contemporary society (10 marks)
A Level Sociology
Theory and Methods: Phenomenology and Ethnomethodology
Spec Title: consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories
Symbolic interactionism key concepts recap
Phenomenology
AO1- Husserl
The world as we know it is a product of the individual mind.
AO2- Schutz
Developed Husserls ideas and applied it to the social world. He states the way the individual mind views the world isn’t completely unique in fact we share these with other people which is how we are able to live in community and social groups. There develop through shared experiences. These may be different in different communities and social groups and are not necessarily applied to society as a whole or across societies.
AO2- for example…
Typifications
AO2- for example…
Life World
AO2- for example…
Recipe Knowledge
(AO2) For example…
Natural Attitude
AO3: Burger and Luckman
They agree that it is right to focus on the common sense knowledge they disagree with the idea that reality is an inter-subjective reality but instead that once the shared meanings have been created, society becomes an external reality that reflects back on us For example religion starts as a set of ideas but becomes powerful structures of society which can constrain us.
Ethnomethodology
AO1: Garfinkel
Garfinkel is interested in how social order is maintained. He is interested in how people construct the common sense knowledge and the rules and processes we use to produce the meanings in the first place.
AO3: How could this be a criticism of symbolic interactionism
How is social order created?
What do Ethnomethodologists study?
Indexicality
Reflexicality
AO2- Breaching experiment
Garfinkle got his students to either act as lodgers in their own home (overly polite, avoiding getting personal) or the haggled over the price of groceries at the checkout of a supermarket.
Breaching experiments are experiments which aim to disrupt people’s sense of order and challenge their reflexivity (individuals are able to shape their behaviours based on the situations they are in) by undermining assumptions about a situation.
By challenging the taken for granted assumptions he was able to show that the orderliness of everyday situations is not fixed but an accomplishment of those who took part. Social order is “participant produced”
AO3:
Giddens theory of structuration
AO1/3 Structuration
AO1- Duality of structure
Reflexivity
AO2- legal system
Methods
AO3- Evaluation of Structuration Theory
Theory and Methods: Feminism
Spec Title: consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories
Three waves of feminism:
First Wave- Early 1900s- late 1920s:
1st creating equality between men and women (suffragette movement). Where women fought for the right to vote.
Second Wave- 1960s- 70s:
2nd concerned with radical transformation of society to overcome patriarchy – this was the era of the 1960’s where women burnt their bras in the street to fight for equal pay, abortion, divorce etc
Third Wave mid 1990s- present day?:
Less focus on laws and political processes and more focused on individual identity. And the differing experiences of women.
It is concerned with diverse and local forms of feminism. it no longer universalises women’s experiences instead it breaks it down into smaller groups in society i.e. Age, ethnicity...
Fourth Wave- present day?:
AO1: The challenge to malestream sociology
What is patriarchy?
Walby defines patriarchy as ‘a system of social structures and practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit women.
AO2: How can society be patriarchal?
Walby (1990) – two types of Patriarchy:
Private-
Public-
AO2:
Women Political Leaders Summit (2017):: Only 23% of the world's politicians are women (34% of MPs in the UK). It's time for that to change
At the summit on 29 and 30 November, politicians and policy experts are discussing issues such as leadership, legislation and policies that work for women, in areas including peace, defence and security; the impact on women’s lives of digital and technology; and how to include gender impact in government policy-making.
Around the world, women are closing the gender gap in areas such as health and education, but significant gender inequality persists in politics
Liberal Feminism:
Developed out of second-wave feminism – seeking reform rather than revolution and argue that smaller changes in the position of women in society would lead to equality between the sexes.
Main arguments:
AO2: Friedan (1963)
Solution
AO3 Analysis:
AO2: Sommerville- March of Progress
AO2: Sharpe
Conducted interviews with secondary school girls in 1976 and another interview 20 years later with a different group to compare results. She found how girls’ attitudes to education and priorities in work had changed. In 1976 the girls placed ‘love, marriage, husbands, and career’ in that order as their top priorities. However, in 1996, they had switched to ‘job, career and being able to support themselves’ as their top priorities. She found that this made the girls:
More confident,
More assertive,
More ambitious, and
More committed to gender equality
Critical of…
Critical of:
AO2:
AO3 analysis:
Faludi- crisis of masculinity
AO3 evaluation:
Policy changes:
Overly optimistic
Radical Feminism:
Particularly associated with certain writers from second-wave feminist thought, who adopted the most extreme position and believed that women are exploited by, and subservient to, men.
Firestone (1972) and Ortner (1974):
Personal is political:
Brownmiller (1976):
“the fear of rape is a powerful deterrent against women to be out alone at night”
AO2:
Sexuality is a social construct:
AO2: Levy (2005)- Raunch culture
Levy: In her book Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture, Levy attacks the increasingly sexualised culture that objectifies women.
AO1/2: Solution:
Advocate separatism (Greer):
Consciousness’ rising:
Political lesbianism:
Women having control over their reproduction:
Firestone argued that contraception was a step towards greater gender equality, because it gave women more control over when they got pregnant. The pill introduced in the U.K. in the early 1960s.
However….
AO3: Evaluation:
Pollert (1996):
Sommerville (2000):
Liberal Feminism:
What about men?
Marxist Feminism:
They reject the notion of gender equality by liberal feminism and also say that patriarchy is not due to sexual exploitation like radical feminism. They say it is rooted in capitalism. Women’s subordination comes because of capitalism as they take on the home duties which is unpaid for the interest of capitalism.
AO2: Four ways women are exploited and oppressed:
Women are a source of cheap and exploitive labour (Delphy and Leonard, 1992)
Women are the reserve army of labour (Benston, 1972)
Women are used to reproduce the labour force (Smith, 2013)
Women act as a safety valve for men (Ansley, 1972)
Barrett (1980) Ideology of Familialism:
Mitchell (1975):
AO3: Evaluation:
They are able to link both class and gender inequality.
It does not explain women’s subordination in non-capitalist societies or societies where there is communism.
Hartmann (1981) ‘sex-blind’:
Hartmann (1979) dual system feminism
Walby:
Difference Feminism
Difference feminist do not see all women as a single homogenous group- women of ethnic minorities, white, working class and middle class, black, heterosexual, transgender, homosexual women all have different experiences.
They say that traditional factions of feminism have been ethnocentric. Meaning that, while claiming to address issues about women in general, the actually concentrate on white women’s experiences in the western world. Other feminists have called this ‘false universality’.
Has developed since the mid-1990s as a part of third wave feminism.
AO1: Intersectionality
AO2:
AO2: Mirza
Essentialists of feminism-
Essentialism= the idea that all women share the same experiences.
AO3 evaluation:
AO1: Post-structuralist feminism (Butler and Scott (1992))
AO1: The enlightenment project
AO2:
AO3: Evaluation:
AO3: Is feminism an important contribution to Sociology?
Theory and Methods: Post modernity Vs Modernity
Spec Title: the concepts of modernity and post-modernity in relation to sociological theory
What do feminism, Marxism and Functionalist all have in common according to Post modernity?
What is modernity?
What is postmodernity?
Annotate and develop the ideas around the differences between modernity and post modernity:
Modern society or Modernity | Postmodern society or Postmodernity |
---|---|
Industrialisation was organised along capitalist lines where people worked mainly in heavy factories like coal mining, manufacturing products etc | The primary sector (coal mining) and secondary sector (factories) have declined because of globalisation, these sectors have been taken to cheaper countries. The tertiary or service sector (financial and retail) has become more dominant. |
Mass media reflecting or mirroring a basic social reality, through media like TV, newspapers, and magazines | Global interactive digital media, social networking and electronic communication (internet). Media becomes more removed from reality. |
Politics centre around social class interests, focused on political parties and government | Politics has become more personalised – identity (e.g. sexuality, ethnicity, religion) politics over party politics. Macro politics replaced by micro (single-issue) politics. |
Nation-states, national economies and national identities predominate | Nation states and national identities are displaced by globalisation. Supranational bodies (e.g. EU/UN), and MNCs (e.g. Apple, Starbucks, etc) eclipse national and local identities. |
Knowledge comes from science rather than religion | Decline in faith in science – began being seen as the cause of problems rather than necessarily the solution |
Does power create knowledge or knowledge create power?
AO1: Foucault:
Power and knowledge are inter-related – knowledge is always an exercise of power and power is always a function of knowledge
Anti-foundationalism
Relativism
AO1: Lyotard (1984): Metanarratives
People do not believe in the myth of truth and societies can no longer be understood in terms of general theories. There has been a loss of faith in superiority of science and progress.
AO3- Coronavirus conspiracy theories
Why isn’t postmodernism a metanarrative?
AO3: Evaluation of Leotard
AO1: Baudrillard:
Life in the postmodern era is so dominated by media imagery that it has become what he calls ‘media saturated’.
Simulacra:
Hyperreality
AO2:
Culture and Identity in Post modernity
Society shows endless versions of truth
Society is unstable
Metanarratives
Metanarratives in the past have failed
In post modernity you can pick and mix identity
However, we have endless amount of truths so according to Baudrillard if we cannot grasp reality, then we have no power to change it
AO3: Evaluation:
AO3: Evaluation of postmodernism
Theories of late modernity
Spec Title: the concepts of modernity and post-modernity in relation to sociological theory
Theories of late modernity do recognise that something important is happening. In their view, key features of modernity that were always present have now become intensified.
For example, social change has always been a feature of modern society, but now the pace of change has gone into overdrive.
So we are still in modernity but we have entered the late phase.
AO1: Giddens:
Duality of structure:
There are experiences of rapid change on a global scale – this is because of two key features of modernity:
Disembedding:
Reflexivity:
AO1: Beck – Risk Society:
He believes that todays late modern society-which he calls ‘risks society’ faces new kinds of dangers:
Two types of dangers:
Society faced dangers due to its inability to control nature (drought etc)
Today it’s dangers from manufactured risks and human activities (grooming, global warming)
AO3: Evaluation of Late Modernity
MODEL PARAGRAPHS
OUTLINE AND EXPLAIN TWO PROBLEMS OF USING THEORIES OF MODERNITY TO STUDY TODAY’S SOCIETY (10)
One problem of using theories of modernity to study today’s society is that it is out of date. This is due to the fact that that it does not take into consideration that identity is now chosen unlike in the period of modernity. During modernity, theorist such as Marxism for instance, discussed identity in terms of inheritance. Class was inherited and consequently, it was as very apparent due to the type of work individuals carried out, which reflected their income. For example, manual workers (proletariats) worked in factories and earned very little. According to postmodernism, this is no longer relevant to today’s society as firstly manual labour is now in decline and there is a rise in service sector (financial and retail) employment. This is due to the rise in globalisation which means that manufacturing sector can now be done more cheaply in developing countries. Marxism does not account for this change and the impact it will have on class. Secondly, class is very complex now resulting in seven classes. Class is no longer only based on income and occupation (using occupation scales) but is also now based on cultural and social capital, which does not always collaborate with occupation due to the rise of social media (such as Facebook). In addition, the working class are now more affluent (Divine) and choose to live lifestyles once believed to be of the upper class (dining out, visiting museums, owning housing and concerts). This however, would not have been possible by the traditional working class which theories of Marxism discuss. Therefore, the rise of globalisation and changes in employment has led to changes/decline in social class which traditionally was the major source of identity in Britain, and theories of modernity do not account for these changes and consequently out of date.
EVALUATE THE VIEW THAT THEORIES OF LATE MODERNITY ARE MORE RELEVANT TO SOCIETY TODAY THAN THEORIES OF MODERNITY. (20)
Some sociologists would agree that theories of late modernity are more relevant to society today than theories of modernity as theories of modernity are out of date. This is due to the fact that that theories of modernity do not take into consideration that identity is now chosen, which is supported by Giddens who refers to reflexivity in the period of late modernity. For Giddens, late modern society is going through rapid change on a global scale. This has led to a reflexive society where tradition and custom has become less important and our actions have become more individualistic and reflexive, taking risks and opportunities. This is relevant to today’s society as for example, in traditional society the royal family will only marry within aristocracy, whereas in today’s society we are seeing royal members such as Harry and William not only marry outside of aristocracy but also outside the British culture. This demonstrates that not only have individuals broken down geographical barriers, but also members of the family are no longer expected to follow family customs and traditions but are free to pursue their own goals and desires. This is also applicable to beliefs, where according to Hervieu- Leger, there is a rise of spiritual shoppers choosing religious beliefs and practices to meet their individual goals and needs. Today we are seeing members within a family belonging to a diversity of faiths and beliefs systems.
However, theories of post modernity can be criticised to still not apply to all social groups in today’s society. This is because although Gidden’s discuss the opportunities to re-evaluate actions and make choices that are more individualistic, this is not possible for all especially those who are more disadvantaged. For example, those with wealth may have greater access to individualism and opportunities. For example, they can decide to move to another country for improved quality of life, but the poor will not have access to similar opportunities.
Item D
According to some sociologist, recent changes such as those associated with globalisation have resulted in major change in the nature of today’s society. For example, postmodernists argue that we no longer live in modern society but are now living in a media-saturated postmodern society in which it is impossible to distinguish image from reality or to change society for the better. As a result, postmodernists argue, we need new theories to explain this kind of society.
However, some critics argue that although there have been major changes in society, these are continuation of modernity rather than a completely new type of society.
Applying material from Item A and your own knowledge, evaluate the claim that we now living in a postmodern age. (20 marks)