The interplay between media and citizenship is complex and constantly evolving.
Concerns exist about the negative impact of commercial media on democracy, focusing on how it promotes triviality, consumer values, and emotional responses that hinder political participation.
Media can also be seen as "citizen machines" that shape public life positively (McCarthy, 2010).
The need to reevaluate citizenship arises from the proliferation and globalization of media, leading to new cultural studies frameworks.
Citizenship traditionally refers to belonging to a political body, with rights and duties (Latin word "civitas").
Citizenship has evolved with the rise of nation-states and "imagined communities" (Anderson, 1991).
The commercial printing press played a pivotal role in creating national identities through standardizing discourse and encouraging shared recognition of commonalities.
Early democracies like the United States experimented with direct political participation but faced mediation through representation.
National citizenship involves mediation through representatives and the dissemination of resources to foster participation.
Mass media (newspapers, magazine, radio) was integral to mass democracy but also raised concerns about its distracting effects.
Social critics like Walter Lippmann viewed popular media as potentially detrimental to informed public participation (Public Opinion, 1922).
Mass communication research proposed the "two-step flow" theory, emphasizing the role of opinion leaders in the political process, reflecting nostalgia for print culture.
The ideal of the rational citizen is critiqued for marginalizing diverse voices and excluding lower socio-economic and racial groups from public discourse.
The public sphere, defined by Jürgen Habermas (1989), is a space for rational debate independent of state and market influence.
The concept of public spaces such as eighteenth-century coffee houses reflects historical exclusivity regarding gender, class, and race.
Feminist and critical race scholars highlight the exclusion of marginalized groups from traditional public spheres.
Media scholars have begun to question traditional definitions of political citizenship since the 1990s, connecting citizenship to broader consumer culture.
Toby Miller asserts that the demands of consumer and political spheres create feelings of inadequacy among citizens.
Jeffrey Jones argues that popular media can enhance political engagement, challenging established notions of quality versus entertainment.
Liesbet Van Zoonen suggests the blending of politics and entertainment could rejuvenate democratic citizenship.
The evolution of daytime talk shows offers a unique lens to explore citizenship, bringing personal issues into the political realm (Josh Gamson, 1999).
These formats allowed for the voices of marginalized groups to emerge within commercial media while challenging traditional notions of decorum and participation.
Globalization complicates national identity and citizenship, leading to the formation of "sphericules" (Stuart Cunningham, 1991).
Lynn Spigel discusses the declining relevance of nationalism due to the influence of late capitalist media practices.
Néstor García-Canclini (2001) describes a shift toward consumer-based national connections, with brand communities becoming significant in defining citizenship.
Sarah Banet-Weiser notes the fusion of citizenship with consumer identity, emphasizing participation within brand communities.
Media corporations now incorporate corporate social responsibility into their branding, blurring lines between citizenship, governance, and consumer culture.
Reality TV reflects neoliberal citizenship ideals by tying personal responsibility and market-oriented identities to citizenship.
It emerged alongside privatization trends in the early 2000s, showcasing the influence of market logic on citizenship narratives.
Media's role in shaping ideals of responsibility and success is noteworthy in the context of neoliberal shifts.
The growth of social media has sparked debates on media's impact on citizenship.
Critics argue that new forms of engagement can distract from substantive political participation.
Conversely, some scholars advocate for the potential of new media to redefine public spheres and catalyze political engagement.
- Recent movements highlight the instrumental role of digital platforms in organizing political action globally.