The exam may not contain unexpected questions, but it will ask to explain and analyze concepts. Expect questions like, "What is strategic…?"
Participation in Exercises
High levels of engagement were noted among students, exemplifying the effectiveness of simulation as a pedagogical tool.
Commonality in engagement: 80-100% involvement from students in simulations, emphasizing the ability to think on feet and respond to other groups.
Ensure to self-reflect on strengths and weaknesses after participation:
Identify positive contributions and areas for improvement.
Assess feelings about performance during the exercises.
Learning from Simulations
The simulation exercise developed negotiation skills critical for future careers, such as:
Identifying interests
Understanding official and unofficial game rules
Expressing and protecting interests in group scenarios.
Realism in Strategic Studies
Realism as a dominant theory in strategic studies:
Understand why realism appeals as a theoretical approach; it addresses conflicts in international behavior.
Engage with other theories (post-structuralism, liberalism, Marxism) that critique realism.
Conflict versus cooperation: Students noted different dynamics, such as cooperation between Russia and Turkey, but eventual conflicts that arose later.
Gender Dynamics in Games
Significant shifts in gender roles within international relations observed:
Leading players were female, contrasting historical norms.
Reflects broader societal changes and challenges traditional narratives in strategic studies.
Gender studies literature indicates ongoing discussions about how male and female leaders are perceived.
Power Dynamics and Anarchy
Anarchy as a state where no overarching power exists:
Importance of forming strategic alliances and the need for power consolidation.
Example: Russia's success was influenced by maintaining strategic advantages and