APUSH LEQ Preparation
Contextualization
- Provides 2-3 specific factual information (SFI) that establishes historical context relevant to the prompt.
- Context should cover events or processes from 25 to 100 years before or after the topic of the prompt.
- A strong contextualization connects the topic to broader historical events, not just general phrases.
Thesis/Claim
- The thesis is the last sentence of your introduction.
- Must respond directly to the prompt with a historically defensible claim that establishes a line of reasoning.
- It should be precise, focused, and presented in a clear manner, avoiding mere rephrasing of the prompt.
Body Paragraphs
- Body paragraphs must provide reasons that support the thesis.
Evidence & Support for Argument
- To earn points, you must:
- Provide at least two specific examples of relevant historical evidence.
- Support your argument with at least two pieces of evidence that connect back to the thesis.
- It is beneficial to include extra examples if possible.
Analysis and Reasoning
- To build a strong argument, you need to:
- Utilize historical reasoning such as comparison, causation, or change over time (CCOT) to frame your argument.
- Demonstrate a complex understanding of the historical developments discussed in the prompt by:
- Exploring nuances within different themes or perspectives.
- Analyzing both similarities and differences, changes, or continuities.
- Use effective evidence to showcase a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Sophisticated Argumentation
- To demonstrate sophistication:
- Examine multiple perspectives and their connections.
- Explain how 4 pieces of relevant evidence contribute to a nuanced argument.
- Acknowledge different historical interpretations and integrate them into your analysis.
Scoring Rubric Overview
- This grading rubric includes guidelines developed by the College Board as of September 2023.
- Total points available for this exercise is up to 6, broken down into:
- 4 points for SFI.
- 2 points for demonstrating complex understanding and effective use of evidence.