Temporal fluctuations in ecosystems
Carbon fluxes at season and annual time scales
Carbon in = Gross primary production (GPP) aka photosynthesis
Carbon out = respiration (plants, animals, microbes)
Net ecosystem production = GPP - Respiration
(+) NEP : Carbon is accumulating
Seasonal dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems
Respiration peaks after GPP because it relies on the organic matter produced during photosynthesis for energy
Slight delay because plants and microbes need to metabolize the stored energy after it has been made
Soil takes longer to warm than air in spring
Microbes require labile carbon inputs to become active
NEP is (+) in spring; (-) in fall
Carbon does not accumulate in fall since leaves are falling and trees are barren
Climate drives global scale variation in species composition but local variation in species composition is driven by disturbances and how the ecosystem recovers
Disturbance
Definitions:
Terrestrial: Discrete event that removes organic matter (plant biomass/soil)
Marine: Event that alters the structure of populations, communities, and ecosystems; causing changes in resource availability or physical environment
Disturbance regime:
Severity: amount of organic matter removed
Intensity: energy released per unit of time/area (how hot was the fire/how strong were the winds)
Frequency: how often does this occur
Type: fire, glacier, storm, disease
size/pattern: large scale or small area
Timing: when was the last disturbance
Succession: directional change in ecosystem structure and functioning after disturbance (characterized by species replacement over time)
Primary succession: starting from parent material; following major disturbance; colonization is far from seed source
Mining and wars; glaciers and volcanoes
Secondary succession: starting from soil + seed bank (plants can re-generate); disturbance less severe
Examples: fire, agricultural clearing, pest outbreaks
Steady state: no directional changes
Herbivores consuming biomass is not succession since no change is occurring
Seed size in relation to dispersion:
Small seeds easier to disperse and can travel further compared to larger seeds
Primary succession has smaller seeds so they can reach and establish in barren lands and there are larger quantities so more chance to grow (smaller seeds = faster growth)
Late successional species have large seeds and are slow growing
What are late successional species? - plant or animal species that dominate an ecosystem once it reaches a stable state, typically characterized by slow growth, long lifespans, and adaptations to low resource availability, appearing at the final stage of ecological succession after early successional species have modified the environment
Secondary succession has variety of seed sizes because they have a seed bank = faster growth rates too
How would you describe the trade-off between growth rate and stress tolerance?
The slower the plant grows, the more stress it is able to take on but the faster it grows, the less stress it can handle
In relation to primary and secondary colonizers, primary colonizers would be slow growers and high stress tolerances and secondary colonizers would have lower stress tolerances but grow faster since they already have the foundational soils
Which life history traits would you expect in species dominating late in succession (as compared to early colonizers)?
Slow growing, large seed size; able to live a long time because in steady state
What drives species replacement and ecosystem change over time?
Primary succession:
Patterns of species abundances and soil properties where ecosystems have different amounts of time to develop
Classical view: species replacement driven by facilitation (when the presence of one species benefits another)
Domino effect in Glacier Bay Alaska (rapid glacial retreat in 200 years)
mosses and lichen add organic matter to make basic soil -> small seeds dispersed and colonize -> grows plants that fix N -> plant litter acidifies soil to favor establishment of spruce trees -> slow decomposition, organic carbon increases CEC of soil
Is competition inhibiting spruce from dominating earlier? (is it slowing down succession?)
Experimented: treated spruce seedlings with 2 different conditions
1. Planted alone with no vegetation; 2. Planted to compete with vegetation
Results: facilitation by neighbors common early in succession and competition was common later on
Species replacement over time are driven by variation in traits of the dominant species (in the beginning, small seeds dominate and larger seeds will dominate later on since they grow slow but live longer); also driven by species interactions (in the beginning, facilitation enhances the growth, but later on as things take hold, competition slows down succession)
Life history parameters: trade-off between establishment and longevity through succession
Early colonizers produce many seeds but they are short lived compared to later colonizers who produce less seeds but since they live a long time, they dominate later
Early colonizing, fast growing plants are more appealing to herbivory and since they prefer these plants, they speed up succession by removing them quicker = speed nutrient cycling
Which describes traits of early vs late dominant species in primary succession on floodplains?
Early successional species produce many seeds with short life spans that herbivores enjoy while the late dominant species produce very few seeds that grow to dominate later on
Secondary succession:
Since the disturbance is not as intense, it still has the soil and seed bank so there are less transitions
What factors explain the characteristic changes of plant communities over the course of succession?
1. Facilitation: helps to enhance the early stages by introducing organic matter into soil so plants can grow and nitrogen fixation can occur
2. Life-history trade-offs: small seeds = faster growing, short life spans but they dominate the early stages; later on, larger seeds will dominate since they are longer lived
3. Herbivory speeds up succession by removing the fast growing seeds to allow the slow growing to dominate sooner
Patterns of carbon and nutrient cycling:
NPP reflect succession:
Forest productivity will peak mid-succession due to species replacement and N inputs
Later on, NPP declines because slower growing species will dominate (have longer life spans); less nutrients because it will be bound to soil organic matter, humus.
Stand age: total pool of plant biomass will continue to slow increase, even as carbon flux through NPP declines
Plant and soil carbon pools increase over succession; any disturbances would decrease plant carbon pool and soil pool
Over time, it will return to the steady state prior to the disturbance
Carbon fluxes will also vary based on when the disturbance occurred
NPP is max mid succession; decomposition lags C inputs; NEP is balance between NPP and decomposition
In secondary succession, NEP is negative because there is more decomposition due to the remaining organic matter
How do carbon pools change following disturbance through the course of primary succession?
They both increase then eventually level off
How would net ecosystem carbon flux (NEP) change as a forest community undergoes early to late primary succession, progressing to a steady state?
Early on, there would be a positive NEP value as plants are taking hold and carbon inputs increase, then as it progresses, these plants with short life spans will decompose and NEP would generally decline until it reaches 0 which is when it is at a steady state
As slower growing species dominate later in succession, how are decomposition and nutrient recycling rates likely to change?
It decreases and slows down since they have longer life spans
Cation nutrient retention: accumulation of soil carbon and rising CEC over time
As carbon in SOM accumulates, soil develop CEC that allows the retention of nutrients
Nutrient recycling is greater in secondary succession because there is already soil that contains SOM unlike primary succession where you are starting from parent material
After disturbances, the soil allows for a supply of nutrients but the plant must be able to maintain the retention of the nutrients
Plant uptake (low early in succession0
Microbial uptake
Chemical fixation (CEC)
If not employed, nutrients will be lost to leaching
Water/energy balance:
After disturbance = no vegetation = more runoff and less transpiration because less plants
Over time, runoff will decrease as ecosystem heals from disturbance
Energy balance:
Successional changes in forest after fire
Albedo would decrease because everything is burnt = darker land = absorption of light
It will increase mid succession as plants grow back
What peaks in mid succession? : carbon fluxes (NPP, GPP, respiration) and albedo
Aspect | Primary Succession | Secondary Succession |
Starting NPP | Very low due to barren substrate | Moderate due to existing soils and seed banks |
Peak NPP Timing | Long time to reach peak (climax community development) | Shorter time due to residual biological activity |
Soil Carbon Pools | Starts from zero, builds slowly | Starts with existing carbon, recovers quickly |
Plant Carbon Pools | Initially absent, slow increase | Recovers faster due to pre-existing conditions |
Respiration | Initially very low, increases with biomass and microbes | Higher from the start, stabilizes earlier |