Challenges in mobile radio channel
Empirical formulas and models for predicting signal strength at mobile stations
Wireless medium between the tower and mobile station.
Also known as wireless transmission media.
Transmitter (base station) and a moving receiver.
Challenges:
Mobility of the user: changes signal strength as the user moves.
Changing surroundings: terrain, buildings, vehicles vary by environment (rural vs. urban).
Multipath propagation: signals arrive via multiple paths (direct, reflected).
Attenuation or fading: signal strength decreases with distance.
Signals reach the mobile station via multiple paths (direct and reflected).
The signals can be in phase or out of phase, leading to constructive or destructive interference.
Mobility of the user.
Changing surroundings (buildings, terrain).
Multipath propagation.
Fading (rapid signal fluctuations).
Path loss (average signal attenuation over distance).
Shadowing (signal attenuation due to obstacles).
Doppler shift (frequency shift due to relative motion).
Large-scale fading: due to distance from the transmitter, path loss, and shadowing.
Small-scale fading: due to multipath propagation and Doppler effect, leading to rapid amplitude and phase changes.
Predict radio signal behavior in different environments.
Network planning, coverage estimation, capacity, and interference analysis.
Handover design: estimate signal strength and interference levels.
Approaches: empirical, analytical, or simulation-based.
Empirical Models:
Derived from real-world measurement data.
Examples: Lee model, Okumura model, Hata model, Ibrahim and Parsons model, COST 231 model.
Used when physical details are unknown or hard to model.
Analytical Models:
Based on theory and geometry.
Examples: free space path loss model, two-ray model, flat earth model, ray-tracing models (computationally intensive).
Statistical Models:
Use probabilistic behavior of fading.
Examples: Rayleigh fading model (no line of sight), Rician, and Nakagami models.
Environment-Based Models:
Indoor models (Wi-Fi, mmWave).
Outdoor models (urban, rural, satellite).
Satellite: free space and two-ray models.
Modern Techniques:
AI and machine learning.
Gather data from real networks, predict signal quality, optimize beamforming.
Mobile radio channels are dynamic.
Propagation models are essential for wireless network design.
Types: empirical, analytical, statistical, or deterministic.
Modern models use AI and machine learning for real-time data analysis.
Simplest model: direct line of sight between transmitter and receiver.
No obstructions, reflections, or scattering.
Calculates power loss as signal propagates through space.
Assumptions:
Line of sight.
No obstacles.
No reflection, multipath, diffraction, or scattering.
Isotropic antennas (radiate energy in all directions).
Spreading loss only.
No atmospheric attenuation or absorption.
No interference.
Power density at distance d: Pd = \frac{Pt G_t}{4 \pi d^2}
P_t: transmitted power
G_t: gain of transmitting antenna
Effective area of receiving antenna: A = \frac{\lambda^2 G_r}{4 \pi}
\lambda: wavelength
G_r: gain of receiving antenna
c = f \lambda
Received power: Pr = \frac{Pt Gt \lambda^2 Gr}{(4 \pi d)^2}
Path loss: PL = \frac{Pt}{Pr} = \frac{(4 \pi d)^2}{Gt Gr \lambda^2}
Path loss in dB: PL{dB} = 10 \log{10}(\frac{Pt}{Pr}) = -10 \log{10}(Gt) - 10 \log{10}(Gr) + 20 \log{10}(f) + 20 \log{10}(d) + K
K = -147.56 (constant)
Simplified equation (distance in km, frequency in MHz): PL{dB} = 32.44 + 20 \log{10}(f{MHz}) + 20 \log{10}(d_{km})
Simplified equation (distance in meters, frequency in Hz): PL{dB} = 20 \log{10}(d) + 20 \log_{10}(f) - 147.55
Path loss increases with distance and frequency.
Frequency and distance dependent.
Applications: satellite communication, microwave line of sight links, initial link budget for 5G, LTE, and Wi-Fi.
Limitations:
Not suitable for indoor or urban environments.
Reflection, diffraction, and scattering are not considered.
Antenna gains and atmospheric effects are not considered.
Assumes perfect line of sight.
Access point on ceiling, laptop 200 meters away, frequency 2.4 GHz.
Calculate path loss.
Path Loss Calculation
PL = 32.44 + 20 \log{10}(f{MHz}) + 20 \log{10}(d{km})
PL = 32.44 + 20 \log{10}(2400) + 20 \log{10}(0.2)
PL = 32.44 + 20(3.38) + 20(-0.699)
PL = 32.44 + 67.6 - 13.98
PL = 86.06 \text{ dB}
Assuming transmitted power is 200 milliwatts: Pt(dBm) = 10 \log{10}(200) = 23 \text{ dBm}
Received power: Pr = Pt - PL = 23 \text{ dBm} - 86.06 \text{ dB} = -63.06 \text{ dBm}
Receiver card needs to detect at least -75 dBm signal.
Conductivity and dielectric constants of the earth.
Poor Dry ground 10^{-3}
Average ground 5 \cdot 10^{-3}
Good ground 2 \cdot 10^{-2}
Seawater: 5
Freshwater 10^{-3}
Curved Reflecting Surfaces can make make the angle of reflection and incidence different.
More realistic: considers direct line of sight and ground-reflected path.
Two paths for signal propagation:
Direct path
Reflected path
Interference may be constructive or destructive.
Depends on distance between transmitter receiver and height of transmitter and receiver.
Assumptions:
Ground surface is flat and smooth.
Ideal reflection (no absorption).
Line of sight signal and ground reflected ray dominate.
Both antennas above the ground.
Accurate for large-scale signal strength over several kilometers with cell towers > 50 meters.
Received power: Pr = \frac{Pt Gt Gr ht^2 hr^2}{d^4}
h_t: height of transmitting antenna
h_r: height of receiving antenna
Power falls off at 40 dB per decade.
In dB: PL{dB} = 40 \log{10}(d) - 10 \log{10}(Gt) - 10 \log{10}(Gr) - 20 \log{10}(ht) - 20 \log{10}(hr)
Accounts for constructive and destructive interference.
Depends on distance and height of transmit receiver.
Applicable in urban and rural environments.
Antenna placement can minimize destructive interference.
Flat earth assumption.
Only considers one ground reflection.
Earth is flat, ground reflects radio waves perfectly.
Considers direct and ground-reflected rays.
Antennas at finite heights above the flat ground plane.
Transmitter gain and receiver gain are 1.
PL{dB} = 40 \log{10}(d) - 20 \log{10}(ht) - 20 \log{10}(hr)
Applications: cellular network coverage planning, minimizing dead zones, interference management, capacity optimization.
Limitations: terrain variations not considered, only one ground reflection.
Terrain-based propagation model for urban and suburban environments.
Developed by John Egli, based on UHF and VHF television transmission.
Based on real-world measurements.
Applicable to point to point communication (radio and TV broadcast).
Estimates median path loss.
Assumptions:
Rural and suburban areas.
Frequency range: 30 MHz to 3 GHz.
Vertically polarized antenna.
Significant antenna height.
Line of sight not strictly required.
Takes into effect the heights and gains of the antennas
\frac{Gb Gm hb hm}{d^2} \beta
\beta = (\frac{40}{f_{MHz}})^2
PL{dB} = -40 \log{10}(d) + 10 \log{10}(Gb) + 10 \log{10}(Gm) + 20 \log{10}(hb) + 20 \log{10}(hm) + 10 \log_{10}(\beta)
Does not account for signal loss due to trees and vegetation.
Only considers one ground reflection.
Designed for cellular systems (800-900 MHz).
Real-world measurements to empirical equations.
Offers a reference distance-based path loss formula.
Correction factors for environment, antenna height, power, and frequency.
Two Modes:
Area to area mode: when detailed path profile is not available.
Point to point mode:
Path profile: graphical numerical representation of the physical terrain obstacles.
Detailed field measurements were done for the following;
Transmitter power: 10 watts
Transmitting base antenna base station antenna gain is six dBd.
Frequency, 900 megahertz.
Out of the transmitter is 30.5 meters, and out of the receiver is three meters
Distance must be greater than 1 kilometer.
Transmitter antenna gain: 6 dBd
Transmitting power: 10 watts
Omnidirectional antenna height: 30.5 meters.
Area to Area Mode
* Medium transmission loss is at the range of 1 kilometer
* The slope of the path loss curve is gamma in dB per decade
Medium path loss at a distance d : L= L0 + \gamma \log(d) + f0
* L0 is median transmission loss * \gamma is the gamma of path loss curves. * f0 is the adjustment factors to match field measured areas and areas.
For open rural areas where Loss L_0 = 91.3 dB and slope \gamma is 43.5 dB/decade
Suburban areas a where Loss L_0 = dB and slope \gamma dB/decade
f0= f1 f2 f3 f4 f5
f_1 = \frac{\text{actual base station antenna height}}{30.5}
f_2 = \frac{\text{actual power transmitted in watt}}{10}
f_3 = \frac{\text{actual gain factor of the base station antenna in dB}}{6}
f_4 = \frac{\text{actual mobile antenna height in meters }}{3}
If antenna is greater than 3 meters must be squared\text{actual mobile antenna height in meters }^2
If antenna is less than 3 meters then height should not be squared.
f_5 = \frac{{\text actual frequency in use}}{900}^2
L{50}= \text{loss} + 20\log{10}(h_e/30)
Calculate The height and draw a slope
Empirical prediction model based on measurements in Tokyo city.
Frequencies: 200 MHz to 2 GHz.
No assumptions of plain earth or other models.
Divided prediction area into open area, suburban area, and urban area.
Open Areas a + b log(r) - e
Suburban Areas a + b log(r) - c
Urban Areas a + b log(r) - d
a = 69.55 + 26.15 log(frequency carrier) -13.82 log(Base antenna high)
b = 44.9 -6.55 log( base station antenna height)
c= 2 (log 5 frequency carrier divide 28 the hold square) + 5.4 (factor for some area the carrier frequency is being adjusted again)
d= 4.78 log (F sub c) squared -18.33 log (frequency carrier) + 40.94 (Open and suburban area)
e =(factor area factor ) depends on three: height of the mobile station is also considered in factor e.(3.2 log(11.75)squared - 4.97 larger series used frequencies greater than 300 MHz use factor 8.29 (factor(1.5) - 1.1 Large Mobile antenna heights are also involved here) Medium and smaller city 1.1 log ( frequency ) -7 times .7 ( 1.56 ( log f - 0.8 ( medium or small sizes)
The model is limitation is that the frequency range is between one fifty megahertz and 1,500 megahertz.
Base Should Be between 30 meters and 200.
Mobile Needs to be from 1 and 10 meters.
Distance always greater than 1.
Field trials around London city.
Concentration on urban propagation loss.
Integrates with previous measurements to render the fraction effects on each 0.5 km square data.
Divided the whole area into squares, with each square having h, u, and l parameters.
h: terrain height
Defined as the actual height of a peak basin plateau valley found in square Or the arithmetic mean of the minimum and maximum heights found in the square if it does not contain any such feature.
u: degree of urbanization
*defined by 4 more floors building site percentage in square building site occupied by four or more square buildings 2 - 95 *urban environment - is one that focuses Street is used in buildings and London London so that's for the urban area
l: land factor
percentage in squares is is actual percentage in squares is and actual buildings or
loss equation can be and LT 4 log what happens loss e is calculated is distance - 2 the long mobile so this is 4 - 2 station and this is our beta so these are calculations and Beta is where is the value H and H value comes the cluster factor is a parameter where the where we have what's the height plus the h factor so we use some semi emperial so and actually get we actually and it's actually it takes geometry buildings and orientation streets and it so and so we