DT

Mobile Radio Propagation Models

Mobile Radio Propagation Models

  • Challenges in mobile radio channel

  • Empirical formulas and models for predicting signal strength at mobile stations

Mobile Radio Channel

  • Wireless medium between the tower and mobile station.

  • Also known as wireless transmission media.

  • Transmitter (base station) and a moving receiver.

  • Challenges:

    • Mobility of the user: changes signal strength as the user moves.

    • Changing surroundings: terrain, buildings, vehicles vary by environment (rural vs. urban).

    • Multipath propagation: signals arrive via multiple paths (direct, reflected).

    • Attenuation or fading: signal strength decreases with distance.

Multipath Propagation
  • Signals reach the mobile station via multiple paths (direct and reflected).

  • The signals can be in phase or out of phase, leading to constructive or destructive interference.

Factors Affecting Mobile Radio Channel
  • Mobility of the user.

  • Changing surroundings (buildings, terrain).

  • Multipath propagation.

  • Fading (rapid signal fluctuations).

  • Path loss (average signal attenuation over distance).

  • Shadowing (signal attenuation due to obstacles).

  • Doppler shift (frequency shift due to relative motion).

Types of Fading
  • Large-scale fading: due to distance from the transmitter, path loss, and shadowing.

  • Small-scale fading: due to multipath propagation and Doppler effect, leading to rapid amplitude and phase changes.

Need for Propagation Models
  • Predict radio signal behavior in different environments.

  • Network planning, coverage estimation, capacity, and interference analysis.

  • Handover design: estimate signal strength and interference levels.

  • Approaches: empirical, analytical, or simulation-based.

Types of Propagation Models

  • Empirical Models:

    • Derived from real-world measurement data.

    • Examples: Lee model, Okumura model, Hata model, Ibrahim and Parsons model, COST 231 model.

    • Used when physical details are unknown or hard to model.

  • Analytical Models:

    • Based on theory and geometry.

    • Examples: free space path loss model, two-ray model, flat earth model, ray-tracing models (computationally intensive).

  • Statistical Models:

    • Use probabilistic behavior of fading.

    • Examples: Rayleigh fading model (no line of sight), Rician, and Nakagami models.

  • Environment-Based Models:

    • Indoor models (Wi-Fi, mmWave).

    • Outdoor models (urban, rural, satellite).

    • Satellite: free space and two-ray models.

  • Modern Techniques:

    • AI and machine learning.

    • Gather data from real networks, predict signal quality, optimize beamforming.

Basic Concept

  • Mobile radio channels are dynamic.

  • Propagation models are essential for wireless network design.

  • Types: empirical, analytical, statistical, or deterministic.

  • Modern models use AI and machine learning for real-time data analysis.

Free Space Path Loss Model

  • Simplest model: direct line of sight between transmitter and receiver.

  • No obstructions, reflections, or scattering.

  • Calculates power loss as signal propagates through space.

  • Assumptions:

    • Line of sight.

    • No obstacles.

    • No reflection, multipath, diffraction, or scattering.

    • Isotropic antennas (radiate energy in all directions).

    • Spreading loss only.

    • No atmospheric attenuation or absorption.

    • No interference.

Equations
  • Power density at distance d: Pd = \frac{Pt G_t}{4 \pi d^2}

    • P_t: transmitted power

    • G_t: gain of transmitting antenna

  • Effective area of receiving antenna: A = \frac{\lambda^2 G_r}{4 \pi}

    • \lambda: wavelength

    • G_r: gain of receiving antenna

    • c = f \lambda

  • Received power: Pr = \frac{Pt Gt \lambda^2 Gr}{(4 \pi d)^2}

  • Path loss: PL = \frac{Pt}{Pr} = \frac{(4 \pi d)^2}{Gt Gr \lambda^2}

  • Path loss in dB: PL{dB} = 10 \log{10}(\frac{Pt}{Pr}) = -10 \log{10}(Gt) - 10 \log{10}(Gr) + 20 \log{10}(f) + 20 \log{10}(d) + K

    • K = -147.56 (constant)

  • Simplified equation (distance in km, frequency in MHz): PL{dB} = 32.44 + 20 \log{10}(f{MHz}) + 20 \log{10}(d_{km})

  • Simplified equation (distance in meters, frequency in Hz): PL{dB} = 20 \log{10}(d) + 20 \log_{10}(f) - 147.55

Observations
  • Path loss increases with distance and frequency.

  • Frequency and distance dependent.

  • Applications: satellite communication, microwave line of sight links, initial link budget for 5G, LTE, and Wi-Fi.

  • Limitations:

    • Not suitable for indoor or urban environments.

    • Reflection, diffraction, and scattering are not considered.

    • Antenna gains and atmospheric effects are not considered.

    • Assumes perfect line of sight.

Example Calculation
  • Access point on ceiling, laptop 200 meters away, frequency 2.4 GHz.

  • Calculate path loss.

  • Path Loss Calculation

    • PL = 32.44 + 20 \log{10}(f{MHz}) + 20 \log{10}(d{km})

    • PL = 32.44 + 20 \log{10}(2400) + 20 \log{10}(0.2)

    • PL = 32.44 + 20(3.38) + 20(-0.699)

    • PL = 32.44 + 67.6 - 13.98

    • PL = 86.06 \text{ dB}

  • Assuming transmitted power is 200 milliwatts: Pt(dBm) = 10 \log{10}(200) = 23 \text{ dBm}

  • Received power: Pr = Pt - PL = 23 \text{ dBm} - 86.06 \text{ dB} = -63.06 \text{ dBm}

  • Receiver card needs to detect at least -75 dBm signal.

Other factors
  • Conductivity and dielectric constants of the earth.

    • Poor Dry ground 10^{-3}

    • Average ground 5 \cdot 10^{-3}

    • Good ground 2 \cdot 10^{-2}

    • Seawater: 5

    • Freshwater 10^{-3}

  • Curved Reflecting Surfaces can make make the angle of reflection and incidence different.

Two-Ray Model

  • More realistic: considers direct line of sight and ground-reflected path.

  • Two paths for signal propagation:

    • Direct path

    • Reflected path

  • Interference may be constructive or destructive.

  • Depends on distance between transmitter receiver and height of transmitter and receiver.

  • Assumptions:

    • Ground surface is flat and smooth.

    • Ideal reflection (no absorption).

    • Line of sight signal and ground reflected ray dominate.

      • Both antennas above the ground.

  • Accurate for large-scale signal strength over several kilometers with cell towers > 50 meters.

Equation
  • Received power: Pr = \frac{Pt Gt Gr ht^2 hr^2}{d^4}

    • h_t: height of transmitting antenna

    • h_r: height of receiving antenna

  • Power falls off at 40 dB per decade.

  • In dB: PL{dB} = 40 \log{10}(d) - 10 \log{10}(Gt) - 10 \log{10}(Gr) - 20 \log{10}(ht) - 20 \log{10}(hr)

Key Points
  • Accounts for constructive and destructive interference.

  • Depends on distance and height of transmit receiver.

  • Applicable in urban and rural environments.

  • Antenna placement can minimize destructive interference.

Limitations
  • Flat earth assumption.

  • Only considers one ground reflection.

Flat Earth Model

  • Earth is flat, ground reflects radio waves perfectly.

  • Considers direct and ground-reflected rays.

  • Antennas at finite heights above the flat ground plane.

  • Transmitter gain and receiver gain are 1.

  • PL{dB} = 40 \log{10}(d) - 20 \log{10}(ht) - 20 \log{10}(hr)

  • Applications: cellular network coverage planning, minimizing dead zones, interference management, capacity optimization.

  • Limitations: terrain variations not considered, only one ground reflection.

Egli Model

  • Terrain-based propagation model for urban and suburban environments.

  • Developed by John Egli, based on UHF and VHF television transmission.

  • Based on real-world measurements.

  • Applicable to point to point communication (radio and TV broadcast).

  • Estimates median path loss.

  • Assumptions:

    • Rural and suburban areas.

    • Frequency range: 30 MHz to 3 GHz.

    • Vertically polarized antenna.

    • Significant antenna height.

    • Line of sight not strictly required.

Formula
  • Takes into effect the heights and gains of the antennas

  • \frac{Gb Gm hb hm}{d^2} \beta

    • \beta = (\frac{40}{f_{MHz}})^2

    • PL{dB} = -40 \log{10}(d) + 10 \log{10}(Gb) + 10 \log{10}(Gm) + 20 \log{10}(hb) + 20 \log{10}(hm) + 10 \log_{10}(\beta)

Limitations
  • Does not account for signal loss due to trees and vegetation.

  • Only considers one ground reflection.

Lee's Model

  • Designed for cellular systems (800-900 MHz).

  • Real-world measurements to empirical equations.

  • Offers a reference distance-based path loss formula.

  • Correction factors for environment, antenna height, power, and frequency.

  • Two Modes:

    • Area to area mode: when detailed path profile is not available.

    • Point to point mode:

  • Path profile: graphical numerical representation of the physical terrain obstacles.

Assumptions
  • Detailed field measurements were done for the following;

    • Transmitter power: 10 watts

    • Transmitting base antenna base station antenna gain is six dBd.

    • Frequency, 900 megahertz.

    • Out of the transmitter is 30.5 meters, and out of the receiver is three meters

  • Distance must be greater than 1 kilometer.

  • Transmitter antenna gain: 6 dBd

  • Transmitting power: 10 watts

  • Omnidirectional antenna height: 30.5 meters.

  • Area to Area Mode
    * Medium transmission loss is at the range of 1 kilometer
    * The slope of the path loss curve is gamma in dB per decade

Equation for Area to Area
  • Medium path loss at a distance d : L= L0 + \gamma \log(d) + f0
    * L0 is median transmission loss * \gamma is the gamma of path loss curves. * f0 is the adjustment factors to match field measured areas and areas.

Some Reference
  • For open rural areas where Loss L_0 = 91.3 dB and slope \gamma is 43.5 dB/decade

  • Suburban areas a where Loss L_0 = dB and slope \gamma dB/decade

Adjustment Factor
  • f0= f1 f2 f3 f4 f5

  • f_1 = \frac{\text{actual base station antenna height}}{30.5}

  • f_2 = \frac{\text{actual power transmitted in watt}}{10}

  • f_3 = \frac{\text{actual gain factor of the base station antenna in dB}}{6}

  • f_4 = \frac{\text{actual mobile antenna height in meters }}{3}

    • If antenna is greater than 3 meters must be squared\text{actual mobile antenna height in meters }^2

  • If antenna is less than 3 meters then height should not be squared.

  • f_5 = \frac{{\text actual frequency in use}}{900}^2

Point To Point Calculation Factor
  • L{50}= \text{loss} + 20\log{10}(h_e/30)

  • Calculate The height and draw a slope

Okumura-Hata Model

  • Empirical prediction model based on measurements in Tokyo city.

  • Frequencies: 200 MHz to 2 GHz.

  • No assumptions of plain earth or other models.

  • Divided prediction area into open area, suburban area, and urban area.

Formulas for different Locations:
  • Open Areas a + b log(r) - e

  • Suburban Areas a + b log(r) - c

  • Urban Areas a + b log(r) - d

Where
  • a = 69.55 + 26.15 log(frequency carrier) -13.82 log(Base antenna high)

  • b = 44.9 -6.55 log( base station antenna height)

  • c= 2 (log 5 frequency carrier divide 28 the hold square) + 5.4 (factor for some area the carrier frequency is being adjusted again)

  • d= 4.78 log (F sub c) squared -18.33 log (frequency carrier) + 40.94 (Open and suburban area)

  • e =(factor area factor ) depends on three: height of the mobile station is also considered in factor e.(3.2 log(11.75)squared - 4.97 larger series used frequencies greater than 300 MHz use factor 8.29 (factor(1.5) - 1.1 Large Mobile antenna heights are also involved here) Medium and smaller city 1.1 log ( frequency ) -7 times .7 ( 1.56 ( log f - 0.8 ( medium or small sizes)

Limitations
  • The model is limitation is that the frequency range is between one fifty megahertz and 1,500 megahertz.

  • Base Should Be between 30 meters and 200.

  • Mobile Needs to be from 1 and 10 meters.

  • Distance always greater than 1.

Ibrahim and Parsons Model

  • Field trials around London city.

  • Concentration on urban propagation loss.

  • Integrates with previous measurements to render the fraction effects on each 0.5 km square data.

  • Divided the whole area into squares, with each square having h, u, and l parameters.

Parameters
  • h: terrain height

    • Defined as the actual height of a peak basin plateau valley found in square Or the arithmetic mean of the minimum and maximum heights found in the square if it does not contain any such feature.

  • u: degree of urbanization

    • *defined by 4 more floors building site percentage in square building site occupied by four or more square buildings 2 - 95 *urban environment - is one that focuses Street is used in buildings and London London so that's for the urban area

  • l: land factor

    • percentage in squares is is actual percentage in squares is and actual buildings or

Some Factors and Formula
  • loss equation can be and LT 4 log what happens loss e is calculated is distance - 2 the long mobile so this is 4 - 2 station and this is our beta so these are calculations and Beta is where is the value H and H value comes the cluster factor is a parameter where the where we have what's the height plus the h factor so we use some semi emperial so and actually get we actually and it's actually it takes geometry buildings and orientation streets and it so and so we