Coding - focuses on translating algorithms and logic into lines of code using a specific programming language
Software Engineering - involves the entire software development life cycle, including planning, design, coding, testing, deployment, and maintenance, with a focus on creating reliable and efficient systems
What is Coding?
Refers to writing instructions in a programming language
Involves translating logic into syntax that a computer can execute
Examples of programming languages: python, Java, C++, JavaScript
What is Software Engineering
A systematic approach to designing, developing, testing, and maintaining software
It involves planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing, and deployment
Software engineers apply engineering principles and knowledge of programming languages to build software solutions for end users
Key Differences of Coding vs Software Engineering
Aspect | Coding | Software Engineering |
Focus | Writing code | Designing & managing systems |
Scope | Specific tasks in software development | Full software lifecycle |
Skills Needed | Programming, debugging | Analysis, designing, testing, management |
Tools Used | Code editors, compilers | IDEs, project management tools, version control |
Teamwork | Often individual tasks | Requires collaboration |
Role of a Coder
Writes code based on given requirements
Debugs and optimizes code for better performance
Follows instructions but may not handle system design
Role of a Software Engineer
Designs software architecture
Develops, tests, and maintains software systems
Works with teams, manages projects, and ensures scalability
Career Paths
Coder Software Engineer
Frontend Developer Software Architect
Backend Developer DevOps Engineer
Mobile App Developer Systems Analyst
Conclusion
Coding is a subset of software engineering
Both are important, and once can transition from coding to software engineering with experience
Software engineering involves a broader perspective beyond just writing code
Lesson 3.2: Structured Approach vs. Ad-hoc Development
Crucial areas for making software
Planning
Defining goals
Gathering requirements
Creating a roadmap
Analysis
Assessing technical and business requirements
Identifying potential challenges
Developing specification
Design
System architecture
Database design
UI/UX design
Security design
Implementation
Programming
Collaborative Development
Incremental Build
Support and Security
Bug fixes and Updates
Security management
Performance monitoring
What could go wrong if we skip testing for software development?
Poor quality
Security vulnerabilities
Increased maintenance & support costs
Poor user experience
Poor software performance
Inadequate Project Assessment & Management for Software development due to:
Unclear goals and criteria
Poor communication
Lack of resource planning
unrealistic expectations
Unrealistic deadlines
Types of Software Development Approach
Structured Development - a systematic, organized approach to software development with clear guidelines and processes
Ad-hoc Development - an informal, unstructured approach focusing on speed and flexibility over process and planning
Aspect | Structured | Ad-hoc |
Process | Systematic and planned | Informal and unplanned |
Documentation | Extensive | Minimal |
Flexibility | Lower, but predictable | High, but risky |
Best for | Large, complex, or critical projects | Small, quick, or experimental projects |
Outcome | Reliable, maintainable software | Quick results, but reliable |
Advantages
Structured Development Ad-hoc Development
a. Clear milestones and deliverables a. Faster for small-scale or urgent projects
b. Easier team collaboration and communication b. Low overhead with minimal documentation
c. reduce risks c. flexible and adaptable to immediate needs
d. Ensures higher quality
Disadvantages
Structured Development Ad-hoc Development
a. Time-consuming and resource intensive a. High risk of errors and inconsistencies
b. Not ideal for rapidly evolving requirements b. difficult to scale and maintain
c. lacks accountability and quality assurance
Why Do Some Choose Ad-hoc Development Over Structured Development?
Urgency of Delivery
Short-Term Projects
Lack of Resources
Experimentation and Innovation
Experience and Expertise
Why Switching to Ad-hoc Development Can Be Good in Certain Scenarios?
Filling knowledge gaps
Flexibility in problem-solving
Speed in Development
Exploration of unknowns
Handling unique or unconventional requirements