Jan. 15
Destruction of human dignity → Lemkin
Motive of destruction of the group itself
vandalism → the deliberate destrcution/ premeditated of the cultural works (art and other artifacts)
not just physical, but cultural
every group has a value worth and how to transpose it to human groups
all have the capacity and the kind of genius that is only unique to them
includes them in the universe of groups and whose destruction is terrible
lebelling genocide 1; defining genocide as a crime
lemkins was the only surviving member of his family
defines the new term genocide
deliberate destruction of a group; analogous on how you would kill a person
not something that is not just tied to killing
in 1942, winston churchill
they could see what germans are doing to the jews
crime without a name
crime of crimes (churchill)
talking about destruction of groups, not only the destruction of many individuals through mass killings
you could have a massacre, use of force with lots of civilians dead, the new term genocide is the deliberate of a group
indiscriminate use of violence, retributino, planned attack to ensure that the group is destroyed
destruction of the essential foundations of groups; more about what the intent it with the aim of annihilating
with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves, deprivation, food, destruction of natural and physical resources, involve the use of violence itself
taking away deliberately, that makes a group a group
cultural genocide is baked into the original understanding
forced assimilation
assimilation of groups is not necessarily genocide
as long as assimilation is in the natural course of things, its not genocide
deliberate is genocide
legal definition
un will negotiate t he term
just like every other treaty, the members debate
we all have the kind of things we want to highlight and think are wrong
genocide convention reflects in many ways
how to define a crime; elements of a crime
big debate about if u want to leave it open, or have a specific group of people
should these groups be included in the genocide convention?
political groups should be defined in the group of concention, but not he soviet
racialized ideology; when soviet’s are talking, tied to primordial groups
primordial objective characteristics; same attributes
seeking to end those types of groups
if the perpetrator wants them gone, then they will tap into those types of groups
political groups are mutable; changing
nobody is really born into a political group
renounce your communist affiliation
show you are no longer a member of this group
lemkin would have wanted cultural genocide as a seperate thing?
it’s the west’s turn to say its unacceptable
what makes a group vulnureable? if they are physically and culturally destroyed; prevent births
2nd to last draft; soviets agree to drop the cultural and west drops for political
punishment provisions
establishing elements of a crime; mental and physical
lower scale of intention
lemkin → genocide is not a bunch of dead civilians
lots of civilians harmed or killed
what has to be behind that outcome is the intention
actual evidence to show that intention; perpetrators deliberately want to destroy a group
have to show that the intent of hiding
destroying that group
not genocide unless you can show that the use of force was done additionally through the intention of destroying the group
proving a genocide charge is difficult
the foundation of the crime
show that the victims fit into these groups
is the evidence supposed to show that the perpetrators fit into these groups and how they understand themselves
3rd party analysis of whether they fit into this group and how they understand it
not until the mid 19990s, international ?? on rwanda
groups targeted for genocide recieved low resources
preventing birth; forced sterilization
eliminate groups now
forced removal; taking children who were born into the group and making sure children would lived bu tthey would never be part of the grouo
jan. 17
punishment provisions
conspiracy is common in all kinds of crimes that involve more than one person to perpetrate
conspiracy charges are charged with organized criminal and gang activity
genocide means an actual act that has happened
kinds of method of destruction
conspiracy that is not actually complete but is at the right of planning
done more than just idle talk
some level of just actual plan
conspiracy; inchoate crime
hasn’t been completed
still a prohibited act because of the plan to perpetuate a crime
it is possible to level a conspiracy charge on its own
if there were sufficient evidence that planning is going, that is not just idle chat
some kind of intention down the road that they are going to carry out a plan
attempts
tried to carry out and failed
incitement
not just at the talk level of planners
never people who are the willing executioners
people who engage in propaganda
1992; leon mugasera
mid 19990s → mid 2010s
ICTR and ICTY
makes the speech and used in the genocide to get ppl to back it
canadian authorities are made aware of him
instead of incitement, canada instead deports him and let that jurisdiction deal with him
deported back to rwanda
complicity
knowingly aid the perpetrators
un convention on punishment on the crime of genocide
principly the convention has been usde for
prosecution could happen in domestic courts where the crime was committed as long as the state is part of the convention
competent tribunal within a member state
can use domestic civilian courts and can use military courts
international tribunal
international criminal court
comes into effect in july of 2022
special tribunal
could use icc
but need to have some kind of standing at the icc
parties must come from the state
referral from the un criminal convention
individually is tried for their part
individual criminal responsibility
each individual contact must be proved at trial
gaccaca courts; local courts
obedience to order’s defence is not allowed
unless it’s a planning officer with a direct threat
lower level perpetrators have lower responsibility
sentencing is incoherent
lot less rigorous
principle of universality
most serious crimes
belgium and spain
any state in the world can try and charge in genocide
most serious is crimes against genetics
crimes against the entire human family
state responsibility against international wrongfulness
These charges reflect the gravity of actions taken by states that violate fundamental human rights and the norms of international law
ensuring that states remain accountable
anything that has international law requires individuals
corporation as an entity engages in some criminality; choose to implicate people
draft treaty; not in full treaty
capacity for state to sue each other
2007 case in bosnia vs. serbia
current case in january 2024
duress
current case is south africa vs israel
allegation by the south african state that the israelis were perpetrating genocide on gaza
intention on genocide
who can be charged
anybody who you can show who played a role in crime of genocide or planning it
public officials; middle range bureaucratic organizers
unless u perpetrate in some way, you will be charged
responsibilities of states
prevention
wording reflects the bare minimum
article 8; parties that have signed and ratified the convention may
icj decision in 2007 the court affirms that there is an obligation for states to prevent genocide
jan. 20
state may call upon the confident organs of the united nations to take actions under the un charter
prevent genocide from occuring
role of states; use their sovereign capacity to decide for themselves
legal obligation
international court of justice; affirmative obligation to engage in prevention
full knowledge that the genocide is occurinb
un security council is not a real focus of genocide prevention
try and response to the failure of the un security council and peacekeeping
responsibility to protect doctrine
r2p; emilurate the kiknd of fact of the responsibilty to rebuild
international committee on international state sovereignity
states have a right to their own sovereignity but it’s conditional
solid r2p mission; libya in 2011; a kind of emerging civil war
nato authorized mission to go in and us eforce to prevent a potential genocide
late 2000s, genocide prevention was popular
allbright column report
west is not interested in moral arguments
appeal to international self interest
refugee flows; refugee camps
can become haven for terrorist activity; incubator for pandemics
genocide prevention is unlikely unless its a goldilocks plan
unstrategic like rwanda
jan.20
related international crimes
crimes against humanity
rwanda trials
london charter ictr
extermination; according to the chamber
intent to kill persons at a mass scale
direct use of force; subject use of force towards people that would lead to their death
not identified by groups; uses different kinds of methods in the genocide convention
war criminals; only those who break geneva conventions
can only be convicted in warfare
genocide can occur in war conflict and peace time
charge crime of extermination and breaches
prosecutors can ensure that all crimes are committed at once
they’re not sure that they are going to get the convention on genocide, so if they have crimes against humanity; they have a higher likely of a convention
grave breaches; name charges in the geneva convention
how armed conflict should be limited
doesn’t say how war is started
how war is fought
grave breaches; following acts if committed against property
inhumane treatment
serious injury to bodily or health
unlawful deportation
lack of access to trial
taking up property not by military necessity
other war crimes isn’t mention because they change overtime
acts that violate other principles
distinction, proportionality, no unnecessary suffering, balanced against military necessity
military necessity; targeting against civilians and targeting civilian places
protected person; captured soldoers
civilian can lose their status; if they decide to take up weapons
regain it when they stop doing that
civilians arent inherently part of conflict
shouldn’t be targeted
use of force on targets should equal to what is required
ethnic cleansing; they just want them outside the location
increase their own resources
aggressive use of force to take another state
prohibited under international law
un charter; article 2 (4); states must refrain from use of force to solve international disputes
William schabas
get rid of genocide because its a lot
politicization
doesn’t accurately describe
condemn political adversaries
clueless denial
hard denial
soft denial
how it works
most functional
Jan. 27
at the start of the 2nd world war, there wasn’t any scholars related to genocide study
nazi regime and Stalinist regime
why hitler and stalin stand at the top and why did they engage in terrible kind of policies
how people came to be and how they came to have these ideologies; informing organizations.
how do they overtime came to play this role?
strategic actors; live in an altered strategic and moral universe
appropriate right thing
from their point of view, it’s morally correct
they need to destroy civilians bc they are part of the insurgency
loss in war, especially territory, economic decline
a marginalized group; prospective theory
critique of a rational actor model
actors know how to engage in a kind of rational ordering of their preferences
they can take pieces of information; determines how they do
within an organization that is hierarchical, ionce a genocide starts, there is a strong bond among the perpetrators themselves
love for one’s own and love/hate for victims
hate on its own is not a reason for genocide
motivated by convenience
; calculation
indigenous genocide; settle colonial states want to execute program
counter argument; need to do a lot of hard work to separate vicigtms
Jan. 31
as a democracy, that believes in the rule of law, the use of the law is front and center
the idea of a divided society
bad political outcomes that flow from the currently divided societies
marginalization, civil war, crimes against humanity
severe cleavages; exist alongside each other but doesn’t mean they are connected
fragmented
rise to a level of division between groups that lead to contestation
segregation of policies
eventual victims, often geographically, segreated into different parts of economy
little interaction between groups
segregation policies
differential opportunities
distortion of the law
social practices and beliefs
who genuinely belongs to the political community
can give rise to an idea that there are some people who are genuine and those who are not
oppressed or in some way then become a cursive relationship of who belongs in a community
tw large groups;worst kind of severe cleavage is when you have two regularly matched groups
he claims that only totalitarian regimes commit genocide
totalitarian states have enormous state capacity
total domination; nazi death camps
no independent capacity for action
have complete control over everyone
non-democratic regimes, assumption that they were all authoritarian
idea of genocide that it was not possible for democracies to commit this crime
relates to genocide
as long as you have a foreign development society, you are insulating genocide
totalitarian ideology that gives reasons for total domination of society
revolutionary ideology of some kind
enormous transformation of society
particular groups that are outside fo the revolutionary order have to be eliminated
capacity for individuals to come together
intervention
use law in perpetration of the cimre
political parties become sectarial
demos; people, conflated with ethnos , meaning the nation
their view of democracy is that its viewed by us
limited democracy
highly authoritarian regimes
role of the law
always happen during a criss
economic and political crisis
feb. 3
genocide as a trigger is what non targeted communities think what a trigger means
what they think is going to happen in the near future
ongoing threat from who they think is responsible
genocide is more likely if there is a crises
political opportunity structure; tarrow
why social movements arise
revolution; the kind of program where u can diagnose whats wrong with society
project of the new political elite
genocide is more likely if there is political oppression; after the crises there is a blaming of a group
if group comes to power, they can come up with political change
the more radical the change, the more likely genocide will happen
construction of a new society and economy that requires restructure
not all genocides take place in conflict
interstate war; aside from civil war, warfare of any kind
1945; krain et al
warfare facilitates the use of force
use of force; shift the object and purpose of fighting to the destruction of a particular group
kind of habitual thing where u can add to violence for purposes of armed conflict
organization; mobilizing the security apparatus and the national military and to fight adversaries
feb. 7
victims are defenseless and no capacity to defend themselves
bystanders; no connection, by doing nothing, they are giving a green light that whatever the perpetrators are doing is okay wit them
collaborators; use their own, facilitate perpetrators
rescuers; organizations that aid victims and create underground assistance
problem with authority
have a strong moral code
boundaries between groups are all fuzzy
changing abt who belongs to what
genocide entrepreneurship; policy radicalization
holocaust cause; working toward the fuhrer
indicates that he wants a different solution; have them fight amongst each other
how can perpetrators also be victims; subaltern genocide
enacting a form of revenge
part of the perpetrator group who become victims
victims; have capacity for agency
victims of victims; collaborate
the drowned + the saved; primo levy
rescue for a while when it suits them, then they will abandon it later
indigenous genocide
individual moments of destruction
continuities made from german scholars
jurgen Zimmerman; argues that whether we are talking about genocide in a settler context or in an ottoman case, that one way or another we are talking about a modern dynamic of colonialism
\
feb. 10
arguments that can be made that have settler colonial democracies
founding moment of the Christian state; where the ottomans headquartered; transitioned to a detained modern nation state
new settle colonial colonies; settler of empire, this dynamic at play
application of direct violence
widespread devastation
relying on holocaust uniqueness
fannie la fontaine; brought into the commission , makes the argument that there are some elements of indigenous genocide where the intent to kill is very clear
key roles played by the settler population; resort to use of violence to try and affect the same type of outcome
frontier violence by settlers
yana (late 1870s and early 80s) exclusively by settlers
beneficiaries; all the land that is taken and redistributed goes to settlers
Patrick wolfe; settler colonialism is different, not the same as colonialism in asia and latin America, different kind of project
all about taking territory permanently
in the longer scope, both a project of destruction and construction
see themselves as building a new world and society
structural matter, not a singular event
fundamental restructuring
massive change in structure , no definitive endpoint
exert their imperial
doctrine of discovery; papal bulls opened up in the 1800s
terre nullius; land without a master
when discovery occurs ; can claim the land for their state even if other people live there
expulsion; taking locals and forcing them to extract resources
has to be from a colonial point of view; removing indigenous permanently from large bouts of land
residential system; reservation system
forced expulsion
policies of expulsion; trail of tears
forcible expulsion through the act of congress; indian removal act of 1830
under president Andrew Jackson
congress passes a law through the so-called 5 civilized tribs
forced incorporation; biological
deliberate race mixing; or whitening
once indigenous people are forced to leave, indigenous people have socioeconomic outcomes entirely out of being vulnerable and dependent state
forced assimilation of indigenous children
indian act 1826
whoop up trade; frontier violence and state violence
furnace around a frontier mentality
forts dotted across the land and meant to protect settlers
feb. 12
global structures
a lot of people who end up in the settlements wanted a chance to won their own farm
some people flee religious persecution
become local agents to claim the agents land ; operate under the colonial system under a symbiotic relationship
colonialism involves a lot of raw materials
the kind of massive influx from Europe near the end of the 19th century means overpopulation issue
overseas competition between European states and export it
hierarchical
nomadic thesis; incorrect, saying that indigenous peoples were nomadic, indigenous peoples are not suited to modernity because they are connected to the land, don’t know how to use the land properly, land has to be cleared by indigenous peoples so they can be modernized
extinction thesis; indigenous peoples biologically can’t survive in the post-modern world because they cant withstand diseases that europeans bring with them
virgin soil hypothesis; north America and indigenous people are living in a bubble by themselves and because of their innate physical weakness, they naturally fell quickly by eurpean diseases
black legend; strange diseases that consumed them like rotten sheep, rested on the idea that as a race, indigenous people were inferior and poor
moral and cultural failure; their way of life is inferior
david s. jones
removal from the land , removal from food sources, repeated exposure to settlers who put them in this situation
everybody in north America is an immigrant
Canadian indian residential schools
system where children are not educated in based schools
project is understood to be as an exercise of genocide through forced assimilation
indigenous rebellion
state schools ran by us government were better than Canada
step in to save ?
genocide of bison is part of the genocide of indigenous peoples ; cuts off their food source
bovine tuberculosis; scioffula
feb. 14
whoop-up trade
royal proclamation 1763
const. act (1867 )
indian act (1876)
chanadian indian residential schools
crown dominion over indians and indial land
upper and lower Canada becoming quebec
in 1857, the passing gradual civilization act
control over the policy with respect to indian lands
updated reiteration of the 1867 indian act
to be able to deal with the Canadian state, reservation systems have been created, take indigenous peoples and turn them into Canadians
very strong understanding that indigenous peoples left to heir own devices; education of young children is the way to overcome
movement to create industrial schools; residential schools and sdet up to educate African American boys, vocational training
recognition to turn indigenous peoples into Americans in a more secularized version
federal government thinks it has a problem they need to fix
avoid indian wars
no standing military force
MA Mcrae
need assistance to be chained to Canadians
riel rebellion 1867 - 1870
welcome and facilitate the settlement of the country but embrace it as they want and render its government easy and not expensive; federal government wants to expand west but don’t want it to be a problem that they spend lot of money
set up schools so they enforce the settler expansion
report on indian school and halfbreeds
it is not going to be possible or desirable for a modern education provided to indigenous children on reserve
conversion to Christianity
funding causes to be dire; most schools were funded at this level adjusted for inflation
$1.09 perchild per year; creates an incentive for churches for funding
federal funding formula ensures that they are able to run but underfunded and schools become an overcrowded place
enforcement; wanted education fro their children
focused on children’s education
daven report; rejects this idea
adult population are hopelessly non-modern
what women were learning ; good western mothers, how to run your household
teachers felt that they were vulnerable and surrounded
nuns took language by mouth; wash mouth with soap
assimilation project
outcomes
by the end of the 2nd worlwar, there was a move towards decommissioning schools
children are getting exposed to disease
Canada becomes one of the un founding members; central documents, un declaration on human rights
continuing to run these schools is not consistent with the un declaration
1st decommissioned residential school
assimilation by having indigenous people going to white schools
feb. 26
ottoman empire
anyone who isnt a muslim is a mehmet
three tier system; muslim subjects regardless of where they were located
islam is the recognized religious ffliation
christians are people of the book; believed in the same abrahamic god
background conditions domesti
one of their male children would be handed over to the sultan;s military
converted to islam and would spend their lives as young people training to be soldiers
internal forces inside the sultanate who wants to see the empire modernized
found help in the main european christian powers
decided that russia would be given responsibility for the christian populations
get rid of the millet system
uniified set of rules about economic activities
right of subjects become the same
repeated wars;
1821-28; remnant of the empire; crowning achievement of the ottoman
taking the dissitine empire
1839 - can no longer risk the christian population have equal treatment to themselves
inevitably turn against the empire themselves
if the christians all want to have independence , they would take all of them and leave nothing
march 3
death by killing and deportation
divert the colony and almost massacre everyone
forcibly remove women and children
deportees; left a whole process on others on the hands of the state
take in children forcibly and be raised in new families
starvation was a deliberate choice
use deportation process as one of the primary methods of destruction
resistance
gets a replacement
a new governor from Istanbul is sent; takes all the people
aleppo; governor also the mayor of ankara
gov. erzurum, trabzon, der zor
refused the deportation order and was replaced
musa dagh
hope that the naval forces would see their bonfire and come in and investigate
Austrian journalist hears about the case; writes a fictionalized version of the book
40 days at musa dagh; franz werfel
rescue
haji khalil
Islam had nothing to do in causing the genocide that happened
turks that are not the problem or Islam
it was a political set of actors
outcome
they wanted to make it so that more than 10%
large Armenian communities outside during the deportation
the nazi holocaust
background
outflow of jewish population from the roman province of judea
wasn’t an independent kingdom at that time
when caesar comes to power, has the backing of the jewish king
rewar
march 7
antisocialist campaign , 1878 - 88
anticatholic ‘kulturekampf’
making it so that socialist groups cant form
criminal proceedings to scoop up socialists to destroy the movement
jews who were outsuides now look like they were on the inside
societal fragmentation
split by region and religion
not all the germans love each other
the plan for the holocaust wasnt decided until the summer
marginalization of jews that everyone forgot about
first kind of indicator that the war has gone on way longer
good at strategy; rathmau??
raioning
jewish men are overrepresented
treaty was and embarrassment
inflation isn’t the problem; it’s the lack of jobs
march 12
other forms of legal separation
by the end of 1930s, most germans did see jews as completely foreign and alien
world war 2 segregation
as the historian retired,u cant understand the holocaust unless u understand the aims of the east
hitler infamous speech; calls himself a prophet
September 1 of 1930; changes the words in a way that shows a genocidal intent
extermination of the aryan race; and the jewish race
replicate the an colonial experience
be enslaved with slave labour
ghettos in nazi occupied Europe
warsaw ghetto
vilnuis
todt
when the Warsaw ghetto was constructed, it was in 1939
all jews who lived I the city
need more resources or need more ghettos
Madagascar plan
segregation to genocide
commissar order
society red army is ready eventually
the first shooting actions start under the commissar order
the shooting actions; chelmo 1941
process of destruction
4 army groups that invade in regions