JH

Thermosynamics 8/25/25

Problem-Solving Method Overview in Thermodynamics

  • Goal: Understand why a formal problem-solving method is important and how it streamlines solving, communicating, and checking work.
  • Why use a method/algorithm:
    • Reduces need for on-the-fly decisions, especially under grading or time pressure.
    • Provides a repeatable, teachable process so others can follow your work.
    • Serves as a formal communication of your reasoning so anyone can understand what you did.

Formal Problem Statement and Communication

  • Do not merely copy a problem statement verbatim from a book or assignment.
    • Rewrite the problem in your own words to internalize it.
  • Include a sketch of the setup and clearly labeled quantities.
  • Define the system and boundary clearly; understand how the boundary can be fixed or movable depending on the problem.

Sketching and Boundary Definition

  • Draw the system first.
  • Draw the boundary next (clear distinction between system and surroundings).
  • Boundary can be fixed or movable; it can move with the system (e.g., a piston).
  • In thermodynamics, assume a zero-thickness boundary that has zero mass and zero volume, but is conceptually crucial.
  • Example: piston-cylinder system with a movable boundary and an inlet. If we care about the gas inside, that gas is the system; the boundary is the piston.

System, Surroundings, and Boundaries

  • Fixed boundary: closed system (control mass). Mass cannot cross the boundary.
  • Moving boundary: boundary may do work or exchange energy; still can be a closed system if mass doesn’t cross.
  • Open system: control volume. Mass can cross the boundary; boundary is often called a control surface.
  • Isolated system: energy and mass do not cross boundaries (in practice, rarely perfectly isolated).
  • Mass crossing boundary distinction is key: closed vs open vs isolated systems.

Types of Systems (Key Concepts)

  • Closed system (control mass): fixed amount of mass; mass cannot cross boundaries; energy can cross.
  • Open system (control volume): mass can cross boundaries; energy and/or mass can cross; boundary often a control surface.
  • Isolated system: neither mass nor energy crosses boundaries in the idealized sense.
  • Fixed mass (closed) vs variable mass (open) distinction is essential for applying the first law and energy analyses.

Boundary and Mass/Energy Flow Details

  • Boundaries are crucial for defining what exchanges occur (heat, work, mass, etc.).
  • The boundary description helps determine what quantities can cross and what must be accounted for in energy balances.
  • Zero-thickness boundary is an abstraction that helps define the system rather than a physical object.

Fundamental vs Derived Units and Property Tables

  • Fundamental (base) units: mass (m), length (L), time (T), temperature (Θ).
  • Derived units: combinations of base units (e.g., velocity with dimensions of L/T).
  • Property tables rely on the continuum assumption and allow practical property values for substances like air and water.
  • The continuum assumption implies water is water and air is air (even though air is a mixture: ~76% N2, ~21% O2, etc.). This supports using single-property values or tabulated data for engineering calculations.
  • Reference to property tables will be covered in Chapter 3 and beyond.

Fundamental, Intensive, and Extensive Properties

  • Fundamental/Extensive properties: depend on the size of the system.
    • Examples: mass $m$, volume $V$. These scale with system size.
  • Intensive properties: do not depend on system size; they are intrinsic to the material and state.
    • Examples: density $
      ho$, specific volume $v$, temperature $T$, pressure $p$, specific enthalpy $h$, specific entropy $s$.
  • Relationship between extensive and intensive properties via mass:
    • Specific volume: v riangleq rac{V}{m} = rac{1}{
      ho}
  • Key density concepts:
    • Density:
      ho riangleq rac{m}{V}
    • Specific gravity: SG riangleq rac{
      ho}{
      ho{ ext{water}}} where $ ho{ ext{water}}$ is the density of water (a convenient reference value).

The Continuum Assumption and Property Tables

  • Continuum assumption: treat substances as continuous media with well-defined properties at every point.
  • This allows the use of property tables for substances (air, water, etc.) and the definition of state properties like $
    ho$, $v$, $T$, $p$, $h$, $s$.
  • Chapter 3 will delve into property tables and how to read them for engineering calculations.

The Algorithmic Problem-Solving Approach (Step-by-Step)

  • Step 1: State the problem in your own words (not verbatim). Clarify exactly what is being solved.
  • Step 2: Draw a sketch of the physical setup.
  • Step 3: Label the system, boundary, and states (including multiple time snapshots if needed).
  • Step 4: List givens with numerical values and units.
    • Emphasize the importance of units; they guide dimensional consistency.
  • Step 5: List assumptions and simplifications (e.g., neglect friction, ignore certain losses) and justify them.
  • Step 6: List relevant equations (start from the most general forms; use an equation sheet as a reference).
    • If you need to look up properties (e.g., densities, viscosities), reference them here so the source is unambiguous.
  • Step 7: Reference data sources (e.g., property tables); if there is a potential typo in the book, you have a trail to verify.
  • Step 8: Start symbolic solving (use letters and algebra first, not numbers).
    • Avoid plugging numbers too early; it helps check consistency and catch mistakes.
  • Step 9: If necessary, substitute numerical values later and check units and magnitudes.
  • Step 10: Perform sanity checks on results (e.g., is a computed efficiency physically reasonable? For a car engine, 65% would be suspicious—discuss within the context and known limits).
  • Step 11: Use external references (e.g., Google) to compare with typical real-world values and discuss how your result fits within expected ranges.
  • This algorithm gives a transferable framework for problems in statics and thermodynamics and can be used beyond this course.

The Thermodynamics Perspective (Thermostatics vs Thermodynamics)

  • The course is described as classical thermo (macroscopic view), not molecular-level.
  • The term thermostatics is used informally to emphasize equilibrium analysis rather than dynamic molecular-scale details.
  • Equilibrium is a central concept; we consider systems that reach or are in equilibrium in various senses.

Two Main Laws and Equilibrium Concepts in the Lecture

  • The lecture introduces two main laws, with emphasis on the first law of thermodynamics, but does not derive it in detail here.
  • Classical thermodynamics is framed around macroscopic quantities and equilibrium behavior rather than molecular descriptions.
  • Equilibrium is broken into several types:
    • Mechanical equilibrium: no net motion (forces balanced).
    • Thermal equilibrium: no net change in temperature over time.
    • Phase equilibrium: no phase change occurring.
    • Chemical equilibrium: no chemical reactions occurring or net reaction rate is zero.
  • These equilibrium concepts will be used to analyze systems and to justify assuming steady-state or quasi-equilibrium conditions when appropriate.

Practical Examples and Metaphors Mentioned

  • Water bottle left at room temperature tends toward thermal equilibrium with surroundings over time.
  • Piston-cylinder with a movable boundary demonstrates mass/energy transfer and boundary movement affecting system state.
  • A hypothetical “Blossman” unit is joked about to illustrate that units must be breakable into fundamental units; there is no such unit in standard practice.

Common Practice and Real-World Considerations

  • Acknowledgement that real systems have friction and losses; these are listed as assumptions to simplify analysis.
  • If a problem yields an unusual result (e.g., an engine efficiency far outside realistic bounds), compare with real data and discuss why the discrepancy may occur.
  • The problem-solving framework is designed to be adaptable to other courses (e.g., statics) and to real-world engineering tasks at CU.

Summary of Key Takeaways

  • A formal problem-solving method improves clarity, reproducibility, and learning transfer.
  • Accurately define the problem, sketch the setup, and clearly identify system, boundary, and surroundings.
  • Distinguish between closed (control mass) and open (control volume) systems; understand how mass and energy may cross boundaries.
  • Use the continuum assumption and property tables to assign state properties; differentiate between extensive and intensive properties.
  • Employ a symbolic-first approach: solve with letters before plugging in numbers to ensure consistency.
  • Always check for physical realism and use external references to contextualize results.
  • Understand the types of equilibrium and their relevance to simplifying analyses in thermo.

Quick Reference: Key Formulas Mentioned

  • Density:
    ho riangleq rac{m}{V}
  • Specific volume: v riangleq rac{V}{m} = rac{1}{
    ho}
  • Density relation to water (specific gravity): SG riangleq rac{
    ho}{
    ho_{ ext{water}}}
  • Boundary concepts: closed system (control mass) vs open system (control volume) with energy and/or mass crossing boundaries as applicable
  • Conceptual: energy interactions can cross a boundary (heat, work), mass interactions may cross in open systems
  • Equilibrium types: mechanical, thermal, phase, chemical (definitions provided in text)
  • Note on units: fundamental vs derived units; kilowatt-hour example discussed as a unit composed of power and time