Sociology: Theoretical Perspectives — Vocabulary Flashcards (Ch 1–5)
Structural Functionalism
- Macro-level theory: views society as a system with parts that have to work together for stability.
- Background and framing:
- Emile Durkheim as a key figure; his era linked life sciences to the study of social life.
- Discussion of research methods in studying structural functionalism.
- Metaphors to understand the whole: organism, machine, or car. You can pick a metaphor; the idea is that parts work together for the whole to function.
- Core idea: structural functionalists see society as a system where interdependent parts promote stability and order.
- Key concepts:
- Social solidarity: the degree of a group's cohesion based on shared values, beliefs, and regular interaction. Higher social solidarity = more stable society.
- Anomie: a negative state produced by absence or poorly defined norms (normlessness).
- Homeostasis: a balanced state within the social system.
- Macro vs micro levels:
- Structural functionalism is a macro-level theory (focus on the big picture of society).
- Contrast with micro-level theories that focus on individual meanings and everyday interactions.
- Social solidarity and stability intuition:
- When people share similar values and interact regularly, cohesion increases and the system remains stable.
- Real-life example concept:
- If a neighborhood experiences a lot of norm violations (e.g., privacy or private-property norms are not shared), social solidarity may be weakened, leading to instability.
- The function of social life:
- Manifest function: the obvious, intended outcome of a phenomenon or institution.
- Latent function: an unintended but positive side effect.
- Dysfunction: negative effects that undermine cohesion or stability.
- Examples of functions in modern life:
- Manifest function of social media: information sharing.
- Latent function of social media: creation of a wide range of jobs in the labor market connected to social media, even if those jobs weren’t the original aim.
- Dysfunction: social media can undermine cohesion, breed distrust in authority, or reduce face-to-face interaction.
- Important caveat about the function typology:
- These are analytic lenses or a typology for thinking about how parts support or undermine the system; they are not rigid testable binaries.
- A few explicit points from the course emphasize that the exact categorization (manifest/latent/dysfunction) isn’t always clean or the only explanation.
- Everyday analogy and norms:
- Norms like walking on the right side of the sidewalk and giving others space illustrate how norms guide social interaction and reduce friction.
- Connections and implications:
- Stability and cohesion depend on shared values and regular interaction (solidarity).
- Normlessness (anomie) can disrupt cohesion and stability.
- The macro lens emphasizes structural constraints and the functioning of the whole society, rather than just individual actions.
Conflict Theory
- Origins and core focus:
- Roots in Karl Marx; commonly referred to as conflict theory.
- Central question: who gets what and why? (resource distribution and power dynamics)
- Different perspective from Durkheim:
- Durkheim emphasizes stability and integration; Marx emphasizes conflict, inequality, and the means of production.
- Means of production:
- The resources needed to produce goods and wealth (e.g., factories, machinery, raw materials, and labor power).
- In capitalist society, ownership of the means of production by the bourgeoisie leads to profit, while the proletariat owns only their labor power.
- Class structure and relations:
- Bourgeoisie: owners of the means of production; tend to profit and control productive assets.
- Proletariat: workers who own only their labor power and must sell it for wages; often work in unsafe conditions.
- Core concepts:
- Means of production and exploitation: economic structure shapes social relations and interests of different classes.
- Class conflict as a driver of social change: tensions between owners and workers can lead to reforms or upheaval.
- Analytical focus and applications:
- Useful lens for understanding patterns of inequality and distribution of power.
- Applies to the study of socioeconomic status (SES), both within a country and across nations.
- Helps explain how economic structure influences other social institutions and outcomes.
- Connections to broader themes:
- The theory encourages looking at how livelihood and economic arrangements shape social life, including politics, education, and culture.
- The framework highlights how those with power may maintain advantages and constrain others.
- Relevance for the module:
- You’ll encounter this perspective explicitly when discussing socioeconomic status and cross-national comparisons (module three).
- Practical and ethical implications:
- By analyzing means of production and class relations, conflict theory informs debates about wealth distribution, labor rights, poverty, and social reform.
Theoretical Tools, Comparison, and Course Context
- How the five theories are framed in this course:
- The instructor notes focus on five theories; some courses cover only the first 3 or 4 theories, but this course centers on five.
- The theory table:
- Throughout chapters you’ll see a theory table that contrasts how each theory views a topic (e.g., religion), with a dedicated focus on how a structural functionalist and a conflict theorist would approach it.
- Some chapters show a theory table with an audio overlay indicated by a play button.
- Foundational piece of the discipline:
- Theory is a foundational piece; not every chapter will discuss every theory in equal depth, but the framework remains.
- Historical context and methods:
- Durkheim’s era coincided with the life sciences’ influence on discourse and social research methods; this shapes how structural functionalism is framed.
- Exam expectations and study approach:
- Your job is to understand the major focus of each perspective and be able to compare theories with one another.
- By Thursday, you should be able to answer the questions related to these theories.
- Important caveat about testing:
- Do not expect to be asked to classify everything strictly as manifest, latent, or dysfunctional in a binary way. These categories are useful for analysis but not rigid test items.
- Metaphors and cognitive tools:
- The car, organism, or machine metaphors help you grasp how parts function together to keep the whole system running.
- Real-world relevance and ethics:
- The theories offer lenses to interpret everyday life, public policy, and ethical questions about social order, inequality, and cohesion.
- Practical takeaways:
- Distinguish macro-level theories (focusing on large-scale social structures) from micro-level theories (focusing on individual meanings and interactions).
- Use social solidarity, anomie, and means of production as anchor concepts to analyze social life, policy, and change.
Everyday Examples and Practical Implications
Norms and everyday behavior:
- Sidewalk etiquette (walking on the right, allowing space, not crowding) is an example of normative behavior that maintains social order.
Social media example:
- Manifest function: information sharing.
- Latent function: emergence of new labor-market opportunities related to social media.
- Dysfunction: erosion of face-to-face cohesion and potential trust in institutions.
Real-world relevance:
- Structural functionalism helps explain how norms and institutions contribute to stability, while conflict theory helps explain how power and resources shape inequality and social change.
Exam preparation emphasis:
- Be able to summarize the major focus of each theory, compare theories side-by-side, and apply them to real-world topics like religion, SES, or neighborhood dynamics.
Final note:
- Thursday’s questions will test your ability to distinguish theories and explain their central ideas and implications.
Numerical references used in this summary: 3 theories; 4 chapters; 5 theories discussed in this course.