Individuals aim to achieve the best possible outcomes under constraints.
The outcome may depend on the choices of others; hence, understanding these interactions is crucial for decision-making.
Norms and institutions play a significant role in shaping these interactions.
The Invisible Hand
Concept introduced by Adam Smith, describing how individuals pursuing their own self-interest can lead to positive social outcomes.
Example: Farmers growing crops based on market demand can lead to an efficient allocation of resources.
The Prisoners' Dilemma
A scenario where two individuals can either cooperate or defect, with the payoff dependent on the choice made by both.
Each player faces a choice with the outcome that is better when they cooperate, but due to mistrust, they may choose not to.
Modeling Social Interaction
Situations involve multiple individuals whose actions affect their outcomes and those of others.
Game theory models these strategic interactions where players consider their decisions' impacts on one another.
Key terms in game theory include:
Players: Individuals participating in the interaction.
Strategies: Actions available to each player.
Payoffs: Utility earned based on the strategies chosen.
Example Scenario: The Invisible Hand Game
Participants: Anil and Bala, two farmers deciding between growing rice or cassava.
Market Dynamics: The prices of crops are determined by market availability; more supply leads to lower prices and vice versa.
Decision Analysis:
Scenario where both farmers grow rice results in excess supply (low price) while the opposite (both growing cassava) leads to the same.
Optimal Strategy:
Each farmer's best response depends on the other's choice. Anil finds that growing cassava is a dominant strategy regardless of Bala's choice.
Nash Equilibrium
An equilibrium occurs when no player has an incentive to change their strategy given the strategy of the opponent.
In the Invisible Hand Game, the outcome (Cassava, Rice) is a Nash Equilibrium and provides the highest payoff for Anil given Bala's actions.
The Prisoners' Dilemma Example
Scenarios:
Assume Anil chooses between using IPC (biological pest control) or Terminator (chemical pesticides), while Bala has the same choices.
Outcome Payoff: The best mutual strategy (IPC, IPC) provides better outcomes for both but is not stable due to individual incentives to defect to Terminator.
Nash Equilibrium in the Dilemma:
Both players end up choosing Terminator, leading to lower overall utility; hence, the outcome is a Nash Equilibrium despite mutual defection being suboptimal.
Example of National Interaction
Two countries claiming a river can choose to share or fight. The payoffs vary based on their decisions, illustrating how strategic choices can lead to different outcomes depending on cooperation versus conflict.
The Nash Equilibrium would depend on the incentives and penalties associated with each choice.