The Conservative government sent a %%constitutional commission of seven members%% headed by %%Sir John Simon%% in %%1927%%.
The Simon Commission %%prepared a report%% amidst opposition by the major Indian political parties.
It recommended a %%federal form of government%% for India, %%abolition of diarchy%% and %%separate electorates%% for Muslims but %%no one third Muslim seats%% in the government it also opposed making Sindh and the NWF as provinces.
%%INC and ML rejected it%% and the Nehru Report was prepared in its response in 1928.
\
\
\
\
\
The form of the future constitution should be federal, with the residuary powers vested in the provinces
All provinces must be given equal Autonomy
All legislatures in the country and other elected bodies shall be constituted on the definite principle of adequate and effective representationof minorities in every province without reducing the majority in any province to a minority or even equality
In the Central Legislature, Muslim representation shall not be less than one-third
Representation of communal groups shall continue to be by means of the separate electorate at present it shall be open to any community, at any time, to abandon its separate electorate in favour of joint electorate
Any territorial distribution that might at any time be necessary shall not in any way affect the Muslim majority in Punjab, Bengaland NWFP provinces
Full religious liberty shall be guaranteed to all communities
No bill or resolution shall be passed in any legislature if three-fourths of the members of any community in that body oppose the bill
Separation of Sindh from Bombay
Overview:
\
The Indian political community rejected the Simon Commission Report of 1927.
The Congress and the Muslim League both refused to accept the recommendations of the Simon Commission.
Different political parties gave vent to their feelings different ways.
The Indian %%political situation seemed deadlocked.%%
The British government refused to contemplate any form of self-government for the people of India.
This caused frustration among the masses, who often expressed their anger in violent clashes.
This %%political chaos forced British to come up with some decisions%% so, in order to review the Simon Commission Report, they %%announced the holding of an RTC%% which was held between November %%1930%% – January 1931.
It was %%attended by Muslim League but not the INC%% because Gandhi was in jail for his non- cooperation movement.
In the absence of INC, the largest political party of India, it was not possible to make any major decision regarding the future constitution of India.
Gandhi was, at that time, the most prominent spokesman and leader of the INC.
Therefore, some arrangements had to be made to involve him in the political proceedings organized by the British in England.
Lord Irwin met Gandhi in jail and persuaded him to call off his non-cooperation movement.
Both reached a settlement called the %%Gandhi-Irwin Pact of March 1931.%%
Under this %%Gandhi was released%% and allowed to go to London to attend the second RTC.
The second RTC was held September – December %%1931%%.
Therefore, one more RTC was needed that was held in November – December %%1932%% in order to reach some consensus about the future Constitution of India.
\
\
After discussing the summary of the three RTCs in the British Parliament, the Government of India Act 1935 was passed in August %%1935%%.
It was sharply %%criticized by both the ML and the INC.%%
\
Reasons for Opposition
\
Outcomes:
Importance:
\
\
\
\