FF

Hgap 6.6 - 6.7

Learning Goals

  • 49-1: Explain how patterns of land use, population and housing density, and technological capabilities shape metropolitan regions.

  • 49-2: Explain recent patterns in city infrastructure, economic base, and housing.

Patterns of Urban Land Use

  • City Structure: The internal organization of cities shares similarities but no model fits precisely; driven primarily by utility and accessibility.

    • Utility & Accessibility: Influenced by transportation technologies; examples include sector and multiple-nuclei models. When discussing accessibility, the role of the automobile as a recent invention impacts urban development environment.

Historical Context

  • Travel in Early Cities:

    • Early cities were compact with people traveling by walking, boats, horses or stagecoaches.

    • Industrialization led to expansion and the creation of mass transit systems starting from the 1850s (horse car to electric streetcars).

    • Different access levels were given based on distance from the city center, controlling residential and industrial development.

Socioeconomic Patterns

  • Income Inequality:

    • Urban environments showcase varying land values due to transportation systems. Higher-income residents gravitate towards suburban living, while lower-income populations remain in inner-city areas due to greater availability of multifamily residences and mass transit.

  • Rise of Automotive Transportation: With the dominance of cars by the 1950s, existing cities expanded significantly; decreasing reliance on mass transit especially among affluent populations, leading to urban sprawl.

Population and Housing Density

  • Definitions:

    • Population Density: Total population divided by total land area.

    • Perceived Density: General impression of people present in a space, influenced by sociocultural factors (visual perceptions).

  • Population Density Gradient:

    • A model illustrating population density decline as distance from the CBD increases, showing the stark contrast of urban living vs suburban single-family home settings.

Housing Density in New York City

Table Overview

City

Population Density

Residential Building Density

Distance from NYC

Commuting Time

New York, NY

26,403/m2

11,000.3/m2

0 miles

North Bergen, NJ

12,216/m2

4,657.8/m2

10 miles

12-14 minutes

Short Hills, NJ

2,433/m2

826.0/m2

23.5 miles

44-60 minutes

Tewksbury Township, NJ

190.1/m2

73.7/m2

47.9 miles

60-90 minutes

Short Hills Example

  • Developed in the 1870s, first planned community with a focus on railway connectivity, retaining its housing value due to mass transit access.

  • Resident Preferences: Open spaces and commuting conveniences contribute to its desirability compared to Manhattan.

Changes in Urban Infrastructure and Economic Base

  • Fiscal Squeeze: Due to decreasing city revenue and increasing urban infrastructure maintenance demands.

    • Consequences: Left with abandoned properties, job shortages, and degraded infrastructure as affluent populations move out.

  • Economic Restructuring: Shift from industrial to digital economies, leading to high-income job creation but decreasing unskilled job availability.

    • Increasing disparity in socioeconomic status; emergence of new residential patterns categorized into six different groups.

Six Residential Patterns of Socioeconomic Groups

Residential Pattern

Occupiers

Building Type

Comments

Protected enclaves

High-income groups

Expensive apartments or homes

Favorable locations

Gentrified areas

Young professionals

Renovated homes

Typically in central city districts

Middle-class suburbs

Middle- to higher-income

Single-family homes, condo complexes

Working-class neighborhoods

Middle- to low-income

Rented tenements

Differentiation according to income or ethnicity

Ethnic enclaves

Ethnic groups

Mixed housing

Example: Chinatown; Little Italy

Excluded ghettos

Very poor

Slums, substandard housing

Conclusion

  • Recent patterns in city infrastructure, population density, and housing trends underscore the complexity of urban spaces. Urban areas must adapt to changes, and a significant focus remains on infrastructure investment to manage fiscal pressures and socioeconomic disparity.

AP® Exam Tip

  • Important to recognize that while the government has an influence on city structure, developers, corporations, and private citizens also play key roles. Don't attribute all power solely to local authorities.