PHL6420 Principles of Chiropractic - Comprehensive Study Notes (Bullet Points)
Subluxation – Historical Definition
A bone (vertebra) out of place pressing on a nerve causing nerve interference
Is a Subluxation Visible on a Radiograph?
Consider… if a bone was truly out of place enough to create nerve root compression, would you expect it to be visible on a radiograph?
Remember that there are many other structures affecting the area – these are more likely to affect the nerve – discs, ligaments, degenerative changes, vasculature, other space-occupying lesions
Can a patient have a normal radiograph and still need an adjustment?
Joint Dysfunction
A joint that has lost a degree of normal movement (hypomobility)
Would you be able to detect this on a radiograph?
How would you detect this?
Can it be measured?
Can it be corrected?
Terminology Choices
Subluxation
Joint dysfunction
Vertebral subluxation complex (VSC)
Joint subluxation/Dysfunction syndrome
Joint restriction
Joint fixation
Subluxation syndrome
And more…
Does Terminology Matter?
Chiropractic perspective
Healthcare perspective
Patient perspective
Subluxation vs. Joint Dysfunction
Terminology choices – when explaining to patients vs. providers
The medical profession defines subluxation as a partial dislocation that is unstable and hypermobile due to a loss of ligamentous integrity
Contrast this with the definition of joint dysfunction as a hypomobility
The Vertebral Subluxation Complex (VSC)
A theoretical model of motion segment dysfunction (subluxation) that incorporates the complex interaction of pathologic changes in nerve, muscle, ligamentous, vascular and connective tissues. (Bergmann and Peterson, Box 3-1, page 37)
Key point: we are not limited to the bony structures – take into account all of the tissues in and surrounding the joint
Components of the VSC
Three main categories of effects (B&P): Mechanical, Vascular, Neurological
Five components (Gatterman): Neuropathophysiology, Kinesiopathology, Myopathology, Histopathology, Biochemical Changes
Mechanical (Kinesiopathology)
1) Joint restriction (hypomobility)
Decreased angular or linear joint motion
Damaged articular soft tissue - fibrosis, loss of elasticity
Chronic degenerative changes
Internal joint derangement
2) Joint hypermobility
Increased angular or linear joint motion
Usually maintains stability and function under load
Potentially reversible
Often compensatory to chronic hypomobility elsewhere (HVLA may be needed there!)
Candidate for stabilization exercises
3) Clinical joint instability
Increased linear and aberrant joint motion
Non-reversible changes
Abnormal patterns of coupled rotational & translational movement
Multiple planes of aberrant movement
Typically not a Chiropractic candidate for adjusting in that area or may need surgical stabilization (severity dependent)
Mechanical (Kinesiopathology) – What parts of our chiropractic examination can we use to identify the mechanical components?
Vascular (Histopathology/Biochemical)
Vascular congestion and venous stasis
Inflammatory response
Edema/swelling
Vascular (Histopathology/Biochemical) – What parts of our chiropractic examination can we use to identify the vascular components?
Note: Some of these signs may indicate a pathology that contraindicates chiropractic care!
Neurological (Neuropathophysiology)
Historical view: nerve root compression (garden hose theory), bone out of place pressing on a nerve
Current view: altered nociceptive and proprioceptive input, typically associated with increased nociception coupled with a decrease in mechanoreceptor activity
Is that all there is to chiropractic?
Do not limit the patient to a joint dysfunction diagnosis
Joint dysfunction can be a standalone diagnosis but…
Must investigate further – why is the joint dysfunctional?
Diagnosis is essential! i.e., Disc herniation vs. facet syndrome
Both may result in joint dysfunction in the surrounding areas
However pathomechanics differ as may treatment approach
Potential for contraindications…
Can Joint Dysfunction in the Spine Affect Non-MSK Tissues?
Meric chart – a view that mapped specific vertebrae to corresponding visceral structures
Clinical validity and implications still heavily debated
Based primarily on observation of early chiropractors and neuroscience understanding at the time
Can Joint Dysfunction in the Spine Affect Non-MSK Tissues? (continued)
Research and current views on chiropractic and non-musculoskeletal tissues focuses heavily on the role of the sympathetic nervous system
Still a poorly understood area that needs additional research
Chiropractic management of these conditions limited due to scope and the extent of the research
More details on these topics will be discussed at the end of the trimester and in future courses
Historical Overview
Spinal Irritation (title only; historical topic covered in slides)
Spinal Irritation
Spinal irritation became an entity in 1828 when Thomas Brown coined the term in the Glasgow Medical Journal
It appeared in the American Journal of Medical Sciences in 1832
The idea: tenderness of a vertebra corresponded to a diseased organ
Spinal Irritation – J. Evans Riadore
J. Evans Riadore – Irritation of Spinal Nerves; considered the contemporary father of the nerve compression hypothesis at the time
Quote: “if any organ is deficiently supplied with nervous energy or of blood, its functions immediately, and sooner or later its structure, become deranged.”
Riadore encouraged manipulation to treat spinal irritation (2 years before Palmer’s birth)
D.D. Palmer
“We adjust displaced vertebrae. Subluxations in the spine. The vertebrae are wrenched, displaced. Chiropractic is the adjustment of vertebrae. Spinal adjustments replace vertebrae into line. Stimulus occluded, normal and abnormal foramina.”
(D.D. Palmer, quoted from The Chiropractic Adjuster, p. 105)
Founder of Chiropractic
Subluxation terminology and idea of bone out of place (Palmer’s account of the first adjustment)
No radiographs used at the time to “see” a bone out of place
D.D. Palmer – Inflammation and Early Theories
Palmer’s first theory was focused on inflammation
Inflammation described as “the result of displacement of any body part: nerve, artery or vein…bone, ligament or muscle.”
Palmer manipulated any displaced anatomy to prevent or relieve friction, thought to trigger heat and inflammation
Within 3 years the inflammation hypothesis was refined and published as “Luxation of Bones Cause Disease”
Palmer believed muscles, nerves, and bones were key in displacement causing pressure, which could be relieved by adjustments
D.D. Palmer – Causes of Subluxation & Nerve Tone
Palmer hypothesized causes of subluxation: Trauma (Physical), Toxins (Chemical), Thoughts/Autosuggestion (Psychological/emotional)
Soon added vibratory theory, stating that nerves vibrated normally at 200 times per minute; this represented the TONE of the nervous system
Innate Intelligence
Quote by D.D. Palmer on Innate: “Innate - born with. And so far I would not change it except to replace it with the name of that individualized entity which really is a part or portion of that All Wise, Almighty, Universal Intelligence…the healing power of nature.” (1910)
B.J. Palmer
Considered the “Developer” of Chiropractic
In 1934 established 4 criteria for subluxation:
Misalignment of vertebra in relation to adjacent segments
Occlusion of a foramen (including the canal)
Pressure on spinal nerve roots (or the cord)
Interference to transmission of mental impulses (nerve function)
Later in his career he focused on the upper cervical region; a focus on C1 (atlas) resulted in his hypothesis that a C1 subluxation would cause compression of the spinal cord; this focus resulted in B.J.’s HIO technique
Should the development of Chiropractic Stop with the Palmers?
Question raised about whether the historical development should have stopped with the Palmers
Langworthy, Smith, and Paxon
Divisions in the profession sprung up in the early days
Graduates of Palmer’s chiropractic program
Published “Modernized Chiropractic” (1906) which rejected the “bone out of place” theory as too simplistic and favored a focus on joint fixation/motion restriction
This separate idea/text was used to defend chiropractors arrested for practicing medicine without a license (debated?)
C.O. Watkins
Primary advocate of applying the scientific method to chiropractic practice, research, and education
Believed chiropractors should generate clinical data and publish clinical research
Public relations should be modest and should not masquerade as science
Joint Fixation and Inflammation
Marcel and Henri Gillet – Belgian chiropractors – along with Swiss chiropractor Fred Illi revitalized the concept of lack of proper joint motion
An injured joint becomes fixated as edema develops around strained capsule and tissues
A focus on pelvic and spinal biomechanics led them to conclude that “one cannot put a vertebra back into place the way one does a fracture or dislocation. What one really does is: to restore the function of a vertebra.”
Illi’s Definition of Chiropractic
Quote: “The art and science concerned with the study and treatment of the mechanics, statics and dynamics of the human body, particularly of the vertebral column and pelvis, for the primary purpose of eliminating neuropathological reflexes and their consequences.” — Fred Illi