Be familiar with definitions and examples of the following to prepare for the exam:
Noise
Anything that interferes with message transmission and interpretation
Physical noise: interferences that are external to the sender and receiver and part of the communication environment
Phone ringing
Psychological noise: Mental interferences
Biases, making an assumption about someone when they enter the room or being preoccupied with personal thoughts that distract from the conversation.
Semantic noise: Misunderstandings that arise from the use of jargon, ambiguous language, or cultural differences that can lead to confusion between the communicator and the receiver.
Physiological noise: bodily interferences
Headache
Semantic noise: linguistic challenges
Misunderstanding meaning of words
Quantitative and qualitative research methods
Quantitative methods: Interested in observations that come in or can be converted to numerical data
Qualitative methods: interested in observations that come in or can be recorded in linguistic form
Ontology and epistemology
Ontology - questions about the nature of reality (What is there to know?)
Realism - there is an actual spoon (there is a world that exists apart from them)
Idealism - there is no actual spoon. When I leave, it is not there because I am not there to perceive it (the only world that exists is what they perceive). Thinks our minds can affect matter
Epistemology - questions about how we know things (How can we try to learn about those things?)
Objectivists- presume the truth exists apart from the knower of truth (and that researchers can study that truth)
Subjectivists- reject this idea, think reality only exists in our perceptions and interpretations (and, thus, those perceptions and interpretations should be the focus of the study)
Critical, interpretive, and empirical approaches to research
Critical Approach:
Believe that those in power shape knowledge in ways that perpetuate the status quo
Powerful people work at keeping themselves in power, silencing minority voices
Main concern is with power
Interpretive Approach:
Views truth as subjective and co-created by the participants, with the researcher clearly being one of the participants
Complete objectivity is seen as impossible
Empirical Approach:
Assumes that objective truths can be uncovered and the process of inquiry that discovers these truths can be value-neutral
Self-fulfilling prophecy & self-concept
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: self-expectations that guide your behavior
Self-concepts are “a relatively stable set of perceptions people hold about themselves.”
Mind & thought
Mind: The ability to use symbols with common social meanings
Thought: Inner conversation
Constructs (in Constructivism)
The core assumption of constructivism is that people make sense of the world through systems of personal constructs.
Aka: stereotypes
Fundamental attribution error & actor-observer bias
The Fundamental Attribution Error describes our tendency to over-emphasize dispositional explanations for the behavior of others while under-emphasizing situational explanations. (internal attributions)
Late to work: assume someone has bad time management instead someone was stuck in unexpected traffic
The Actor-Observer bias occurs when we over-emphasize situational explanations for our OWN behavior and under-emphasize dispositional explanations. (external attributions)
Getting a bad grade, blaming it on family issues
Passive, active, and interactive uncertainty reduction strategies
Passive - Observing
Active - Asking others or observing a response to a manipulation
Interactive - Engaging directly
Stigma
Goffman defined stigma as “an attribute that is deeply discrediting.”
Abominations of the body – physical “defects”
Blemishes of individual character – character deficits
Tribal associations – membership in a religious, racial, or ethnic group that is not the majority
Primary, secondary, and public territories
Primary territories are the exclusive domain of an individual. Markers or signs are usually erected to indicate ownership.
Bedroom
Secondary territories signal some sort of personal connection with an area or object. They are not exclusive to an individual, but the person identifies with them.
The seat you sit in in a classroom
Public territories involve no personal affiliations and include those areas that are open to all people.
Library
Proxemics
Proxemics is the study of how humans use space to communicate.
Intimate distance includes behaviors that take place in a range from 0 to 18 inches.
Personal distance includes behaviors that take place in an area ranging from 18 inches to 4 feet; it is typically reserved for interactions with family and close friends.
Social distance includes behaviors that take place in an area ranging from 4 to 12 feet; it is typically reserved for casual and social settings.
Public distance includes behaviors that take place in an area ranging from 12 feet and beyond; it is typically reserved for formal discussions.
Territoriality
Territoriality is frequently accompanied by prevention and reaction.
Humans typically stake out their territory in four primary ways:
Markers (marking one’s spot)
Labels (identification symbols)
Offensive displays (demonstrating aggressive looks and behaviors)
Tenure (being there first and staying the longest)
Expectancies
Expectancies (or expectations) drive human interaction.
Expectancies are defined as the cognitions and behaviors that we anticipate in conversations with others.
These expectancies include nonverbal and verbal behaviors.
One's cultural background has a strong influence on expectations of appropriate behaviors.
Expectancies for human behavior are learned.
Cognitive and physical arousal
Arousal - increased interest or attention when deviations occur
Cognitive arousal is an alertness or an orientation to a violation.
Physical arousal includes those behaviors that a communicator employs during an interaction.
Violation valence, communicator reward valence
The positive or negative characteristics that an individual brings to an interaction.
Violation valence: the perceived positive or negative impact of a breach of expectations in communication, which can influence how the recipient interprets the behavior.
Communicator Reward Valence: Acts performed by high-reward communicators might be assigned positive meanings, whereas the same act performed by a low-reward communicator might be interpreted negatively.
Falsification, equivocation, and concealment
Deception strategies
Falsification creates a fiction.
Concealment hides a secret.
Equivocation dodges the issue.
Leakage
Unconscious nonverbal cues that signal an internal state.
Familiarize yourself with the following:
The linear, interactional, and transactional models of communication
Linear model of communication: sender/source -> message -> target/receiver
Interactional Model of communication
Allows receiver to reply and give feedback. Only allows one message to be sent in response to another
Transactional Model of Communication
Able to go back and forth between communicators. Instead of sender/receiver
The different parts of the definitions of communication and theory
Defining Communication
Communication is a process - dynamic and ever changing
Meaning matters - not assumed or inherent
Shared meaning should not be assumed - there is lots of miscommunication
Communication occurs between people
Defining Theory:
Judee Burgoon: “A set of systematic, informed hunches about the way things operate”
Not an isolated idea: Theories provide explanations
Reserved for an integrated system of concepts: Theories connect the dots
Based on research: Theories are educated guesses
Theory components (including the difference between real and nominal concepts)
Concepts: words or terms that label the most important elements of a theory
Nominal Concepts - unobservable
Require operationalization- turning something unobservable into an observable concept
Ex: For love, using a number scale, counting amount of time they show physical affection
Real Concepts – observable
Relationships: ways in which the concepts of a theory link together
The purpose of theory
To explain, to understand, to predict, to effect social change
Criteria used to evaluate theory
Scope - breadth of behaviors covered by the theory
Don’t want theory to be too broad - trying to accomplish everything
Don’t want to be too narrow - only applies in limited circumstances
Want to be in the middle
Logical consistency - clear, consistent relationships
Parsimony - simplicity of the explanation
Parsimonious - straightforward, simple explanations
Utility - usefulness or practical value
Testability - our ability to investigate a theory’s accuracy
Never will be able to “prove” a theory
All you can do is disprove
Heurism - the amount of research and new thinking generated by the theory
Test of Time – durability
Want theories that have been tested and stood the test of time
Subjectivist and objectivist epistemologies
Epistemology - questions about how we know things (How can we try to learn about those things?)
Objectivists- presume the truth exists apart from the knower of truth (and that researchers can study that truth)
Subjectivists- reject this idea, think reality only exists in our perceptions and interpretations (and, thus, those perceptions and interpretations should be the focus of the study)
What POEM stands for
Paradigm - General world view (dictates your ontology)
Ontology - Questions about nature of reality
Epistemology - How you think you can study reality
Method - (Objectivist - lean towards quantitative)
The role of meaning in SIT
Individuals construct meaning via communication
Meaning is not intrinsic to things; it takes people to make meaning
Goal of interaction is to create shared meaning
Meaning occurs BETWEEN people
Meaning can only exist if people share common interpretations of the symbols they exchange in interaction
Meanings are modified through interpretive processes
Criticisms of SIT (Symbolic Interaction Theory)
Scope- some complain it’s too broad
Testability
Utility - Implications of a language-based definition of humanity
Saying people that can’t speak are not human
The use of the RCQ(Role Category Questionnaire) in Constructivism Theory
The RCQ is designed to sample personal constructs.
Used to measure the respondent’s degree of cognitive complexity.
People with a large set of personal constructs have better social perception skills than those with fewer constructs.
Person-centered messages and cognitive complexity
Messages which reflect an awareness of and adaptations to subjective, affective, and relational aspects of the communication contexts.
Says you must be cognitively complex to make a person-centered message. That is not sufficient, also have to be motivated and in the right place
Better able to adapt messages to individuals
The three types of interpersonal goals
Identity goals - want to present a specific impression of yourself
Nice towards professors
Relational goals - always craving a relationship
If you don’t like someone, may keep interaction brief
Flirty because you have a goal to create intimate relationship
Instrumental goals - tangible goals that guide communication
Need a ride home after class
O’Keefe’s design logics
The goals that one chooses to pursue are sources of variation in message design
3 design logics ordered in terms of cognitive complexity (least to most)
Expressive - Communication as a means of self-expression
Conventional - Communication as a game
Rhetorical - Communication as a negotiation of realities (most sophisticated)
Criticisms of constructivism
Some argue that it just measures “wordiness”
Heider’s sliding scale of personal causation
Association, causality, justifiability, foreseeability, and intentionality
Steps in the attribution process
Step 1: Observation of the action
Step 2: Judgment of Intention
In this step, we ask, “To what extent was the behavior intended?”
Step 3: Attribution of Disposition
Attributional tendencies of actors and observers
The Actor-Observer bias occurs when we over-emphasize situational explanations for our OWN behavior and under-emphasize dispositional explanations. (external attributions)
Three types of stigma and the difference between discredited and discreditable identities
Goffman also described three kinds of stigma:
Abominations of the body – physical “defects”
Blemishes of individual character – character deficits
Tribal associations – membership in a religious, racial, or ethnic group that is not the majority
Goffman described two types of “spoiled identities:” discreditable (invisible) and discredited (visible) identities.
Effects of attributional ambiguity on those with discredited and discreditable identities
This theory states that we are sense-making creatures who engage in continual processes to understand the feedback we receive from others.
This sense-making process is more difficult for stigmatized individuals.
AA can cause stress for those with discreditable identities.
Goals of individuals in initial interactions (according to URT – Uncertainty Related Theories)
A primary goal of individuals in initial interactions is prediction, defined as the ability to forecast one’s own and others’ behavioral choices.
Another goal in initial interaction is explanation, defined as the ability to interpret the meaning of behavioral choices.
The assumptions of URT
People experience uncertainty in interpersonal settings
Uncertainty is an aversive state, generating cognitive stress
When strangers meet, their primary concern is to reduce uncertainty & increase predictability
Communication is the primary means of uncertainty reduction
Interpersonal communication is a developmental process that occurs in stages, and it is the primary means of uncertainty reduction.
It is possible to predict people’s behavior in a law-like fashion
The phases of interpersonal communication
Entry phase
This is the first stage in an interaction between strangers.
Interaction is guided by rules and norms.
Personal phase
Parties in a conversation start to communicate more spontaneously.
More personal information is disclosed during this phase.
Exit phase
Individuals make decisions about whether they wish to engage in future interactions with this person. The quantity and nature of info that people share changes over time
Uncertainty appraisals (according to uncertainty management theory) and their related uncertainty management strategies
Reactions to uncertainty are predicated on emotions and appraisals.
Appraisal theory says that we judge meanings of events based on two factors: relevance and likelihood.
If a situation elicits positive emotions, then uncertainty likely will be evaluated positively.
If a situation elicits negative emotions, then uncertainty likely will be evaluated negatively.
If a situation does not elicit emotions, then uncertainty will be appraised as inconsequential.
Uncertainty management strategies are chosen based on appraisals.
Uncertainty as an opportunity
May avoid information/experiences that would reduce their uncertainty
May seek conflicting information to increase uncertainty
Uncertainty as a threat
May seek information or support to reduce uncertainty
Uncertainty as a chronic condition
May learn to appreciate or tolerate uncertainty
The two competing needs for space (from Expectancy Violations Theory)
Affiliation refers to the need to belong to a group.
Humans also need to maintain personal space.
This refers to the "invisible, variable volume of space surrounding an individual which defines that individual's preferred distance from others."
The history of deception research
Attributed to David Buller and Judee Burgoon
Explains the relationship between sender and receiver cognitions and behavior in deceptive exchanges
They defined deception as “a message knowingly transmitted by a sender to foster a false belief or conclusion by the receiver.”
Deception strategies identified by Buller and Burgoon include:
Falsification creates a fiction.
Concealment hides a secret.
Equivocation dodges the issue.
People are rarely more than 60 percent accurate in their ability to spot deception.
Nonverbal deception cues (as identified by Zuckerman)
Leakage
Increased blinking and enlarged pupils.
Frequent speech errors
Increased speech hesitations.
Higher voice pitch
Increased discrepancies between verbal and nonverbal channels
Conditions under which liars put more effort into planning and control
When situation is highly interactive
When participants know each other well
When deceiver is fearful of discovery
When motive for lying is selfish