Sources of Criminal Law
Common law, statutory law (modern trend), and Model Penal Code (MPC)
Apply generally accepted principles unless fact pattern specifies otherwise
Basic Elements of an Offense
{Actus reus} + {Mens rea} + {Causation} + Concurrence
Strict-liability crimes: no ext{mens rea} required
Actus Reus
Must be a voluntary physical act (incl. speech, possession) or a legally required omission
Omission liability only if: statute, contract, special relationship, voluntary undertaking, or defendant’s peril creation
Mens Rea (Common Law)
Specific intent (FIAT crimes)
Malice (murder, arson)
General intent (battery, rape, kidnapping, false imprisonment)
Strict liability (e.g., statutory rape)
Mens Rea (MPC hierarchy)
Purposely > Knowingly > Recklessly > Negligently
If statute silent \rightarrow at least “recklessly” required
Feature | Common Law | Model Penal Code (MPC) |
---|---|---|
Mens Rea | Specific Intent, Malice, General Intent, Strict Liability | Purposely, Knowingly, Recklessly, Negligently (hierarchy) |
Default Mens Rea (if statute silent) | Often General Intent implied | At least "recklessly" required |
Attempt Standard | Often "dangerous proximity" (not in notes, adding for comparison) | "Substantial step" toward the crime |
Mistake of Law | Usually no defense | Defense if it negates required mental state or fits statutory exception |
Mistake
Fact: defense if honest; must be reasonable unless crime is specific-intent
Law: usually no defense; MPC allows if it negates required mental state or fits statutory exemption
Transferred Intent
Applies to completed crimes (homicide, battery, arson) when wrong victim harmed; does NOT apply to attempt
Parties to a Crime
Principal = actor;
Accomplice = aids/encourages with intent;
Accessory after the fact = helps avoid capture
Accomplice may withdraw by: repudiating aid, neutralizing effect, timely warning police
Vicarious & Corporate Liability
Employers/companies vicariously liable for agents’ strict-liability/regulatory offenses; MPC lists specific grounds
Homicide Overview
Murder: unlawful killing with malice aforethought (intent to kill, SBI, depraved heart, felony murder)
Degrees (statutory): 1st = premeditated or BARRK felony murder; 2nd = all other murder w/ malice
Manslaughter: Voluntary (heat of passion / imperfect self-defense); Involuntary (criminal negligence or non-BARRK unlawful act)
Property Crimes (Core Distinctions)
Larceny = trespassory taking & carrying away ext{(asportation)} of personal property w/ intent to permanently deprive
Embezzlement = lawful possession \rightarrow fraudulent conversion
False pretenses = obtain title by material misrepresentation
Larceny by trick = obtain possession (not title) by fraud
Robbery = larceny from person/presence by force/intimidation
Burglary (CL) = breaking & entering dwelling of another at night w/ intent to commit felony
Arson (CL) = malicious burning (charring) of another’s dwelling
Inchoate Offenses
Solicitation: urging another to commit crime w/ intent they do so (merges if crime committed)
Conspiracy: agreement + intent + (modern rule) overt act; no merger with completed crime
Each conspirator liable for foreseeable crimes of co-conspirators (Pinkerton)
Attempt: substantial step toward crime + specific intent; impossibility no defense unless legal impossibility; merges on completion
Defenses (Highlights)
Insanity tests: M’Naghten, Irresistible-Impulse, Durham, MPC substantial-capacity; defendant bears burden in most states
Insanity Test | Description |
---|---|
M’Naghten Rule | Defendant due to mental disease/defect did not know wrongfulness or nature/quality of act. |
Irresistible-Impulse Test | Defendant due to mental disease/defect was unable to control his actions or conform conduct to law. |
Durham Rule | Unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect. (Broadest) |
MPC Substantial-Capacity Test | Defendant lacks substantial capacity to appreciate criminality (wrongfulness) of act or conform conduct to law. (Combines M'Naghten and Irresistible-Impulse) |
Intoxication: voluntary \leftrightarrow defense only to specific-intent if it negates intent; involuntary \leftrightarrow defense to all but strict-liability acts may negate voluntariness
Self-Defense: reasonable non-aggressor may use proportional force; deadly force only to prevent death/SBI; retreat (castle doctrine exceptions)
Defense of Others/Property: same reasonableness; deadly force never for property alone (except dwelling intruder)
Necessity: natural forces, lesser-evil choice; Duress: human threat of death/SBI (not defense to intentional homicide)
Entrapment (majority subjective): govt inducement + no predisposition
Mistake, Consent, Public/Parental authority as situational defenses
Merger & Double Jeopardy Quick Check
Attempt + solicitation merge into completed offense
Conspiracy does NOT merge
Lesser-included offenses barred by Double Jeopardy after conviction/acquittal
Exam Flags
Use ext{BARRK} to spot felony-murder & first-degree statutes
Remember continuing-trespass for larceny intent timing
MPC uses “substantial step,” not dangerous-proximity, for attempt
Majority vs. Minority Rules
Legal Concept | Majority Rule | Minority Rule |
---|---|---|
Entrapment Test | Subjective (predisposition) | Objective (govt inducement's effect on ordinary person) |
Felony-Murder Bystander Killings | Agency (killer must be felon) | Proximate Cause (foreseeable death during felony) |