KR

MBE Criminal Law Comprehensive Review

Sources of Criminal Law

  • Common law, statutory law (modern trend), and Model Penal Code (MPC)

  • Apply generally accepted principles unless fact pattern specifies otherwise

Basic Elements of an Offense

  • {Actus reus} + {Mens rea} + {Causation} + Concurrence

  • Strict-liability crimes: no ext{mens rea} required

Actus Reus

  • Must be a voluntary physical act (incl. speech, possession) or a legally required omission

  • Omission liability only if: statute, contract, special relationship, voluntary undertaking, or defendant’s peril creation

Mens Rea (Common Law)

  • Specific intent (FIAT crimes)

  • Malice (murder, arson)

  • General intent (battery, rape, kidnapping, false imprisonment)

  • Strict liability (e.g., statutory rape)

Mens Rea (MPC hierarchy)

  • Purposely > Knowingly > Recklessly > Negligently

  • If statute silent \rightarrow at least “recklessly” required

Common Law vs. Model Penal Code (MPC)

Feature

Common Law

Model Penal Code (MPC)

Mens Rea

Specific Intent, Malice, General Intent, Strict Liability

Purposely, Knowingly, Recklessly, Negligently (hierarchy)

Default Mens Rea (if statute silent)

Often General Intent implied

At least "recklessly" required

Attempt Standard

Often "dangerous proximity" (not in notes, adding for comparison)

"Substantial step" toward the crime

Mistake of Law

Usually no defense

Defense if it negates required mental state or fits statutory exception

Mistake

  • Fact: defense if honest; must be reasonable unless crime is specific-intent

  • Law: usually no defense; MPC allows if it negates required mental state or fits statutory exemption

Transferred Intent

  • Applies to completed crimes (homicide, battery, arson) when wrong victim harmed; does NOT apply to attempt

Parties to a Crime

  • Principal = actor;

  • Accomplice = aids/encourages with intent;

  • Accessory after the fact = helps avoid capture

  • Accomplice may withdraw by: repudiating aid, neutralizing effect, timely warning police

Vicarious & Corporate Liability

  • Employers/companies vicariously liable for agents’ strict-liability/regulatory offenses; MPC lists specific grounds

Homicide Overview

  • Murder: unlawful killing with malice aforethought (intent to kill, SBI, depraved heart, felony murder)

  • Degrees (statutory): 1st = premeditated or BARRK felony murder; 2nd = all other murder w/ malice

  • Manslaughter: Voluntary (heat of passion / imperfect self-defense); Involuntary (criminal negligence or non-BARRK unlawful act)

Property Crimes (Core Distinctions)

  • Larceny = trespassory taking & carrying away ext{(asportation)} of personal property w/ intent to permanently deprive

  • Embezzlement = lawful possession \rightarrow fraudulent conversion

  • False pretenses = obtain title by material misrepresentation

  • Larceny by trick = obtain possession (not title) by fraud

  • Robbery = larceny from person/presence by force/intimidation

  • Burglary (CL) = breaking & entering dwelling of another at night w/ intent to commit felony

  • Arson (CL) = malicious burning (charring) of another’s dwelling

Inchoate Offenses

  • Solicitation: urging another to commit crime w/ intent they do so (merges if crime committed)

  • Conspiracy: agreement + intent + (modern rule) overt act; no merger with completed crime

Each conspirator liable for foreseeable crimes of co-conspirators (Pinkerton)

  • Attempt: substantial step toward crime + specific intent; impossibility no defense unless legal impossibility; merges on completion

Defenses (Highlights)

  • Insanity tests: M’Naghten, Irresistible-Impulse, Durham, MPC substantial-capacity; defendant bears burden in most states

Insanity Test

Description

M’Naghten Rule

Defendant due to mental disease/defect did not know wrongfulness or nature/quality of act.

Irresistible-Impulse Test

Defendant due to mental disease/defect was unable to control his actions or conform conduct to law.

Durham Rule

Unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect. (Broadest)

MPC Substantial-Capacity Test

Defendant lacks substantial capacity to appreciate criminality (wrongfulness) of act or conform conduct to law. (Combines M'Naghten and Irresistible-Impulse)

  • Intoxication: voluntary \leftrightarrow defense only to specific-intent if it negates intent; involuntary \leftrightarrow defense to all but strict-liability acts may negate voluntariness

  • Self-Defense: reasonable non-aggressor may use proportional force; deadly force only to prevent death/SBI; retreat (castle doctrine exceptions)

  • Defense of Others/Property: same reasonableness; deadly force never for property alone (except dwelling intruder)

  • Necessity: natural forces, lesser-evil choice; Duress: human threat of death/SBI (not defense to intentional homicide)

  • Entrapment (majority subjective): govt inducement + no predisposition

  • Mistake, Consent, Public/Parental authority as situational defenses

Merger & Double Jeopardy Quick Check

  • Attempt + solicitation merge into completed offense

  • Conspiracy does NOT merge

  • Lesser-included offenses barred by Double Jeopardy after conviction/acquittal

Exam Flags

  • Use ext{BARRK} to spot felony-murder & first-degree statutes

  • Remember continuing-trespass for larceny intent timing

  • MPC uses “substantial step,” not dangerous-proximity, for attempt

Majority vs. Minority Rules

Legal Concept

Majority Rule

Minority Rule

Entrapment Test

Subjective (predisposition)

Objective (govt inducement's effect on ordinary person)

Felony-Murder Bystander Killings

Agency (killer must be felon)

Proximate Cause (foreseeable death during felony)