Positive Liberty vs Negative Liberty
Positive liberty involves the state determining the standard of good life.
Example: The French Revolution established liberty, equality, fraternity as standards. Those who opposed faced severe consequences.
Danger: The government could coerce individual choices by imposing its vision of a good life.
Negative liberty focuses on limiting interference, making it harder for the government to dictate individual lives.
Self-Mastery and Liberty
Two forms of interference can affect personal freedom: external (government) and internal (personal issues).
Example: A desire to study Buddhism can be hindered by a state-imposed religion (external) or by addiction (internal).
Both types of obstacles complicate the notion of positive liberty.
Discontent with Liberalism
Freud's perspective: Individuals repress desires to live in a stable society, leading to discontent.
Similar observations from Geist about liberalism: it promotes freedom but struggles to address systemic issues like racism and income inequality.
Core Tenets of Liberalism
Voluntary Action: Liberty means choosing how to live.
Individual Rights: Protection against government oppression is essential.
Fear of State Power: Liberals worry about the power of the state infringing individual rights.
Tolerance: In a pluralistic society, multiple versions of the good life exist, necessitating tolerance of different beliefs and practices.
Consensus Issues
Tyranny of the Majority: Majority opinions can overshadow minority views, leading to a false sense of agreement.
Example: A country might seem consensus-driven with laws (e.g., banning headscarves) that suppress minority views.
Consensus may not reflect true agreement but rather suppression of dissent.
Liberalism as a Critique
While liberalism offers valuable critiques of government power, it doesn't encompass all societal issues.
Constitutions: US vs British
British constitution is unwritten, rooted in tradition.
US constitution is written, offering specific rights and legal guidance.
Importance of the Bill of Rights
Provides clear authority for judges in rights-related claims.
Example: Supreme Court's decision on whether flag burning is protected speech.
Civil Rights in Wartime
Civil liberties are often threatened during wartime as governments may impose restrictions.
Historical cases: Hirabayashi and Korematsu during the Japanese internment period exemplify governmental overreach.
Natural Law
Concept originating from the Declaration of Independence: all individuals have inherent rights.
Natural law asserts rights that resist legislative limitations.
Positive Law vs Natural Law
Positive law refers to statutes enacted by legislatures.
Tension arises when positive laws contradict natural law, particularly regarding slavery.
Due Process of Law
Originates from the Magna Carta, ensuring legal action against individuals must follow established law.
Debate over the Magna Carta's Significance
Some argue it primarily benefited nobles; thus, its role as a founding moment for civil liberties is debated.
Critics point to its limitations, primarily serving a small elite rather than the populace.
Antislavery Constitutionalism
The Constitution includes provisions that protect slavery, which complicates the abolitionist argument.
Advocates argue the Constitution’s deeper essence as aligned with natural law supports the case against slavery.
Key Cases
Somerset v Stewart: Recognized the principle of freedom on English soil.
Antelope Case: Questioned the treatment of captured individuals, highlighting the injustices within the legal framework.
Dred Scott v Sanford: Ruled that African Americans could not sue in federal court, denying them standing and reflecting racial prejudice entrenched in law.
Pragmatism
Focused on practical results rather than preexisting truths, contrasting with natural law.
Example: Holmes suggests all life is an experiment, indicating that actions should be based on outcomes.
Holmes' Perspective on Free Speech
Emphasized that free speech should be protected unless it poses a clear and present danger.
Stressed the importance of allowing varied ideas to confront one another in the marketplace of ideas.
Blackstone's View on Free Speech
Protects publication, but once speech is made, no further protections exist.
Significant jurors must be reasonable; if they find a speech had a bad tendency to harm, convictions can be made.
Snyder v. Phelps: Emotional distress case involving protest during a funeral.
Ruled that the speech was protected due to public concern and absence of imminent danger.
Exceptions to First Amendment: Fighting words, obscenity, and clear present danger are not applicable in this case.
Importance of distinguishing between various forms of speech regulation, ensuring protections remain robust.
Reconstruction Era Changes
Enabled African American participation in government.
Shifted as Jim Crow laws implemented systemic barriers following Reconstruction's end.
Notable Supreme Court decisions laid groundwork for future civil rights arguments despite earlier protections.