In-depth Notes on Apple's Case with Greenpeace and Facebook's Environmental Challenges
Course Logistics and Reminders
- Confirm discrepancies via email; no more than two makeup tests allowed.
- Important deadlines: Last case analysis memo due Monday; last online test also on Monday.
Apple and Greenpeace Case Study
Background on the Campaign
- The iLife campaign by Apple increased their visibility.
- Greenpeace targeted Apple to critique their environmental impact, particularly with electronic waste.
Tactics Used by Greenpeace
- Initial Engagement:
- Launch parody commercials critiquing Apple.
- Raise awareness of Apple’s electronic waste issues.
- Path to Redemption:
- Provide guidelines for Apple to improve their practices.
- Promote a plan to make Apple socially responsible, such as:
- Implementing a take-back program for old electronics.
- Redesigning products to be free of hazardous chemicals.
Impact on Apple
- Greenpeace framed Apple's practices as harmful, influencing public perception.
- Apple eventually responded positively by adopting greener practices to improve their brand image:
- New MacBooks marketed as the “world's greenest family of notebooks.”
Key Marketing and Social Activism Lessons
Two-Step Activist Strategy
- Attract Attention:
- Use marketing strategies to criticize a company’s practices.
- Negotiate Terms for Compliance:
- Provide a roadmap with clear expectations for how the target can improve their behavior.
Benefits of Compliance for Companies
- Complying with social regulations can convert negative press into positive attention, improving brand value.
Activist Dynamics
- Activist organizations, like Greenpeace, typically target industry leaders to drive change across the sector.
- A single company’s response can influence the entire industry.
Facebook and Environmental Regulation
Introduction to Facebook's Case
- Discussion on Facebook’s commitment to using renewable energy in their data facilities.
- Greenpeace targeted Facebook during their announcement of a major data center in Oregon.
Facebook's Dilemma
- Facebook touted its environmentally sustainable practices while being critiqued for using coal energy.
- Greenpeace launched the “Unfriend Coal” campaign to educate users about Facebook's environmental practices:
- Created a community with 500,000 followers to raise awareness on Facebook about coal emissions from their data centers.
Facebook's Response Strategy
- Pushback against Greenpeace’s claims:
- Facebook claimed they had no control over their power supplier.
- Public Perception:
- Fear of losing political neutrality by aligning with a specific activist cause.
- Concerns about setting a precedent that could lead to more demands from other activist groups.
Conclusion
Summary of Social Activism and Business Responses
- The effectiveness of organizations like Greenpeace in mobilizing public opinion.
- The necessity for businesses to carefully evaluate the political implications of engaging with activist movements.
Final Thoughts
- The growing intersection of social accountability and corporate responsibility.
- Businesses must weigh the benefit vs. cost of compliance to social demands.