Definition of an Offer: A declaration by the offeror indicating their intent to bind themselves to a contract upon acceptance by the offeree.
Importance: An offer is crucial for contract formation as it initiates the negotiation process.
Context: Clooney proposed washing cars in a toga as part of a fundraising campaign.
Key Questions:
Is Clooney's proposal a binding offer?
Would a reasonable person perceive it as a formal offer or a joke?
Evaluation of intent: Subjective vs. Objective standards in determining intent.
Objective Intent: Clear communication of present intent to contract from the offeror.
Specificity/Definiteness: Terms of the offer should be clear and exact so that both parties understand their obligations.
Communication: The offer must be communicated to the offeree to be valid.
UCC vs. Common Law:
Common Law: Applies to services, real estate, and intangibles. Requires a higher specificity standard for offers.
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): Applies to the sale of goods, allowing a broader approach where contracts can be formed based on conduct rather than strict terms.
Present Intent: The intent must clearly reflect a desire to create a binding contract upon acceptance; ambiguity or joking does not constitute an offer.
Evaluating Intent: Courts analyze intent based on the reasonable impression given by the offeror's words and actions rather than their private thoughts.
Importance: Definiteness is essential for determining if an offer has been made. Vague offers lead to negotiations rather than contracts.
Examples:
A vague statement like "I'd like to buy your house" is an ineffective offer.
A detailed letter with clearly stated terms likely indicates mutual intent to contract.
Classical Approach: Requires all essential terms to be clear and specific to enforce a contract.
Modern Evolving Standards: Increasing flexibility allows courts to fill in gaps if the parties show intent to contract.
UCC Section 2-204: Contracts can be formed in various ways; even implied agreements may form binding contracts if the intent to contract is evident.
Gap-Filling Rules: Courts can fill in missing terms if intent to contract is clear.
Element of Communication: An offer must be severally communicated to an offeree for it to be actionable.
Example: If Stevens does not tell Meyer directly about his offer, Meyer cannot accept it based solely on third-party communication.
General Principle: Advertisements are usually considered invitations to negotiate rather than offers, except in specific cases.
Case Example: A specific advertisement for a limited item with a clear price and conditions may constitute an offer.
Conditions for Ads to be Offers:
Limited number of offerees
Specific terms and conditions stated clearly
Duration: Offers remain valid for a reasonable time unless stipulated otherwise.
Revocation: Offers can generally be revoked at any time before acceptance unless protections apply.
Methods of Termination:
Revocation by the offeror.
Rejection by the offeree.
Lapse of Time if an offer is not accepted within a reasonable timeframe.
Death or Incapacity of either party automatically terminates the offer.
Destruction of Subject Matter leads to termination.
Intervening Illegality voids the offer if the proposed agreement becomes illegal.
Option Contracts: Separate agreements wherein the offeror cannot revoke the offer for a specific period, usually involving consideration.
Unilateral Contracts: Offers that require full performance to accept remain binding once performance begins.
Promissory Estoppel: Under certain conditions, if an offeree relies on the offer being kept open, revocation may not be permissible.
Understanding the nuances of offers, including intent, definiteness, and communication, is vital for contract law application and enforcement.