Explain important leadership traits and behaviours.
Describe the contingency theories of leadership.
State and explain current issues in leadership development.
Explain the communication process.
Describe how communication can be improved.
Developing Leaders: A Firm's Most Important Job
Procter & Gamble (P&G) recognizes the importance of developing excellent leaders.
P&G uses "The Talent Portfolio," a blue binder containing names of up-and-coming leaders, sections showing outperformers, those "at risk," promotion readiness, and those needing more time.
There are at least three candidates for each major job, showing bench strength.
Executives who become general managers are evaluated every six months on financial measures and leadership/team-building abilities.
Managers are evaluated by bosses, lateral managers, and direct reports.
P&G executives are expected to develop leadership skills in themselves and others and was selected as one of the World's Best Companies for Leaders by Fortune magazine.
Integrity
Integrity is being honest, credible, and consistent.
Lack of integrity signs include giving special treatment, lying, blaming others, falsifying reports, instigating conflict, taking credit for others' ideas, and stealing.
Peter Drucker emphasized "service" as central to integrity: leaders subordinate their preferences to the welfare of the institution and see the world as it is.
The Nature of Leadership
Leadership is the process of inspiring others to work hard to accomplish important tasks.
Managers face challenges with shorter time frames and complex problems, needing skills and competencies to their full advantage.
Leadership and Power
Leadership success rests on making things happen to serve team/organizational goals, relating to "power."
Power is the ability to get someone else to do something you want done or to make things happen the way you want.
Positive power influences control for the group's good, essential for effective leadership.
Leaders gain power from positions and personal qualities.
Position power includes reward, coercive, and legitimate power.
Personal power includes expertise, referent, and relational power.
Position Power
Reward power: The ability to influence through rewards by offering something of value (pay raises, bonuses, promotions, etc.). If you do what I ask, I'll give you a reward.
Coercive power: The ability to influence through punishment or withholding positive outcomes. If you don't do what I want, I'll punish you.
Legitimate power: The ability to influence through authority based on organizational position. Because I am the boss, you must do as I ask.
Personal Power
Expert power: The ability to influence through special expertise derived from knowledge and skills. You should do what I want because of my special expertise or information.
Referent power: The ability to influence through identification, admiration, and positive relationships. You should do what I want in order to maintain a positive, self-defined relationship with me.
Relational power: The ability to work and function well in a team towards a collective goal. You should do what I want because it is in the best interests of the team.
Leadership and Vision
Great leaders inspire and motivate towards a common purpose using their power well.
Vision: A future one hopes to create to improve the present.
Visionary leadership describes a leader bringing a clear sense of the future and actions needed to get there, communicating the vision, and inspiring motivation.
Visionary leadership brings meaning to people's work.
Leadership as Service
Servant leadership: Leadership based on a commitment to serving others, helping them use talents for organizations that benefit society.
Servant leadership is follower-centered, generating empowerment.
Empowerment is the process through which managers enable others to gain power and achieve influence by providing information, responsibility, authority, and trust.
Leadership Traits and Behaviours
Historically, leadership has been studied from trait, behavioural, and contingency approaches.
Leadership Traits
Early research searched for universal traits separating effective from ineffective leaders, called the "great person theory,” but physical characteristics make no difference in determining leadership success.
Successful leaders are consistently admired for being honest, competent, forward-looking, inspiring, and credible.
Personal traits of successful leaders include:
Drive: High energy, initiative, tenacious.
Self-confidence: Trust in their abilities.
Creativity: Original thinking.
Cognitive ability: Intelligence to integrate information.
Job-relevant knowledge: Understanding of the industry.
Motivation: Enjoy influencing others.
Flexibility: Adapt to follower needs.
Honesty and integrity: Trustworthy, predictable, and dependable.
Leadership Behaviours
Research shifted to how leaders behave, investigating leadership styles.
Studies at Ohio State and Michigan focused on concern for the task and concern for people.
Ohio State: Initiating structure and consideration.
Michigan: Production-centered and employee-centered.
High concern for the task: Plans work, assigns responsibilities, sets standards, urges completion, monitors results.
High concern for people: Acts warm, supportive, respects feelings, shows trust.
Early research suggested people-oriented leaders were most productive, but evolved to effective leaders being high in both concerns.
Blake and Mouton's leadership grid describes tendencies toward people and production concerns.
The preferred combination is called the team manager.
Classic Leadership Styles
Autocratic style: emphasizes task over people, command-and-control fashion.
Human relations style: emphasizes people over tasks.
Laissez-faire style: shows little concern for the task, lets the group make decisions.
Democratic style: committed to both task and people, encourages participation.
Contingency Approaches to Leadership
Researchers recognized the need to examine circumstances where different leadership styles are preferable, leading to contingency approaches.
Fiedler's Contingency Model
Good leadership depends on matching leadership style and situational demands.
Leadership style is measured on the least-preferred co-worker scale, LPC which measures tendencies to behave as a task-motivated or relationship-motivated leader.
Fiedler believes leadership style is part of one's personality and difficult to change.
The key is to put existing styles to work where they fit best.
The variable used to diagnose situational control is how much control a situation allows the leader.
Leader-member relations (good or poor): degree to which the group supports the leader.
Task structure (high or low): extent to which goals/procedures are spelled out.
Position power (strong or weak): degree to which the position gives the leader power to reward/punish.
Eight leadership situations are based on different combinations of these variables with situations ranging from high to low control.
A task-oriented leader is most successful in very favorable (high-control) or unfavorable (low-control) situations.
A relationship-oriented leader is most successful in situations of moderate control.
Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Model
Successful leaders adjust their styles based on the maturity of followers, indicated by their readiness to perform in a given situation which is based on how able and willing or confident followers are to perform required tasks.
Delegating: Allowing the group to take responsibility for task decisions. Is a low-task, low-relationship style.
Participating: Emphasizing shared ideas and participative decisions on task directions; low-task, high-relationship style.
Selling: Explaining task directions in a supportive and persuasive way; high-task, high-relationship style.
Telling: Giving specific task directions and closely supervising work; high-task, low-relationship style.
The delegating style works best in high-readiness situations with able and willing, or confident followers.
The telling style works best at the other extreme of low readiness, where followers are unable and unwilling, or insecure.
The participating style is recommended for low-to-moderate-readiness followers-able but unwilling, or insecure.
The selling style is for moderate-to-high-readiness followers-unable, but willing or confident.
Leadership styles should be adjusted as followers change over time.
Path-Goal Leadership Theory
An effective leader clarifies paths by which followers can achieve goals, clarifying goals, removing barriers, and providing valued rewards.
Directive leadership: Letting subordinates know what is expected; giving directions on what to do and how; scheduling work to be done; maintaining definite standards of performance; clarifying the leader's role in the group.
Supportive leadership: Doing things to make work more pleasant; treating group members as equals; being friendly and approachable; showing concern for the well-being of subordinates.
Achievement-oriented leadership: Setting challenging goals; expecting the highest levels of performance; emphasizing continuous improvement in performance; displaying confidence in meeting high standards.
Participative leadership: Involving subordinates in decision-making; consulting with subordinates; asking for suggestions from subordinates; using these suggestions when making a decision.
Managers should use leadership styles that fit situational needs.
Important contingencies include follower characteristics (ability, experience, locus of control) and work environment characteristics (task structure, authority system, work group).
Substitutes for Leadership
Substitutes for leadership are aspects of the work setting and people involved that reduce the need for a leader’s personal involvement.
Possible substitutes include subordinate characteristics, task characteristics (routineness, feedback), and organizational characteristics (clarity of plans, formalization of rules).
Leader-Member Exchange Theory
Leader-member exchange theory (LMX) recognizes that not everyone is treated the same.
People fall into "in-groups" with high-exchange relationships and "out-groups" with low-exchange relationships with the leader.
Follower’s role is defined as a leader and follower interact over time.
Leader-Participation Model
The Vroom-Jago leader-participation model indicates that leadership success results when the decision-making method best-fits the problem.
Choices for making decisions fall into authority, consultative, or group decisions.
An authority decision is made by the leader and communicated to the group.
A consultative decision is made by a leader gathering information and advice.
A group decision is made by the group.
Choice is governed by decision quality, decision acceptance to implement and decision time available.
Authority decisions work best when:
Leaders have the expertise needed to solve the problem.
They are confident and capable of acting alone.
Others are likely to accept and implement the decision they make.
Little or no time is available for discussion.
Consultative and group decisions work best when:
The leader lacks sufficient expertise and information to solve the problem alone.
The problem is unclear and help is needed to clarify.
Acceptance of the decision and commitment by others are necessary for implementation.
Adequate time is available to allow for true participation.
Issues in Leadership Development
There is interest in charismatic leaders, who inspire others in exceptional ways improving personal leadership qualities.
Transformational Leadership
Transactional leadership focuses on tasks, styles, and rewards, analytical approach, adjusting tasks, and allocating rewards to achieve positive influence.
Transformational leadership is inspiring, arousing others to seek extraordinary performance accomplishments, raising aspirations, and shifting systems into new patters.
Transformational leaders raise confidence, aspirations, and performance commitments through vision, charisma, symbolism, empowerment, intellectual stimulation, and integrity.
Emotional Intelligence and Leadership
Emotional intelligence ("EI") is the ability to manage our emotions in social relationships.
Self-awareness: the ability to understand our own' moods and emotions, and to understand their impact on our work and on others.
Self-management: the ability to think before we act and to control otherwise disruptive impulses.
Motivation: being able to work hard with persistence and for reasons other than money/status.
Social awareness: empathy/ability to understand the emotions of others and to use this understanding to better relate to them.
Relationship management: establishing rapport with others and building good relationships/networks.
Gender and Leadership
The gender similarities hypothesis states that males and females are similar psychologically.
Both can be equally effective but may achieve leadership success differently.