The chapter draws on Carol Dweck's research about mindsets, published in her book "Mindset" (2006).
Personal anecdote about Joshua, an engineering major at LSU, reflecting a transition from a fixed to a growth mindset in chemistry.
Fixed Mindset: Belief that intelligence is static; perceived as a set of intellectual cards that can’t be changed.
Individuals avoid challenges, give up easily, ignore constructive criticism, feel threatened by the success of others.
Growth Mindset: Belief that intelligence can grow through effort and action; viewed as a process rather than a fixed state.
Individuals embrace challenges, persist through setbacks, view effort as essential to mastery, learn from criticism, and find inspiration in others’ successes.
Dweck (2006) emphasizes that beliefs about intelligence significantly affect one's performance.
Fixed mindsets lead to decreased motivation and reliance on perceived natural ability.
Growth mindsets are linked to increased motivation and academic success.
Dweck's research references multiple peer-reviewed studies to support her findings on mindsets.
David H. Uttal (1997) study focuses on the engaged attitudes of Asian mothers regarding their children's mathematical abilities compared to American mothers, highlighting cultural differences in mindset.
Aguilar et al. (2014) intervention demonstrated that students respond positively to constructive criticism when it’s presented as a means for improvement.
Uttal's study revealed:
American mothers emphasize innate ability over effort compared to Asian mothers.
American children were more likely to adopt fixed mindsets, viewing math success as innate rather than earned.
Errors are viewed negatively in fixed mindsets while growth mindsets see them as vital learning steps.
A teacher’s experience showing the negative impact of labeling gifted students; students may avoid challenges to maintain their 'smart' identity, resulting in low effort and engagement when faced with difficulties.
Educational experiences often categorize students into 'smart' or 'slow' groups, reinforcing fixed mindsets.
Those labeled as 'gifted' may avoid risk-taking to preserve their identity while students labeled as 'slow' may internalize a lack of ability.
It’s crucial to reaffirm that all students can succeed through metacognitive strategies, regardless of previous labeling.
Labels do not equate to actual ability; effective learning strategies can change performance levels.
Adam's story illustrates how adopting metacognitive strategies led him from failure to exceptional success in his analytical chemistry course.
He shifted from a fixed mindset perspective regarding his performance to embracing growth and improving study habits, illustrating the impact of mindset.
Keep the Faith: Recall stories of people overcoming academic challenges.
Stand in Your Power: Reflect on personal challenges and how they were overcome to build confidence.
Learn Neurobiology: Understanding brain plasticity supports the idea that intelligence can be developed.
Start Easy, End Strong: Gradually build up from easier tasks to complex ones to foster confidence and avoid feelings of helplessness.
The general belief in a fixed mindset among students can lead to a false sense of their abilities based on grades and past performance.
Evidence suggests that strategies for learning can greatly impact students’ capacities for improvement and success in their academic endeavors.
Adopting a growth mindset is pivotal for resilience and achievement in learning.
Consider whether your mindset is fixed or growth-oriented and how it impacts your beliefs about intelligence and learning.