Price ceiling: maximum price allowed by law
it has five effects
shortages
reductions in product quality
wasteful lines and other search costs
a loss in gains from trade
a misallocation of resources
In 1971, President Nixon, in an effort to control inflation, declared price increases illegal. Because prices couldn’t increase, they began hitting a ceiling. With a price ceiling, buyers are unable to signal their increased demand by bidding prices up, and suppliers have no incentive to increase quantity supplied because they can’t raise the price.
What results when the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied? A shortage! In the 1970s, for example, buyers began to signal their demand for gasoline by waiting in long lines, if they even had access to gasoline at all. As you’ll recall from the previous section on the price system, prices help coordinate global economic activity. And with price controls in place, the economy became far less coordinated.
When Qd > Qs, sellers have more customers than goods.
They can cut quality and costs, and still sell everything they want to sell at the controlled price.
With a surplus of buyers, sellers have less of an incentive to give good service.
Price controls do not eliminate competition
Competition for scarce goods is an ever present force under all forms of social organization.
Price controls change the form that competition takes.
there are other ways of competing
some may try to bribe the owners
use political connections
be willing to wait in line, this costs money
willingness to pay = time price + money price
buyers bid up the price by arriving earlier
this pushes up the time cost
paying in time is more wasteful
money payments go to the seller
time payment is lost, it benefits no one
when mutually profitable gains from trade are not fully exploited, we have lost a consumer and producer surplus, a deadweight loss
Distorted price signals cause resources to be misallocated.
no price, no signal, no incentive
a good is used in low value uses even when there's not enough for high value uses
prevents highest valued uses from outbidding lower value uses
allocation will be sort of random
we dont get the best use of a resource
price floor: a minimum price allowed by law
price floors create:
surpluses
lost gains from trade
wasteful increases in quality
misallocation of resources
they are less common than price ceilings
an example is minimum wage
at best, the minimum wage raises the wages of some low skill and young workers, most of whose wages would have increased anyway as they became more skilled
at worst, the minimum wage will increase prices and create serious unemployment
creates a deadweight loss
producer surplus is given up in favor of quality so sellers can compete
the cost of quality was higher than the value to the customers
customers prefer lower fares instead of quality
prevents competition
Communism can be tought of as a system of universal price controls
price cant give signals to properly allocate resources