Chapter Two: Research in Abnormal Psychology

\

  • Research in abnormal psychology is especially important: a wrong belief in the field leads to suffering   * Schizophrenia: severe disorder that causes people to lose contact with reality     * Lobotomies were believed to cure schizophrenia, but this was false     * Wasn’t disproven until tens of thousands of people had been lobotomized     * Caused irreversible brain damage that left patients withdrawn

What Do Clinical Researchers Do?

  • Clinical Researchers / Clinical Scientists try to discover universal laws / principles of abnormal psychological functioning using the scientific method
  • Clinical Practitioners assess, diagnose, and treat individual clients   * seek an individualistic understanding of abnormal behavior
  • Clinical Researchers use three methods of investigation to form hypotheses   * Case Study: focused on one individual   * Correlational and experimental methods     * Observe many individuals     * Apply procedures uniformly (allows for replication)     * Use statistical tests to analyze results

The Case Study

  • A detailed description of a person’s life and psychological problems
How Are Case Studies Helpful?
  • Can be a source of new ideas about behavior
  • Can challenge a theory’s assumptions
  • Can show the value of new therapeutic techniques
  • Can offer opportunities to study unusual problems
What Are the Limitations of Case Studies?
  • Reported by biased observers
  • Rely on subjective evidence
  • Low internal and external validity scores
  • Little basis for generalization

The Correlational Method

  • Correlation: the degree to which events / characteristics vary with each other
  • Correlational Method: research procedure used to determine correlation between variables
  • Subjects / Participants: people chosen for a study
  • Sample: collective name for participants in a sample   * Must be representative of the larger population
Describing a Correlation
  • Line of best fit   * Positive Direction: when variables change the same way. shows positive correlation   * Negative Direction: when variables change in different ways. shows negative correlation   * Unrelated variables: there is no consistent relationship between variables and no slope
  • Magnitude: How closely do the two variables correspond?   * The closer the data points are to the line of best fit, the greater the magnitude between the variables
  • Correlation Coefficient   * Positive / negative sign of the coefficient signifies direction   * The number represents its magnitude - the closer it is to zero, the lower the relationship the variables have
When Can Correlations Be Trusted?
  • p < .05: Findings are statistically significant and are thought to reflect the larger population
  • The larger the magnitude of the correlation and the bigger the sample ➝ the more likely it is that a correlation will be statistically significant
What Are the Merits of the Correlational Method?
  • High external validity
  • Lack internal validity - describes the relationship between two variables, but doesn’t explain it   * Variables can be correlated for any reason   * Correlation doesn’t equal causation

The Experimental Method

  • Experiment: research procedure in which a variable is manipulated and the manipulation’s effect on another variable is observed   * Independent variable   * Dependent variable   * Confounding variable     * To guard against confounding variables, researchers should include a control group, random assignment, and a masked design     * ex: bias
  • Control Group: A group of research participants who are not exposed to the independent variable under investigation
  • Experimental Group: The participants who are exposed to the independent variable
  • Statistical Significance: Indicates whether a participant’s improvement in functioning occurred because of treatment
  • Clinical Significance: Indicates whether the amount of improvement is meaningful in the person’s life
Random Assignment
  • Random Assignment: Any selection procedure that ensures that every participant in the experiment is as likely to be placed in one group as the other

  • Reduces the effects of preexisting differences

Masked / Blind Design
  • Avoids bias in experiments
  • Individuals are kept unaware of their assigned group
  • Double-Masked Design: Prevents against both patient bias and experimenter bias
  • Triple-Masked Design: Experimenters arrange for judges to assess and analyze the outcomes, and the judges are also kept unaware of group assignments

Alternative Research Designs

  • aka Mixed Designs / Quasi-experimental Designs
  • Designs that intermix elements of both correlational and experimental studies
Matched Designs
  • Researchers match the experimental participants with control participants who are similar in age, sex, socioeconomic status, etc.

  • Make use of groups that already exist in the world (ex: effects of abuse on children. splits children into groups of abused and not abused)

  • Violates the rule of random assignment

  • Matched design minimizes confounding variables caused by not using random assignment

Natural Experiments
  • Nature itself manipulates the independent variable while the experimenter observes the effects

  • Used for studying the psychological effects of natural disasters and other unpredictable events (floods, plane crashes, fires, etc)

Analogue Experiments
  • Experimenters induce lab participants to behave in ways that seem to resemble real-life abnormal behavior

  • Investigators can manipulate independent variables freely while avoiding ethical and practical limitations of clinical research

  • Often use animals as participants

Single-Subject Experiments
  • A single participant is observed both before and after the manipulation of an independent variable

  • Rely on baseline data (information gathered before any manipulations) that can be compared to data gathered after the manipulation of an independent variable

Longitudinal Studies
  • Researchers observe the same individuals on many occasions over a long period of time
Epidemiological Studies
  • Determine the incidence and prevalence of a problem in a particular population

  • Incidence: Number of new cases that emerge in a population during a given period of time

  • Prevalence: Total number of cases in the population during a given period   * Includes both existing and new cases

  • Help researchers identify groups at risk for particular disorders

  • Cannot confirm causation alone

Protecting Human Participants

  • Institutional Review Boards: Committees of five or more members who review and monitor every study conducted at a research facility, starting at proposal
  • Rules:   * Participants enlist voluntarily   * Before enlisting, the participants are given informed consent   * The participants can end their participation at any time   * The benefits of the study outweigh its risks   * Participants are protected from physical and psychological harm   * Participants have access to info about the study   * Participants have protected privacy
  • IRBs are flawed: Ethical principles can’t always be broken down into simple guidelines

\