Week 7 - Kantian Ethics and Deontology summary
THEORIES OF ETHICS: DEONTOLOGY
Definition: Also known as intrinsicalism; focuses on actions being right or wrong in themselves.
Principle: Morality determined by adherence to obligations, not by consequences.
DEONTOLOGY OVERVIEW
Duty-based ethics emphasize doing the right thing for its own sake.
Abides by fixed moral rules (e.g., wrong to kill, steal, lie).
MAJOR PHILOSOPHERS
Immanuel Kant: Morality based in reason; actions are duty-driven.
W.D. Ross: Developed aspects of Kantian ethics.
KANTIAN THEORY
Actions should be undertaken out of duty, not self-interest.
Morality governed by the Categorical Imperative, which is absolute and unconditional.
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
Formulation 1: Act only on maxims that you would will to become universal laws.
- Universalisability: maxims must apply equally to all.Formulation 2: Treat humanity as an end, not as a means to an end.
- Emphasizes respect for individuals and their autonomy.
DUTIES IN KANTIAN ETHICS
Perfect Duties: Absolute obligations (e.g., not to kill, not to lie).
Imperfect Duties: Flexible obligations that are praiseworthy (e.g., support the poor).
ARGUMENTS FOR KANTIAN THEORY
Provides a rational basis for moral judgments.
Establishes a clear moral code recognizing individual rights and autonomy.
Asserts that some actions are morally impermissible regardless of consequences.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST KANTIAN THEORY
Principles can be vague, lacking comprehensive application to moral dilemmas.
May overlook nuances in moral situations, leading to rigidity.
Conflicts in duties can arise, leading to consequentialist reasoning.
Does not account for emotional factors or consequences affecting morality.
EXAMPLES IN DEONTOLOGY
Case of Robin Hood: Deontologists argue against heroic theft.
Media responsibility: journalists should not lie even to save lives.
Ethical dilemmas: conflicts between duty and truth-telling are challenging.