Protections guaranteed in the Constitution since 1789.
Key Protections
Writ of Habeas Corpus:
Latin for "body of proof"; protects against indefinite detention without proper proof or judgment.
Ex Post Facto Laws:
Prevents arrest for acts that were not crimes when committed.
Bill of Attainder:
Protects against legislative acts that impose punishment without trial.
Due Process
Defined in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Procedural Due Process:
Concerned with how laws are applied (fair treatment in legal processes).
Substantive Due Process:
Concerns whether laws violate basic rights to life, liberty, or property.
Fourth Amendment
Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Probable Cause:
Required for warrants; must show cause in the application.
Examples of Searches:
Evidence in plain sight can be seized.
In Plain Sight Rule:
Items visible to an officer at the time of a lawful search can be used in court.
Exclusionary Rule:
Illegal evidence may not be used against an accused person.
Case: Mapp v. Ohio (1961) incorporated the exclusionary rule into state law.
Searches in Schools
Students have fewer protections than in public spaces.
Case: New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) highlighted different standards for student rights.
Fifth Amendment
Protects against multiple issues:
Grand Jury Presentment/Indictment: Required for serious crimes.
Double Jeopardy: You cannot be tried for the same charges twice.
If acquitted of capital murder, can still face lesser charges.
Self-Incrimination:
Right to not testify against oneself.
Sixth Amendment
Provides rights in criminal prosecutions:
Right to a speedy and public trial.
Right to a jury.
Right to know charges; confront witnesses against you.
Right to counsel:
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) established that states must provide lawyers to defendants who cannot afford one.
Miranda Rights: Originated from Miranda v. Arizona (1966); rights read to defendants prior to interrogation.
Protects against unlawful confessions.
Eighth Amendment
Protects against cruel and unusual punishments; excessive fines or bail.
Establishes that punishment must fit the crime.
Death Penalty Controversies:
Furman v. Georgia (1972) ruled against death penalty due to inhumane execution methods.
Gregg v. Georgia (1976) allowed it to resume under federal guidelines.
Different states have varying stances on the death penalty (e.g., some have abolished it).