Development of a new argument from consciousness to theism: the argument from psychophysical harmony.
Psychophysical harmony refers to the favorable correlation between phenomenal states (conscious experiences) and physical states, particularly in how they relate to behavior and verbal reports:
Example: Pain correlates with avoidance behavior (e.g., withdrawing from damaging stimuli).
This paper aims to show that psychophysical harmony provides strong evidence for the existence of God (theism).
The argument posits that God has reasons to design psychophysical laws to realize values associated with harmony.
Two controversial metaphysical assumptions made initially:
Dualism: Phenomenal and physical domains are distinct and co-fundamental.
Causal Completeness: Every physical event has a sufficient causal explanation based on prior physical events.
Argument remains valid under alternative views on consciousness (e.g., dualist interactionism, physicalism).
The argument suggests that psychophysical harmony is not threatened by multiverse hypotheses, unlike traditional cosmological arguments.
Theism understood as the belief in an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good creator of the universe.
Potential alternative explanations include axiarchism and other forms of deism that do not require divine attributes of omnipotence or omniscience.
Previous arguments share a similar structure:
Argue against physicalist accounts of consciousness.
Assert necessity of personal explanations for correlations between conscious and physical states.
Offer strong likelihood of a personal agent (i.e., God) explaining these correlations.
Key differences of this argument:
Focus on psychophysical harmony rather than mere existence of correlations.
No reliance on complexity of psychophysical laws for argument validity.
Argument does not require rejecting physicalism upfront.
Psychophysical Harmony: States of consciousness exhibit harmonious correlations with physical states, perceived as mysteriously fortunate.
Key types include:
Normative Harmony: Psychological laws correlate physical functional states with conscious experiences in ways that provide rational justification.
Hedonic Harmony Example: Physical state representing pain maps onto an experience of pain that incites avoidance behavior.
Epistemic Harmony Example: Physical states producing beliefs about round objects correlate with visual experiences of roundness.
Difficult to provide a satisfactory evolutionary explanation for normative harmony, as evolution cannot dictate psychophysical laws.
Contingent Normative Roles Explanation: Suggests experiences have normative roles based on their associated functional roles leading to perceived harmony.
Critique of denying normative harmony or relying on error theory due to their implausibility.
Semantic Harmony: Phenomenal states are linked to verbal judgments, often showing a direct correspondence.
Ex.: Consciously expressing a round object correlates with the physical state indicative of roundness.
Distinction from normative harmony, although examples may overlap.
Challenges associated with common cause explanations do not satisfactorily address the luckiness of semantic relationships.
Emphasizes the improbability of observed harmony on atheism vs. theistic frameworks.
Bayesian Terms: Likelihood of harmony is significantly higher under theism compared to atheism, meriting comparison based on prior probabilities.
Dismisses ideas of atheistic or multiverse hypotheses explaining harmony.
Concludes that psychophysical harmony supports theism robustly and merits inclusion alongside traditional theistic arguments.
Reassesses dualism and causal completeness as not strictly necessary for argument's strength.
Suggests the investigation into psychophysical harmony is crucial for understanding consciousness and its divine implications.