Aristotle's Ethics
How Should I Live?
Socrates’ assertion: "The unexamined life is not worth living."
Major Philosophical Questions Addressed:
What does a good (worthwhile) life look like?
How do I live it?
Influential Philosophers and Philosophical Traditions:
Plato
Aristotle
Epictetus
Buddhism
Confucianism
Aristotle
Biographical Context:
Born: 384-322 BC in Stagira, Macedonia.
Student of Plato at the Academy in Athens for 20 years.
Founded his own school: The Lyceum.
What Kind of Ethics Is This?
Aristotle’s ethical framework:
Often referred to as "virtue ethics."
Emphasis on living well throughout one’s entire life.
Central Question: What kind of person should I become to live well?
Ethics as practical:
Goal is not just knowledge, but becoming good.
Purpose of studying ethics: not merely understanding virtue, but actualizing it.
Key Reflective Questions:
What does it mean to take responsibility for my character?
Am I fulfilling my purpose as a human being?
Teleological Worldview in Aristotle’s Ethics
Aristotle views the world through the lens of teleology:
Definition of Teleology:
Derived from Greek "telos" (end) and "logos" (reason); refers to explanations by reference to purpose, end, goal, or function.
Nature seen as inherently purposive:
Contrasts with the idea of random, purposeless existence.
Notable Principle from “Nicomachean Ethics” (NE):
“Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good.” (388)
This "good" is seen as a goal or end.
Hierarchy of Ends
Observation by Aristotle: Every action aims at achieving something:
Example Chain:
Studying → to earn a degree → to secure a job → to live well.
Suggests a hierarchical relationship among ends:
Each action is conducted for the sake of a higher pursuit.
The Concept of a Final End
Aristotle's Argument: There exists a final end, which is the highest good.
Importance of this final end:
Without it, human desires would be infinite and ultimately pointless.
Characteristics of the Highest Good:
Final: Chosen for its own sake.
Self-sufficient: Provides completeness in life, lacking nothing.
Aristotle identifies this final good as happiness.
Understanding Happiness
Happiness (Eudaimonia):
Defined as living well, flourishing, and perfecting oneself.
Inquiry into contemporary meaning of "being happy":
How far does common understanding align with Aristotle's views of happiness?
Aristotle clarifies that happiness must be pursued:
Not just as an end, but as an intrinsic aspect of the human experience.
Common Misconceptions about Happiness
Misinterpretations of happiness:
Pleasure:
Reduces happiness to a bestial existence. Happiness must reflect human distinctiveness.
Honours:
Depend on external validation and can be lost, compromising the ultimate good.
Wealth:
Viewed as an instrumental good, desired only for its purchasing power.
True happiness cannot be reliant on external factors; must represent a final, complete good.
Achieving Happiness through Function Argument
Function Argument:
The ultimate good of anything resides in its ability to perform its unique function excellently (virtuously).
Human happiness (Eudaimonia) found in:
Humans performing their unique function excellently.
Queries regarding unique human function:
Identifying what constitutes a good human, similar to evaluating the quality of knives or chairs.
Unique Function of Human Beings
Rational Activity:
Identification of unique function of human beings:
Nutrition, growth, sensation, perception, movement are shared with other life forms.
Humans distinguish themselves by rational activity.
Structure of Human Soul:
Comprised of two parts:
Irrational Appetitive Part: Desires and emotions.
Rational Part: Engages in reasoning.
Quote from Aristotle:
“…the function of man is an activity of soul which follows or implies a rational principle.” (389)
Rational Activity and Excellence
Definition of Good Human Life:
Rational activity exhibited excellently/virtuously.
Requisites for Virtuous Life:
Activity must be sustained over time and represent a complete life.
Understanding Virtue
Definition of Virtue:
Ultimately, good is found in performing one’s function excellently (virtuously).
Excellence = Virtue (Aretē):
Refers to being excellent at fulfilling one’s purpose.
Actualization of potential for reason:
Requires consistent exercise and intention to develop excellence.
Types of Virtue
Intellectual Virtue:
Involves habits and attitudes that enable individuals to uncover truth.
Engages with unchanging, universal truths.
Quote: “Intellectual virtue owes both its birth and its growth to teaching (for which reason it requires experience and time).” (389)
Moral Virtue:
Focuses on developing character excellences.
Characterized as stable states concerning choice, existing between two extremes (excess and deficiency).
Determined by reason.
Characteristics of Moral Virtue
Concern:
Centered on actions and passions, which can exhibit:
Excess: Failure in virtue
Defect: Another form of failure
Intermediate: Expression of success and virtue.
Correctness of feeling:
Applying the right feelings (e.g., anger, confidence) at the right times and objects, directed toward appropriate individuals, motivate moral virtue.
Seeking the Mean
Aiming for the Mean in Moral Virtue:
The mean serves as a balance between two vices, mutually responsive to context.
**Three Areas of Application: **
1. Actions
2. Passions
Context-Sensitive Balance:
Virtue is not the average; it corresponds to an excellent balance relevant to the situation.
Exceptions:
Certain feelings and actions do not allow for a mean (e.g., envy, malice).
Examples of Virtue and Vices
Table of Virtue and Vices:
Deficiency (Vice) | Mean (Virtue) | Excess (Vice)
--- | --- | ---
Cowardice | Courage | Rashness
Insensibility | Temperance | Self-indulgence
Unirascibility | Good Temper | Irascibility
Quarrelsome | Friendliness | Flattery
Self-deprecation | Truthfulness | Boastfulness
Boorishness | Wit | Buffoonery
Acquiring Moral Virtue
Development Process:
Acquired through practice, akin to arts; we become virtuous through action.
Engaging in just acts leads to development into just individuals.
Significance of Habits:
Importance of moral training from childhood.
Key Components in Developing Moral Virtue
Moral virtue as skill:
Cultivated through habitual practice rather than inherent nature.
Actions Over Nature:
Virtue achieved through consistent virtuous actions;
Path to moral virtue involves:
1. Aiming for the mean
2. Following moral exemplars
3. Habitual practice to align desires with reason
Pleasure as Motivation:
Must be oriented towards good, not neutral in itself.
Role of Practical Wisdom (Phronesis)
Defines ability to navigate moral choices effectively.
Key Characteristics:
Requires judgment; involves moral perception and experience.
Distinction: Not merely cleverness but deliberate judgment on living well.
Attributes of a Morally Virtuous Individual
Stable Character Trait:
A disposition to consistently choose the mean;
Characteristics of Virtuous Person:
Recognizes the right action (perfected reasoning).
Acts out of intrinsic motivation.
Takes pleasure in virtuous actions (habituation).
Desires harmonize with virtue.
Distinction Among States:
Differentiates between continence, incontinence, virtue, and vice (refer to Driver's discussion pp 272-273).
Critical Reflection on Aristotle’s Ethics
Examine personal connections to Aristotle’s ethics:
Strengths: What useful insights arise from Aristotle’s recommendations?
Challenges Raised by Julia Driver’s Critique:
Questions on practical guidance provided by Aristotle.
Examining complexities of applying Aristotle’s virtues in moral dilemmas.
Key Discussion Questions
Does Virtue Ethics Provide Sufficient Action Guidance?
Investigate practical implications of being virtuous (e.g., honesty).
Handling Conflicts Between Virtues:
How to deal with dilemmas (e.g., honesty vs. kindness).
Stability of Character Traits
Aristotelian View: Virtuous individuals possess stable character traits (not momentary instances).
Counterpoint by Driver: Experimental data reflects situational influences on behavior.
Response Strategies: Consider defending Aristotle’s conceptualization of stable virtue against situational arguments.
Examination of Essentialism in Aristotle's Philosophy
Aristotle’s Notion of Essential Nature:
Raises complex philosophical inquiries:
Do humans possess an intrinsic essence?
Is rationality the absolute basis of being a 'good' human?
Challenges with Following Virtuous Persons
Foundational Issues:
Starting learners risk emulating non-virtuous individuals.
Potential Biases:
Virtue may reflect societal conventions fraught with bias.
Defensive Responses: Analyze how one might respond to uphold Aristotle’s ethical framework in light of these challenges.